Are species-area relationships from entire archipelagos congruent with those of their constituent islands

To establish the extent to which archipelagos follow the same species-area relationship as their constituent islands and to explore the factors that may explain departures from the relationship. Thirty-eight archipelagos distributed worldwide. We used ninety-seven published datasets to create island...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global ecology and biogeography 2010-07, Vol.19 (4), p.527-540
Hauptverfasser: Santos, Ana M. C., Whittaker, Robert J., Triantis, Kostas A., Borges, Paulo A. V., Jones, Owen R., Quicke, Donald L. J., Hortal, Joaquín
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 540
container_issue 4
container_start_page 527
container_title Global ecology and biogeography
container_volume 19
creator Santos, Ana M. C.
Whittaker, Robert J.
Triantis, Kostas A.
Borges, Paulo A. V.
Jones, Owen R.
Quicke, Donald L. J.
Hortal, Joaquín
description To establish the extent to which archipelagos follow the same species-area relationship as their constituent islands and to explore the factors that may explain departures from the relationship. Thirty-eight archipelagos distributed worldwide. We used ninety-seven published datasets to create island species-area relationships (ISARs) using the Arrhenius logarithmic form of the power model. Observed and predicted species richness of an archipelago and of each of its islands were used to calculate two indices that determined whether the archipelago followed the ISAR. Archipelagic residuals (ArcRes) were calculated as the residual of the prediction provided by the ISAR using the total area of the archipelago, standardized by the total richness observed in the archipelago. We also tested whether any characteristic of the archipelago (geological origin and isolation) and/or taxon accounts for whether an archipelago fits into the ISAR or not. Finally, we explored the relationship between ArcRes and two metrics of nestedness. The archipelago was close to the ISAR of its constituent islands in most of the cases analysed. Exceptions arose for archipelagos where (i) the slopes of the ISAR are low, (ii) observed species richness is higher than expected by the ISAR and/or (iii) distance to the mainland is small. The archipelago's geological origin was also important; a higher percentage of oceanic archipelagos fit into their ISAR than continental ones. ArcRes indicated that the ISAR underpredicts archipelagic richness in the least isolated archipelagos. Different types of taxon showed no differences in ArcRes. Nestedness and ArcRes appear to be related, although the form of the relationship varies between metrics. Archipelagos, as a rule, follow the same ISAR as their constituent islands. Therefore, they can be used as distinct units themselves in large-scale biogeographical and macroecological studies. Departure from the ISAR can be used as a crude indicator of richness-ordered nestedness, responsive to factors such as isolation, environmental heterogeneity, number and age of islands.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00536.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744624458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40801857</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40801857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5086-98f1947b1279987ed7a50c18f59d41ea2cbe6b746d6ca66a2ad0d6b5c2aa5e6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9v00AQxS0EEqXwERC-IE5O1-v9Z4lLiUpaqSpIpYXbarIeJxucbLrjqOm3Z11XPrOXHc3vvZnRy7K8ZLMyvbPNrBRKFYZXZsZZ6jImKzU7vspOJvB6qvmft9k7og1LKiHVSebPI-a0R-eRCogIecQOeh92tPZ7ytsYtjnuep9kEF3qJbwKlLuwW8VDIvmj79d5vw6EeWhTgT4OlHrfP3NPHewaep-9aaEj_PDyn2Z33y9-zS-L6x-Lq_n5deEkM6qoTVvWQi9LruvaaGw0SOZK08q6ESUCd0tUSy1UoxwoBRwa1qildBxAomqr0-zLOHcfw8MBqbdbTw67dASGA1kthOJCSJOUZlS6GIgitnYf_Rbiky2ZHcK1GzvkZocM7RCufQ7XHpP188sSIAddG2HnPE1-zo2sKsWS7uuoe_QdPv33fLu4-JaKZP842jfUhzjZBTOsNFInXozcU4_HiUP8a5WutLS_bxb2dn7_83Jxc28H_adR30KwsIrp5LvbtLgaxlVMm-ofBMyxbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744624458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are species-area relationships from entire archipelagos congruent with those of their constituent islands</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Santos, Ana M. C. ; Whittaker, Robert J. ; Triantis, Kostas A. ; Borges, Paulo A. V. ; Jones, Owen R. ; Quicke, Donald L. J. ; Hortal, Joaquín</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ana M. C. ; Whittaker, Robert J. ; Triantis, Kostas A. ; Borges, Paulo A. V. ; Jones, Owen R. ; Quicke, Donald L. J. ; Hortal, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><description>To establish the extent to which archipelagos follow the same species-area relationship as their constituent islands and to explore the factors that may explain departures from the relationship. Thirty-eight archipelagos distributed worldwide. We used ninety-seven published datasets to create island species-area relationships (ISARs) using the Arrhenius logarithmic form of the power model. Observed and predicted species richness of an archipelago and of each of its islands were used to calculate two indices that determined whether the archipelago followed the ISAR. Archipelagic residuals (ArcRes) were calculated as the residual of the prediction provided by the ISAR using the total area of the archipelago, standardized by the total richness observed in the archipelago. We also tested whether any characteristic of the archipelago (geological origin and isolation) and/or taxon accounts for whether an archipelago fits into the ISAR or not. Finally, we explored the relationship between ArcRes and two metrics of nestedness. The archipelago was close to the ISAR of its constituent islands in most of the cases analysed. Exceptions arose for archipelagos where (i) the slopes of the ISAR are low, (ii) observed species richness is higher than expected by the ISAR and/or (iii) distance to the mainland is small. The archipelago's geological origin was also important; a higher percentage of oceanic archipelagos fit into their ISAR than continental ones. ArcRes indicated that the ISAR underpredicts archipelagic richness in the least isolated archipelagos. Different types of taxon showed no differences in ArcRes. Nestedness and ArcRes appear to be related, although the form of the relationship varies between metrics. Archipelagos, as a rule, follow the same ISAR as their constituent islands. Therefore, they can be used as distinct units themselves in large-scale biogeographical and macroecological studies. Departure from the ISAR can be used as a crude indicator of richness-ordered nestedness, responsive to factors such as isolation, environmental heterogeneity, number and age of islands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-8238</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00536.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Archipelagic residuals ; Archipelagos ; Biogeography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Canaries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; geological origin ; Insect ecology ; island biogeography ; island species-area relationship ; isolation ; macroecology ; Marine ecology ; nestedness ; Population ecology ; power model ; Snails ; Species ; Synecology ; Taxa ; z-values</subject><ispartof>Global ecology and biogeography, 2010-07, Vol.19 (4), p.527-540</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing</rights><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5086-98f1947b1279987ed7a50c18f59d41ea2cbe6b746d6ca66a2ad0d6b5c2aa5e6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5086-98f1947b1279987ed7a50c18f59d41ea2cbe6b746d6ca66a2ad0d6b5c2aa5e6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40801857$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40801857$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22853360$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ana M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantis, Kostas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Paulo A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Owen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quicke, Donald L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hortal, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><title>Are species-area relationships from entire archipelagos congruent with those of their constituent islands</title><title>Global ecology and biogeography</title><description>To establish the extent to which archipelagos follow the same species-area relationship as their constituent islands and to explore the factors that may explain departures from the relationship. Thirty-eight archipelagos distributed worldwide. We used ninety-seven published datasets to create island species-area relationships (ISARs) using the Arrhenius logarithmic form of the power model. Observed and predicted species richness of an archipelago and of each of its islands were used to calculate two indices that determined whether the archipelago followed the ISAR. Archipelagic residuals (ArcRes) were calculated as the residual of the prediction provided by the ISAR using the total area of the archipelago, standardized by the total richness observed in the archipelago. We also tested whether any characteristic of the archipelago (geological origin and isolation) and/or taxon accounts for whether an archipelago fits into the ISAR or not. Finally, we explored the relationship between ArcRes and two metrics of nestedness. The archipelago was close to the ISAR of its constituent islands in most of the cases analysed. Exceptions arose for archipelagos where (i) the slopes of the ISAR are low, (ii) observed species richness is higher than expected by the ISAR and/or (iii) distance to the mainland is small. The archipelago's geological origin was also important; a higher percentage of oceanic archipelagos fit into their ISAR than continental ones. ArcRes indicated that the ISAR underpredicts archipelagic richness in the least isolated archipelagos. Different types of taxon showed no differences in ArcRes. Nestedness and ArcRes appear to be related, although the form of the relationship varies between metrics. Archipelagos, as a rule, follow the same ISAR as their constituent islands. Therefore, they can be used as distinct units themselves in large-scale biogeographical and macroecological studies. Departure from the ISAR can be used as a crude indicator of richness-ordered nestedness, responsive to factors such as isolation, environmental heterogeneity, number and age of islands.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Archipelagic residuals</subject><subject>Archipelagos</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Canaries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>geological origin</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>island biogeography</subject><subject>island species-area relationship</subject><subject>isolation</subject><subject>macroecology</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>nestedness</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>power model</subject><subject>Snails</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>z-values</subject><issn>1466-822X</issn><issn>1466-8238</issn><issn>1466-822X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9v00AQxS0EEqXwERC-IE5O1-v9Z4lLiUpaqSpIpYXbarIeJxucbLrjqOm3Z11XPrOXHc3vvZnRy7K8ZLMyvbPNrBRKFYZXZsZZ6jImKzU7vspOJvB6qvmft9k7og1LKiHVSebPI-a0R-eRCogIecQOeh92tPZ7ytsYtjnuep9kEF3qJbwKlLuwW8VDIvmj79d5vw6EeWhTgT4OlHrfP3NPHewaep-9aaEj_PDyn2Z33y9-zS-L6x-Lq_n5deEkM6qoTVvWQi9LruvaaGw0SOZK08q6ESUCd0tUSy1UoxwoBRwa1qildBxAomqr0-zLOHcfw8MBqbdbTw67dASGA1kthOJCSJOUZlS6GIgitnYf_Rbiky2ZHcK1GzvkZocM7RCufQ7XHpP188sSIAddG2HnPE1-zo2sKsWS7uuoe_QdPv33fLu4-JaKZP842jfUhzjZBTOsNFInXozcU4_HiUP8a5WutLS_bxb2dn7_83Jxc28H_adR30KwsIrp5LvbtLgaxlVMm-ofBMyxbg</recordid><startdate>201007</startdate><enddate>201007</enddate><creator>Santos, Ana M. C.</creator><creator>Whittaker, Robert J.</creator><creator>Triantis, Kostas A.</creator><creator>Borges, Paulo A. V.</creator><creator>Jones, Owen R.</creator><creator>Quicke, Donald L. J.</creator><creator>Hortal, Joaquín</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201007</creationdate><title>Are species-area relationships from entire archipelagos congruent with those of their constituent islands</title><author>Santos, Ana M. C. ; Whittaker, Robert J. ; Triantis, Kostas A. ; Borges, Paulo A. V. ; Jones, Owen R. ; Quicke, Donald L. J. ; Hortal, Joaquín</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5086-98f1947b1279987ed7a50c18f59d41ea2cbe6b746d6ca66a2ad0d6b5c2aa5e6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Archipelagic residuals</topic><topic>Archipelagos</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Canaries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>geological origin</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>island biogeography</topic><topic>island species-area relationship</topic><topic>isolation</topic><topic>macroecology</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>nestedness</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>power model</topic><topic>Snails</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>z-values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ana M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantis, Kostas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Paulo A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Owen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quicke, Donald L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hortal, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos, Ana M. C.</au><au>Whittaker, Robert J.</au><au>Triantis, Kostas A.</au><au>Borges, Paulo A. V.</au><au>Jones, Owen R.</au><au>Quicke, Donald L. J.</au><au>Hortal, Joaquín</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are species-area relationships from entire archipelagos congruent with those of their constituent islands</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle><date>2010-07</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>527-540</pages><issn>1466-822X</issn><eissn>1466-8238</eissn><eissn>1466-822X</eissn><abstract>To establish the extent to which archipelagos follow the same species-area relationship as their constituent islands and to explore the factors that may explain departures from the relationship. Thirty-eight archipelagos distributed worldwide. We used ninety-seven published datasets to create island species-area relationships (ISARs) using the Arrhenius logarithmic form of the power model. Observed and predicted species richness of an archipelago and of each of its islands were used to calculate two indices that determined whether the archipelago followed the ISAR. Archipelagic residuals (ArcRes) were calculated as the residual of the prediction provided by the ISAR using the total area of the archipelago, standardized by the total richness observed in the archipelago. We also tested whether any characteristic of the archipelago (geological origin and isolation) and/or taxon accounts for whether an archipelago fits into the ISAR or not. Finally, we explored the relationship between ArcRes and two metrics of nestedness. The archipelago was close to the ISAR of its constituent islands in most of the cases analysed. Exceptions arose for archipelagos where (i) the slopes of the ISAR are low, (ii) observed species richness is higher than expected by the ISAR and/or (iii) distance to the mainland is small. The archipelago's geological origin was also important; a higher percentage of oceanic archipelagos fit into their ISAR than continental ones. ArcRes indicated that the ISAR underpredicts archipelagic richness in the least isolated archipelagos. Different types of taxon showed no differences in ArcRes. Nestedness and ArcRes appear to be related, although the form of the relationship varies between metrics. Archipelagos, as a rule, follow the same ISAR as their constituent islands. Therefore, they can be used as distinct units themselves in large-scale biogeographical and macroecological studies. Departure from the ISAR can be used as a crude indicator of richness-ordered nestedness, responsive to factors such as isolation, environmental heterogeneity, number and age of islands.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00536.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1466-822X
ispartof Global ecology and biogeography, 2010-07, Vol.19 (4), p.527-540
issn 1466-822X
1466-8238
1466-822X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744624458
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Archipelagic residuals
Archipelagos
Biogeography
Biological and medical sciences
Canaries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
geological origin
Insect ecology
island biogeography
island species-area relationship
isolation
macroecology
Marine ecology
nestedness
Population ecology
power model
Snails
Species
Synecology
Taxa
z-values
title Are species-area relationships from entire archipelagos congruent with those of their constituent islands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A35%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20species-area%20relationships%20from%20entire%20archipelagos%20congruent%20with%20those%20of%20their%20constituent%20islands&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20biogeography&rft.au=Santos,%20Ana%20M.%20C.&rft.date=2010-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=527-540&rft.issn=1466-822X&rft.eissn=1466-8238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00536.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40801857%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744624458&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40801857&rfr_iscdi=true