New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China's forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation
We developed a volume-to-biomass method based on age groups representative of forest development stages to estimate live tree biomass, C, and biomass and C accumulation rates of China's forests between 1973 and 1993. The data were from plot-level forest inventory, national-level inventory stati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Climatic change 2004-12, Vol.67 (2-3), p.211-236 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 236 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2-3 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Climatic change |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | PAN, Yude TIANXIANG LUO BIRDSEY, Richard HOME, John MELILLO, Jerry |
description | We developed a volume-to-biomass method based on age groups representative of forest development stages to estimate live tree biomass, C, and biomass and C accumulation rates of China's forests between 1973 and 1993. The data were from plot-level forest inventory, national-level inventory statistics, and ecological site studies specified to estimate biomass in different tree components. Our results indicate that carbon storage in China's forests was 4.34 Pg C in the early 1990s, an increase of 13% since the early 1970s. The annual forest C sequestration rate from the late 1980s to early 1990s was 0.068 Pg C/yr and approximately four- to five-times higher than in the 1970s and 1980s. The large C sink in China's forests in the early 1990s was likely related to age structure changes that had developed to more productive stages, a consequence of reforestation and afforestation programs from the 1960s. The results were compared with other C store estimates, which were based on the same inventory data. Various methods can produce estimates that differ in the direction of C flux as well as its magnitude. Separating age groups with the volume-biomass method could cause a 27% difference in estimated carbon pools but an 89% difference in C sequestration rates whereas the biomass density method would provide an estimate that differs by 65% in the C pools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743362509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743362509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-6c6d454f97a02f64b565fd752525de3e8bd70254fa6ae6c1f175278d441da5353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewsJGBlsONXwg5VvCQEG1hHUz9oUJqAJwXxC3w1ppQNC0Be2Jp77lx7TMiu4EeCc3uMgutSMc4VK2xVMb1GRkJbyYQq-ToZcWF0Vnm1SbYQHz9PtjAj8n4TXmnAoZnDEJD2kTpI076jOPQJHgKFzlMMz4vMJBiarDQdncyaDg6Rxj7lOp7QsxiDG5b-bGKuBcSldR6GWe_p0vYSutz0jU0Bg__OWWXnxttkI0KLYWe1j8n9-dnd5JJd315cTU6vmZOlHphxxiutYmWBF9GoqTY6equLvHyQoZx6y4sMgIFgnIgia7b0SgkPWmo5JodffZ9Sv3xXPW_QhbaFLvQLrK2S0hSaV5k8-JUshCpMJdSfoLDGCCP4f0BZ8tJkcO8H-NgvUpfnUouq1Fpy-Xm__RUE6KCNCTrXYP2U8kTTW52_XAqeUz8ATLGoeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198553039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China's forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>PAN, Yude ; TIANXIANG LUO ; BIRDSEY, Richard ; HOME, John ; MELILLO, Jerry</creator><creatorcontrib>PAN, Yude ; TIANXIANG LUO ; BIRDSEY, Richard ; HOME, John ; MELILLO, Jerry</creatorcontrib><description>We developed a volume-to-biomass method based on age groups representative of forest development stages to estimate live tree biomass, C, and biomass and C accumulation rates of China's forests between 1973 and 1993. The data were from plot-level forest inventory, national-level inventory statistics, and ecological site studies specified to estimate biomass in different tree components. Our results indicate that carbon storage in China's forests was 4.34 Pg C in the early 1990s, an increase of 13% since the early 1970s. The annual forest C sequestration rate from the late 1980s to early 1990s was 0.068 Pg C/yr and approximately four- to five-times higher than in the 1970s and 1980s. The large C sink in China's forests in the early 1990s was likely related to age structure changes that had developed to more productive stages, a consequence of reforestation and afforestation programs from the 1960s. The results were compared with other C store estimates, which were based on the same inventory data. Various methods can produce estimates that differ in the direction of C flux as well as its magnitude. Separating age groups with the volume-biomass method could cause a 27% difference in estimated carbon pools but an 89% difference in C sequestration rates whereas the biomass density method would provide an estimate that differs by 65% in the C pools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biochemistry and biology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass energy ; Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; Climate change ; Ecosystems ; Estimates ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Leaves ; Methods ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; Reforestation ; Soil science ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2004-12, Vol.67 (2-3), p.211-236</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-6c6d454f97a02f64b565fd752525de3e8bd70254fa6ae6c1f175278d441da5353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23911,23912,25120,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16531010$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PAN, Yude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIANXIANG LUO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIRDSEY, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOME, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MELILLO, Jerry</creatorcontrib><title>New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China's forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation</title><title>Climatic change</title><description>We developed a volume-to-biomass method based on age groups representative of forest development stages to estimate live tree biomass, C, and biomass and C accumulation rates of China's forests between 1973 and 1993. The data were from plot-level forest inventory, national-level inventory statistics, and ecological site studies specified to estimate biomass in different tree components. Our results indicate that carbon storage in China's forests was 4.34 Pg C in the early 1990s, an increase of 13% since the early 1970s. The annual forest C sequestration rate from the late 1980s to early 1990s was 0.068 Pg C/yr and approximately four- to five-times higher than in the 1970s and 1980s. The large C sink in China's forests in the early 1990s was likely related to age structure changes that had developed to more productive stages, a consequence of reforestation and afforestation programs from the 1960s. The results were compared with other C store estimates, which were based on the same inventory data. Various methods can produce estimates that differ in the direction of C flux as well as its magnitude. Separating age groups with the volume-biomass method could cause a 27% difference in estimated carbon pools but an 89% difference in C sequestration rates whereas the biomass density method would provide an estimate that differs by 65% in the C pools.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biochemistry and biology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewsJGBlsONXwg5VvCQEG1hHUz9oUJqAJwXxC3w1ppQNC0Be2Jp77lx7TMiu4EeCc3uMgutSMc4VK2xVMb1GRkJbyYQq-ToZcWF0Vnm1SbYQHz9PtjAj8n4TXmnAoZnDEJD2kTpI076jOPQJHgKFzlMMz4vMJBiarDQdncyaDg6Rxj7lOp7QsxiDG5b-bGKuBcSldR6GWe_p0vYSutz0jU0Bg__OWWXnxttkI0KLYWe1j8n9-dnd5JJd315cTU6vmZOlHphxxiutYmWBF9GoqTY6equLvHyQoZx6y4sMgIFgnIgia7b0SgkPWmo5JodffZ9Sv3xXPW_QhbaFLvQLrK2S0hSaV5k8-JUshCpMJdSfoLDGCCP4f0BZ8tJkcO8H-NgvUpfnUouq1Fpy-Xm__RUE6KCNCTrXYP2U8kTTW52_XAqeUz8ATLGoeA</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>PAN, Yude</creator><creator>TIANXIANG LUO</creator><creator>BIRDSEY, Richard</creator><creator>HOME, John</creator><creator>MELILLO, Jerry</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China's forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation</title><author>PAN, Yude ; TIANXIANG LUO ; BIRDSEY, Richard ; HOME, John ; MELILLO, Jerry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-6c6d454f97a02f64b565fd752525de3e8bd70254fa6ae6c1f175278d441da5353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biochemistry and biology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PAN, Yude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIANXIANG LUO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIRDSEY, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOME, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MELILLO, Jerry</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PAN, Yude</au><au>TIANXIANG LUO</au><au>BIRDSEY, Richard</au><au>HOME, John</au><au>MELILLO, Jerry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China's forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>211-236</pages><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><coden>CLCHDX</coden><abstract>We developed a volume-to-biomass method based on age groups representative of forest development stages to estimate live tree biomass, C, and biomass and C accumulation rates of China's forests between 1973 and 1993. The data were from plot-level forest inventory, national-level inventory statistics, and ecological site studies specified to estimate biomass in different tree components. Our results indicate that carbon storage in China's forests was 4.34 Pg C in the early 1990s, an increase of 13% since the early 1970s. The annual forest C sequestration rate from the late 1980s to early 1990s was 0.068 Pg C/yr and approximately four- to five-times higher than in the 1970s and 1980s. The large C sink in China's forests in the early 1990s was likely related to age structure changes that had developed to more productive stages, a consequence of reforestation and afforestation programs from the 1960s. The results were compared with other C store estimates, which were based on the same inventory data. Various methods can produce estimates that differ in the direction of C flux as well as its magnitude. Separating age groups with the volume-biomass method could cause a 27% difference in estimated carbon pools but an 89% difference in C sequestration rates whereas the biomass density method would provide an estimate that differs by 65% in the C pools.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0009 |
ispartof | Climatic change, 2004-12, Vol.67 (2-3), p.211-236 |
issn | 0165-0009 1573-1480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743362509 |
source | SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Age groups Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biochemistry and biology Biological and medical sciences Biomass Biomass energy Carbon Carbon sequestration Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties Climate change Ecosystems Estimates Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities Leaves Methods Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils Reforestation Soil science Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems Trees |
title | New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China's forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A49%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20estimates%20of%20carbon%20storage%20and%20sequestration%20in%20China's%20forests:%20Effects%20of%20age-class%20and%20method%20on%20inventory-based%20carbon%20estimation&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=PAN,%20Yude&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=211-236&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft.coden=CLCHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E743362509%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198553039&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |