Fructose: Comparison with sucrose as sweetener in four products

Because of a possible ban on the use of saccharin as a sweetener, alternatives, including the use of fructose, are being reevaluated. Fructose, the sweetest of the naturally occurring sugars, is 1.0-1.8 times as sweet as sucrose in similar conditions. However, it is unclear whether or not fructose h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1979-01, Vol.74 (1), p.41-46
Hauptverfasser: Hardy, Sherrie Lynn, Brennand, Charlotte P, Wyse, Bonita W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Journal of the American Dietetic Association
container_volume 74
creator Hardy, Sherrie Lynn
Brennand, Charlotte P
Wyse, Bonita W
description Because of a possible ban on the use of saccharin as a sweetener, alternatives, including the use of fructose, are being reevaluated. Fructose, the sweetest of the naturally occurring sugars, is 1.0-1.8 times as sweet as sucrose in similar conditions. However, it is unclear whether or not fructose has any advantages over sucrose in its effects on blood glucose levels in diabetic adults. In addition, a recent study analyzing the flavor of foods prepared with fructose instead of sucrose, indicated that fructose was not sweeter in sugar cookies, white cake, or vanilla pudding. In fact, many times sucrose was ranked as significantly sweeter
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)39778-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74408464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74408464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-18ef36134a3c97b78e8d5695e75fafe393f369bb3eb5dd971e1afc1461394d603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxSPEvzH4AgiknBAcCnGTNikXhCYGSJM4jJ2jtHWgaF1H0mri25Ou00629d6zrR8h18DugUH6MGeMxZGKY34bwx3PpFSROCAjUKHhiWSHZLS3nJIz73_CyBJgJ-RYpjEXMCJPU9cVbePxkU6aem1c5ZsV3VTtN_Vd4YJAjad-g9jiCh2tVtQ2naNr15Qh6M_JkTVLjxe7OiaL6cvn5C2afby-T55nURFz2Uag0PIUuDC8yGQuFaoySbMEZWKNRZ7xIGd5zjFPyjKTgGBsASJEMlGmjI_JzbA3HP7t0Le6rnyBy6VZYdN5LYVgSqQiGJPB2D_vHVq9dlVt3J8GpntuestN91B0DHrLTfe5q92BLq-x3KcGUEG-HGRrGm2-Aia9mCsmlATF_wG8DXCZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74408464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fructose: Comparison with sucrose as sweetener in four products</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hardy, Sherrie Lynn ; Brennand, Charlotte P ; Wyse, Bonita W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Sherrie Lynn ; Brennand, Charlotte P ; Wyse, Bonita W</creatorcontrib><description>Because of a possible ban on the use of saccharin as a sweetener, alternatives, including the use of fructose, are being reevaluated. Fructose, the sweetest of the naturally occurring sugars, is 1.0-1.8 times as sweet as sucrose in similar conditions. However, it is unclear whether or not fructose has any advantages over sucrose in its effects on blood glucose levels in diabetic adults. In addition, a recent study analyzing the flavor of foods prepared with fructose instead of sucrose, indicated that fructose was not sweeter in sugar cookies, white cake, or vanilla pudding. In fact, many times sucrose was ranked as significantly sweeter</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)39778-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 762341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Cooking ; Food - standards ; Fructose ; Humans ; Sucrose ; Sweetening Agents - standards ; Taste</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1979-01, Vol.74 (1), p.41-46</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-18ef36134a3c97b78e8d5695e75fafe393f369bb3eb5dd971e1afc1461394d603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-18ef36134a3c97b78e8d5695e75fafe393f369bb3eb5dd971e1afc1461394d603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/762341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Sherrie Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennand, Charlotte P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyse, Bonita W</creatorcontrib><title>Fructose: Comparison with sucrose as sweetener in four products</title><title>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</title><addtitle>J Am Diet Assoc</addtitle><description>Because of a possible ban on the use of saccharin as a sweetener, alternatives, including the use of fructose, are being reevaluated. Fructose, the sweetest of the naturally occurring sugars, is 1.0-1.8 times as sweet as sucrose in similar conditions. However, it is unclear whether or not fructose has any advantages over sucrose in its effects on blood glucose levels in diabetic adults. In addition, a recent study analyzing the flavor of foods prepared with fructose instead of sucrose, indicated that fructose was not sweeter in sugar cookies, white cake, or vanilla pudding. In fact, many times sucrose was ranked as significantly sweeter</description><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Food - standards</subject><subject>Fructose</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Sweetening Agents - standards</subject><subject>Taste</subject><issn>0002-8223</issn><issn>1878-3570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxSPEvzH4AgiknBAcCnGTNikXhCYGSJM4jJ2jtHWgaF1H0mri25Ou00629d6zrR8h18DugUH6MGeMxZGKY34bwx3PpFSROCAjUKHhiWSHZLS3nJIz73_CyBJgJ-RYpjEXMCJPU9cVbePxkU6aem1c5ZsV3VTtN_Vd4YJAjad-g9jiCh2tVtQ2naNr15Qh6M_JkTVLjxe7OiaL6cvn5C2afby-T55nURFz2Uag0PIUuDC8yGQuFaoySbMEZWKNRZ7xIGd5zjFPyjKTgGBsASJEMlGmjI_JzbA3HP7t0Le6rnyBy6VZYdN5LYVgSqQiGJPB2D_vHVq9dlVt3J8GpntuestN91B0DHrLTfe5q92BLq-x3KcGUEG-HGRrGm2-Aia9mCsmlATF_wG8DXCZ</recordid><startdate>197901</startdate><enddate>197901</enddate><creator>Hardy, Sherrie Lynn</creator><creator>Brennand, Charlotte P</creator><creator>Wyse, Bonita W</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197901</creationdate><title>Fructose: Comparison with sucrose as sweetener in four products</title><author>Hardy, Sherrie Lynn ; Brennand, Charlotte P ; Wyse, Bonita W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-18ef36134a3c97b78e8d5695e75fafe393f369bb3eb5dd971e1afc1461394d603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Food - standards</topic><topic>Fructose</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Sweetening Agents - standards</topic><topic>Taste</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Sherrie Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennand, Charlotte P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyse, Bonita W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardy, Sherrie Lynn</au><au>Brennand, Charlotte P</au><au>Wyse, Bonita W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fructose: Comparison with sucrose as sweetener in four products</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Dietetic Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Diet Assoc</addtitle><date>1979-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>41-46</pages><issn>0002-8223</issn><eissn>1878-3570</eissn><abstract>Because of a possible ban on the use of saccharin as a sweetener, alternatives, including the use of fructose, are being reevaluated. Fructose, the sweetest of the naturally occurring sugars, is 1.0-1.8 times as sweet as sucrose in similar conditions. However, it is unclear whether or not fructose has any advantages over sucrose in its effects on blood glucose levels in diabetic adults. In addition, a recent study analyzing the flavor of foods prepared with fructose instead of sucrose, indicated that fructose was not sweeter in sugar cookies, white cake, or vanilla pudding. In fact, many times sucrose was ranked as significantly sweeter</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>762341</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-8223(21)39778-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8223
ispartof Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1979-01, Vol.74 (1), p.41-46
issn 0002-8223
1878-3570
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74408464
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cooking
Food - standards
Fructose
Humans
Sucrose
Sweetening Agents - standards
Taste
title Fructose: Comparison with sucrose as sweetener in four products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fructose:%20Comparison%20with%20sucrose%20as%20sweetener%20in%20four%20products&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Dietetic%20Association&rft.au=Hardy,%20Sherrie%20Lynn&rft.date=1979-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=41-46&rft.issn=0002-8223&rft.eissn=1878-3570&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-8223(21)39778-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74408464%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74408464&rft_id=info:pmid/762341&rfr_iscdi=true