Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations
An advanced research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW) Model is used to simulate the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) using grids nested to high resolution (3 km). A series of numerical simulations is conducted to examine the sensitivity of the simulation to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly weather review 2008-12, Vol.136 (12), p.4819-4838 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4838 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4819 |
container_title | Monthly weather review |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Li, Xuanli Pu, Zhaoxia |
description | An advanced research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW) Model is used to simulate the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) using grids nested to high resolution (3 km). A series of numerical simulations is conducted to examine the sensitivity of the simulation to available cloud microphysical (CM) and planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes. Results indicate that the numerical simulations of the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily are very sensitive to the choice of CM and PBL schemes in the ARW model. Specifically, with different CM schemes, the simulated minimum central sea level pressure (MSLP) varies by up to 29 hPa, and the use of various PBL schemes has resulted in differences in the simulated MSLP of up to 19 hPa during the 30-h forecast period. Physical processes associated with the above sensitivities are investigated. It is found that the magnitude of the environmental vertical wind shear is not well correlated with simulated hurricane intensities. In contrast, the eyewall convective heating distributions and the latent heat flux and high equivalent potential temperature (θe) feeding from the ocean surface are directly associated with the simulated intensities. Consistent with recognized facts, higher latent heat release in stronger eyewall convection, stronger surface energy, and high θe air feeding from the ocean surface into the hurricane eyewall are evident in the more enhanced convection and intense storms. The sensitivity studies in this paper also indicate that the contributions from the CM and PBL processes can only partially explain the slow intensification in the ARW simulations. Simulation at 1-km grid resolution shows a slight improvement in Emily’s intensity forecast, implying that the higher resolution is somewhat helpful, but still not enough to cause the model to reproduce the real intensity of the hurricane. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/2008MWR2366.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743459916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743459916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-cec3c6b5dfd15c361da0da3df7066c5e73491c951c53c779ceed90bab4ba17eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhS0EEsPAkr2FxGuR4hu_xksYDbTSFKoWxDJybEe4SuLBdpDSn9NfitMWhFjAxrauv3N079FF6CmQIwDJ39SEbE6_ntdUiCO4h1bAa1IRpuh9tCKklhURjD1Ej1K6JIQIweoVur5wY_LZ__B5xqHDH6fBRW90jy_8MPU6-zAu9Z2O_YzP9cFbfDLmRdQV7Nf38RQX1ejwbvAFfFV64a9xDnjbh8niU29iOHyb0421Hi0-6wuddZzxuzCNdnns9ewiPtNRDy6XLq5u7NNj9KDTfXJP7u41-vJ-93l7XO0_fTjZvt1XhknIlXGGGtFy21nghgqwmlhNbSfLqIY7SZkCozgYTo2UyjhnFWl1y1oN0rV0jV7e-h5i-D65lJvBJ-P6pdEwpUYyyrhSIAr54p9kDVQBA_Z_kNANp1IW8Nlf4GWY4ljGbUBtKBW8nGtU3UIly5Si65pD9ENJrgHSLBvQ_LEBDRT--Z2pTiX2LurR-PRbVAPhRDFKfwKRSrK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198336598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Xuanli ; Pu, Zhaoxia</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuanli ; Pu, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><description>An advanced research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW) Model is used to simulate the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) using grids nested to high resolution (3 km). A series of numerical simulations is conducted to examine the sensitivity of the simulation to available cloud microphysical (CM) and planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes. Results indicate that the numerical simulations of the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily are very sensitive to the choice of CM and PBL schemes in the ARW model. Specifically, with different CM schemes, the simulated minimum central sea level pressure (MSLP) varies by up to 29 hPa, and the use of various PBL schemes has resulted in differences in the simulated MSLP of up to 19 hPa during the 30-h forecast period. Physical processes associated with the above sensitivities are investigated. It is found that the magnitude of the environmental vertical wind shear is not well correlated with simulated hurricane intensities. In contrast, the eyewall convective heating distributions and the latent heat flux and high equivalent potential temperature (θe) feeding from the ocean surface are directly associated with the simulated intensities. Consistent with recognized facts, higher latent heat release in stronger eyewall convection, stronger surface energy, and high θe air feeding from the ocean surface into the hurricane eyewall are evident in the more enhanced convection and intense storms. The sensitivity studies in this paper also indicate that the contributions from the CM and PBL processes can only partially explain the slow intensification in the ARW simulations. Simulation at 1-km grid resolution shows a slight improvement in Emily’s intensity forecast, implying that the higher resolution is somewhat helpful, but still not enough to cause the model to reproduce the real intensity of the hurricane.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2008MWR2366.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Boundary layers ; Colleges & universities ; Convection ; Cyclones ; Data assimilation ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental conditions ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Heat transfer ; High performance computing ; Hurricanes ; Ice ; Latent heat ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Rain ; Studies ; Wind shear</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2008-12, Vol.136 (12), p.4819-4838</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-cec3c6b5dfd15c361da0da3df7066c5e73491c951c53c779ceed90bab4ba17eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-cec3c6b5dfd15c361da0da3df7066c5e73491c951c53c779ceed90bab4ba17eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3681,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21050943$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuanli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pu, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>An advanced research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW) Model is used to simulate the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) using grids nested to high resolution (3 km). A series of numerical simulations is conducted to examine the sensitivity of the simulation to available cloud microphysical (CM) and planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes. Results indicate that the numerical simulations of the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily are very sensitive to the choice of CM and PBL schemes in the ARW model. Specifically, with different CM schemes, the simulated minimum central sea level pressure (MSLP) varies by up to 29 hPa, and the use of various PBL schemes has resulted in differences in the simulated MSLP of up to 19 hPa during the 30-h forecast period. Physical processes associated with the above sensitivities are investigated. It is found that the magnitude of the environmental vertical wind shear is not well correlated with simulated hurricane intensities. In contrast, the eyewall convective heating distributions and the latent heat flux and high equivalent potential temperature (θe) feeding from the ocean surface are directly associated with the simulated intensities. Consistent with recognized facts, higher latent heat release in stronger eyewall convection, stronger surface energy, and high θe air feeding from the ocean surface into the hurricane eyewall are evident in the more enhanced convection and intense storms. The sensitivity studies in this paper also indicate that the contributions from the CM and PBL processes can only partially explain the slow intensification in the ARW simulations. Simulation at 1-km grid resolution shows a slight improvement in Emily’s intensity forecast, implying that the higher resolution is somewhat helpful, but still not enough to cause the model to reproduce the real intensity of the hurricane.</description><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Cyclones</subject><subject>Data assimilation</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>High performance computing</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Latent heat</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wind shear</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhS0EEsPAkr2FxGuR4hu_xksYDbTSFKoWxDJybEe4SuLBdpDSn9NfitMWhFjAxrauv3N079FF6CmQIwDJ39SEbE6_ntdUiCO4h1bAa1IRpuh9tCKklhURjD1Ej1K6JIQIweoVur5wY_LZ__B5xqHDH6fBRW90jy_8MPU6-zAu9Z2O_YzP9cFbfDLmRdQV7Nf38RQX1ejwbvAFfFV64a9xDnjbh8niU29iOHyb0421Hi0-6wuddZzxuzCNdnns9ewiPtNRDy6XLq5u7NNj9KDTfXJP7u41-vJ-93l7XO0_fTjZvt1XhknIlXGGGtFy21nghgqwmlhNbSfLqIY7SZkCozgYTo2UyjhnFWl1y1oN0rV0jV7e-h5i-D65lJvBJ-P6pdEwpUYyyrhSIAr54p9kDVQBA_Z_kNANp1IW8Nlf4GWY4ljGbUBtKBW8nGtU3UIly5Si65pD9ENJrgHSLBvQ_LEBDRT--Z2pTiX2LurR-PRbVAPhRDFKfwKRSrK4</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Li, Xuanli</creator><creator>Pu, Zhaoxia</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations</title><author>Li, Xuanli ; Pu, Zhaoxia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-cec3c6b5dfd15c361da0da3df7066c5e73491c951c53c779ceed90bab4ba17eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Cyclones</topic><topic>Data assimilation</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>High performance computing</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Latent heat</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wind shear</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuanli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pu, Zhaoxia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xuanli</au><au>Pu, Zhaoxia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4819</spage><epage>4838</epage><pages>4819-4838</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>An advanced research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW) Model is used to simulate the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) using grids nested to high resolution (3 km). A series of numerical simulations is conducted to examine the sensitivity of the simulation to available cloud microphysical (CM) and planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes. Results indicate that the numerical simulations of the early rapid intensification of Hurricane Emily are very sensitive to the choice of CM and PBL schemes in the ARW model. Specifically, with different CM schemes, the simulated minimum central sea level pressure (MSLP) varies by up to 29 hPa, and the use of various PBL schemes has resulted in differences in the simulated MSLP of up to 19 hPa during the 30-h forecast period. Physical processes associated with the above sensitivities are investigated. It is found that the magnitude of the environmental vertical wind shear is not well correlated with simulated hurricane intensities. In contrast, the eyewall convective heating distributions and the latent heat flux and high equivalent potential temperature (θe) feeding from the ocean surface are directly associated with the simulated intensities. Consistent with recognized facts, higher latent heat release in stronger eyewall convection, stronger surface energy, and high θe air feeding from the ocean surface into the hurricane eyewall are evident in the more enhanced convection and intense storms. The sensitivity studies in this paper also indicate that the contributions from the CM and PBL processes can only partially explain the slow intensification in the ARW simulations. Simulation at 1-km grid resolution shows a slight improvement in Emily’s intensity forecast, implying that the higher resolution is somewhat helpful, but still not enough to cause the model to reproduce the real intensity of the hurricane.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2008MWR2366.1</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-0644 |
ispartof | Monthly weather review, 2008-12, Vol.136 (12), p.4819-4838 |
issn | 0027-0644 1520-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743459916 |
source | American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Boundary layers Colleges & universities Convection Cyclones Data assimilation Earth, ocean, space Environmental conditions Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Heat transfer High performance computing Hurricanes Ice Latent heat Marine Meteorology Rain Studies Wind shear |
title | Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20Numerical%20Simulation%20of%20Early%20Rapid%20Intensification%20of%20Hurricane%20Emily%20(2005)%20to%20Cloud%20Microphysical%20and%20Planetary%20Boundary%20Layer%20Parameterizations&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=Li,%20Xuanli&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4819&rft.epage=4838&rft.pages=4819-4838&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2008MWR2366.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743459916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198336598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |