Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis

Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2010-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1379-1388
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Xiaoli, Ma, Chunbo, Hong, Dongyue
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1388
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1379
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 38
creator Zhao, Xiaoli
Ma, Chunbo
Hong, Dongyue
description Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743561224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421509008490</els_id><sourcerecordid>1941080211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEQxxtRcFx9Ai-NoJ66TeWzW_Ag4ycMeFE8hky6ZidDT7pNehb6tu_gydfbJ7HaWfbgYQOVFMWv_qnkXxTPgdXAQL851BjHoa85Y20NUDNoHxQraIyotDHmYbFigkElOajHxZOcD4wx2bRyVbif-7nsQleu9yG6m-s_ucSI6XIuQ5ww5jAtmU_oMpbdKYV4WULbNjfXv-ky_bb8gH44jgOBYYili11JgwQ_U-r6OYf8tHi0c33GZ7fnRfHj08fv6y_V5tvnr-v3m8orpabKaFJ1gNxL7jvpW2Wkl84zA4i8c1QzmkOnpNmqrWpAc8StEZy1fufQiYvi9Vl3TMOvE-bJHkP22Pcu4nDK1kihNHAuiXx1LykMbzhoTeCL_8DDcEr0rmw5U0IyoYEgcYZ8GnJOuLNjCkeXZgvMLu7Yg_3njl3csQCW3KGuzbkr4Yj-rgVpRVzgKyucaGibKTgjLeHCUqMYKUAYEhNNY_fTkeRe3k7qsnf9LrnoQ76T5Vy1jP6KuHdnDsmJq4DJZh8weuxCQj_Zbgj3jv0XNTjAfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205340361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Zhao, Xiaoli ; Ma, Chunbo ; Hong, Dongyue</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoli ; Ma, Chunbo ; Hong, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; China ; China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy ; China’s energy consumption ; Decomposition ; Economic data ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy economics ; Energy efficiency ; Energy policy ; Energy price policy ; Energy prices ; Exact sciences and technology ; General, economic and professional studies ; Industrial policy ; Industrial production ; Industrial structure ; Methodology. Modelling ; Power demand ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2010-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1379-1388</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4006,27865,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22590732$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a38_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a1379-1388.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><title>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy</subject><subject>China’s energy consumption</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Economic data</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy price policy</subject><subject>Energy prices</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General, economic and professional studies</subject><subject>Industrial policy</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Industrial structure</subject><subject>Methodology. Modelling</subject><subject>Power demand</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEQxxtRcFx9Ai-NoJ66TeWzW_Ag4ycMeFE8hky6ZidDT7pNehb6tu_gydfbJ7HaWfbgYQOVFMWv_qnkXxTPgdXAQL851BjHoa85Y20NUDNoHxQraIyotDHmYbFigkElOajHxZOcD4wx2bRyVbif-7nsQleu9yG6m-s_ucSI6XIuQ5ww5jAtmU_oMpbdKYV4WULbNjfXv-ky_bb8gH44jgOBYYili11JgwQ_U-r6OYf8tHi0c33GZ7fnRfHj08fv6y_V5tvnr-v3m8orpabKaFJ1gNxL7jvpW2Wkl84zA4i8c1QzmkOnpNmqrWpAc8StEZy1fufQiYvi9Vl3TMOvE-bJHkP22Pcu4nDK1kihNHAuiXx1LykMbzhoTeCL_8DDcEr0rmw5U0IyoYEgcYZ8GnJOuLNjCkeXZgvMLu7Yg_3njl3csQCW3KGuzbkr4Yj-rgVpRVzgKyucaGibKTgjLeHCUqMYKUAYEhNNY_fTkeRe3k7qsnf9LrnoQ76T5Vy1jP6KuHdnDsmJq4DJZh8weuxCQj_Zbgj3jv0XNTjAfw</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Zhao, Xiaoli</creator><creator>Ma, Chunbo</creator><creator>Hong, Dongyue</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</title><author>Zhao, Xiaoli ; Ma, Chunbo ; Hong, Dongyue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-76998a1e2c42cd4c9574c4ac071ee2dacd47621d547b5b58162eeb73209cfaea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy</topic><topic>China’s energy consumption</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Economic data</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy price policy</topic><topic>Energy prices</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General, economic and professional studies</topic><topic>Industrial policy</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Industrial structure</topic><topic>Methodology. Modelling</topic><topic>Power demand</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Dongyue</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Xiaoli</au><au>Ma, Chunbo</au><au>Hong, Dongyue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1379</spage><epage>1388</epage><pages>1379-1388</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Despite the fact that China’s energy intensity has continuously decreased during the 1980s and mostly 1990s, the decreasing trend has reversed since 1998 and the past few years have witnessed rapid increase in China’s energy intensity. We firstly conduct an index decomposition analysis to identify the key forces behind the increase. It is found that: (1) the high energy demand in industrial sectors is mainly attributed to expansion of production scale, especially in energy-intensive industries; (2) energy saving mainly comes from efficiency improvement, with energy-intensive sectors making the largest contribution; and (3) a heavier industrial structure also contributes to the increase. This study also makes the first attempt to bridge the quantitative decomposition analysis with qualitative policy analyses and fill the gap between decomposition results and policy relevance in previous work. We argue that: (1) energy efficiency improvement in energy-intensive sectors is mainly due to the industrial policies that have been implemented in the past few years; (2) low energy prices have directly contributed to high industrial energy consumption and indirectly to the heavy industrial structure. We provide policy suggestions in the end.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2010-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1379-1388
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743561224
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Applied sciences
China
China's energy consumption Industrial policy Energy price policy
China’s energy consumption
Decomposition
Economic data
Energy
Energy consumption
Energy economics
Energy efficiency
Energy policy
Energy price policy
Energy prices
Exact sciences and technology
General, economic and professional studies
Industrial policy
Industrial production
Industrial structure
Methodology. Modelling
Power demand
Studies
title Why did China’s energy intensity increase during 1998–2006: Decomposition and policy analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A00%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20did%20China%E2%80%99s%20energy%20intensity%20increase%20during%201998%E2%80%932006:%20Decomposition%20and%20policy%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Zhao,%20Xiaoli&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1379&rft.epage=1388&rft.pages=1379-1388&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1941080211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205340361&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421509008490&rfr_iscdi=true