No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas

We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2009-12, Vol.395, p.223-244
Hauptverfasser: Hatch, Leila T., Fristrup, Kurt M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue
container_start_page 223
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 395
creator Hatch, Leila T.
Fristrup, Kurt M.
description We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps07945
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744692804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24874252</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24874252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-2f590cd7e6fd31e9975ca9669249dff73535faeedb60f35199b3fcc156cf5b383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90DtLxEAUBeBBFIyrhb1COrGIzs2dR6aUxRcs2mg9TCZ3MMtmE2eSwn9vJLLVgcPHKQ5jl8DvEKW472hIXBshj1gGClQB0phjlnHQUFQK-Sk7S2nLOSihVcau3vq8djG2FHM35uMX5XU_7Rs3N-mcnQS3S3Txnyv2-fT4sX4pNu_Pr-uHTeERqrEogzTcN5pUaBDIGC29M0qZUpgmBI0SZXBETa14QAnG1Bi8B6l8kDVWuGI3y-4Q---J0mi7Nnna7dye-ilZLcQ8VnExy9tF-tinFCnYIbadiz8WuP07wB4OmO31Yrdp7OMBlqLSopQl_gICSFaF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744692804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Inter-Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hatch, Leila T. ; Fristrup, Kurt M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Leila T. ; Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><description>We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps07945</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Acoustic noise ; Aircraft noise ; Brackish ; Freshwater ; Marine ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine resources ; National parks ; Natural resource management ; Oceans ; Sound ; Transportation noise ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2009-12, Vol.395, p.223-244</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-2f590cd7e6fd31e9975ca9669249dff73535faeedb60f35199b3fcc156cf5b383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24874252$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24874252$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3746,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Leila T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><title>No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting.</description><subject>Acoustic noise</subject><subject>Aircraft noise</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine resources</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Transportation noise</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90DtLxEAUBeBBFIyrhb1COrGIzs2dR6aUxRcs2mg9TCZ3MMtmE2eSwn9vJLLVgcPHKQ5jl8DvEKW472hIXBshj1gGClQB0phjlnHQUFQK-Sk7S2nLOSihVcau3vq8djG2FHM35uMX5XU_7Rs3N-mcnQS3S3Txnyv2-fT4sX4pNu_Pr-uHTeERqrEogzTcN5pUaBDIGC29M0qZUpgmBI0SZXBETa14QAnG1Bi8B6l8kDVWuGI3y-4Q---J0mi7Nnna7dye-ilZLcQ8VnExy9tF-tinFCnYIbadiz8WuP07wB4OmO31Yrdp7OMBlqLSopQl_gICSFaF</recordid><startdate>20091203</startdate><enddate>20091203</enddate><creator>Hatch, Leila T.</creator><creator>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091203</creationdate><title>No barrier at the boundaries</title><author>Hatch, Leila T. ; Fristrup, Kurt M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-2f590cd7e6fd31e9975ca9669249dff73535faeedb60f35199b3fcc156cf5b383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acoustic noise</topic><topic>Aircraft noise</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine resources</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Transportation noise</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Leila T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fristrup, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatch, Leila T.</au><au>Fristrup, Kurt M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2009-12-03</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>395</volume><spage>223</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>223-244</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>We compare the status of regional or ecosystem frameworks for managing airborne and underwater noise sources in the US, with particular emphasis on transportation noise in national marine sanctuaries and national parks. The Organic Act demands that the US National Park Service (NPS) preserve natural and cultural resources unimpaired for future generations, and NPS policies provide explicit guidance for managing acoustical environments to meet this standard. The US Office of National Marine Sanctuaries identifies noise as a threat to sanctuary resources, but does not address how the program should manage noise levels to minimize impacts to wildlife and protect the aesthetic resources within sanctuaries. Methods and results from 2 case studies that address noise management in spatially explicit contexts are highlighted: the Gerry E. Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary and the Grand Canyon National Park. In both case studies, noise generated by transportation networks that extend far beyond protected area boundaries must be managed to conserve local resources. Effective noise control policies must be developed through partnerships among transportation and resource management agencies, surmounting differences in their missions, professional cultures, and historical precedents. Four collective approaches for managing noise in protected natural areas emerge from this analysis: (1) investing in monitoring programs and data management; (2) expanding the resolution and scope of impact assessment tools; (3) enhancing coordination and the governance structure; and (4) engaging and educating US citizens regarding the benefits of quieting.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps07945</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2009-12, Vol.395, p.223-244
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744692804
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Inter-Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acoustic noise
Aircraft noise
Brackish
Freshwater
Marine
Marine ecosystems
Marine resources
National parks
Natural resource management
Oceans
Sound
Transportation noise
Wildlife management
title No barrier at the boundaries: implementing regional frameworks for noise management in protected natural areas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A51%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20barrier%20at%20the%20boundaries:%20implementing%20regional%20frameworks%20for%20noise%20management%20in%20protected%20natural%20areas&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Hatch,%20Leila%20T.&rft.date=2009-12-03&rft.volume=395&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=223-244&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps07945&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24874252%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744692804&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24874252&rfr_iscdi=true