Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data

Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing of environment 2010-03, Vol.114 (3), p.618-625
Hauptverfasser: Julien, Yves, Sobrino, José A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 625
container_issue 3
container_start_page 618
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 114
creator Julien, Yves
Sobrino, José A.
description Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744613249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425709003265</els_id><sourcerecordid>744613249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac272309159e890525c6918b5833e25d1a2bf3ecf875f9d48633433493f86ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNtexNOu-div4EnqV6EognoNaXaCKbubmkkF_72pLR6FgYHheWeSh5BzRgtGWX21KgJCwSmVBWMFpeyATFjbyJw2tDwkE0pFmZe8ao7JCeIqAVXbsAl5mflhrYNDP2beZqb3my4PYPyIMWxMdGk-QPzwHWbWhyy6ATKE4AB_-ZT26CJkT7fv86zTUZ-SI6t7hLN9n5K3-7vX2WO-eH6Yz24WuUnPiLnRhjdcUMkqCa2kFa9MLVm7rFohgFcd03xpBRjbNpWVXdnWQpSppLBtDVZMyeVu7zr4zw1gVINDA32vR_AbVE1Z1kzwxE8J25EmeMQAVq2DG3T4VoyqrT21Usme2tpTjKkkJ2Uu9ts1Gt3boEfj8C_IedkIKUXirnccpK9-OQgKjYPRQOeSxag67_658gMMTYQT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744613249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Julien, Yves ; Sobrino, José A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Julien, Yves ; Sobrino, José A.</creatorcontrib><description>Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSEEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied geophysics ; Atmospheric contamination ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data reconstruction ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; GIMMS ; IDR ; Internal geophysics ; NDVI ; Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2010-03, Vol.114 (3), p.618-625</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac272309159e890525c6918b5833e25d1a2bf3ecf875f9d48633433493f86ef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22473993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Julien, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, José A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Atmospheric contamination</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data reconstruction</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>GIMMS</subject><subject>IDR</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>NDVI</subject><subject>Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNtexNOu-div4EnqV6EognoNaXaCKbubmkkF_72pLR6FgYHheWeSh5BzRgtGWX21KgJCwSmVBWMFpeyATFjbyJw2tDwkE0pFmZe8ao7JCeIqAVXbsAl5mflhrYNDP2beZqb3my4PYPyIMWxMdGk-QPzwHWbWhyy6ATKE4AB_-ZT26CJkT7fv86zTUZ-SI6t7hLN9n5K3-7vX2WO-eH6Yz24WuUnPiLnRhjdcUMkqCa2kFa9MLVm7rFohgFcd03xpBRjbNpWVXdnWQpSppLBtDVZMyeVu7zr4zw1gVINDA32vR_AbVE1Z1kzwxE8J25EmeMQAVq2DG3T4VoyqrT21Usme2tpTjKkkJ2Uu9ts1Gt3boEfj8C_IedkIKUXirnccpK9-OQgKjYPRQOeSxag67_658gMMTYQT</recordid><startdate>20100315</startdate><enddate>20100315</enddate><creator>Julien, Yves</creator><creator>Sobrino, José A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100315</creationdate><title>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</title><author>Julien, Yves ; Sobrino, José A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac272309159e890525c6918b5833e25d1a2bf3ecf875f9d48633433493f86ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Atmospheric contamination</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data reconstruction</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>GIMMS</topic><topic>IDR</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>NDVI</topic><topic>Teledetection and vegetation maps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Julien, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, José A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Julien, Yves</au><au>Sobrino, José A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2010-03-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>618-625</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><coden>RSEEA7</coden><abstract>Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 2010-03, Vol.114 (3), p.618-625
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744613249
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied geophysics
Atmospheric contamination
Biological and medical sciences
Data reconstruction
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
GIMMS
IDR
Internal geophysics
NDVI
Teledetection and vegetation maps
title Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T22%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cloud-reconstruction%20methods%20for%20time%20series%20of%20composite%20NDVI%20data&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Julien,%20Yves&rft.date=2010-03-15&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=618-625&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft.coden=RSEEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744613249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744613249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425709003265&rfr_iscdi=true