The myths about e-learning in higher education
Proponents have marketed e‐learning by focusing on its adoption as the right thing to do while disregarding, among other things, the concerns of the potential users, the adverse effects on users and the existing research on the use of e‐learning or related innovations. In this paper, the e‐learning‐...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of educational technology 2010-03, Vol.41 (2), p.199-212 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | British journal of educational technology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Njenga, James Kariuki Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry |
description | Proponents have marketed e‐learning by focusing on its adoption as the right thing to do while disregarding, among other things, the concerns of the potential users, the adverse effects on users and the existing research on the use of e‐learning or related innovations. In this paper, the e‐learning‐adoption proponents are referred to as the technopositivists. It is argued that most of the technopositivists in the higher education context are driven by a personal agenda, with the aim of propagating a technopositivist ideology to stakeholders. The technopositivist ideology is defined as a ‘compulsive enthusiasm’ about e‐learning in higher education that is being created, propagated and channelled repeatedly by the people who are set to gain without giving the educators the time and opportunity to explore the dangers and rewards of e‐learning on teaching and learning. Ten myths on e‐learning that the technopositivists have used are presented with the aim of initiating effective and constructive dialogue, rather than merely criticising the efforts being made. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743508573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ872751</ericid><sourcerecordid>743508573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-b4bfc05a48af7d243baa5d59095d7a88ce51a3b0270dc539c81183961eda32b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLFu2zAURYmiAeo6_YMMQpZOUh5F0aSGDK3rxEmMtIOLjA8URdt0ZckhJdT--1BR4CFTuJDEvefh4RASUUhoOFfbhGYTEUvOeJICyAQgD9nhExmdgs9kBAAipkDZF_LV-234AuPZiCTLjYl2x3bjI1U0XRuZuDLK1bZeR7aONna9MS4yZadVa5v6nJytVOXNt7d7TP7ezJbTebz4fXs3_bGIdcYoxEVWrDRwlUm1EmWasUIpXvIccl4KJaU2nCpWQCqg1JzlWlIqWT6hplQsLVI2Jt-HuXvXPHfGt7izXpuqUrVpOo8iYxwkFyw0L981t03n6rAcpmkuZEZzGUpyKGnXeO_MCvfO7pQ7IgXsNeIWe1vY28JeI75qxENALwbUOKtP2OxeilRwGuLrIf5vK3P88Fj8eT9bhlfg44G3vjWHE6_cP5wIJjg-Pd7ifPHwZ8rhF3L2AgJgjqM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229784198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The myths about e-learning in higher education</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Njenga, James Kariuki ; Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry</creator><creatorcontrib>Njenga, James Kariuki ; Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry</creatorcontrib><description>Proponents have marketed e‐learning by focusing on its adoption as the right thing to do while disregarding, among other things, the concerns of the potential users, the adverse effects on users and the existing research on the use of e‐learning or related innovations. In this paper, the e‐learning‐adoption proponents are referred to as the technopositivists. It is argued that most of the technopositivists in the higher education context are driven by a personal agenda, with the aim of propagating a technopositivist ideology to stakeholders. The technopositivist ideology is defined as a ‘compulsive enthusiasm’ about e‐learning in higher education that is being created, propagated and channelled repeatedly by the people who are set to gain without giving the educators the time and opportunity to explore the dangers and rewards of e‐learning on teaching and learning. Ten myths on e‐learning that the technopositivists have used are presented with the aim of initiating effective and constructive dialogue, rather than merely criticising the efforts being made.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJETAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>CAI ; Computer assisted instruction ; Criticism ; Educational Policy ; Educational Technology ; Educational Trends ; Electronic Learning ; Higher Education ; Ideology ; Innovations ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Misconceptions ; Mythology ; Online instruction ; Program Implementation ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational technology, 2010-03, Vol.41 (2), p.199-212</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 British Educational Communications and Technology Agency</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2010 Becta</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-b4bfc05a48af7d243baa5d59095d7a88ce51a3b0270dc539c81183961eda32b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-b4bfc05a48af7d243baa5d59095d7a88ce51a3b0270dc539c81183961eda32b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8535.2008.00910.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8535.2008.00910.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ872751$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Njenga, James Kariuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry</creatorcontrib><title>The myths about e-learning in higher education</title><title>British journal of educational technology</title><description>Proponents have marketed e‐learning by focusing on its adoption as the right thing to do while disregarding, among other things, the concerns of the potential users, the adverse effects on users and the existing research on the use of e‐learning or related innovations. In this paper, the e‐learning‐adoption proponents are referred to as the technopositivists. It is argued that most of the technopositivists in the higher education context are driven by a personal agenda, with the aim of propagating a technopositivist ideology to stakeholders. The technopositivist ideology is defined as a ‘compulsive enthusiasm’ about e‐learning in higher education that is being created, propagated and channelled repeatedly by the people who are set to gain without giving the educators the time and opportunity to explore the dangers and rewards of e‐learning on teaching and learning. Ten myths on e‐learning that the technopositivists have used are presented with the aim of initiating effective and constructive dialogue, rather than merely criticising the efforts being made.</description><subject>CAI</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Educational Trends</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Mythology</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0007-1013</issn><issn>1467-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLFu2zAURYmiAeo6_YMMQpZOUh5F0aSGDK3rxEmMtIOLjA8URdt0ZckhJdT--1BR4CFTuJDEvefh4RASUUhoOFfbhGYTEUvOeJICyAQgD9nhExmdgs9kBAAipkDZF_LV-234AuPZiCTLjYl2x3bjI1U0XRuZuDLK1bZeR7aONna9MS4yZadVa5v6nJytVOXNt7d7TP7ezJbTebz4fXs3_bGIdcYoxEVWrDRwlUm1EmWasUIpXvIccl4KJaU2nCpWQCqg1JzlWlIqWT6hplQsLVI2Jt-HuXvXPHfGt7izXpuqUrVpOo8iYxwkFyw0L981t03n6rAcpmkuZEZzGUpyKGnXeO_MCvfO7pQ7IgXsNeIWe1vY28JeI75qxENALwbUOKtP2OxeilRwGuLrIf5vK3P88Fj8eT9bhlfg44G3vjWHE6_cP5wIJjg-Pd7ifPHwZ8rhF3L2AgJgjqM</recordid><startdate>201003</startdate><enddate>201003</enddate><creator>Njenga, James Kariuki</creator><creator>Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201003</creationdate><title>The myths about e-learning in higher education</title><author>Njenga, James Kariuki ; Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4310-b4bfc05a48af7d243baa5d59095d7a88ce51a3b0270dc539c81183961eda32b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>CAI</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Educational Trends</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Mythology</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Njenga, James Kariuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Njenga, James Kariuki</au><au>Fourie, Louis Cyril Henry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ872751</ericid><atitle>The myths about e-learning in higher education</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle><date>2010-03</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>199-212</pages><issn>0007-1013</issn><eissn>1467-8535</eissn><coden>BJETAH</coden><abstract>Proponents have marketed e‐learning by focusing on its adoption as the right thing to do while disregarding, among other things, the concerns of the potential users, the adverse effects on users and the existing research on the use of e‐learning or related innovations. In this paper, the e‐learning‐adoption proponents are referred to as the technopositivists. It is argued that most of the technopositivists in the higher education context are driven by a personal agenda, with the aim of propagating a technopositivist ideology to stakeholders. The technopositivist ideology is defined as a ‘compulsive enthusiasm’ about e‐learning in higher education that is being created, propagated and channelled repeatedly by the people who are set to gain without giving the educators the time and opportunity to explore the dangers and rewards of e‐learning on teaching and learning. Ten myths on e‐learning that the technopositivists have used are presented with the aim of initiating effective and constructive dialogue, rather than merely criticising the efforts being made.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1013 |
ispartof | British journal of educational technology, 2010-03, Vol.41 (2), p.199-212 |
issn | 0007-1013 1467-8535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743508573 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Education Source |
subjects | CAI Computer assisted instruction Criticism Educational Policy Educational Technology Educational Trends Electronic Learning Higher Education Ideology Innovations Instructional Effectiveness Misconceptions Mythology Online instruction Program Implementation Stakeholders |
title | The myths about e-learning in higher education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T12%3A41%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20myths%20about%20e-learning%20in%20higher%20education&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Njenga,%20James%20Kariuki&rft.date=2010-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=199-212&rft.issn=0007-1013&rft.eissn=1467-8535&rft.coden=BJETAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743508573%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229784198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ872751&rfr_iscdi=true |