A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions

We propose a descriptive version of the classical multi-attribute utility model; to that end, we add a new parameter, momentary salience, to the customary formulation. The addition of this parameter allows the theory to accommodate changes in the decision maker’s mood and circumstances, as the salie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theory and decision 2010-02, Vol.68 (1-2), p.101-114
Hauptverfasser: Weiss, Jie W., Weiss, David J., Edwards, Ward
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 101
container_title Theory and decision
container_volume 68
creator Weiss, Jie W.
Weiss, David J.
Edwards, Ward
description We propose a descriptive version of the classical multi-attribute utility model; to that end, we add a new parameter, momentary salience, to the customary formulation. The addition of this parameter allows the theory to accommodate changes in the decision maker’s mood and circumstances, as the saliencies of anticipated consequences are driven by concerns of the moment. By allowing for the number of consequences given attention at the moment of decision to vary, the new model mutes the criticism that SEU models call for an omniscient decision maker. Use of the model is illustrated with a large-scale longitudinal study showing that adolescent smokers have higher utility for smoking than nonsmokers. We also propose to use the model hierarchically to describe everyday decisions that people deal with repeatedly. Big decisions, which set policy, guide a host of nested little decisions, which in turn lead to action. For a little decision, one of the options will be consistent with the policy, and will inherit its high utility. Accordingly, most little decisions will be made quickly and will follow the policy. However, people do sometimes decide to violate their own policies, and we describe how these lapses can lead to collapse of the policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11238-009-9155-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743802646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1266757255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c87b5440c10ff111d9a7ea7ae0ba2d07b8705a67f181452cafc5896b8b972a913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFLJDEQhYO44Oj6A7w1griXuFXpTlf6qIOrgrCX3XNIp9MS6ekek7Qw_94MIwqC4qkO9dXjvXqMnSBcIAD9joiiVByg4Q1KyXGPLVBSyQkV7bMFQAVcqrI8YIcxPgKAUiQX7Oqy6Fy0wa-Tf3bFah6S5yal4Ns5uWJOfvBpU6ymzg1FP4XCPbuw6cwmn1kf_TTGn-xHb4bojl_nEfv_5_rf8pbf_725W17ecytBJm4VtbKqwCL0PSJ2jSFnyDhojeiAWkUgTU09KqyksKa3UjV1q9qGhGmwPGLnO911mJ5mF5Ne-WjdMJjRTXPUVJUKRF3V3yGB6kZVmfz1JYmirkmSkDKjpx_Qx2kOY06sRf49ITUiQ7iDbJhiDK7X6-BXJmw0gt4WpXdF6VyU3halt7nOXoVNtGbogxnzZ98OhagAsovMiR0X82p8cOHdwOfiL7bcoSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212371792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Weiss, Jie W. ; Weiss, David J. ; Edwards, Ward</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jie W. ; Weiss, David J. ; Edwards, Ward</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a descriptive version of the classical multi-attribute utility model; to that end, we add a new parameter, momentary salience, to the customary formulation. The addition of this parameter allows the theory to accommodate changes in the decision maker’s mood and circumstances, as the saliencies of anticipated consequences are driven by concerns of the moment. By allowing for the number of consequences given attention at the moment of decision to vary, the new model mutes the criticism that SEU models call for an omniscient decision maker. Use of the model is illustrated with a large-scale longitudinal study showing that adolescent smokers have higher utility for smoking than nonsmokers. We also propose to use the model hierarchically to describe everyday decisions that people deal with repeatedly. Big decisions, which set policy, guide a host of nested little decisions, which in turn lead to action. For a little decision, one of the options will be consistent with the policy, and will inherit its high utility. Accordingly, most little decisions will be made quickly and will follow the policy. However, people do sometimes decide to violate their own policies, and we describe how these lapses can lead to collapse of the policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7187</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11238-009-9155-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: THDCBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Applied sciences ; Behavioral/Experimental Economics ; Collapse ; Decision making ; Decision theory. Utility theory ; Decisions ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Exact sciences and technology ; Expected utility ; Expected values ; Finance ; Game Theory ; Hierarchy ; Insurance ; Management ; Mathematical models ; Moods ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Policies ; Preferences ; Public health ; Smoking ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Statistics for Business ; Students ; Studies ; Utilities ; Utility functions ; Utility measurement ; Utility theory</subject><ispartof>Theory and decision, 2010-02, Vol.68 (1-2), p.101-114</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c87b5440c10ff111d9a7ea7ae0ba2d07b8705a67f181452cafc5896b8b972a913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c87b5440c10ff111d9a7ea7ae0ba2d07b8705a67f181452cafc5896b8b972a913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11238-009-9155-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-009-9155-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22400667$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jie W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ward</creatorcontrib><title>A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions</title><title>Theory and decision</title><addtitle>Theory Decis</addtitle><description>We propose a descriptive version of the classical multi-attribute utility model; to that end, we add a new parameter, momentary salience, to the customary formulation. The addition of this parameter allows the theory to accommodate changes in the decision maker’s mood and circumstances, as the saliencies of anticipated consequences are driven by concerns of the moment. By allowing for the number of consequences given attention at the moment of decision to vary, the new model mutes the criticism that SEU models call for an omniscient decision maker. Use of the model is illustrated with a large-scale longitudinal study showing that adolescent smokers have higher utility for smoking than nonsmokers. We also propose to use the model hierarchically to describe everyday decisions that people deal with repeatedly. Big decisions, which set policy, guide a host of nested little decisions, which in turn lead to action. For a little decision, one of the options will be consistent with the policy, and will inherit its high utility. Accordingly, most little decisions will be made quickly and will follow the policy. However, people do sometimes decide to violate their own policies, and we describe how these lapses can lead to collapse of the policy.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory. Utility theory</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Hierarchy</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moods</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Statistics for Business</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Utility measurement</subject><subject>Utility theory</subject><issn>0040-5833</issn><issn>1573-7187</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFLJDEQhYO44Oj6A7w1griXuFXpTlf6qIOrgrCX3XNIp9MS6ekek7Qw_94MIwqC4qkO9dXjvXqMnSBcIAD9joiiVByg4Q1KyXGPLVBSyQkV7bMFQAVcqrI8YIcxPgKAUiQX7Oqy6Fy0wa-Tf3bFah6S5yal4Ns5uWJOfvBpU6ymzg1FP4XCPbuw6cwmn1kf_TTGn-xHb4bojl_nEfv_5_rf8pbf_725W17ecytBJm4VtbKqwCL0PSJ2jSFnyDhojeiAWkUgTU09KqyksKa3UjV1q9qGhGmwPGLnO911mJ5mF5Ne-WjdMJjRTXPUVJUKRF3V3yGB6kZVmfz1JYmirkmSkDKjpx_Qx2kOY06sRf49ITUiQ7iDbJhiDK7X6-BXJmw0gt4WpXdF6VyU3halt7nOXoVNtGbogxnzZ98OhagAsovMiR0X82p8cOHdwOfiL7bcoSI</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Weiss, Jie W.</creator><creator>Weiss, David J.</creator><creator>Edwards, Ward</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions</title><author>Weiss, Jie W. ; Weiss, David J. ; Edwards, Ward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c87b5440c10ff111d9a7ea7ae0ba2d07b8705a67f181452cafc5896b8b972a913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory. Utility theory</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Hierarchy</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moods</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Statistics for Business</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Utility measurement</topic><topic>Utility theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jie W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Ward</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Theory and decision</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiss, Jie W.</au><au>Weiss, David J.</au><au>Edwards, Ward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions</atitle><jtitle>Theory and decision</jtitle><stitle>Theory Decis</stitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>101-114</pages><issn>0040-5833</issn><eissn>1573-7187</eissn><coden>THDCBA</coden><abstract>We propose a descriptive version of the classical multi-attribute utility model; to that end, we add a new parameter, momentary salience, to the customary formulation. The addition of this parameter allows the theory to accommodate changes in the decision maker’s mood and circumstances, as the saliencies of anticipated consequences are driven by concerns of the moment. By allowing for the number of consequences given attention at the moment of decision to vary, the new model mutes the criticism that SEU models call for an omniscient decision maker. Use of the model is illustrated with a large-scale longitudinal study showing that adolescent smokers have higher utility for smoking than nonsmokers. We also propose to use the model hierarchically to describe everyday decisions that people deal with repeatedly. Big decisions, which set policy, guide a host of nested little decisions, which in turn lead to action. For a little decision, one of the options will be consistent with the policy, and will inherit its high utility. Accordingly, most little decisions will be made quickly and will follow the policy. However, people do sometimes decide to violate their own policies, and we describe how these lapses can lead to collapse of the policy.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11238-009-9155-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-5833
ispartof Theory and decision, 2010-02, Vol.68 (1-2), p.101-114
issn 0040-5833
1573-7187
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743802646
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adolescents
Applied sciences
Behavioral/Experimental Economics
Collapse
Decision making
Decision theory. Utility theory
Decisions
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Exact sciences and technology
Expected utility
Expected values
Finance
Game Theory
Hierarchy
Insurance
Management
Mathematical models
Moods
Operational research and scientific management
Operational research. Management science
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Policies
Preferences
Public health
Smoking
Social and Behav. Sciences
Statistics for Business
Students
Studies
Utilities
Utility functions
Utility measurement
Utility theory
title A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20descriptive%20multi-attribute%20utility%20model%20for%20everyday%20decisions&rft.jtitle=Theory%20and%20decision&rft.au=Weiss,%20Jie%20W.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=101-114&rft.issn=0040-5833&rft.eissn=1573-7187&rft.coden=THDCBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11238-009-9155-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1266757255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212371792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true