PATTERNS OF NOMINALIZATION IN NUMIC
I examine deverbal nominalization in the Numic branch of Uto-Aztecan and reconstruct an inventory of nominalizer suffixes for Proto-Numic. While some of the protoforms have been supplanted in the daughter languages, others have not changed at all. I attribute this difference in stability to a distin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of American linguistics 2010, Vol.76 (1), p.71-100 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 100 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 71 |
| container_title | International journal of American linguistics |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar |
| description | I examine deverbal nominalization in the Numic branch of Uto-Aztecan and reconstruct an inventory of nominalizer suffixes for Proto-Numic. While some of the protoforms have been supplanted in the daughter languages, others have not changed at all. I attribute this difference in stability to a distinction between the nomenclative and constructional functions of nominalization. The data for this study, compiled from a survey of dictionaries and grammars, comprises some 2,000 forms and is included in an online appendix. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/652755 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744445142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993299721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-3ab98bd4d07eb848e4fa0cd21f19e4701d87630115d5174dc879f1d5d66dd2d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxVf0NQ1FN0Zj-ym2MorQbaRDS9eAnb3Q20pE3dbQ_-e1NaPDhzmDk8DMNLyC3CM4JKXhJBpRBnZICCi1gC4DkZAFDod4mX5CqEFQBIpdSA3L9nVTX-KD6jchIV5Swvsmn-lVV5WUR5ERXzWT66JheNboO7Oc0hmU_G1egtnpav-SibxoZxvouZXqRqYbkF6RaKK8cbDcZSbDB1XAJaJRMGiMIKlNwaJdMGrbBJYi21KRuSp-Pdre--9y7s6vUyGNe2euO6fagl70sgp728-ydX3d5v-udqyvpOUR7Q4xEZ34XgXVNv_XKt_U-NUB-Sqo9J9fDhdE0Ho9vG641Zhj9NGbAUOGO_k0Rg5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232329172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PATTERNS OF NOMINALIZATION IN NUMIC</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar</creator><creatorcontrib>TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar</creatorcontrib><description>I examine deverbal nominalization in the Numic branch of Uto-Aztecan and reconstruct an inventory of nominalizer suffixes for Proto-Numic. While some of the protoforms have been supplanted in the daughter languages, others have not changed at all. I attribute this difference in stability to a distinction between the nomenclative and constructional functions of nominalization. The data for this study, compiled from a survey of dictionaries and grammars, comprises some 2,000 forms and is included in an online appendix. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/652755</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJALBH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Diachrony and historical linguistics ; Grammar ; Linguistics ; Native languages ; Native North Americans ; Nouns ; Numic languages ; Proto languages ; Suffixes ; Uto-Aztecan languages</subject><ispartof>International journal of American linguistics, 2010, Vol.76 (1), p.71-100</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-3ab98bd4d07eb848e4fa0cd21f19e4701d87630115d5174dc879f1d5d66dd2d93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23039043$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar</creatorcontrib><title>PATTERNS OF NOMINALIZATION IN NUMIC</title><title>International journal of American linguistics</title><description>I examine deverbal nominalization in the Numic branch of Uto-Aztecan and reconstruct an inventory of nominalizer suffixes for Proto-Numic. While some of the protoforms have been supplanted in the daughter languages, others have not changed at all. I attribute this difference in stability to a distinction between the nomenclative and constructional functions of nominalization. The data for this study, compiled from a survey of dictionaries and grammars, comprises some 2,000 forms and is included in an online appendix. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Diachrony and historical linguistics</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Native languages</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Numic languages</subject><subject>Proto languages</subject><subject>Suffixes</subject><subject>Uto-Aztecan languages</subject><issn>0020-7071</issn><issn>1545-7001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxVf0NQ1FN0Zj-ym2MorQbaRDS9eAnb3Q20pE3dbQ_-e1NaPDhzmDk8DMNLyC3CM4JKXhJBpRBnZICCi1gC4DkZAFDod4mX5CqEFQBIpdSA3L9nVTX-KD6jchIV5Swvsmn-lVV5WUR5ERXzWT66JheNboO7Oc0hmU_G1egtnpav-SibxoZxvouZXqRqYbkF6RaKK8cbDcZSbDB1XAJaJRMGiMIKlNwaJdMGrbBJYi21KRuSp-Pdre--9y7s6vUyGNe2euO6fagl70sgp728-ydX3d5v-udqyvpOUR7Q4xEZ34XgXVNv_XKt_U-NUB-Sqo9J9fDhdE0Ho9vG641Zhj9NGbAUOGO_k0Rg5w</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>PATTERNS OF NOMINALIZATION IN NUMIC</title><author>TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-3ab98bd4d07eb848e4fa0cd21f19e4701d87630115d5174dc879f1d5d66dd2d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Diachrony and historical linguistics</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Native languages</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Numic languages</topic><topic>Proto languages</topic><topic>Suffixes</topic><topic>Uto-Aztecan languages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>International journal of American linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TOOSARVANDANI, Maziar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PATTERNS OF NOMINALIZATION IN NUMIC</atitle><jtitle>International journal of American linguistics</jtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>71-100</pages><issn>0020-7071</issn><eissn>1545-7001</eissn><coden>IJALBH</coden><abstract>I examine deverbal nominalization in the Numic branch of Uto-Aztecan and reconstruct an inventory of nominalizer suffixes for Proto-Numic. While some of the protoforms have been supplanted in the daughter languages, others have not changed at all. I attribute this difference in stability to a distinction between the nomenclative and constructional functions of nominalization. The data for this study, compiled from a survey of dictionaries and grammars, comprises some 2,000 forms and is included in an online appendix. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/652755</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7071 |
| ispartof | International journal of American linguistics, 2010, Vol.76 (1), p.71-100 |
| issn | 0020-7071 1545-7001 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744445142 |
| source | JSTOR |
| subjects | Diachrony and historical linguistics Grammar Linguistics Native languages Native North Americans Nouns Numic languages Proto languages Suffixes Uto-Aztecan languages |
| title | PATTERNS OF NOMINALIZATION IN NUMIC |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A17%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PATTERNS%20OF%20NOMINALIZATION%20IN%20NUMIC&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20American%20linguistics&rft.au=TOOSARVANDANI,%20Maziar&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=71-100&rft.issn=0020-7071&rft.eissn=1545-7001&rft.coden=IJALBH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/652755&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993299721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232329172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |