No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas
We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2009-12, Vol.395, p.223-244 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 244 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) |
container_volume | 395 |
creator | Hatch, Leila T. Fristrup, Kurt M. |
description | We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3354/meps07945 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744692804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24874252</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24874252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-2f590cd7e6fd31e9975ca9669249dff73535faeedb60f35199b3fcc156cf5b383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90DtLxEAUBeBBFIyrhb1COrGIzs2dR6aUxRcs2mg9TCZ3MMtmE2eSwn9vJLLVgcPHKQ5jl8DvEKW472hIXBshj1gGClQB0phjlnHQUFQK-Sk7S2nLOSihVcau3vq8djG2FHM35uMX5XU_7Rs3N-mcnQS3S3Txnyv2-fT4sX4pNu_Pr-uHTeERqrEogzTcN5pUaBDIGC29M0qZUpgmBI0SZXBETa14QAnG1Bi8B6l8kDVWuGI3y-4Q---J0mi7Nnna7dye-ilZLcQ8VnExy9tF-tinFCnYIbadiz8WuP07wB4OmO31Yrdp7OMBlqLSopQl_gICSFaF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744692804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Inter-Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hatch, Leila T. ; Fristrup, Kurt M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Leila T. ; Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><description>We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps07945</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Acoustic noise ; Aircraft noise ; Brackish ; Freshwater ; Marine ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine resources ; National parks ; Natural resource management ; Oceans ; Sound ; Transportation noise ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2009-12, Vol.395, p.223-244</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-2f590cd7e6fd31e9975ca9669249dff73535faeedb60f35199b3fcc156cf5b383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24874252$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24874252$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3746,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Leila T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><title>No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting.</description><subject>Acoustic noise</subject><subject>Aircraft noise</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine resources</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Transportation noise</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90DtLxEAUBeBBFIyrhb1COrGIzs2dR6aUxRcs2mg9TCZ3MMtmE2eSwn9vJLLVgcPHKQ5jl8DvEKW472hIXBshj1gGClQB0phjlnHQUFQK-Sk7S2nLOSihVcau3vq8djG2FHM35uMX5XU_7Rs3N-mcnQS3S3Txnyv2-fT4sX4pNu_Pr-uHTeERqrEogzTcN5pUaBDIGC29M0qZUpgmBI0SZXBETa14QAnG1Bi8B6l8kDVWuGI3y-4Q---J0mi7Nnna7dye-ilZLcQ8VnExy9tF-tinFCnYIbadiz8WuP07wB4OmO31Yrdp7OMBlqLSopQl_gICSFaF</recordid><startdate>20091203</startdate><enddate>20091203</enddate><creator>Hatch, Leila T.</creator><creator>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091203</creationdate><title>No barrier at the boundaries</title><author>Hatch, Leila T. ; Fristrup, Kurt M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-2f590cd7e6fd31e9975ca9669249dff73535faeedb60f35199b3fcc156cf5b383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acoustic noise</topic><topic>Aircraft noise</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine resources</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Transportation noise</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Leila T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatch, Leila T.</au><au>Fristrup, Kurt M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2009-12-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>395</volume><spage>223</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>223-244</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps07945</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-8630 |
ispartof | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2009-12, Vol.395, p.223-244 |
issn | 0171-8630 1616-1599 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744692804 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Inter-Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acoustic noise Aircraft noise Brackish Freshwater Marine Marine ecosystems Marine resources National parks Natural resource management Oceans Sound Transportation noise Wildlife management |
title | No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A51%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20barrier%20at%20the%20boundaries:%20implementing%20regional%20frameworks%20for%20noise%20management%20in%20protected%20natural%20areas&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Hatch,%20Leila%20T.&rft.date=2009-12-03&rft.volume=395&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=223-244&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps07945&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24874252%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744692804&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24874252&rfr_iscdi=true |