Implicit and multigrid procedures for steady-state computations with upwind algorithms

A computational study for the convergence acceleration of Euler and Navier–Stokes computations with upwind schemes has been conducted in a unified framework. It involves the flux-vector splitting algorithms due to Steger–Warming and Van Leer, the flux-difference splitting algorithms due to Roe and O...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers & fluids 1999-02, Vol.28 (2), p.187-212
Hauptverfasser: Amaladas, J Richard, Kamath, Hemant
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 187
container_title Computers & fluids
container_volume 28
creator Amaladas, J Richard
Kamath, Hemant
description A computational study for the convergence acceleration of Euler and Navier–Stokes computations with upwind schemes has been conducted in a unified framework. It involves the flux-vector splitting algorithms due to Steger–Warming and Van Leer, the flux-difference splitting algorithms due to Roe and Osher and the hybrid algorithms, AUSM (Advection Upstream Splitting Method) and HUS (Hybrid Upwind Splitting). Implicit time integration with line Gauss–Seidel relaxation and multigrid are among the procedures which have been systematically investigated on an individual as well as cumulative basis. The upwind schemes have been tested in various implicit–explicit operator combinations such that the optimal among them can be determined based on extensive computations for two-dimensional flows in subsonic, transonic, supersonic and hypersonic flow regimes. In this study, the performance of these implicit time-integration procedures has been systematically compared with those corresponding to a multigrid accelerated explicit Runge–Kutta method. It has been demonstrated that a multigrid method employed in conjunction with an implicit time-integration scheme yields distinctly superior convergence as compared to those associated with either of the acceleration procedures provided that effective smoothers, which have been identified in this investigation, are prescribed in the implicit operator.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0045-7930(98)00022-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744628743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004579309800022X</els_id><sourcerecordid>744628743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2e2534b4d8caf5e523a56d443aa21ef1f5e7efc94805e39701ca808d33e1b7af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQhoMoOI4-gtAHcTm0Zu2kTyLiBoIHF7yFTLpaI72ZpB3m7Y3OoDc9pVJ8f1XxIbRL8DHBpDi5x5iLXJYMH5bqCGNMaf68hiZEyTLHkst1NPlBNtFWCG8J4ozyCXq6aYfGWRcz01VZOzbRvXhXZYPvLVSjh5DVvc9CBFMt8hBNhMz27TCmyvVdyOYuvmbjMHcpbpqX3qd_G7bRRm2aADurd4oeLy8ezq_z27urm_Oz29xyVsScAhWMz3ilrKkFCMqMKCrOmTGUQE1ST0JtS66wAFZKTKxRWFWMAZlJU7MpOljOTfe-jxCibl2w0DSmg34MWnJeUCU5S-T-nyRNw7EQMoFiCVrfh-Ch1oN3rfELTbD-8q2_fesvmbpU-tu3fk65vdUCE6xpam8668JvuKApoBJ2usQgaflw4HWwDrok23mwUVe9-2fRJ8E7lhU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27010557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit and multigrid procedures for steady-state computations with upwind algorithms</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Amaladas, J Richard ; Kamath, Hemant</creator><creatorcontrib>Amaladas, J Richard ; Kamath, Hemant</creatorcontrib><description>A computational study for the convergence acceleration of Euler and Navier–Stokes computations with upwind schemes has been conducted in a unified framework. It involves the flux-vector splitting algorithms due to Steger–Warming and Van Leer, the flux-difference splitting algorithms due to Roe and Osher and the hybrid algorithms, AUSM (Advection Upstream Splitting Method) and HUS (Hybrid Upwind Splitting). Implicit time integration with line Gauss–Seidel relaxation and multigrid are among the procedures which have been systematically investigated on an individual as well as cumulative basis. The upwind schemes have been tested in various implicit–explicit operator combinations such that the optimal among them can be determined based on extensive computations for two-dimensional flows in subsonic, transonic, supersonic and hypersonic flow regimes. In this study, the performance of these implicit time-integration procedures has been systematically compared with those corresponding to a multigrid accelerated explicit Runge–Kutta method. It has been demonstrated that a multigrid method employed in conjunction with an implicit time-integration scheme yields distinctly superior convergence as compared to those associated with either of the acceleration procedures provided that effective smoothers, which have been identified in this investigation, are prescribed in the implicit operator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-7930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(98)00022-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPFLBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Computational methods in fluid dynamics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Hypersonic flow ; Integration ; Mathematical operators ; Navier Stokes equations ; Physics ; Subsonic flow ; Supersonic flow ; Transonic flow ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>Computers &amp; fluids, 1999-02, Vol.28 (2), p.187-212</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2e2534b4d8caf5e523a56d443aa21ef1f5e7efc94805e39701ca808d33e1b7af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2e2534b4d8caf5e523a56d443aa21ef1f5e7efc94805e39701ca808d33e1b7af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7930(98)00022-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1629308$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amaladas, J Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamath, Hemant</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit and multigrid procedures for steady-state computations with upwind algorithms</title><title>Computers &amp; fluids</title><description>A computational study for the convergence acceleration of Euler and Navier–Stokes computations with upwind schemes has been conducted in a unified framework. It involves the flux-vector splitting algorithms due to Steger–Warming and Van Leer, the flux-difference splitting algorithms due to Roe and Osher and the hybrid algorithms, AUSM (Advection Upstream Splitting Method) and HUS (Hybrid Upwind Splitting). Implicit time integration with line Gauss–Seidel relaxation and multigrid are among the procedures which have been systematically investigated on an individual as well as cumulative basis. The upwind schemes have been tested in various implicit–explicit operator combinations such that the optimal among them can be determined based on extensive computations for two-dimensional flows in subsonic, transonic, supersonic and hypersonic flow regimes. In this study, the performance of these implicit time-integration procedures has been systematically compared with those corresponding to a multigrid accelerated explicit Runge–Kutta method. It has been demonstrated that a multigrid method employed in conjunction with an implicit time-integration scheme yields distinctly superior convergence as compared to those associated with either of the acceleration procedures provided that effective smoothers, which have been identified in this investigation, are prescribed in the implicit operator.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Hypersonic flow</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Mathematical operators</subject><subject>Navier Stokes equations</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Subsonic flow</subject><subject>Supersonic flow</subject><subject>Transonic flow</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><issn>0045-7930</issn><issn>1879-0747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQhoMoOI4-gtAHcTm0Zu2kTyLiBoIHF7yFTLpaI72ZpB3m7Y3OoDc9pVJ8f1XxIbRL8DHBpDi5x5iLXJYMH5bqCGNMaf68hiZEyTLHkst1NPlBNtFWCG8J4ozyCXq6aYfGWRcz01VZOzbRvXhXZYPvLVSjh5DVvc9CBFMt8hBNhMz27TCmyvVdyOYuvmbjMHcpbpqX3qd_G7bRRm2aADurd4oeLy8ezq_z27urm_Oz29xyVsScAhWMz3ilrKkFCMqMKCrOmTGUQE1ST0JtS66wAFZKTKxRWFWMAZlJU7MpOljOTfe-jxCibl2w0DSmg34MWnJeUCU5S-T-nyRNw7EQMoFiCVrfh-Ch1oN3rfELTbD-8q2_fesvmbpU-tu3fk65vdUCE6xpam8668JvuKApoBJ2usQgaflw4HWwDrok23mwUVe9-2fRJ8E7lhU</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Amaladas, J Richard</creator><creator>Kamath, Hemant</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Implicit and multigrid procedures for steady-state computations with upwind algorithms</title><author>Amaladas, J Richard ; Kamath, Hemant</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-2e2534b4d8caf5e523a56d443aa21ef1f5e7efc94805e39701ca808d33e1b7af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Computational methods in fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Hypersonic flow</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Mathematical operators</topic><topic>Navier Stokes equations</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Subsonic flow</topic><topic>Supersonic flow</topic><topic>Transonic flow</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amaladas, J Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamath, Hemant</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Computers &amp; fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amaladas, J Richard</au><au>Kamath, Hemant</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit and multigrid procedures for steady-state computations with upwind algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Computers &amp; fluids</jtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>187-212</pages><issn>0045-7930</issn><eissn>1879-0747</eissn><coden>CPFLBI</coden><abstract>A computational study for the convergence acceleration of Euler and Navier–Stokes computations with upwind schemes has been conducted in a unified framework. It involves the flux-vector splitting algorithms due to Steger–Warming and Van Leer, the flux-difference splitting algorithms due to Roe and Osher and the hybrid algorithms, AUSM (Advection Upstream Splitting Method) and HUS (Hybrid Upwind Splitting). Implicit time integration with line Gauss–Seidel relaxation and multigrid are among the procedures which have been systematically investigated on an individual as well as cumulative basis. The upwind schemes have been tested in various implicit–explicit operator combinations such that the optimal among them can be determined based on extensive computations for two-dimensional flows in subsonic, transonic, supersonic and hypersonic flow regimes. In this study, the performance of these implicit time-integration procedures has been systematically compared with those corresponding to a multigrid accelerated explicit Runge–Kutta method. It has been demonstrated that a multigrid method employed in conjunction with an implicit time-integration scheme yields distinctly superior convergence as compared to those associated with either of the acceleration procedures provided that effective smoothers, which have been identified in this investigation, are prescribed in the implicit operator.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0045-7930(98)00022-X</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-7930
ispartof Computers & fluids, 1999-02, Vol.28 (2), p.187-212
issn 0045-7930
1879-0747
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744628743
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Computational methods in fluid dynamics
Exact sciences and technology
Fluid dynamics
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Hypersonic flow
Integration
Mathematical operators
Navier Stokes equations
Physics
Subsonic flow
Supersonic flow
Transonic flow
Vectors
title Implicit and multigrid procedures for steady-state computations with upwind algorithms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A54%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20and%20multigrid%20procedures%20for%20steady-state%20computations%20with%20upwind%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=Computers%20&%20fluids&rft.au=Amaladas,%20J%20Richard&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=187-212&rft.issn=0045-7930&rft.eissn=1879-0747&rft.coden=CPFLBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0045-7930(98)00022-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744628743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27010557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S004579309800022X&rfr_iscdi=true