Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada
Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics trai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mind, brain and education brain and education, 2010-03, Vol.4 (1), p.20-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Mind, brain and education |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Lombera, Sofia Fine, Alan Grunau, Ruth E. Illes, Judy |
description | Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744678783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ873584</ericid><sourcerecordid>744678783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEEs8_YOEdqwQ7iWMHiQWUUp4FIV47a2JPwCVNit2K8vckBHXNbGakO2dknyAgjEasrcNJxARnYRzL1yimNI8ooyKPlmvB1ipYX82CbQbb3k8o5ZxnbCu4G87frfbE1mSMC9d4bbHWSEYOzALmSB4d2NrWb-TeNW8Opv6IPFv88gRqQ24bg5UnpWumZAA1GNgNNkqoPO799Z3g6Xz4OLgIb-5Gl4OTm1CnguZhrik3kqYxQMJN-8ZCsiQD4JLTAgtTYiEMj0vMDc8h1VmK1Jg8L6WWEqBIdoKD_u7MNZ8L9HM1tV5jVUGNzcIrkaaZkEIm7absN3X7O--wVDNnp-C-FaOqU6gmqrOjOlOqU6h-Fapli-73KDqrV9jwSoqEy7SNj_v4y1b4_e-z6vZ02E0tH_a89XNcrnhwHyoTieDqZTxSL-KBX4-TM0WTHy2skHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744678783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lombera, Sofia ; Fine, Alan ; Grunau, Ruth E. ; Illes, Judy</creator><creatorcontrib>Lombera, Sofia ; Fine, Alan ; Grunau, Ruth E. ; Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><description>Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-2271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-228X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Brain ; Canada ; Cooperation ; Ethics ; Foreign Countries ; Graduate Study ; Grants ; Interviews ; Mentors ; Science Education ; Scientists ; Surveys ; Trainees</subject><ispartof>Mind, brain and education, 2010-03, Vol.4 (1), p.20-27</ispartof><rights>2010 the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 International Mind, Brain, and Education Society and Blackwell Publishing, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1751-228X.2009.01079.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1751-228X.2009.01079.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ873584$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lombera, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunau, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</title><title>Mind, brain and education</title><description>Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Graduate Study</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mentors</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><issn>1751-2271</issn><issn>1751-228X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEEs8_YOEdqwQ7iWMHiQWUUp4FIV47a2JPwCVNit2K8vckBHXNbGakO2dknyAgjEasrcNJxARnYRzL1yimNI8ooyKPlmvB1ipYX82CbQbb3k8o5ZxnbCu4G87frfbE1mSMC9d4bbHWSEYOzALmSB4d2NrWb-TeNW8Opv6IPFv88gRqQ24bg5UnpWumZAA1GNgNNkqoPO799Z3g6Xz4OLgIb-5Gl4OTm1CnguZhrik3kqYxQMJN-8ZCsiQD4JLTAgtTYiEMj0vMDc8h1VmK1Jg8L6WWEqBIdoKD_u7MNZ8L9HM1tV5jVUGNzcIrkaaZkEIm7absN3X7O--wVDNnp-C-FaOqU6gmqrOjOlOqU6h-Fapli-73KDqrV9jwSoqEy7SNj_v4y1b4_e-z6vZ02E0tH_a89XNcrnhwHyoTieDqZTxSL-KBX4-TM0WTHy2skHY</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Lombera, Sofia</creator><creator>Fine, Alan</creator><creator>Grunau, Ruth E.</creator><creator>Illes, Judy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</title><author>Lombera, Sofia ; Fine, Alan ; Grunau, Ruth E. ; Illes, Judy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-9c05d8042aa35d228b8136aa5850bebdfeb7d52fe9d59a4c64e0dd99f8c88aab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Graduate Study</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mentors</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lombera, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunau, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mind, brain and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lombera, Sofia</au><au>Fine, Alan</au><au>Grunau, Ruth E.</au><au>Illes, Judy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ873584</ericid><atitle>Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada</atitle><jtitle>Mind, brain and education</jtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>20-27</pages><issn>1751-2271</issn><eissn>1751-228X</eissn><abstract>Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data exist on the education in ethics available to them. We examined the current landscape of ethics training in neuroscience programs, beginning with the Canadian context specifically, to elucidate the perceived needs of mentors and trainees and offer recommendations for resource development to meet those needs. We surveyed neuroscientists at all training levels and interviewed directors of neuroscience programs and training grants. A total of 88% of survey respondents reported general interest in ethics, and 96% indicated a desire for more ethics content as it applies to brain research and clinical translation. Expert interviews revealed formal ethics education in over half of programs and in 90% of grants‐based programs. Lack of time, resources, and expertise, however, are major barriers to expanding ethics content in neuroscience education. We conclude with an initial set of recommendations to address these barriers which includes the development of flexible, tailored ethics education tools, increased financial support for ethics training, and strategies for fostering collaboration between ethics experts, neuroscience program directors, and funding agencies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1751-2271 |
ispartof | Mind, brain and education, 2010-03, Vol.4 (1), p.20-27 |
issn | 1751-2271 1751-228X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744678783 |
source | Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Barriers Brain Canada Cooperation Ethics Foreign Countries Graduate Study Grants Interviews Mentors Science Education Scientists Surveys Trainees |
title | Ethics in Neuroscience Graduate Training Programs: Views and Models from Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A49%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20in%20Neuroscience%20Graduate%20Training%20Programs:%20Views%20and%20Models%20from%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Mind,%20brain%20and%20education&rft.au=Lombera,%20Sofia&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=20-27&rft.issn=1751-2271&rft.eissn=1751-228X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01079.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744678783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744678783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ873584&rfr_iscdi=true |