Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis
Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2010-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1379-1388 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1388 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1379 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Zhao, Xiaoli Ma, Chunbo Hong, Dongyue |
description | Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743561224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421509008490</els_id><sourcerecordid>1941080211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEQxxtRcFx9Ai-NoJ66TeWzW_Ag4ycMeFE8hky6ZidDT7pNehb6tu_gydfbJ7HaWfbgYQOVFMWv_qnkXxTPgdXAQL851BjHoa85Y20NUDNoHxQraIyotDHmYbFigkElOajHxZOcD4wx2bRyVbif-7nsQleu9yG6m-s_ucSI6XIuQ5ww5jAtmU_oMpbdKYV4WULbNjfXv-ky_bb8gH44jgOBYYili11JgwQ_U-r6OYf8tHi0c33GZ7fnRfHj08fv6y_V5tvnr-v3m8orpabKaFJ1gNxL7jvpW2Wkl84zA4i8c1QzmkOnpNmqrWpAc8StEZy1fufQiYvi9Vl3TMOvE-bJHkP22Pcu4nDK1kihNHAuiXx1LykMbzhoTeCL_8DDcEr0rmw5U0IyoYEgcYZ8GnJOuLNjCkeXZgvMLu7Yg_3njl3csQCW3KGuzbkr4Yj-rgVpRVzgKyucaGibKTgjLeHCUqMYKUAYEhNNY_fTkeRe3k7qsnf9LrnoQ76T5Vy1jP6KuHdnDsmJq4DJZh8weuxCQj_Zbgj3jv0XNTjAfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205340361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Zhao, Xiaoli ; Ma, Chunbo ; Hong, Dongyue</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoli ; Ma, Chunbo ; Hong, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; China ; China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy ; China’s energy consumption ; Decomposition ; Economic data ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy economics ; Energy efficiency ; Energy policy ; Energy price policy ; Energy prices ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Industrial policy ; Industrial production ; Industrial structure ; Methodology. Modelling ; Power demand ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2010-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1379-1388</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4006,27865,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22590732$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a38_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a1379-1388.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><title>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy</subject><subject>China’s energy consumption</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy price policy</subject><subject>Energy prices</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Industrial policy</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Industrial structure</subject><subject>Methodology. Modelling</subject><subject>Power demand</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEQxxtRcFx9Ai-NoJ66TeWzW_Ag4ycMeFE8hky6ZidDT7pNehb6tu_gydfbJ7HaWfbgYQOVFMWv_qnkXxTPgdXAQL851BjHoa85Y20NUDNoHxQraIyotDHmYbFigkElOajHxZOcD4wx2bRyVbif-7nsQleu9yG6m-s_ucSI6XIuQ5ww5jAtmU_oMpbdKYV4WULbNjfXv-ky_bb8gH44jgOBYYili11JgwQ_U-r6OYf8tHi0c33GZ7fnRfHj08fv6y_V5tvnr-v3m8orpabKaFJ1gNxL7jvpW2Wkl84zA4i8c1QzmkOnpNmqrWpAc8StEZy1fufQiYvi9Vl3TMOvE-bJHkP22Pcu4nDK1kihNHAuiXx1LykMbzhoTeCL_8DDcEr0rmw5U0IyoYEgcYZ8GnJOuLNjCkeXZgvMLu7Yg_3njl3csQCW3KGuzbkr4Yj-rgVpRVzgKyucaGibKTgjLeHCUqMYKUAYEhNNY_fTkeRe3k7qsnf9LrnoQ76T5Vy1jP6KuHdnDsmJq4DJZh8weuxCQj_Zbgj3jv0XNTjAfw</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Zhao, Xiaoli</creator><creator>Ma, Chunbo</creator><creator>Hong, Dongyue</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</title><author>Zhao, Xiaoli ; Ma, Chunbo ; Hong, Dongyue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy</topic><topic>China’s energy consumption</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy price policy</topic><topic>Energy prices</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Industrial policy</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Industrial structure</topic><topic>Methodology. Modelling</topic><topic>Power demand</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Xiaoli</au><au>Ma, Chunbo</au><au>Hong, Dongyue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1379</spage><epage>1388</epage><pages>1379-1388</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2010-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1379-1388 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743561224 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Applied sciences China China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy China’s energy consumption Decomposition Economic data Energy Energy consumption Energy economics Energy efficiency Energy policy Energy price policy Energy prices Exact sciences and technology General, economic and professional studies Industrial policy Industrial production Industrial structure Methodology. Modelling Power demand Studies |
title | Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A00%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20did%20China%E2%80%99s%20energy%20intensity%20increase%20during%201998%E2%80%932006:%20Decomposition%20and%20policy%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Zhao,%20Xiaoli&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1379&rft.epage=1388&rft.pages=1379-1388&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1941080211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205340361&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421509008490&rfr_iscdi=true |