Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data
Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Remote sensing of environment 2010-03, Vol.114 (3), p.618-625 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 625 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 618 |
container_title | Remote sensing of environment |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Julien, Yves Sobrino, José A. |
description | Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744613249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425709003265</els_id><sourcerecordid>744613249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac272309159e890525c6918b5833e25d1a2bf3ecf875f9d48633433493f86ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNtexNOu-div4EnqV6EognoNaXaCKbubmkkF_72pLR6FgYHheWeSh5BzRgtGWX21KgJCwSmVBWMFpeyATFjbyJw2tDwkE0pFmZe8ao7JCeIqAVXbsAl5mflhrYNDP2beZqb3my4PYPyIMWxMdGk-QPzwHWbWhyy6ATKE4AB_-ZT26CJkT7fv86zTUZ-SI6t7hLN9n5K3-7vX2WO-eH6Yz24WuUnPiLnRhjdcUMkqCa2kFa9MLVm7rFohgFcd03xpBRjbNpWVXdnWQpSppLBtDVZMyeVu7zr4zw1gVINDA32vR_AbVE1Z1kzwxE8J25EmeMQAVq2DG3T4VoyqrT21Usme2tpTjKkkJ2Uu9ts1Gt3boEfj8C_IedkIKUXirnccpK9-OQgKjYPRQOeSxag67_658gMMTYQT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>744613249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Julien, Yves ; Sobrino, José A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Julien, Yves ; Sobrino, José A.</creatorcontrib><description>Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSEEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied geophysics ; Atmospheric contamination ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data reconstruction ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; GIMMS ; IDR ; Internal geophysics ; NDVI ; Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2010-03, Vol.114 (3), p.618-625</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac272309159e890525c6918b5833e25d1a2bf3ecf875f9d48633433493f86ef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22473993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Julien, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, José A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Atmospheric contamination</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data reconstruction</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>GIMMS</subject><subject>IDR</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>NDVI</subject><subject>Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNtexNOu-div4EnqV6EognoNaXaCKbubmkkF_72pLR6FgYHheWeSh5BzRgtGWX21KgJCwSmVBWMFpeyATFjbyJw2tDwkE0pFmZe8ao7JCeIqAVXbsAl5mflhrYNDP2beZqb3my4PYPyIMWxMdGk-QPzwHWbWhyy6ATKE4AB_-ZT26CJkT7fv86zTUZ-SI6t7hLN9n5K3-7vX2WO-eH6Yz24WuUnPiLnRhjdcUMkqCa2kFa9MLVm7rFohgFcd03xpBRjbNpWVXdnWQpSppLBtDVZMyeVu7zr4zw1gVINDA32vR_AbVE1Z1kzwxE8J25EmeMQAVq2DG3T4VoyqrT21Usme2tpTjKkkJ2Uu9ts1Gt3boEfj8C_IedkIKUXirnccpK9-OQgKjYPRQOeSxag67_658gMMTYQT</recordid><startdate>20100315</startdate><enddate>20100315</enddate><creator>Julien, Yves</creator><creator>Sobrino, José A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100315</creationdate><title>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</title><author>Julien, Yves ; Sobrino, José A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-cac272309159e890525c6918b5833e25d1a2bf3ecf875f9d48633433493f86ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Atmospheric contamination</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data reconstruction</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>GIMMS</topic><topic>IDR</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>NDVI</topic><topic>Teledetection and vegetation maps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Julien, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, José A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Julien, Yves</au><au>Sobrino, José A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2010-03-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>618-625</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><coden>RSEEA7</coden><abstract>Land cover change can be assessed from ground measurements or remotely sensed data. As regards remotely sensed data, such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) parameter, the presence of atmospherically contaminated data in the time series introduces some noise that may blur the change analysis. Several methods have already been developed to reconstruct NDVI time series, although most methods have been dedicated to reconstruction of acquired time series, while publicly available databases are usually composited over time. This paper presents the IDR (iterative Interpolation for Data Reconstruction) method, a new method designed to approximate the upper envelope of the NDVI time series while conserving as much as possible of the original data. This method is compared quantitatively to two previously applied methods to NDVI time series over different land cover classes. The IDR method provides the best profile reconstruction in most cases. Nevertheless, the IDR method tends to overestimate low NDVI values when high rates of change are present, although this effect can be lowered with shorter compositing periods. This method could also be applied to data before compositing, as well as to reconstruct time series for other biophysical parameters such as land surface temperature, as long as atmospheric contamination affects these parameters negatively.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-4257 |
ispartof | Remote sensing of environment, 2010-03, Vol.114 (3), p.618-625 |
issn | 0034-4257 1879-0704 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744613249 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied geophysics Atmospheric contamination Biological and medical sciences Data reconstruction Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Techniques GIMMS IDR Internal geophysics NDVI Teledetection and vegetation maps |
title | Comparison of cloud-reconstruction methods for time series of composite NDVI data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T22%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cloud-reconstruction%20methods%20for%20time%20series%20of%20composite%20NDVI%20data&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Julien,%20Yves&rft.date=2010-03-15&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=618-625&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft.coden=RSEEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744613249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=744613249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425709003265&rfr_iscdi=true |