Durkheim and the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences
The paper concentrates on Durkheim's analyses of the sciences and of the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences. The first part deals with Durkheim's description of the anomic division of scientific labor which is manifested in the lack of coordination between th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association 2009-01, Vol.1, p.3-15 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | hun |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Némedi, Dénes |
description | The paper concentrates on Durkheim's analyses of the sciences and of the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences. The first part deals with Durkheim's description of the anomic division of scientific labor which is manifested in the lack of coordination between the different branches of knowledge. It comes to the conclusion that the market model is inadequate to describe scientific exchanges and that Durkheim must have felt that. However, he was unable to define a remedy. In later works, he sketched two models which, according to him, would solve the problem of scientific exchanges. The first one was outlined in his program for the Année sociologique. There he defined sociology as an interdisciplinary venture which would coordinate the different social sciences, providing methodological unity and assuring the exchange of scientific knowledge. The second model was sketched in Durkheim's history of higher education. There he saw periods of intensive exchange, of collective scientific effervescence where spontaneous cooperation between scientists emerged. In this sense, scientific exchanges would contribute to the establishment of social solidarity itself. Durkheim's answers are inadequate but the problem of scientific cooperation and exchange remains a problem which is not satisfactorily solved. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743807546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743807546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p117t-8991f7be21ce70a7d9d4a11380b9cadbc866700ba711f6bdb15b2dc6b7ee94663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjktLw0AURmehYKn9D7NzFZg7Se5kllKfUBCKrss87phoOqm5CfrzDdXVtzh8h3MhVqABC61quBIb5g-lFGCjtcKV2N_N42dL3VG6HOXUkqSf0Lr8TvI0DoGYiaWn6Zson3HsUqKR8iT96HJoFzykM-HQUV4e1-IyuZ5p879r8fZw_7p9KnYvj8_b211xAjBT0VgLyXjSEMgoZ6KNlQMoG-VtcNGHBtEo5Z0BSOijh9rrGNAbIlshlmtx8-ddQr9m4ulw7DhQ37tMw8wHUy0uU1dY_gIkb04M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>743807546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Durkheim and the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Némedi, Dénes</creator><creatorcontrib>Némedi, Dénes</creatorcontrib><description>The paper concentrates on Durkheim's analyses of the sciences and of the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences. The first part deals with Durkheim's description of the anomic division of scientific labor which is manifested in the lack of coordination between the different branches of knowledge. It comes to the conclusion that the market model is inadequate to describe scientific exchanges and that Durkheim must have felt that. However, he was unable to define a remedy. In later works, he sketched two models which, according to him, would solve the problem of scientific exchanges. The first one was outlined in his program for the Année sociologique. There he defined sociology as an interdisciplinary venture which would coordinate the different social sciences, providing methodological unity and assuring the exchange of scientific knowledge. The second model was sketched in Durkheim's history of higher education. There he saw periods of intensive exchange, of collective scientific effervescence where spontaneous cooperation between scientists emerged. In this sense, scientific exchanges would contribute to the establishment of social solidarity itself. Durkheim's answers are inadequate but the problem of scientific cooperation and exchange remains a problem which is not satisfactorily solved. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle</description><identifier>ISSN: 1216-2051</identifier><language>hun</language><subject>Anomie ; Cooperation ; Division of labour ; Durkheim, Émile ; History of sociology ; Science ; Scientists ; Social theory ; Sociological theory ; Sociologists</subject><ispartof>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association, 2009-01, Vol.1, p.3-15</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Némedi, Dénes</creatorcontrib><title>Durkheim and the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences</title><title>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association</title><description>The paper concentrates on Durkheim's analyses of the sciences and of the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences. The first part deals with Durkheim's description of the anomic division of scientific labor which is manifested in the lack of coordination between the different branches of knowledge. It comes to the conclusion that the market model is inadequate to describe scientific exchanges and that Durkheim must have felt that. However, he was unable to define a remedy. In later works, he sketched two models which, according to him, would solve the problem of scientific exchanges. The first one was outlined in his program for the Année sociologique. There he defined sociology as an interdisciplinary venture which would coordinate the different social sciences, providing methodological unity and assuring the exchange of scientific knowledge. The second model was sketched in Durkheim's history of higher education. There he saw periods of intensive exchange, of collective scientific effervescence where spontaneous cooperation between scientists emerged. In this sense, scientific exchanges would contribute to the establishment of social solidarity itself. Durkheim's answers are inadequate but the problem of scientific cooperation and exchange remains a problem which is not satisfactorily solved. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle</description><subject>Anomie</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Division of labour</subject><subject>Durkheim, Émile</subject><subject>History of sociology</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><subject>Sociological theory</subject><subject>Sociologists</subject><issn>1216-2051</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjktLw0AURmehYKn9D7NzFZg7Se5kllKfUBCKrss87phoOqm5CfrzDdXVtzh8h3MhVqABC61quBIb5g-lFGCjtcKV2N_N42dL3VG6HOXUkqSf0Lr8TvI0DoGYiaWn6Zson3HsUqKR8iT96HJoFzykM-HQUV4e1-IyuZ5p879r8fZw_7p9KnYvj8_b211xAjBT0VgLyXjSEMgoZ6KNlQMoG-VtcNGHBtEo5Z0BSOijh9rrGNAbIlshlmtx8-ddQr9m4ulw7DhQ37tMw8wHUy0uU1dY_gIkb04M</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Némedi, Dénes</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Durkheim and the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences</title><author>Némedi, Dénes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p117t-8991f7be21ce70a7d9d4a11380b9cadbc866700ba711f6bdb15b2dc6b7ee94663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>hun</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Anomie</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Division of labour</topic><topic>Durkheim, Émile</topic><topic>History of sociology</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><topic>Sociological theory</topic><topic>Sociologists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Némedi, Dénes</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Némedi, Dénes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Durkheim and the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences</atitle><jtitle>Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>3</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>3-15</pages><issn>1216-2051</issn><abstract>The paper concentrates on Durkheim's analyses of the sciences and of the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences. The first part deals with Durkheim's description of the anomic division of scientific labor which is manifested in the lack of coordination between the different branches of knowledge. It comes to the conclusion that the market model is inadequate to describe scientific exchanges and that Durkheim must have felt that. However, he was unable to define a remedy. In later works, he sketched two models which, according to him, would solve the problem of scientific exchanges. The first one was outlined in his program for the Année sociologique. There he defined sociology as an interdisciplinary venture which would coordinate the different social sciences, providing methodological unity and assuring the exchange of scientific knowledge. The second model was sketched in Durkheim's history of higher education. There he saw periods of intensive exchange, of collective scientific effervescence where spontaneous cooperation between scientists emerged. In this sense, scientific exchanges would contribute to the establishment of social solidarity itself. Durkheim's answers are inadequate but the problem of scientific cooperation and exchange remains a problem which is not satisfactorily solved. Reprinted by permission of Szociológiai Szemle</abstract><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1216-2051 |
ispartof | Szociológiai szemle : review of sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association, 2009-01, Vol.1, p.3-15 |
issn | 1216-2051 |
language | hun |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743807546 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anomie Cooperation Division of labour Durkheim, Émile History of sociology Science Scientists Social theory Sociological theory Sociologists |
title | Durkheim and the exchange processes between the different branches of the sciences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Durkheim%20and%20the%20exchange%20processes%20between%20the%20different%20branches%20of%20the%20sciences&rft.jtitle=Szociol%C3%B3giai%20szemle%20:%20review%20of%20sociology%20of%20the%20Hungarian%20Sociological%20Association&rft.au=N%C3%A9medi,%20D%C3%A9nes&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=3-15&rft.issn=1216-2051&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E743807546%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=743807546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |