The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory

Since planning is a normative activity one would expect public planning to be based on moral foundations. Unfortunately, post-WWII mainstream planning theory became divorced from ethical theory. Ironically, this cleavage reflected an erroneous shared premise—that each discipline was technical in nat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of planning education and research 1992-01, Vol.11 (2), p.105-116
Hauptverfasser: Harper, Thomas L., Stein, Stanley M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title Journal of planning education and research
container_volume 11
creator Harper, Thomas L.
Stein, Stanley M.
description Since planning is a normative activity one would expect public planning to be based on moral foundations. Unfortunately, post-WWII mainstream planning theory became divorced from ethical theory. Ironically, this cleavage reflected an erroneous shared premise—that each discipline was technical in nature and should eschew value questions. This fallacious premise is now largely rejected. Contemporary planning theory fully recognizes the inherently normative nature of public planning processes. However, it still makes little use of normative ethical theory to illuminate the issues raised by this recognition. In this article we will present a spectrum of five normative ethical theories and show how these theories provide the underlying normative foundation for six theories of planning. Thus many debates about planning theories can be understood as debates about underlying normative ethical theories
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0739456X9201100203
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743629721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0739456X9201100203</sage_id><sourcerecordid>743629721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-5d97ca9358a904eec90590c861a30ad2f31d05b94d6a527f160d561d604ce1633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFNuntZOkk3SHGWpVinqoYK3ELPZdsvupiap0H9vSnsTPA3DfG947yF0S-CeECknIJkqufhUFAgBoMDO0IhwTgvBpTxHowNQHIhLdBXjJiOkZHKEXpZrhys3pGC6Nu2xb_CrD71J7Y_Ds7RurelwZnzY4-Rx5Yfk-q0PJu_vnRmGdlid7tfoojFddDenOUYfj7NlNS8Wb0_P1cOisFSwVPBaSWsU41OjoHTOKuAK7FQQw8DUtGGkBv6lyloYTmVDBNRckFpAaR0RjI3R3fHvNvjvnYtJ9220rstunN9FLUsmqJKUZJIeSRt8jME1ehvaPlvXBPShN_23tyyaHEXRrJze-F0Ycpr_FL-yxG0L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>743629721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Harper, Thomas L. ; Stein, Stanley M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harper, Thomas L. ; Stein, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><description>Since planning is a normative activity one would expect public planning to be based on moral foundations. Unfortunately, post-WWII mainstream planning theory became divorced from ethical theory. Ironically, this cleavage reflected an erroneous shared premise—that each discipline was technical in nature and should eschew value questions. This fallacious premise is now largely rejected. Contemporary planning theory fully recognizes the inherently normative nature of public planning processes. However, it still makes little use of normative ethical theory to illuminate the issues raised by this recognition. In this article we will present a spectrum of five normative ethical theories and show how these theories provide the underlying normative foundation for six theories of planning. Thus many debates about planning theories can be understood as debates about underlying normative ethical theories</description><identifier>ISSN: 0739-456X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9201100203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of planning education and research, 1992-01, Vol.11 (2), p.105-116</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-5d97ca9358a904eec90590c861a30ad2f31d05b94d6a527f160d561d604ce1633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-5d97ca9358a904eec90590c861a30ad2f31d05b94d6a527f160d561d604ce1633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0739456X9201100203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0739456X9201100203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harper, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory</title><title>Journal of planning education and research</title><description>Since planning is a normative activity one would expect public planning to be based on moral foundations. Unfortunately, post-WWII mainstream planning theory became divorced from ethical theory. Ironically, this cleavage reflected an erroneous shared premise—that each discipline was technical in nature and should eschew value questions. This fallacious premise is now largely rejected. Contemporary planning theory fully recognizes the inherently normative nature of public planning processes. However, it still makes little use of normative ethical theory to illuminate the issues raised by this recognition. In this article we will present a spectrum of five normative ethical theories and show how these theories provide the underlying normative foundation for six theories of planning. Thus many debates about planning theories can be understood as debates about underlying normative ethical theories</description><issn>0739-456X</issn><issn>1552-6577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFNuntZOkk3SHGWpVinqoYK3ELPZdsvupiap0H9vSnsTPA3DfG947yF0S-CeECknIJkqufhUFAgBoMDO0IhwTgvBpTxHowNQHIhLdBXjJiOkZHKEXpZrhys3pGC6Nu2xb_CrD71J7Y_Ds7RurelwZnzY4-Rx5Yfk-q0PJu_vnRmGdlid7tfoojFddDenOUYfj7NlNS8Wb0_P1cOisFSwVPBaSWsU41OjoHTOKuAK7FQQw8DUtGGkBv6lyloYTmVDBNRckFpAaR0RjI3R3fHvNvjvnYtJ9220rstunN9FLUsmqJKUZJIeSRt8jME1ehvaPlvXBPShN_23tyyaHEXRrJze-F0Ycpr_FL-yxG0L</recordid><startdate>199201</startdate><enddate>199201</enddate><creator>Harper, Thomas L.</creator><creator>Stein, Stanley M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199201</creationdate><title>The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory</title><author>Harper, Thomas L. ; Stein, Stanley M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-5d97ca9358a904eec90590c861a30ad2f31d05b94d6a527f160d561d604ce1633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harper, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Stanley M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of planning education and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harper, Thomas L.</au><au>Stein, Stanley M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of planning education and research</jtitle><date>1992-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>105-116</pages><issn>0739-456X</issn><eissn>1552-6577</eissn><abstract>Since planning is a normative activity one would expect public planning to be based on moral foundations. Unfortunately, post-WWII mainstream planning theory became divorced from ethical theory. Ironically, this cleavage reflected an erroneous shared premise—that each discipline was technical in nature and should eschew value questions. This fallacious premise is now largely rejected. Contemporary planning theory fully recognizes the inherently normative nature of public planning processes. However, it still makes little use of normative ethical theory to illuminate the issues raised by this recognition. In this article we will present a spectrum of five normative ethical theories and show how these theories provide the underlying normative foundation for six theories of planning. Thus many debates about planning theories can be understood as debates about underlying normative ethical theories</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0739456X9201100203</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0739-456X
ispartof Journal of planning education and research, 1992-01, Vol.11 (2), p.105-116
issn 0739-456X
1552-6577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743629721
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A06%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Centrality%20of%20Normative%20Ethical%20Theory%20to%20Contemporary%20Planning%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20planning%20education%20and%20research&rft.au=Harper,%20Thomas%20L.&rft.date=1992-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=105-116&rft.issn=0739-456X&rft.eissn=1552-6577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0739456X9201100203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743629721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=743629721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0739456X9201100203&rfr_iscdi=true