Spatial distribution of soil carbon in pastures with cow-calf operation: effects of slope aspect and slope position

Background, aim, and scope The rate at which soil carbon (C) accumulates in terrestrial beef agro-ecosystem is uncertain, as are the mechanisms responsible for the current C sink. Broad knowledge of cattle movement in pasture situations is critical to understanding their impact on agro-ecosystems. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of soils and sediments 2010-03, Vol.10 (2), p.240-247
Hauptverfasser: Sigua, Gilbert C, Coleman, Samuel W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 247
container_issue 2
container_start_page 240
container_title Journal of soils and sediments
container_volume 10
creator Sigua, Gilbert C
Coleman, Samuel W
description Background, aim, and scope The rate at which soil carbon (C) accumulates in terrestrial beef agro-ecosystem is uncertain, as are the mechanisms responsible for the current C sink. Broad knowledge of cattle movement in pasture situations is critical to understanding their impact on agro-ecosystems. Movement of free-ranging cattle varies due to spatial arrangement of forage resources within pastures and the proximity of water, mineral feeders, and shades to grazing sites. The effects of slope aspect (SA) and slope position (SP) on nutrient dynamics in pastures are not well understood. Few studies have been made of soil-vegetation and soil-landscape relationships along an elevation gradient in tropical and subtropical regions. Current literature suggests no clear general relationships between grazing management and nutrient cycling. Early study reported no effect of grazing on soils nutrients, while other studies determined increases in soil nutrients due to grazing. We hypothesize that SA and SP could be of relative importance in controlling spatial variability of soil organic carbon (SOC). This study addressed the effects of SA and SP on the spatial distribution of SOC in forage-based pastures with cow-calf operation in subtropical region of southeastern USA. Materials and methods Soil samples were collected at 0-20 and 20-40 cm on contiguous south-, north-, east-, and west-facing slopes across different landscape positions (top slope, middle slope, and bottom slope) of 100 ha pastures during three summer seasons (2004-2006). Soil samples were air-dried, passed through a 2-mm mesh sieve, and visible roots were removed prior to analyses of SOC and other soil properties likely to affect spatial distribution of SOC. Analyses of soils were conducted at the Subtropical Agricultural Research Station in Brooksville, FL, following the dry-ash or the ‘loss-on-ignition' method. Concentrations of organic carbon in soils from four different SA, three SP, and two soil depths (SD) in 2004, 2005, and 2006 were analyzed statistically following a four-way analysis of variance using the SAS PROC general linear model. Results There was an SA × SP interaction (p ≤ 0.0001) effect on the concentration of SOC. The two highest concentrations of SOC were observed from top slope (8.4 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (7.8 g kg⁻¹) in south-facing slope, and the two lowest levels of SOC were in top slope (2.6 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (3.0 g kg⁻¹) of north-facing slope, respectively. Soil C als
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11368-009-0110-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744670416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>744670416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-856d3c9dfdd9009cce824ecf6903246cdcc0135539ba3e1badb41480f7a0b1673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFq3DAUNKWBbrf9gJ4qcsnJzXuWbNm5hZCkgYUeNnsWsixtFRzL1bNZ8veR60Cgh570NG_mMcNk2TeEHwggLwmRV3UO0OSACDl8yDZYocilqOFjmgVfNlB_yj4TPQFwmdabjPajnrzuWedpir6dJx8GFhyj4HtmdGzT1w9s1DTN0RI7-ek3M-GUG907FkYb9SK5YtY5ayb6q-0TzjSNCWB66N6AMZBfuF-yM6d7sl_f3m12uLt9vPmZ737dP9xc73KTzE15XVYdN03nuq5JuYyxdSGscVUDvBCV6YwB5GXJm1Zzi63uWoEprZMaWqwk32YX690xhj-zpUk9ezK27_Vgw0xKClFJEFgl5vk_zKcwxyGZUwWIUjYgMZFwJZkYiKJ1aoz-WccXhaCWEtRagkpm1VKCgqQpVg0l7nC08f3w_0TfV5HTQelj9KQO-yJlBayhbkrBXwGjg5Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204579071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial distribution of soil carbon in pastures with cow-calf operation: effects of slope aspect and slope position</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sigua, Gilbert C ; Coleman, Samuel W</creator><creatorcontrib>Sigua, Gilbert C ; Coleman, Samuel W</creatorcontrib><description>Background, aim, and scope The rate at which soil carbon (C) accumulates in terrestrial beef agro-ecosystem is uncertain, as are the mechanisms responsible for the current C sink. Broad knowledge of cattle movement in pasture situations is critical to understanding their impact on agro-ecosystems. Movement of free-ranging cattle varies due to spatial arrangement of forage resources within pastures and the proximity of water, mineral feeders, and shades to grazing sites. The effects of slope aspect (SA) and slope position (SP) on nutrient dynamics in pastures are not well understood. Few studies have been made of soil-vegetation and soil-landscape relationships along an elevation gradient in tropical and subtropical regions. Current literature suggests no clear general relationships between grazing management and nutrient cycling. Early study reported no effect of grazing on soils nutrients, while other studies determined increases in soil nutrients due to grazing. We hypothesize that SA and SP could be of relative importance in controlling spatial variability of soil organic carbon (SOC). This study addressed the effects of SA and SP on the spatial distribution of SOC in forage-based pastures with cow-calf operation in subtropical region of southeastern USA. Materials and methods Soil samples were collected at 0-20 and 20-40 cm on contiguous south-, north-, east-, and west-facing slopes across different landscape positions (top slope, middle slope, and bottom slope) of 100 ha pastures during three summer seasons (2004-2006). Soil samples were air-dried, passed through a 2-mm mesh sieve, and visible roots were removed prior to analyses of SOC and other soil properties likely to affect spatial distribution of SOC. Analyses of soils were conducted at the Subtropical Agricultural Research Station in Brooksville, FL, following the dry-ash or the ‘loss-on-ignition' method. Concentrations of organic carbon in soils from four different SA, three SP, and two soil depths (SD) in 2004, 2005, and 2006 were analyzed statistically following a four-way analysis of variance using the SAS PROC general linear model. Results There was an SA × SP interaction (p ≤ 0.0001) effect on the concentration of SOC. The two highest concentrations of SOC were observed from top slope (8.4 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (7.8 g kg⁻¹) in south-facing slope, and the two lowest levels of SOC were in top slope (2.6 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (3.0 g kg⁻¹) of north-facing slope, respectively. Soil C also varied significantly among SA (p ≤ 0.0001), SP (p ≤ 0.001), and SD (p ≤ 0.0001). Averaged across years and SP, soils on the south-facing slope contained the greatest amount of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the least amount of SOC. Average concentrations of SOC in top slope and middle slope were comparable. These values were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher when compared with soils from bottom slope. About 73% of SOC spatial variability could be explained by total clay content. Concentrations of SOC were quadratically (SOC = 0.05 × clay² − 0.29 × clay + 4.4; p ≤ 0.001) related with total clay content. No other significant correlations between SOC and other soil properties were found. Discussion Our results have shown that soils on the south-facing slope had greatest concentration of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the lowest concentration of SOC. The differences may be attributed to topographic aspect-induced microclimatic differences, which are causing differences in the biotic soil component and SOC trend. SA may be acting as an important topographic factor influencing local site microclimate mainly because it determines the amount of solar radiation received. Differences in microclimate are often linked to varying soil moisture and erosion potential and in turn could be used to explain distribution of plant communities. The north-facing slope had the lower forage availability when compared with the south-facing slope. There was a decreasing trend in the average forage availability with decreasing slope. Between the top slope and the bottom slope, forage availability declined from 2,484 to 1,448 kg ha⁻¹, which can be attributed to more grazing activities of cattle at bottom slope. Differences in SOC among different SA and SP could also be explained by varying amount of total clay. Concentrations of SOC were linearly related with increasing total clay content. The greatest amount of SOC was observed from soils located at the top slope of south-facing slope. Of the entire SA, south-facing slope had the greatest concentration of total clay, while the greatest clay content among SP was observed from the top slope. Results further revealed that 73% of SOC spatial variability could be explained by total clay content. The relationship between SOC and total clay content was best described by a quadratic equation: SOC = 0.05 × clay² − 0.29 × clay + 4.4; R ² = 0.73; p ≤ 0.001. Conclusions Results of our study are suggesting that SA and SP could be of relative importance in controlling spatial variability of SOC. Averaged across years, soils on the south-facing slope contained the greatest amount of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the least amount of SOC. Based on the average concentration of SOC, the south-facing slope may have sequestered about 6,460 kg ha⁻¹ of SOC. Recommendation and perspectives Results have shown that landscape attributes (e.g., SA and SP) associated with beef cattle pastures as a part of the agro-ecological system could be potential sink for C sequestration, thus reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. It is still critical to understand how the interactions of pasture management and landscape are affecting soil C dynamics. More studies are needed to assess the rate at which soil C is accumulating as well as the mechanisms responsible for the current and future C sink in forage-based pastures with cow-calf operations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-009-0110-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural research ; Beef cattle ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Cattle ; Clay ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environ Risk Assess ; Environment ; Environmental Physics ; Forage ; Geochemistry ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; Landscape ; Microclimate ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrient dynamics ; Organic carbon ; Pasture ; Pasture management ; Plant communities ; Sec 2 Global Change ; Soil analysis ; Soil depth ; Soil moisture ; Soil nutrients ; Soil properties ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Soil sciences ; Soils ; Solar radiation ; Spatial analysis ; Spatial distribution ; Sustainable Land Use Research Article ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2010-03, Vol.10 (2), p.240-247</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-856d3c9dfdd9009cce824ecf6903246cdcc0135539ba3e1badb41480f7a0b1673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-856d3c9dfdd9009cce824ecf6903246cdcc0135539ba3e1badb41480f7a0b1673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11368-009-0110-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11368-009-0110-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sigua, Gilbert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Samuel W</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial distribution of soil carbon in pastures with cow-calf operation: effects of slope aspect and slope position</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Background, aim, and scope The rate at which soil carbon (C) accumulates in terrestrial beef agro-ecosystem is uncertain, as are the mechanisms responsible for the current C sink. Broad knowledge of cattle movement in pasture situations is critical to understanding their impact on agro-ecosystems. Movement of free-ranging cattle varies due to spatial arrangement of forage resources within pastures and the proximity of water, mineral feeders, and shades to grazing sites. The effects of slope aspect (SA) and slope position (SP) on nutrient dynamics in pastures are not well understood. Few studies have been made of soil-vegetation and soil-landscape relationships along an elevation gradient in tropical and subtropical regions. Current literature suggests no clear general relationships between grazing management and nutrient cycling. Early study reported no effect of grazing on soils nutrients, while other studies determined increases in soil nutrients due to grazing. We hypothesize that SA and SP could be of relative importance in controlling spatial variability of soil organic carbon (SOC). This study addressed the effects of SA and SP on the spatial distribution of SOC in forage-based pastures with cow-calf operation in subtropical region of southeastern USA. Materials and methods Soil samples were collected at 0-20 and 20-40 cm on contiguous south-, north-, east-, and west-facing slopes across different landscape positions (top slope, middle slope, and bottom slope) of 100 ha pastures during three summer seasons (2004-2006). Soil samples were air-dried, passed through a 2-mm mesh sieve, and visible roots were removed prior to analyses of SOC and other soil properties likely to affect spatial distribution of SOC. Analyses of soils were conducted at the Subtropical Agricultural Research Station in Brooksville, FL, following the dry-ash or the ‘loss-on-ignition' method. Concentrations of organic carbon in soils from four different SA, three SP, and two soil depths (SD) in 2004, 2005, and 2006 were analyzed statistically following a four-way analysis of variance using the SAS PROC general linear model. Results There was an SA × SP interaction (p ≤ 0.0001) effect on the concentration of SOC. The two highest concentrations of SOC were observed from top slope (8.4 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (7.8 g kg⁻¹) in south-facing slope, and the two lowest levels of SOC were in top slope (2.6 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (3.0 g kg⁻¹) of north-facing slope, respectively. Soil C also varied significantly among SA (p ≤ 0.0001), SP (p ≤ 0.001), and SD (p ≤ 0.0001). Averaged across years and SP, soils on the south-facing slope contained the greatest amount of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the least amount of SOC. Average concentrations of SOC in top slope and middle slope were comparable. These values were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher when compared with soils from bottom slope. About 73% of SOC spatial variability could be explained by total clay content. Concentrations of SOC were quadratically (SOC = 0.05 × clay² − 0.29 × clay + 4.4; p ≤ 0.001) related with total clay content. No other significant correlations between SOC and other soil properties were found. Discussion Our results have shown that soils on the south-facing slope had greatest concentration of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the lowest concentration of SOC. The differences may be attributed to topographic aspect-induced microclimatic differences, which are causing differences in the biotic soil component and SOC trend. SA may be acting as an important topographic factor influencing local site microclimate mainly because it determines the amount of solar radiation received. Differences in microclimate are often linked to varying soil moisture and erosion potential and in turn could be used to explain distribution of plant communities. The north-facing slope had the lower forage availability when compared with the south-facing slope. There was a decreasing trend in the average forage availability with decreasing slope. Between the top slope and the bottom slope, forage availability declined from 2,484 to 1,448 kg ha⁻¹, which can be attributed to more grazing activities of cattle at bottom slope. Differences in SOC among different SA and SP could also be explained by varying amount of total clay. Concentrations of SOC were linearly related with increasing total clay content. The greatest amount of SOC was observed from soils located at the top slope of south-facing slope. Of the entire SA, south-facing slope had the greatest concentration of total clay, while the greatest clay content among SP was observed from the top slope. Results further revealed that 73% of SOC spatial variability could be explained by total clay content. The relationship between SOC and total clay content was best described by a quadratic equation: SOC = 0.05 × clay² − 0.29 × clay + 4.4; R ² = 0.73; p ≤ 0.001. Conclusions Results of our study are suggesting that SA and SP could be of relative importance in controlling spatial variability of SOC. Averaged across years, soils on the south-facing slope contained the greatest amount of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the least amount of SOC. Based on the average concentration of SOC, the south-facing slope may have sequestered about 6,460 kg ha⁻¹ of SOC. Recommendation and perspectives Results have shown that landscape attributes (e.g., SA and SP) associated with beef cattle pastures as a part of the agro-ecological system could be potential sink for C sequestration, thus reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. It is still critical to understand how the interactions of pasture management and landscape are affecting soil C dynamics. More studies are needed to assess the rate at which soil C is accumulating as well as the mechanisms responsible for the current and future C sink in forage-based pastures with cow-calf operations.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environ Risk Assess</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pasture management</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Sec 2 Global Change</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil depth</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Sustainable Land Use Research Article</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFq3DAUNKWBbrf9gJ4qcsnJzXuWbNm5hZCkgYUeNnsWsixtFRzL1bNZ8veR60Cgh570NG_mMcNk2TeEHwggLwmRV3UO0OSACDl8yDZYocilqOFjmgVfNlB_yj4TPQFwmdabjPajnrzuWedpir6dJx8GFhyj4HtmdGzT1w9s1DTN0RI7-ek3M-GUG907FkYb9SK5YtY5ayb6q-0TzjSNCWB66N6AMZBfuF-yM6d7sl_f3m12uLt9vPmZ737dP9xc73KTzE15XVYdN03nuq5JuYyxdSGscVUDvBCV6YwB5GXJm1Zzi63uWoEprZMaWqwk32YX690xhj-zpUk9ezK27_Vgw0xKClFJEFgl5vk_zKcwxyGZUwWIUjYgMZFwJZkYiKJ1aoz-WccXhaCWEtRagkpm1VKCgqQpVg0l7nC08f3w_0TfV5HTQelj9KQO-yJlBayhbkrBXwGjg5Qw</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Sigua, Gilbert C</creator><creator>Coleman, Samuel W</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Spatial distribution of soil carbon in pastures with cow-calf operation: effects of slope aspect and slope position</title><author>Sigua, Gilbert C ; Coleman, Samuel W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-856d3c9dfdd9009cce824ecf6903246cdcc0135539ba3e1badb41480f7a0b1673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environ Risk Assess</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pasture management</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Sec 2 Global Change</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil depth</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Sustainable Land Use Research Article</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sigua, Gilbert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Samuel W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sigua, Gilbert C</au><au>Coleman, Samuel W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial distribution of soil carbon in pastures with cow-calf operation: effects of slope aspect and slope position</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>240-247</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Background, aim, and scope The rate at which soil carbon (C) accumulates in terrestrial beef agro-ecosystem is uncertain, as are the mechanisms responsible for the current C sink. Broad knowledge of cattle movement in pasture situations is critical to understanding their impact on agro-ecosystems. Movement of free-ranging cattle varies due to spatial arrangement of forage resources within pastures and the proximity of water, mineral feeders, and shades to grazing sites. The effects of slope aspect (SA) and slope position (SP) on nutrient dynamics in pastures are not well understood. Few studies have been made of soil-vegetation and soil-landscape relationships along an elevation gradient in tropical and subtropical regions. Current literature suggests no clear general relationships between grazing management and nutrient cycling. Early study reported no effect of grazing on soils nutrients, while other studies determined increases in soil nutrients due to grazing. We hypothesize that SA and SP could be of relative importance in controlling spatial variability of soil organic carbon (SOC). This study addressed the effects of SA and SP on the spatial distribution of SOC in forage-based pastures with cow-calf operation in subtropical region of southeastern USA. Materials and methods Soil samples were collected at 0-20 and 20-40 cm on contiguous south-, north-, east-, and west-facing slopes across different landscape positions (top slope, middle slope, and bottom slope) of 100 ha pastures during three summer seasons (2004-2006). Soil samples were air-dried, passed through a 2-mm mesh sieve, and visible roots were removed prior to analyses of SOC and other soil properties likely to affect spatial distribution of SOC. Analyses of soils were conducted at the Subtropical Agricultural Research Station in Brooksville, FL, following the dry-ash or the ‘loss-on-ignition' method. Concentrations of organic carbon in soils from four different SA, three SP, and two soil depths (SD) in 2004, 2005, and 2006 were analyzed statistically following a four-way analysis of variance using the SAS PROC general linear model. Results There was an SA × SP interaction (p ≤ 0.0001) effect on the concentration of SOC. The two highest concentrations of SOC were observed from top slope (8.4 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (7.8 g kg⁻¹) in south-facing slope, and the two lowest levels of SOC were in top slope (2.6 g kg⁻¹) and middle slope (3.0 g kg⁻¹) of north-facing slope, respectively. Soil C also varied significantly among SA (p ≤ 0.0001), SP (p ≤ 0.001), and SD (p ≤ 0.0001). Averaged across years and SP, soils on the south-facing slope contained the greatest amount of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the least amount of SOC. Average concentrations of SOC in top slope and middle slope were comparable. These values were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher when compared with soils from bottom slope. About 73% of SOC spatial variability could be explained by total clay content. Concentrations of SOC were quadratically (SOC = 0.05 × clay² − 0.29 × clay + 4.4; p ≤ 0.001) related with total clay content. No other significant correlations between SOC and other soil properties were found. Discussion Our results have shown that soils on the south-facing slope had greatest concentration of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the lowest concentration of SOC. The differences may be attributed to topographic aspect-induced microclimatic differences, which are causing differences in the biotic soil component and SOC trend. SA may be acting as an important topographic factor influencing local site microclimate mainly because it determines the amount of solar radiation received. Differences in microclimate are often linked to varying soil moisture and erosion potential and in turn could be used to explain distribution of plant communities. The north-facing slope had the lower forage availability when compared with the south-facing slope. There was a decreasing trend in the average forage availability with decreasing slope. Between the top slope and the bottom slope, forage availability declined from 2,484 to 1,448 kg ha⁻¹, which can be attributed to more grazing activities of cattle at bottom slope. Differences in SOC among different SA and SP could also be explained by varying amount of total clay. Concentrations of SOC were linearly related with increasing total clay content. The greatest amount of SOC was observed from soils located at the top slope of south-facing slope. Of the entire SA, south-facing slope had the greatest concentration of total clay, while the greatest clay content among SP was observed from the top slope. Results further revealed that 73% of SOC spatial variability could be explained by total clay content. The relationship between SOC and total clay content was best described by a quadratic equation: SOC = 0.05 × clay² − 0.29 × clay + 4.4; R ² = 0.73; p ≤ 0.001. Conclusions Results of our study are suggesting that SA and SP could be of relative importance in controlling spatial variability of SOC. Averaged across years, soils on the south-facing slope contained the greatest amount of SOC, while soils on the north-facing slope had the least amount of SOC. Based on the average concentration of SOC, the south-facing slope may have sequestered about 6,460 kg ha⁻¹ of SOC. Recommendation and perspectives Results have shown that landscape attributes (e.g., SA and SP) associated with beef cattle pastures as a part of the agro-ecological system could be potential sink for C sequestration, thus reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. It is still critical to understand how the interactions of pasture management and landscape are affecting soil C dynamics. More studies are needed to assess the rate at which soil C is accumulating as well as the mechanisms responsible for the current and future C sink in forage-based pastures with cow-calf operations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-009-0110-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-0108
ispartof Journal of soils and sediments, 2010-03, Vol.10 (2), p.240-247
issn 1439-0108
1614-7480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744670416
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agricultural ecosystems
Agricultural research
Beef cattle
Carbon
Carbon dioxide
Cattle
Clay
Earth and Environmental Science
Environ Risk Assess
Environment
Environmental Physics
Forage
Geochemistry
Grasslands
Grazing
Landscape
Microclimate
Nutrient cycles
Nutrient dynamics
Organic carbon
Pasture
Pasture management
Plant communities
Sec 2 Global Change
Soil analysis
Soil depth
Soil moisture
Soil nutrients
Soil properties
Soil Science & Conservation
Soil sciences
Soils
Solar radiation
Spatial analysis
Spatial distribution
Sustainable Land Use Research Article
Variance analysis
title Spatial distribution of soil carbon in pastures with cow-calf operation: effects of slope aspect and slope position
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20distribution%20of%20soil%20carbon%20in%20pastures%20with%20cow-calf%20operation:%20effects%20of%20slope%20aspect%20and%20slope%20position&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Sigua,%20Gilbert%20C&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=240-247&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-009-0110-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744670416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204579071&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true