Teaching Writing to High School Students: A National Survey
A random sample of language arts, social studies, and science high school teachers ( N = 361; 53% women) from the United States were surveyed about what their students wrote, their use of evidence-based writing practices, the adaptations they made for weaker writers, how they assessed writing, their...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of educational psychology 2009-02, Vol.101 (1), p.136-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 160 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 136 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Kiuhara, Sharlene A Graham, Steve Hawken, Leanne S |
description | A random sample of language arts, social studies, and science high school teachers (
N
= 361; 53% women) from the United States were surveyed about what their students wrote, their use of evidence-based writing practices, the adaptations they made for weaker writers, how they assessed writing, their preparation to teach writing, beliefs about the importance of writing, and judgments about their students' writing capabilities. The findings from this survey raised some concerns about the quality of high school writing instruction. The writing activities they were assigned most frequently by teachers involved little analysis and interpretation, and almost one half of the participating teachers did not assign at least one multiparagraph writing assignment monthly. Although the majority of high school teachers did apply most of the evidence-based practices and adaptations included in the survey, they used these practices infrequently. Most teachers did not believe their college teacher education program adequately prepared them to teach writing. A sizable minority of language arts and social studies teachers indicated that their in-service preparation was inadequate too. For science teachers this was close to 60%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0013097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744444021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ829242</ericid><sourcerecordid>744444021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-8ba1f895bc7751b886ff871e88f0073e9127aab5b263bb6a08304823088434283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9LAzEQxYMoWKvgB_BQBLUHV2eSbJI9Sqn_KHhoxWPIxqxdWXdrsnvotzeltUIPJochvB_zZl4IOUW4QWDy1gAgg0zukR5mLEsoSrFPegCUJiAEOyRHIXwCAIuPHhnOnLHzsv4YvPmyXdW2GTyWH_PB1M6bphpM2-7d1W04JgeFqYI72dQ-eb0fz0aPyeTl4Wl0N0kMF7RNVG6wUFmaWylTzJUSRaEkOqUKAMlchlQak6c5FSzPhQHFgCvKQCnOOFWsT67WfRe--e5caPVXGayrKlO7pgta8tUBipG8_JcUGOdQcdE-Od8BP5vO13GLyPAUeBz1P4hizJOi4BEariHrmxC8K_TCl1_GLzWCXsWvf-OP6MWmnwnWVIU3tS3DlqeIKYVs5Xu25pwv7VYePyuaUU6jfL2WzcLoRVha49vSVi7Yzvv4L9q9d9EZdbxM_Lnu4jvcD3sQpE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614504775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teaching Writing to High School Students: A National Survey</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Kiuhara, Sharlene A ; Graham, Steve ; Hawken, Leanne S</creator><contributor>Graesser, Arthur C</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kiuhara, Sharlene A ; Graham, Steve ; Hawken, Leanne S ; Graesser, Arthur C</creatorcontrib><description>A random sample of language arts, social studies, and science high school teachers (
N
= 361; 53% women) from the United States were surveyed about what their students wrote, their use of evidence-based writing practices, the adaptations they made for weaker writers, how they assessed writing, their preparation to teach writing, beliefs about the importance of writing, and judgments about their students' writing capabilities. The findings from this survey raised some concerns about the quality of high school writing instruction. The writing activities they were assigned most frequently by teachers involved little analysis and interpretation, and almost one half of the participating teachers did not assign at least one multiparagraph writing assignment monthly. Although the majority of high school teachers did apply most of the evidence-based practices and adaptations included in the survey, they used these practices infrequently. Most teachers did not believe their college teacher education program adequately prepared them to teach writing. A sizable minority of language arts and social studies teachers indicated that their in-service preparation was inadequate too. For science teachers this was close to 60%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0013097</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Educational psychology ; English Instruction ; English Teachers ; Evaluation Methods ; Evidence Based Practice ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; High School Education ; High School Students ; High School Teachers ; High Schools ; Human ; Language Arts ; Language Arts Education ; Male ; Polls & surveys ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopedagogics. Didactics ; Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure ; Science Teachers ; Secondary school students ; Secondary School Teachers ; Social Studies ; Student Evaluation ; Student writing ; Surveys ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher education ; Teacher Education Programs ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Skills ; Writing Assignments ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Skills ; Written Communication</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2009-02, Vol.101 (1), p.136-160</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-8ba1f895bc7751b886ff871e88f0073e9127aab5b263bb6a08304823088434283</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3541-5495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ829242$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21152095$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Graesser, Arthur C</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kiuhara, Sharlene A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawken, Leanne S</creatorcontrib><title>Teaching Writing to High School Students: A National Survey</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>A random sample of language arts, social studies, and science high school teachers (
N
= 361; 53% women) from the United States were surveyed about what their students wrote, their use of evidence-based writing practices, the adaptations they made for weaker writers, how they assessed writing, their preparation to teach writing, beliefs about the importance of writing, and judgments about their students' writing capabilities. The findings from this survey raised some concerns about the quality of high school writing instruction. The writing activities they were assigned most frequently by teachers involved little analysis and interpretation, and almost one half of the participating teachers did not assign at least one multiparagraph writing assignment monthly. Although the majority of high school teachers did apply most of the evidence-based practices and adaptations included in the survey, they used these practices infrequently. Most teachers did not believe their college teacher education program adequately prepared them to teach writing. A sizable minority of language arts and social studies teachers indicated that their in-service preparation was inadequate too. For science teachers this was close to 60%.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>English Instruction</subject><subject>English Teachers</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>High School Education</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>High School Teachers</subject><subject>High Schools</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Language Arts Education</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopedagogics. Didactics</subject><subject>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</subject><subject>Science Teachers</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Social Studies</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Skills</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><subject>Written Communication</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9LAzEQxYMoWKvgB_BQBLUHV2eSbJI9Sqn_KHhoxWPIxqxdWXdrsnvotzeltUIPJochvB_zZl4IOUW4QWDy1gAgg0zukR5mLEsoSrFPegCUJiAEOyRHIXwCAIuPHhnOnLHzsv4YvPmyXdW2GTyWH_PB1M6bphpM2-7d1W04JgeFqYI72dQ-eb0fz0aPyeTl4Wl0N0kMF7RNVG6wUFmaWylTzJUSRaEkOqUKAMlchlQak6c5FSzPhQHFgCvKQCnOOFWsT67WfRe--e5caPVXGayrKlO7pgta8tUBipG8_JcUGOdQcdE-Od8BP5vO13GLyPAUeBz1P4hizJOi4BEariHrmxC8K_TCl1_GLzWCXsWvf-OP6MWmnwnWVIU3tS3DlqeIKYVs5Xu25pwv7VYePyuaUU6jfL2WzcLoRVha49vSVi7Yzvv4L9q9d9EZdbxM_Lnu4jvcD3sQpE0</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Kiuhara, Sharlene A</creator><creator>Graham, Steve</creator><creator>Hawken, Leanne S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-5495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Teaching Writing to High School Students</title><author>Kiuhara, Sharlene A ; Graham, Steve ; Hawken, Leanne S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-8ba1f895bc7751b886ff871e88f0073e9127aab5b263bb6a08304823088434283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>English Instruction</topic><topic>English Teachers</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>High School Education</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>High School Teachers</topic><topic>High Schools</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Language Arts Education</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopedagogics. Didactics</topic><topic>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</topic><topic>Science Teachers</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Social Studies</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Skills</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><topic>Written Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kiuhara, Sharlene A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawken, Leanne S</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kiuhara, Sharlene A</au><au>Graham, Steve</au><au>Hawken, Leanne S</au><au>Graesser, Arthur C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ829242</ericid><atitle>Teaching Writing to High School Students: A National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>136-160</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPA5</coden><abstract>A random sample of language arts, social studies, and science high school teachers (
N
= 361; 53% women) from the United States were surveyed about what their students wrote, their use of evidence-based writing practices, the adaptations they made for weaker writers, how they assessed writing, their preparation to teach writing, beliefs about the importance of writing, and judgments about their students' writing capabilities. The findings from this survey raised some concerns about the quality of high school writing instruction. The writing activities they were assigned most frequently by teachers involved little analysis and interpretation, and almost one half of the participating teachers did not assign at least one multiparagraph writing assignment monthly. Although the majority of high school teachers did apply most of the evidence-based practices and adaptations included in the survey, they used these practices infrequently. Most teachers did not believe their college teacher education program adequately prepared them to teach writing. A sizable minority of language arts and social studies teachers indicated that their in-service preparation was inadequate too. For science teachers this was close to 60%.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/a0013097</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-5495</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 2009-02, Vol.101 (1), p.136-160 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744444021 |
source | PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Educational psychology English Instruction English Teachers Evaluation Methods Evidence Based Practice Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology High School Education High School Students High School Teachers High Schools Human Language Arts Language Arts Education Male Polls & surveys Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychopedagogics. Didactics Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure Science Teachers Secondary school students Secondary School Teachers Social Studies Student Evaluation Student writing Surveys Teacher Attitudes Teacher education Teacher Education Programs Teachers Teaching Methods Teaching Skills Writing Assignments Writing Instruction Writing Skills Written Communication |
title | Teaching Writing to High School Students: A National Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A52%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching%20Writing%20to%20High%20School%20Students:%20A%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Kiuhara,%20Sharlene%20A&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=136-160&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0013097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E744444021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614504775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ829242&rfr_iscdi=true |