Quantifying technological aspects of process sustainability: a thermodynamic approach
Thermodynamic analysis has greatly helped to compare and to improve the energy efficiency of all kinds of technological processes, and recently we have also attempted to analyse some important biochemical processes under intracellular conditions. This work has pointed to some key strategies on susta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clean technologies and environmental policy 2003-10, Vol.5 (3-4), p.248-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 248 |
container_title | Clean technologies and environmental policy |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Lems, S van der Kooi, H J de Swaan Arons, J |
description | Thermodynamic analysis has greatly helped to compare and to improve the energy efficiency of all kinds of technological processes, and recently we have also attempted to analyse some important biochemical processes under intracellular conditions. This work has pointed to some key strategies on sustainable process operation, such as the exceptionally high thermodynamic efficiencies of chemical and solar energy conversion in living cells. From this it was expected that the sustainability strategies of specific biochemical processes and those of the ecosphere as a whole could be of guidance to current technological processes, especially now that there is a growing demand from government and industry to effectively deal with sustainability aspects in process analysis. Our focus on this issue has led to methodologies to quantify technological aspects of sustainability by making use of thermodynamic principles. Three indicators were constructed to express three technological aspects of process sustainability. First, an indicator for the sustainability of resource utilization considers the thermodynamic input and the availability the resources used in the process. Secondly, an efficiency indicator focuses on the conversion and loss of thermodynamic quantities in the process itself. Thirdly, an indicator for environmental compatibility takes into account the thermodynamic input required to prevent possible negative side effects of the process, such as global warming or water pollution. The three indicators are used to reflect on (un)sustainable characteristics of current technological processes compared to biochemical processes. Finally, we address the drawbacks of combining indicator values to express overall sustainability. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10098-003-0219-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743408787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17293020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2117-15ca8b345c489012493ea6963e48bf215edfd0c55ffcdabc5388962a48616d773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6rH8Bb8aCnaiZJ8_Am4gsWRHDBW0jTZDdLXzbtod_elhUPHvQyM4cfMwx_hM4BXwPG4iZOVckUY5piAirlB2gBHGSqskwe_szs4xidxLjDmBBB8AKt3wZT98GPod4kvbPbuimbTbCmTExsne1j0vik7RrrYkziEHsTapOHMvTjbWKSfuu6qinG2lTBJqadpLHbU3TkTRnd2XdfovXjw_v9c7p6fXq5v1ullgCIFDJrZE5ZZplUGAhT1BmuOHVM5p5A5gpfYJtl3tvC5DajUipODJMceCEEXaKr_d7p7OfgYq-rEK0rS1O7ZohaMMqwFHKWl39KApQDFvAvBEEUxQRP8OIX3DVDV0_vakKUAkpgRrBHtmti7JzXbRcq040asJ6D0_vg9BScnoPTnH4B_LyLVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229913210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying technological aspects of process sustainability: a thermodynamic approach</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lems, S ; van der Kooi, H J ; de Swaan Arons, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Lems, S ; van der Kooi, H J ; de Swaan Arons, J</creatorcontrib><description>Thermodynamic analysis has greatly helped to compare and to improve the energy efficiency of all kinds of technological processes, and recently we have also attempted to analyse some important biochemical processes under intracellular conditions. This work has pointed to some key strategies on sustainable process operation, such as the exceptionally high thermodynamic efficiencies of chemical and solar energy conversion in living cells. From this it was expected that the sustainability strategies of specific biochemical processes and those of the ecosphere as a whole could be of guidance to current technological processes, especially now that there is a growing demand from government and industry to effectively deal with sustainability aspects in process analysis. Our focus on this issue has led to methodologies to quantify technological aspects of sustainability by making use of thermodynamic principles. Three indicators were constructed to express three technological aspects of process sustainability. First, an indicator for the sustainability of resource utilization considers the thermodynamic input and the availability the resources used in the process. Secondly, an efficiency indicator focuses on the conversion and loss of thermodynamic quantities in the process itself. Thirdly, an indicator for environmental compatibility takes into account the thermodynamic input required to prevent possible negative side effects of the process, such as global warming or water pollution. The three indicators are used to reflect on (un)sustainable characteristics of current technological processes compared to biochemical processes. Finally, we address the drawbacks of combining indicator values to express overall sustainability. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-954X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-9558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10098-003-0219-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Energy conversion ; Energy efficiency ; Entropy ; Environmental indicators ; Environmental policy ; Global warming ; Solar energy ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Technology ; Thermodynamics ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Clean technologies and environmental policy, 2003-10, Vol.5 (3-4), p.248-253</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2117-15ca8b345c489012493ea6963e48bf215edfd0c55ffcdabc5388962a48616d773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lems, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Swaan Arons, J</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying technological aspects of process sustainability: a thermodynamic approach</title><title>Clean technologies and environmental policy</title><description>Thermodynamic analysis has greatly helped to compare and to improve the energy efficiency of all kinds of technological processes, and recently we have also attempted to analyse some important biochemical processes under intracellular conditions. This work has pointed to some key strategies on sustainable process operation, such as the exceptionally high thermodynamic efficiencies of chemical and solar energy conversion in living cells. From this it was expected that the sustainability strategies of specific biochemical processes and those of the ecosphere as a whole could be of guidance to current technological processes, especially now that there is a growing demand from government and industry to effectively deal with sustainability aspects in process analysis. Our focus on this issue has led to methodologies to quantify technological aspects of sustainability by making use of thermodynamic principles. Three indicators were constructed to express three technological aspects of process sustainability. First, an indicator for the sustainability of resource utilization considers the thermodynamic input and the availability the resources used in the process. Secondly, an efficiency indicator focuses on the conversion and loss of thermodynamic quantities in the process itself. Thirdly, an indicator for environmental compatibility takes into account the thermodynamic input required to prevent possible negative side effects of the process, such as global warming or water pollution. The three indicators are used to reflect on (un)sustainable characteristics of current technological processes compared to biochemical processes. Finally, we address the drawbacks of combining indicator values to express overall sustainability. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Energy conversion</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Environmental indicators</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>1618-954X</issn><issn>1618-9558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6rH8Bb8aCnaiZJ8_Am4gsWRHDBW0jTZDdLXzbtod_elhUPHvQyM4cfMwx_hM4BXwPG4iZOVckUY5piAirlB2gBHGSqskwe_szs4xidxLjDmBBB8AKt3wZT98GPod4kvbPbuimbTbCmTExsne1j0vik7RrrYkziEHsTapOHMvTjbWKSfuu6qinG2lTBJqadpLHbU3TkTRnd2XdfovXjw_v9c7p6fXq5v1ullgCIFDJrZE5ZZplUGAhT1BmuOHVM5p5A5gpfYJtl3tvC5DajUipODJMceCEEXaKr_d7p7OfgYq-rEK0rS1O7ZohaMMqwFHKWl39KApQDFvAvBEEUxQRP8OIX3DVDV0_vakKUAkpgRrBHtmti7JzXbRcq040asJ6D0_vg9BScnoPTnH4B_LyLVQ</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Lems, S</creator><creator>van der Kooi, H J</creator><creator>de Swaan Arons, J</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Quantifying technological aspects of process sustainability: a thermodynamic approach</title><author>Lems, S ; van der Kooi, H J ; de Swaan Arons, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2117-15ca8b345c489012493ea6963e48bf215edfd0c55ffcdabc5388962a48616d773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Energy conversion</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Environmental indicators</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lems, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Swaan Arons, J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clean technologies and environmental policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lems, S</au><au>van der Kooi, H J</au><au>de Swaan Arons, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying technological aspects of process sustainability: a thermodynamic approach</atitle><jtitle>Clean technologies and environmental policy</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>248-253</pages><issn>1618-954X</issn><eissn>1618-9558</eissn><abstract>Thermodynamic analysis has greatly helped to compare and to improve the energy efficiency of all kinds of technological processes, and recently we have also attempted to analyse some important biochemical processes under intracellular conditions. This work has pointed to some key strategies on sustainable process operation, such as the exceptionally high thermodynamic efficiencies of chemical and solar energy conversion in living cells. From this it was expected that the sustainability strategies of specific biochemical processes and those of the ecosphere as a whole could be of guidance to current technological processes, especially now that there is a growing demand from government and industry to effectively deal with sustainability aspects in process analysis. Our focus on this issue has led to methodologies to quantify technological aspects of sustainability by making use of thermodynamic principles. Three indicators were constructed to express three technological aspects of process sustainability. First, an indicator for the sustainability of resource utilization considers the thermodynamic input and the availability the resources used in the process. Secondly, an efficiency indicator focuses on the conversion and loss of thermodynamic quantities in the process itself. Thirdly, an indicator for environmental compatibility takes into account the thermodynamic input required to prevent possible negative side effects of the process, such as global warming or water pollution. The three indicators are used to reflect on (un)sustainable characteristics of current technological processes compared to biochemical processes. Finally, we address the drawbacks of combining indicator values to express overall sustainability. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10098-003-0219-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-954X |
ispartof | Clean technologies and environmental policy, 2003-10, Vol.5 (3-4), p.248-253 |
issn | 1618-954X 1618-9558 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743408787 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Climate change Energy conversion Energy efficiency Entropy Environmental indicators Environmental policy Global warming Solar energy Sustainability Sustainable development Technology Thermodynamics Water pollution |
title | Quantifying technological aspects of process sustainability: a thermodynamic approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A36%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20technological%20aspects%20of%20process%20sustainability:%20a%20thermodynamic%20approach&rft.jtitle=Clean%20technologies%20and%20environmental%20policy&rft.au=Lems,%20S&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=248-253&rft.issn=1618-954X&rft.eissn=1618-9558&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10098-003-0219-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17293020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229913210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |