Increasing Diversity in Telecommunications Ownership and Increasing Efficiency in Spectrum Auctions by Breaking the Link between Capital Market Discrimination and FCC Spectrum Auction Outcomes

In Section 309(j)4(D) of the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is required to increase opportunities for minority groups to participate in the provision of spectrum based services. In Adarand Construction, Inc. v. Pena, the Supreme Court held that race-based governmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Review of Black political economy 2010-06, Vol.37 (2), p.131-152
1. Verfasser: Bush, Clarence Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title The Review of Black political economy
container_volume 37
creator Bush, Clarence Anthony
description In Section 309(j)4(D) of the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is required to increase opportunities for minority groups to participate in the provision of spectrum based services. In Adarand Construction, Inc. v. Pena, the Supreme Court held that race-based government programs were subject to strict scrutiny. That is race-based programs must serve a compelling governmental interest such as remedying past discrimination, and must be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. Against this backdrop, a simple theoretical model is developed that explains the relationship between capital market discrimination and outcomes in FCC spectrum auctions. Given capital market discrimination and all other factors being equal, it is shown that a minority firm has zero probability of winning in an auction for spectrum. In addition, it is proven that, if equal bidding credits are given to all firms, if there is capital market discrimination, and if all other things are equal, the minority firm has a zero probability of winning in a spectrum auction. It is shown that a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, is an inferior policy among policies that can be used to allocate spectrum. Finally, a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, results in an inefficient auction. These theoretical results and the empirical literature on capital market discrimination suggest that the FCC is implicitly discriminating against minorities through its auctioning of spectrum under conditions of discrimination in capital markets. The results imply that race-based programs are necessary/justified in order to increase diversity in telecommunications ownership and increase the efficiency of FCC Spectrum Auctions. Given possible legal remedies, the paper contains a critical “audit”/analysis of the FCC's lending practices under the FCC's installment payments. Legislative proposals for creating some new form of credit/installment payment in conjunction with some experienced financial institution(s) are summarized and reviewed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12114-009-9049-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743811076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1007_s12114-009-9049-z</sage_id><sourcerecordid>743058132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428z-a283e94e576c337d3b332d9ff994bd605ba09d7706c2d9fb24e5d6372b89553d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEEkPhAdhZbFil-BYnXpbQQqVBs6CsLcc5mbqTOMFOWs08HY-GM6kEaiU0K0v2952L9SfJe4LPCcb5p0AoITzFWKYSc5keXiQrIplIeUH4y2SFMeOp4Fy8Tt6EcIcxoaIgq-T3tTMedLBui77Ye_DBjntkHbqBFkzfdZOzRo-2dwFtHlx8v7UD0q5G_4iXTWONBWeO5o8BzOinDl1MZhGrPfoc2d3MjreA1tbtUAXjA4BDpR7sqFv0XfsdjHGIYLztrDs2PXa6KstnRdFmGuN4EN4mrxrdBnj3eJ4lP68ub8pv6Xrz9bq8WKeG0-KQalowkByyXBjG8ppVjNFaNo2UvKoFziqNZZ3nWJj5uqIRrQXLaVXILGM1O0s-LnUH3_-aIIyqi5NC22oH_RRUzllBCM7FKSTOCsLoSSQTVLJIfnhC3vWTd3FhVeSEMiayuTFZIOP7EDw0aog_qf1eEazmlKglJSqmRM0pUYfo0MUJkXVb8H8L_086f5T0Fk4R_gBF2dE0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871233656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing Diversity in Telecommunications Ownership and Increasing Efficiency in Spectrum Auctions by Breaking the Link between Capital Market Discrimination and FCC Spectrum Auction Outcomes</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Bush, Clarence Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Bush, Clarence Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>In Section 309(j)4(D) of the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is required to increase opportunities for minority groups to participate in the provision of spectrum based services. In Adarand Construction, Inc. v. Pena, the Supreme Court held that race-based government programs were subject to strict scrutiny. That is race-based programs must serve a compelling governmental interest such as remedying past discrimination, and must be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. Against this backdrop, a simple theoretical model is developed that explains the relationship between capital market discrimination and outcomes in FCC spectrum auctions. Given capital market discrimination and all other factors being equal, it is shown that a minority firm has zero probability of winning in an auction for spectrum. In addition, it is proven that, if equal bidding credits are given to all firms, if there is capital market discrimination, and if all other things are equal, the minority firm has a zero probability of winning in a spectrum auction. It is shown that a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, is an inferior policy among policies that can be used to allocate spectrum. Finally, a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, results in an inefficient auction. These theoretical results and the empirical literature on capital market discrimination suggest that the FCC is implicitly discriminating against minorities through its auctioning of spectrum under conditions of discrimination in capital markets. The results imply that race-based programs are necessary/justified in order to increase diversity in telecommunications ownership and increase the efficiency of FCC Spectrum Auctions. Given possible legal remedies, the paper contains a critical “audit”/analysis of the FCC's lending practices under the FCC's installment payments. Legislative proposals for creating some new form of credit/installment payment in conjunction with some experienced financial institution(s) are summarized and reviewed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12114-009-9049-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RBPEDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Auction theory ; Auctions ; Bidding ; Capital market ; Capital markets ; Credit ; Cultural Pluralism ; Debt financing ; Discrimination ; Economic Policy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Efficiency ; Finance ; Financial institutions ; Installment payments ; Interest rates ; Legislation ; Licenses ; Literature reviews ; Market entry ; Markets ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Ownership ; Payment systems ; Payments ; Political Science ; Proposals ; Racial discrimination ; Regulation ; Sociology ; Spectrum allocation ; Telecommunications ; U.S.A ; Variables</subject><ispartof>The Review of Black political economy, 2010-06, Vol.37 (2), p.131-152</ispartof><rights>2010 National Economic Association</rights><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428z-a283e94e576c337d3b332d9ff994bd605ba09d7706c2d9fb24e5d6372b89553d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428z-a283e94e576c337d3b332d9ff994bd605ba09d7706c2d9fb24e5d6372b89553d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1007/s12114-009-9049-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1007/s12114-009-9049-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21819,27344,27924,27925,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bush, Clarence Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing Diversity in Telecommunications Ownership and Increasing Efficiency in Spectrum Auctions by Breaking the Link between Capital Market Discrimination and FCC Spectrum Auction Outcomes</title><title>The Review of Black political economy</title><addtitle>Rev Black Polit Econ</addtitle><description>In Section 309(j)4(D) of the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is required to increase opportunities for minority groups to participate in the provision of spectrum based services. In Adarand Construction, Inc. v. Pena, the Supreme Court held that race-based government programs were subject to strict scrutiny. That is race-based programs must serve a compelling governmental interest such as remedying past discrimination, and must be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. Against this backdrop, a simple theoretical model is developed that explains the relationship between capital market discrimination and outcomes in FCC spectrum auctions. Given capital market discrimination and all other factors being equal, it is shown that a minority firm has zero probability of winning in an auction for spectrum. In addition, it is proven that, if equal bidding credits are given to all firms, if there is capital market discrimination, and if all other things are equal, the minority firm has a zero probability of winning in a spectrum auction. It is shown that a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, is an inferior policy among policies that can be used to allocate spectrum. Finally, a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, results in an inefficient auction. These theoretical results and the empirical literature on capital market discrimination suggest that the FCC is implicitly discriminating against minorities through its auctioning of spectrum under conditions of discrimination in capital markets. The results imply that race-based programs are necessary/justified in order to increase diversity in telecommunications ownership and increase the efficiency of FCC Spectrum Auctions. Given possible legal remedies, the paper contains a critical “audit”/analysis of the FCC's lending practices under the FCC's installment payments. Legislative proposals for creating some new form of credit/installment payment in conjunction with some experienced financial institution(s) are summarized and reviewed.</description><subject>Auction theory</subject><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bidding</subject><subject>Capital market</subject><subject>Capital markets</subject><subject>Credit</subject><subject>Cultural Pluralism</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Installment payments</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Market entry</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Payment systems</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Racial discrimination</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Spectrum allocation</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0034-6446</issn><issn>1936-4814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEEkPhAdhZbFil-BYnXpbQQqVBs6CsLcc5mbqTOMFOWs08HY-GM6kEaiU0K0v2952L9SfJe4LPCcb5p0AoITzFWKYSc5keXiQrIplIeUH4y2SFMeOp4Fy8Tt6EcIcxoaIgq-T3tTMedLBui77Ye_DBjntkHbqBFkzfdZOzRo-2dwFtHlx8v7UD0q5G_4iXTWONBWeO5o8BzOinDl1MZhGrPfoc2d3MjreA1tbtUAXjA4BDpR7sqFv0XfsdjHGIYLztrDs2PXa6KstnRdFmGuN4EN4mrxrdBnj3eJ4lP68ub8pv6Xrz9bq8WKeG0-KQalowkByyXBjG8ppVjNFaNo2UvKoFziqNZZ3nWJj5uqIRrQXLaVXILGM1O0s-LnUH3_-aIIyqi5NC22oH_RRUzllBCM7FKSTOCsLoSSQTVLJIfnhC3vWTd3FhVeSEMiayuTFZIOP7EDw0aog_qf1eEazmlKglJSqmRM0pUYfo0MUJkXVb8H8L_086f5T0Fk4R_gBF2dE0</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Bush, Clarence Anthony</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>Increasing Diversity in Telecommunications Ownership and Increasing Efficiency in Spectrum Auctions by Breaking the Link between Capital Market Discrimination and FCC Spectrum Auction Outcomes</title><author>Bush, Clarence Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428z-a283e94e576c337d3b332d9ff994bd605ba09d7706c2d9fb24e5d6372b89553d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Auction theory</topic><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bidding</topic><topic>Capital market</topic><topic>Capital markets</topic><topic>Credit</topic><topic>Cultural Pluralism</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Installment payments</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Market entry</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Payment systems</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Racial discrimination</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Spectrum allocation</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bush, Clarence Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Review of Black political economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bush, Clarence Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing Diversity in Telecommunications Ownership and Increasing Efficiency in Spectrum Auctions by Breaking the Link between Capital Market Discrimination and FCC Spectrum Auction Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>The Review of Black political economy</jtitle><stitle>Rev Black Polit Econ</stitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>131-152</pages><issn>0034-6446</issn><eissn>1936-4814</eissn><coden>RBPEDE</coden><abstract>In Section 309(j)4(D) of the Communications Act, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is required to increase opportunities for minority groups to participate in the provision of spectrum based services. In Adarand Construction, Inc. v. Pena, the Supreme Court held that race-based government programs were subject to strict scrutiny. That is race-based programs must serve a compelling governmental interest such as remedying past discrimination, and must be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. Against this backdrop, a simple theoretical model is developed that explains the relationship between capital market discrimination and outcomes in FCC spectrum auctions. Given capital market discrimination and all other factors being equal, it is shown that a minority firm has zero probability of winning in an auction for spectrum. In addition, it is proven that, if equal bidding credits are given to all firms, if there is capital market discrimination, and if all other things are equal, the minority firm has a zero probability of winning in a spectrum auction. It is shown that a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, is an inferior policy among policies that can be used to allocate spectrum. Finally, a policy of auctioning spectrum, when there is capital market discrimination, results in an inefficient auction. These theoretical results and the empirical literature on capital market discrimination suggest that the FCC is implicitly discriminating against minorities through its auctioning of spectrum under conditions of discrimination in capital markets. The results imply that race-based programs are necessary/justified in order to increase diversity in telecommunications ownership and increase the efficiency of FCC Spectrum Auctions. Given possible legal remedies, the paper contains a critical “audit”/analysis of the FCC's lending practices under the FCC's installment payments. Legislative proposals for creating some new form of credit/installment payment in conjunction with some experienced financial institution(s) are summarized and reviewed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1007/s12114-009-9049-z</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6446
ispartof The Review of Black political economy, 2010-06, Vol.37 (2), p.131-152
issn 0034-6446
1936-4814
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743811076
source Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Auction theory
Auctions
Bidding
Capital market
Capital markets
Credit
Cultural Pluralism
Debt financing
Discrimination
Economic Policy
Economics
Economics and Finance
Efficiency
Finance
Financial institutions
Installment payments
Interest rates
Legislation
Licenses
Literature reviews
Market entry
Markets
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Ownership
Payment systems
Payments
Political Science
Proposals
Racial discrimination
Regulation
Sociology
Spectrum allocation
Telecommunications
U.S.A
Variables
title Increasing Diversity in Telecommunications Ownership and Increasing Efficiency in Spectrum Auctions by Breaking the Link between Capital Market Discrimination and FCC Spectrum Auction Outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A14%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20Diversity%20in%20Telecommunications%20Ownership%20and%20Increasing%20Efficiency%20in%20Spectrum%20Auctions%20by%20Breaking%20the%20Link%20between%20Capital%20Market%20Discrimination%20and%20FCC%20Spectrum%20Auction%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20Black%20political%20economy&rft.au=Bush,%20Clarence%20Anthony&rft.date=2010-06&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=131-152&rft.issn=0034-6446&rft.eissn=1936-4814&rft.coden=RBPEDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12114-009-9049-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743058132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871233656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1007_s12114-009-9049-z&rfr_iscdi=true