On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality
Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resource and energy economics 2010-04, Vol.32 (2), p.154-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 164 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 154 |
container_title | Resource and energy economics |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Brozović, Nicholas Sunding, David L. Zilberman, David |
description | Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744620119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928765509000712</els_id><sourcerecordid>1981440111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhGYiQEL0kzNiO7Uhcqgpoq0q9wNlynNnWq2wS7KRl375OU-2hBziMZ2x98-ufcZZ9RCgRUH7dlYEi9URuKBlAXSKWgPAq26BWvADG8HW2gZrpQsmqepu9i3EHAFViN9m3mz6f7iiPo5287fLeTnOgfNg-vd6GYe7bBztRyMd5P_r-Nqe_6dbbzk-H99mbre0ifXjOJ9nvH99_nV8U1zc_L8_PrgsnUU5FI6CVnLO2VrZBSY2tKsmUYjVo3YCrBddta0mT0ILxljdKKqmrmguHXCE_yb6sumMY_swUJ7P30VHX2Z6GORolhGSAWCfy9J8kSoUCtJA6oZ9eoLthXgZLVK2FSHqQILVCLgwxBtqaMfi9DQeDYJb1m505rt8s6zeIBp46r9bOQCO5YxsRrby5N9xylo5DiuQeUvJLmWJMgZVIdoW5m_ZJ7POzVxud7bbB9s7HoyhjlWBYLTOdrRyl37j3FEx0nnpHrQ_kJtMO_r_GHwETBLXf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198440110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brozović, Nicholas ; Sunding, David L. ; Zilberman, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Brozović, Nicholas ; Sunding, David L. ; Zilberman, David</creatorcontrib><description>Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-7655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0221</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Approximation ; Aquifers ; Buildings. Public works ; Calibration ; Common property resource ; Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Dynamic optimization ; Economic models ; Economics ; Environmental policy ; Exact sciences and technology ; Externalities ; Externality ; Groundwater ; Groundwater management ; Mathematical models ; Pumping ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Studies ; Water collecting, well, pumping ; Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Resource and energy economics, 2010-04, Vol.32 (2), p.154-164</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,3994,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22542158$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeresene/v_3a32_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a154-164.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brozović, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunding, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, David</creatorcontrib><title>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</title><title>Resource and energy economics</title><description>Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Common property resource</subject><subject>Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Dynamic optimization</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Externalities</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater management</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Pumping</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Water collecting, well, pumping</subject><subject>Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</subject><issn>0928-7655</issn><issn>1873-0221</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhGYiQEL0kzNiO7Uhcqgpoq0q9wNlynNnWq2wS7KRl375OU-2hBziMZ2x98-ufcZZ9RCgRUH7dlYEi9URuKBlAXSKWgPAq26BWvADG8HW2gZrpQsmqepu9i3EHAFViN9m3mz6f7iiPo5287fLeTnOgfNg-vd6GYe7bBztRyMd5P_r-Nqe_6dbbzk-H99mbre0ifXjOJ9nvH99_nV8U1zc_L8_PrgsnUU5FI6CVnLO2VrZBSY2tKsmUYjVo3YCrBddta0mT0ILxljdKKqmrmguHXCE_yb6sumMY_swUJ7P30VHX2Z6GORolhGSAWCfy9J8kSoUCtJA6oZ9eoLthXgZLVK2FSHqQILVCLgwxBtqaMfi9DQeDYJb1m505rt8s6zeIBp46r9bOQCO5YxsRrby5N9xylo5DiuQeUvJLmWJMgZVIdoW5m_ZJ7POzVxud7bbB9s7HoyhjlWBYLTOdrRyl37j3FEx0nnpHrQ_kJtMO_r_GHwETBLXf</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Brozović, Nicholas</creator><creator>Sunding, David L.</creator><creator>Zilberman, David</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</title><author>Brozović, Nicholas ; Sunding, David L. ; Zilberman, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-b40d6332d97ab16eba55627729088b0c9438ddae8e48423d3b767685934c13713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Common property resource</topic><topic>Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Dynamic optimization</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Externalities</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater management</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Pumping</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Water collecting, well, pumping</topic><topic>Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brozović, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunding, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Resource and energy economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brozović, Nicholas</au><au>Sunding, David L.</au><au>Zilberman, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality</atitle><jtitle>Resource and energy economics</jtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>154-164</pages><issn>0928-7655</issn><eissn>1873-0221</eissn><abstract>Most existing economic analyses of optimal groundwater management use single-cell aquifer models, which assume that an aquifer responds uniformly and instantly to groundwater pumping. In this paper, we develop an economic model of groundwater management that explicitly incorporates spatial dynamic groundwater flow equations. Calibration of our model to published economic studies of specific aquifers demonstrates that existing studies generally incorrectly estimate the magnitude of the groundwater pumping externality relative to spatially explicit models. In particular, for large aquifers with surface areas of thousands of square miles, the marginal pumping externality predicted by single-cell models may be orders of magnitude less than that predicted by a spatially explicit model, even at large distances from a pumping well. Conversely, for small aquifers with areas of a few hundred square miles or less, single-cell models reasonably approximate the pumping externality. Application of single-cell models to inappropriate settings may result in misleading policy implications due to understatement of the magnitude and spatial nature of the groundwater externality.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0928-7655 |
ispartof | Resource and energy economics, 2010-04, Vol.32 (2), p.154-164 |
issn | 0928-7655 1873-0221 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744620119 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Approximation Aquifers Buildings. Public works Calibration Common property resource Common property resource Groundwater Dynamic optimization Computation methods. Tables. Charts Dynamic optimization Economic models Economics Environmental policy Exact sciences and technology Externalities Externality Groundwater Groundwater management Mathematical models Pumping Structural analysis. Stresses Studies Water collecting, well, pumping Water supply. Pipings. Water treatment |
title | On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20spatial%20nature%20of%20the%20groundwater%20pumping%20externality&rft.jtitle=Resource%20and%20energy%20economics&rft.au=Brozovi%C4%87,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=154-164&rft.issn=0928-7655&rft.eissn=1873-0221&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1981440111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198440110&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0928765509000712&rfr_iscdi=true |