The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin
The potential effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin are assessed by comparing simulated hydrologic and water resources scenarios derived from downscaled climate simulations of the U.S. Department of Energy/National Center for Atmospheric Research...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Climatic change 2004-01, Vol.62 (1-3), p.337-363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 363 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 337 |
container_title | Climatic change |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Christensen, Niklas S Wood, Andrew W Voisin, Nathalie Lettenmaier, Dennis P Palmer, Richard N |
description | The potential effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin are assessed by comparing simulated hydrologic and water resources scenarios derived from downscaled climate simulations of the U.S. Department of Energy/National Center for Atmospheric Research Parallel Climate Model (PCM) to scenarios driven by observed historical (1950-1999) climate. PCM climate scenarios include an ensemble of three 105-year future climate simulations based on projected 'business-as-usual' (BAU) greenhouse gas emissions and a control climate simulation based on static 1995 greenhouse gas concentrations. Downscaled transient temperature and precipitation sequences were extracted from PCM simulations, and were used to drive the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model to produce corresponding streamflow sequences. Results for the BAU scenarios were summarized into Periods 1, 2, and 3 (2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2098). Average annual temperature changes for the Colorado River basin were 0.5 degrees C warmer for control climate, and 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 degrees C warmer for Periods 1-3, respectively, relative to the historical climate. Basin-average annual precipitation for the control climate was slightly (1%) less than for observed historical climate, and 3, 6, and 3% less for future Periods 1-3, respectively. Annual runoff in the control run was about 10% lower than for simulated historical conditions, and 14, 18, and 17% less for Periods 1-3, respectively. Analysis of water management operations using a water management model driven by simulated streamflows showed that streamflows associated with control and future BAU climates would significantly degrade the performance of the water resources system relative to historical conditions, with average total basin storage reduced by 7% for the control climate and 36, 32 and 40% for Periods 1-3, respectively. Releases from Glen Canyon Dam to the Lower Basin (mandated by the Colorado River Compact) were met in 80% of years for the control climate simulation (versus 92% in the historical climate simulation), and only in 59-75% of years for the future climate runs. Annual hydropower output was also significantly reduced for the control and future climate simulations. The high sensitivity of reservoir system performance for future climate is a reflection of the fragile equilibrium that now exists in operation of the system, with system demands only slightly less than long- |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013684.13621.1f |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743501555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21355838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a559t-5c4c1a0a4b6e7eeec869a1be94de8d12552f50a2b9bb4ced4ba05cc3f499da523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UFrHCEUB3ApDXSb9DtIDu1ptj71zTq5dYe0CWwJhJTeKo7zTDZMxlRnA_vt6ySBQA9tPKjgzye-P2PHIJYgpPq8Pmk359-XYh6gaqOXZZawhPCGLQBXqgJtxFu2EFBjVVDzjr3P-XberWS9YL-uboifhkB-yjwG3g7bOzcRb2_ceE08jnwq4GzfpzjE6z13Y89_FpD4JeW4S54er82oLSK5PvLL7UM5X7u8HY_YQXBDpg_P6yH78fX0qj2rNhffztsvm8ohNlOFXntwwumuphUReVM3DjpqdE-mB4koAwonu6brtKded06g9yropukdSnXIPj3VvU_x947yZO-22dMwuJHiLtuVVigAEYv8-E8pQSEaZf4LwQglwLwC6toYLeenj_-Ct6WDY-mLhcaUrxjUBZ08IZ9izomCvU8lkrS3IOycuV3bOXP7krl9zNxCUH8ATrKfZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198499854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Christensen, Niklas S ; Wood, Andrew W ; Voisin, Nathalie ; Lettenmaier, Dennis P ; Palmer, Richard N</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Niklas S ; Wood, Andrew W ; Voisin, Nathalie ; Lettenmaier, Dennis P ; Palmer, Richard N</creatorcontrib><description>The potential effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin are assessed by comparing simulated hydrologic and water resources scenarios derived from downscaled climate simulations of the U.S. Department of Energy/National Center for Atmospheric Research Parallel Climate Model (PCM) to scenarios driven by observed historical (1950-1999) climate. PCM climate scenarios include an ensemble of three 105-year future climate simulations based on projected 'business-as-usual' (BAU) greenhouse gas emissions and a control climate simulation based on static 1995 greenhouse gas concentrations. Downscaled transient temperature and precipitation sequences were extracted from PCM simulations, and were used to drive the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model to produce corresponding streamflow sequences. Results for the BAU scenarios were summarized into Periods 1, 2, and 3 (2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2098). Average annual temperature changes for the Colorado River basin were 0.5 degrees C warmer for control climate, and 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 degrees C warmer for Periods 1-3, respectively, relative to the historical climate. Basin-average annual precipitation for the control climate was slightly (1%) less than for observed historical climate, and 3, 6, and 3% less for future Periods 1-3, respectively. Annual runoff in the control run was about 10% lower than for simulated historical conditions, and 14, 18, and 17% less for Periods 1-3, respectively. Analysis of water management operations using a water management model driven by simulated streamflows showed that streamflows associated with control and future BAU climates would significantly degrade the performance of the water resources system relative to historical conditions, with average total basin storage reduced by 7% for the control climate and 36, 32 and 40% for Periods 1-3, respectively. Releases from Glen Canyon Dam to the Lower Basin (mandated by the Colorado River Compact) were met in 80% of years for the control climate simulation (versus 92% in the historical climate simulation), and only in 59-75% of years for the future climate runs. Annual hydropower output was also significantly reduced for the control and future climate simulations. The high sensitivity of reservoir system performance for future climate is a reflection of the fragile equilibrium that now exists in operation of the system, with system demands only slightly less than long-term mean annual inflow. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013684.13621.1f</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Annual runoff ; Atmospheric research ; Canyons ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; Climate models ; Freshwater ; General circulation models ; Greenhouse gases ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Infiltration capacity ; Precipitation ; Reservoirs ; River basins ; Rivers ; Runoff ; Simulation ; Snow ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Water analysis ; Water management ; Water resources ; Water shortages</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2004-01, Vol.62 (1-3), p.337-363</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a559t-5c4c1a0a4b6e7eeec869a1be94de8d12552f50a2b9bb4ced4ba05cc3f499da523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Niklas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voisin, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lettenmaier, Dennis P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Richard N</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin</title><title>Climatic change</title><description>The potential effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin are assessed by comparing simulated hydrologic and water resources scenarios derived from downscaled climate simulations of the U.S. Department of Energy/National Center for Atmospheric Research Parallel Climate Model (PCM) to scenarios driven by observed historical (1950-1999) climate. PCM climate scenarios include an ensemble of three 105-year future climate simulations based on projected 'business-as-usual' (BAU) greenhouse gas emissions and a control climate simulation based on static 1995 greenhouse gas concentrations. Downscaled transient temperature and precipitation sequences were extracted from PCM simulations, and were used to drive the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model to produce corresponding streamflow sequences. Results for the BAU scenarios were summarized into Periods 1, 2, and 3 (2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2098). Average annual temperature changes for the Colorado River basin were 0.5 degrees C warmer for control climate, and 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 degrees C warmer for Periods 1-3, respectively, relative to the historical climate. Basin-average annual precipitation for the control climate was slightly (1%) less than for observed historical climate, and 3, 6, and 3% less for future Periods 1-3, respectively. Annual runoff in the control run was about 10% lower than for simulated historical conditions, and 14, 18, and 17% less for Periods 1-3, respectively. Analysis of water management operations using a water management model driven by simulated streamflows showed that streamflows associated with control and future BAU climates would significantly degrade the performance of the water resources system relative to historical conditions, with average total basin storage reduced by 7% for the control climate and 36, 32 and 40% for Periods 1-3, respectively. Releases from Glen Canyon Dam to the Lower Basin (mandated by the Colorado River Compact) were met in 80% of years for the control climate simulation (versus 92% in the historical climate simulation), and only in 59-75% of years for the future climate runs. Annual hydropower output was also significantly reduced for the control and future climate simulations. The high sensitivity of reservoir system performance for future climate is a reflection of the fragile equilibrium that now exists in operation of the system, with system demands only slightly less than long-term mean annual inflow. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Annual runoff</subject><subject>Atmospheric research</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>General circulation models</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Infiltration capacity</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UFrHCEUB3ApDXSb9DtIDu1ptj71zTq5dYe0CWwJhJTeKo7zTDZMxlRnA_vt6ySBQA9tPKjgzye-P2PHIJYgpPq8Pmk359-XYh6gaqOXZZawhPCGLQBXqgJtxFu2EFBjVVDzjr3P-XberWS9YL-uboifhkB-yjwG3g7bOzcRb2_ceE08jnwq4GzfpzjE6z13Y89_FpD4JeW4S54er82oLSK5PvLL7UM5X7u8HY_YQXBDpg_P6yH78fX0qj2rNhffztsvm8ohNlOFXntwwumuphUReVM3DjpqdE-mB4koAwonu6brtKded06g9yropukdSnXIPj3VvU_x947yZO-22dMwuJHiLtuVVigAEYv8-E8pQSEaZf4LwQglwLwC6toYLeenj_-Ct6WDY-mLhcaUrxjUBZ08IZ9izomCvU8lkrS3IOycuV3bOXP7krl9zNxCUH8ATrKfZA</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Christensen, Niklas S</creator><creator>Wood, Andrew W</creator><creator>Voisin, Nathalie</creator><creator>Lettenmaier, Dennis P</creator><creator>Palmer, Richard N</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin</title><author>Christensen, Niklas S ; Wood, Andrew W ; Voisin, Nathalie ; Lettenmaier, Dennis P ; Palmer, Richard N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a559t-5c4c1a0a4b6e7eeec869a1be94de8d12552f50a2b9bb4ced4ba05cc3f499da523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Annual runoff</topic><topic>Atmospheric research</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>General circulation models</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Infiltration capacity</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Niklas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voisin, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lettenmaier, Dennis P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Richard N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Niklas S</au><au>Wood, Andrew W</au><au>Voisin, Nathalie</au><au>Lettenmaier, Dennis P</au><au>Palmer, Richard N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>337-363</pages><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><coden>CLCHDX</coden><abstract>The potential effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin are assessed by comparing simulated hydrologic and water resources scenarios derived from downscaled climate simulations of the U.S. Department of Energy/National Center for Atmospheric Research Parallel Climate Model (PCM) to scenarios driven by observed historical (1950-1999) climate. PCM climate scenarios include an ensemble of three 105-year future climate simulations based on projected 'business-as-usual' (BAU) greenhouse gas emissions and a control climate simulation based on static 1995 greenhouse gas concentrations. Downscaled transient temperature and precipitation sequences were extracted from PCM simulations, and were used to drive the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model to produce corresponding streamflow sequences. Results for the BAU scenarios were summarized into Periods 1, 2, and 3 (2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2098). Average annual temperature changes for the Colorado River basin were 0.5 degrees C warmer for control climate, and 1.0, 1.7, and 2.4 degrees C warmer for Periods 1-3, respectively, relative to the historical climate. Basin-average annual precipitation for the control climate was slightly (1%) less than for observed historical climate, and 3, 6, and 3% less for future Periods 1-3, respectively. Annual runoff in the control run was about 10% lower than for simulated historical conditions, and 14, 18, and 17% less for Periods 1-3, respectively. Analysis of water management operations using a water management model driven by simulated streamflows showed that streamflows associated with control and future BAU climates would significantly degrade the performance of the water resources system relative to historical conditions, with average total basin storage reduced by 7% for the control climate and 36, 32 and 40% for Periods 1-3, respectively. Releases from Glen Canyon Dam to the Lower Basin (mandated by the Colorado River Compact) were met in 80% of years for the control climate simulation (versus 92% in the historical climate simulation), and only in 59-75% of years for the future climate runs. Annual hydropower output was also significantly reduced for the control and future climate simulations. The high sensitivity of reservoir system performance for future climate is a reflection of the fragile equilibrium that now exists in operation of the system, with system demands only slightly less than long-term mean annual inflow. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013684.13621.1f</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0009 |
ispartof | Climatic change, 2004-01, Vol.62 (1-3), p.337-363 |
issn | 0165-0009 1573-1480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743501555 |
source | SpringerLink |
subjects | Annual runoff Atmospheric research Canyons Climate change Climate effects Climate models Freshwater General circulation models Greenhouse gases Hydroelectric power Hydrologic models Hydrology Infiltration capacity Precipitation Reservoirs River basins Rivers Runoff Simulation Snow Stream discharge Stream flow Water analysis Water management Water resources Water shortages |
title | The Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Water Resources of the Colorado River Basin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T14%3A07%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Climate%20Change%20on%20the%20Hydrology%20and%20Water%20Resources%20of%20the%20Colorado%20River%20Basin&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Christensen,%20Niklas%20S&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=337-363&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft.coden=CLCHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013684.13621.1f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21355838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198499854&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |