Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada

Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics trai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mind, brain and education brain and education, 2010-03, Vol.4 (1), p.20-27
Hauptverfasser: Lombera, Sofia, Fine, Alan, Grunau, Ruth E., Illes, Judy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Mind, brain and education
container_volume 4
creator Lombera, Sofia
Fine, Alan
Grunau, Ruth E.
Illes, Judy
description Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744678783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ873584</ericid><sourcerecordid>744678783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEEs8_YOEdqwQ7iWMHiQWUUp4FIV47a2JPwCVNit2K8vckBHXNbGakO2dknyAgjEasrcNJxARnYRzL1yimNI8ooyKPlmvB1ipYX82CbQbb3k8o5ZxnbCu4G87frfbE1mSMC9d4bbHWSEYOzALmSB4d2NrWb-TeNW8Opv6IPFv88gRqQ24bg5UnpWumZAA1GNgNNkqoPO799Z3g6Xz4OLgIb-5Gl4OTm1CnguZhrik3kqYxQMJN-8ZCsiQD4JLTAgtTYiEMj0vMDc8h1VmK1Jg8L6WWEqBIdoKD_u7MNZ8L9HM1tV5jVUGNzcIrkaaZkEIm7absN3X7O--wVDNnp-C-FaOqU6gmqrOjOlOqU6h-Fapli-73KDqrV9jwSoqEy7SNj_v4y1b4_e-z6vZ02E0tH_a89XNcrnhwHyoTieDqZTxSL-KBX4-TM0WTHy2skHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744678783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lombera, Sofia ; Fine, Alan ; Grunau, Ruth E. ; Illes, Judy</creator><creatorcontrib>Lombera, Sofia ; Fine, Alan ; Grunau, Ruth E. ; Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><description>Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-2271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-228X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Brain ; Canada ; Cooperation ; Ethics ; Foreign Countries ; Graduate Study ; Grants ; Interviews ; Mentors ; Science Education ; Scientists ; Surveys ; Trainees</subject><ispartof>Mind, brain and education, 2010-03, Vol.4 (1), p.20-27</ispartof><rights>2010 the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 International Mind, Brain, and Education Society and Blackwell Publishing, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1751-228X.2009.01079.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1751-228X.2009.01079.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ873584$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lombera, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunau, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</title><title>Mind, brain and education</title><description>Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Graduate Study</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><issn>1751-2271</issn><issn>1751-228X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEEs8_YOEdqwQ7iWMHiQWUUp4FIV47a2JPwCVNit2K8vckBHXNbGakO2dknyAgjEasrcNJxARnYRzL1yimNI8ooyKPlmvB1ipYX82CbQbb3k8o5ZxnbCu4G87frfbE1mSMC9d4bbHWSEYOzALmSB4d2NrWb-TeNW8Opv6IPFv88gRqQ24bg5UnpWumZAA1GNgNNkqoPO799Z3g6Xz4OLgIb-5Gl4OTm1CnguZhrik3kqYxQMJN-8ZCsiQD4JLTAgtTYiEMj0vMDc8h1VmK1Jg8L6WWEqBIdoKD_u7MNZ8L9HM1tV5jVUGNzcIrkaaZkEIm7absN3X7O--wVDNnp-C-FaOqU6gmqrOjOlOqU6h-Fapli-73KDqrV9jwSoqEy7SNj_v4y1b4_e-z6vZ02E0tH_a89XNcrnhwHyoTieDqZTxSL-KBX4-TM0WTHy2skHY</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Lombera, Sofia</creator><creator>Fine, Alan</creator><creator>Grunau, Ruth E.</creator><creator>Illes, Judy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</title><author>Lombera, Sofia ; Fine, Alan ; Grunau, Ruth E. ; Illes, Judy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Graduate Study</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lombera, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunau, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mind, brain and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lombera, Sofia</au><au>Fine, Alan</au><au>Grunau, Ruth E.</au><au>Illes, Judy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ873584</ericid><atitle>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</atitle><jtitle>Mind, brain and education</jtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>20-27</pages><issn>1751-2271</issn><eissn>1751-228X</eissn><abstract>Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-2271
ispartof Mind, brain and education, 2010-03, Vol.4 (1), p.20-27
issn 1751-2271
1751-228X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744678783
source Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Barriers
Brain
Canada
Cooperation
Ethics
Foreign Countries
Graduate Study
Grants
Interviews
Mentors
Science Education
Scientists
Surveys
Trainees
title Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A49%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20in%20Neuroscience%20Graduate%20Training%20Programs:%20Views%20and%20Models%20from%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Mind,%20brain%20and%20education&rft.au=Lombera,%20Sofia&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=20-27&rft.issn=1751-2271&rft.eissn=1751-228X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744678783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744678783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ873584&rfr_iscdi=true