On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality

Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resource and energy economics 2010-04, Vol.32 (2), p.154-164
Hauptverfasser: Brozović, Nicholas, Sunding, David L., Zilberman, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue 2
container_start_page 154
container_title Resource and energy economics
container_volume 32
creator Brozović, Nicholas
Sunding, David L.
Zilberman, David
description Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744620119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928765509000712</els_id><sourcerecordid>1981440111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhGYiQEL0kzNiO7Uhcqgpoq0q9wNlynNnWq2wS7KRl375OU-2hBziMZ2x98-ufcZZ9RCgRUH7dlYEi9URuKBlAXSKWgPAq26BWvADG8HW2gZrpQsmqepu9i3EHAFViN9m3mz6f7iiPo5287fLeTnOgfNg-vd6GYe7bBztRyMd5P_r-Nqe_6dbbzk-H99mbre0ifXjOJ9nvH99_nV8U1zc_L8_PrgsnUU5FI6CVnLO2VrZBSY2tKsmUYjVo3YCrBddta0mT0ILxljdKKqmrmguHXCE_yb6sumMY_swUJ7P30VHX2Z6GORolhGSAWCfy9J8kSoUCtJA6oZ9eoLthXgZLVK2FSHqQILVCLgwxBtqaMfi9DQeDYJb1m505rt8s6zeIBp46r9bOQCO5YxsRrby5N9xylo5DiuQeUvJLmWJMgZVIdoW5m_ZJ7POzVxud7bbB9s7HoyhjlWBYLTOdrRyl37j3FEx0nnpHrQ_kJtMO_r_GHwETBLXf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198440110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brozović, Nicholas ; Sunding, David L. ; Zilberman, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Brozović, Nicholas ; Sunding, David L. ; Zilberman, David</creatorcontrib><description>Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-7655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0221</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Approximation ; Aquifers ; Buildings. Public works ; Calibration ; Common property resource ; Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Dynamic optimization ; Economic models ; Economics ; Environmental policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Externalities ; Externality ; Groundwater ; Groundwater management ; Mathematical models ; Pumping ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Studies ; Water collecting, well, pumping ; Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Resource and energy economics, 2010-04, Vol.32 (2), p.154-164</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,3994,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22542158$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeresene/v_3a32_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a154-164.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brozović, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunding, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, David</creatorcontrib><title>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</title><title>Resource and energy economics</title><description>Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Common property resource</subject><subject>Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Dynamic optimization</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Externalities</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater management</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Pumping</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Water collecting, well, pumping</subject><subject>Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</subject><issn>0928-7655</issn><issn>1873-0221</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhGYiQEL0kzNiO7Uhcqgpoq0q9wNlynNnWq2wS7KRl375OU-2hBziMZ2x98-ufcZZ9RCgRUH7dlYEi9URuKBlAXSKWgPAq26BWvADG8HW2gZrpQsmqepu9i3EHAFViN9m3mz6f7iiPo5287fLeTnOgfNg-vd6GYe7bBztRyMd5P_r-Nqe_6dbbzk-H99mbre0ifXjOJ9nvH99_nV8U1zc_L8_PrgsnUU5FI6CVnLO2VrZBSY2tKsmUYjVo3YCrBddta0mT0ILxljdKKqmrmguHXCE_yb6sumMY_swUJ7P30VHX2Z6GORolhGSAWCfy9J8kSoUCtJA6oZ9eoLthXgZLVK2FSHqQILVCLgwxBtqaMfi9DQeDYJb1m505rt8s6zeIBp46r9bOQCO5YxsRrby5N9xylo5DiuQeUvJLmWJMgZVIdoW5m_ZJ7POzVxud7bbB9s7HoyhjlWBYLTOdrRyl37j3FEx0nnpHrQ_kJtMO_r_GHwETBLXf</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Brozović, Nicholas</creator><creator>Sunding, David L.</creator><creator>Zilberman, David</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</title><author>Brozović, Nicholas ; Sunding, David L. ; Zilberman, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Common property resource</topic><topic>Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Dynamic optimization</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Externalities</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater management</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Pumping</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Water collecting, well, pumping</topic><topic>Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brozović, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunding, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Resource and energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brozović, Nicholas</au><au>Sunding, David L.</au><au>Zilberman, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</atitle><jtitle>Resource and energy economics</jtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>154-164</pages><issn>0928-7655</issn><eissn>1873-0221</eissn><abstract>Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0928-7655
ispartof Resource and energy economics, 2010-04, Vol.32 (2), p.154-164
issn 0928-7655
1873-0221
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744620119
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Approximation
Aquifers
Buildings. Public works
Calibration
Common property resource
Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Dynamic optimization
Economic models
Economics
Environmental policy
Exact sciences and technology
Externalities
Externality
Groundwater
Groundwater management
Mathematical models
Pumping
Structural analysis. Stresses
Studies
Water collecting, well, pumping
Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment
title On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20spatial%20nature%20of%20the%20groundwater%20pumping%20externality&rft.jtitle=Resource%20and%20energy%20economics&rft.au=Brozovi%C4%87,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=154-164&rft.issn=0928-7655&rft.eissn=1873-0221&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1981440111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198440110&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0928765509000712&rfr_iscdi=true