Family Provisioning Is Not the Only Reason Men Hunt: A Comment on Gurven and Hill
Hawkes, O'Connell, and Coxworth comment on Gurven and Hill criticisms on family provisioning which is not the only reason men hunt. According to him, Gurven and Hill imply that he and his colleagues previous work inappropriately discounted the contribution of men's hunting to Ache and Hadz...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current anthropology 2010-04, Vol.51 (2), p.259-264 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 264 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 259 |
| container_title | Current anthropology |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Hawkes, Kristen O’Connell, James F. Coxworth, James E. |
| description | Hawkes, O'Connell, and Coxworth comment on Gurven and Hill criticisms on family provisioning which is not the only reason men hunt. According to him, Gurven and Hill imply that he and his colleagues previous work inappropriately discounted the contribution of men's hunting to Ache and Hadza diets. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/651074 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743799969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/651074</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/651074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-74bcd387d3c94ade0d9205e3875950f085b9f161b8b1eb549771cef391df1b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtaqvyEo6Gl1ZpNsNkcp1haqFdFz2I-sbtkmNdkV-u-NrCfB08A7D8PwEnKOcIOQZ7eZQJD8gExQMJkIlqeHZAKAmLAU-DE5CWEDAEqgnBA2L7Ztt6fP3n21oXW2te90GeiT62n_YejaxuWLKYKz9NFYuhhsf0qOmqIL5ux3Tsnb_P51tkhW64fl7G6VVKlkfSJ5WdUslzWrFC9qA7VKQZiYCCWggVyUqsEMy7xEUwqupMTKNExh3cSwZlNyPd7defc5mNDrbRsq03WFNW4IWnImlVKZivLij9y4wdv4nE6ZhJynQkR0NaLKuxC8afTOt9vC7zWC_mlOj81FeDnCTeid_099A281aA8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>237084255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family Provisioning Is Not the Only Reason Men Hunt: A Comment on Gurven and Hill</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hawkes, Kristen ; O’Connell, James F. ; Coxworth, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Kristen ; O’Connell, James F. ; Coxworth, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>Hawkes, O'Connell, and Coxworth comment on Gurven and Hill criticisms on family provisioning which is not the only reason men hunt. According to him, Gurven and Hill imply that he and his colleagues previous work inappropriately discounted the contribution of men's hunting to Ache and Hadza diets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/651074</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUANAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Cultural anthropology ; Cultural heritage ; Discourse analysis ; Families & family life ; Family studies ; Hunting ; Income ; Literary criticism ; Masculinity ; Men</subject><ispartof>Current anthropology, 2010-04, Vol.51 (2), p.259-264</ispartof><rights>2010 by The Wenner‐Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-74bcd387d3c94ade0d9205e3875950f085b9f161b8b1eb549771cef391df1b8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27907,27908,33757</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coxworth, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Family Provisioning Is Not the Only Reason Men Hunt: A Comment on Gurven and Hill</title><title>Current anthropology</title><description>Hawkes, O'Connell, and Coxworth comment on Gurven and Hill criticisms on family provisioning which is not the only reason men hunt. According to him, Gurven and Hill imply that he and his colleagues previous work inappropriately discounted the contribution of men's hunting to Ache and Hadza diets.</description><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family studies</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Men</subject><issn>0011-3204</issn><issn>1537-5382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtaqvyEo6Gl1ZpNsNkcp1haqFdFz2I-sbtkmNdkV-u-NrCfB08A7D8PwEnKOcIOQZ7eZQJD8gExQMJkIlqeHZAKAmLAU-DE5CWEDAEqgnBA2L7Ztt6fP3n21oXW2te90GeiT62n_YejaxuWLKYKz9NFYuhhsf0qOmqIL5ux3Tsnb_P51tkhW64fl7G6VVKlkfSJ5WdUslzWrFC9qA7VKQZiYCCWggVyUqsEMy7xEUwqupMTKNExh3cSwZlNyPd7defc5mNDrbRsq03WFNW4IWnImlVKZivLij9y4wdv4nE6ZhJynQkR0NaLKuxC8afTOt9vC7zWC_mlOj81FeDnCTeid_099A281aA8</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Hawkes, Kristen</creator><creator>O’Connell, James F.</creator><creator>Coxworth, James E.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Family Provisioning Is Not the Only Reason Men Hunt</title><author>Hawkes, Kristen ; O’Connell, James F. ; Coxworth, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-74bcd387d3c94ade0d9205e3875950f085b9f161b8b1eb549771cef391df1b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family studies</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Men</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coxworth, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hawkes, Kristen</au><au>O’Connell, James F.</au><au>Coxworth, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family Provisioning Is Not the Only Reason Men Hunt: A Comment on Gurven and Hill</atitle><jtitle>Current anthropology</jtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>259-264</pages><issn>0011-3204</issn><eissn>1537-5382</eissn><coden>CUANAX</coden><abstract>Hawkes, O'Connell, and Coxworth comment on Gurven and Hill criticisms on family provisioning which is not the only reason men hunt. According to him, Gurven and Hill imply that he and his colleagues previous work inappropriately discounted the contribution of men's hunting to Ache and Hadza diets.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/651074</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0011-3204 |
| ispartof | Current anthropology, 2010-04, Vol.51 (2), p.259-264 |
| issn | 0011-3204 1537-5382 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743799969 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Cultural anthropology Cultural heritage Discourse analysis Families & family life Family studies Hunting Income Literary criticism Masculinity Men |
| title | Family Provisioning Is Not the Only Reason Men Hunt: A Comment on Gurven and Hill |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A05%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20Provisioning%20Is%20Not%20the%20Only%20Reason%20Men%20Hunt:%20A%20Comment%20on%20Gurven%20and%20Hill&rft.jtitle=Current%20anthropology&rft.au=Hawkes,%20Kristen&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=259-264&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.coden=CUANAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/651074&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/651074%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=237084255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/651074&rfr_iscdi=true |