An agronomic and physiological re-evaluation of the potassium and sodium requirements and fertilizer recommendations for sugar beet

The potassium (K) and sodium (Na) requirements of sugar beet were re-examined in a 6-year series of experiments between 2000 and 2005 using reference plots with a wide range of long-established differences in exchangeable topsoil K (Kex). Two groups of plots with a topsoil concentration Kex range of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of agricultural science 2008-08, Vol.146 (4), p.429-443
Hauptverfasser: MILFORD, G. F. J., JARVIS, P. J., JONES, J., BARRACLOUGH, P. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 443
container_issue 4
container_start_page 429
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 146
creator MILFORD, G. F. J.
JARVIS, P. J.
JONES, J.
BARRACLOUGH, P. B.
description The potassium (K) and sodium (Na) requirements of sugar beet were re-examined in a 6-year series of experiments between 2000 and 2005 using reference plots with a wide range of long-established differences in exchangeable topsoil K (Kex). Two groups of plots with a topsoil concentration Kex range of 40–550 mg/kg were used, each situated within an individual field, one on a silty clay loam at Rothamsted and the other on a contrasting sandy loam at Woburn. The interactions between topsoil Kex and applied N, K and Na fertilizers were studied at Rothamsted. Under these well-defined conditions, maximum yields of 55–71 t/ha of adjusted clean beet were achieved with a topsoil Kex concentration of 120–150 mg/kg, i.e. at Soil K Index 2–, with a small difference between the two soils being accounted for by differences in exchangeable soil Na and subsoil Kex. There were no yield responses to freshly applied fertilizer K, even on low K plots where responses might be expected. It is concluded that the existing recommendations for K fertilizer use on UK sugar beet do not need to be adjusted to allow for the higher yields of modern crops. There were no yield responses to NaCl fertilizer at any level of topsoil Kex at Rothamsted (where the soil contained 15–20 mg Na/kg), but yields were increased on low Kex plots at Woburn whose sandy loam contained only 5–10 mg Na/kg. The uptake of Na from the applied NaCl fertilizer was strongly influenced by the exchangeable K and Na status of the soil. On the low Na soil at Woburn, almost all of the applied Na was taken up by sugar beet grown on plots with low concentrations of topsoil Kex and half of it on plots with adequate concentrations of topsoil Kex compared with two-thirds and one-fifth, respectively, on the higher Na-content soil at Rothamsted. Plants partitioned 0·75 of their K and 0·95 of their Na to the shoot and the balance to the storage root. This pattern of distribution was consistent across sites, seasons and soil K supply. The physiological interactions between K and Na were studied by examining their millimolar concentrations in the tissue-water (mmol/kg) of the shoots and storage roots. The tissue-water concentrations of K in the shoot increased asymptotically with the concentration of Kex in the topsoil, and the increase in K concentration was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the tissue-water concentration of Na. Maximum concentrations of K in shoot tissue-water (and minimum concentrations of Na) were ac
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859607007630
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743323343</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859607007630</cupid><sourcerecordid>743323343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e31360cf7cd1f2db33a13a70a446c1ab75b33cc552862d594dffdca2f0c41bd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EEsvCD-CEhYQ4Bcbf2WNV9YNShFCphLhYjmNvXZJ4ayeo7ZU_jrO7KhKIy9ia95l3xh6EXhJ4R4Co9xcAlNRiJUEBKMngEVoQLleVKPExWsxyNetP0bOcr6FAsKoX6NfBgM06xSH2wWIztHhzdZdD7OI6WNPh5Cr303STGUMccPR4vHJ4E0eTc5j6bUGO7XxN7mYKyfVuGPM2710aQxfuXSqajX1R2q1Nxj4mnKe1SbhxbnyOnnjTZfdify7R5fHR18PT6vzzyYfDg_PKcg5j5RhhEqxXtiWetg1jhjCjwHAuLTGNEiVlrRC0lrQVK95631pDPVhOmpazJXq7892keDO5POo-ZOu6zgwuTlkrzhhlrMQlev0XeR2nNJThNAWmCFA5Q2QH2RRzTs7rTQq9SXeagJ6Xov9ZSql5szc2uXyvT2awIT8UUuB1TYQsXLXjQh7d7YNu0g8tFVNCy5Mv-uPp2dnxt--gPxX-1Y73Juqyz-J5eUGBMCCCl_6iEGw_rembFNq1-_Om_8_7G4y_tis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203710263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An agronomic and physiological re-evaluation of the potassium and sodium requirements and fertilizer recommendations for sugar beet</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>MILFORD, G. F. J. ; JARVIS, P. J. ; JONES, J. ; BARRACLOUGH, P. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>MILFORD, G. F. J. ; JARVIS, P. J. ; JONES, J. ; BARRACLOUGH, P. B.</creatorcontrib><description>The potassium (K) and sodium (Na) requirements of sugar beet were re-examined in a 6-year series of experiments between 2000 and 2005 using reference plots with a wide range of long-established differences in exchangeable topsoil K (Kex). Two groups of plots with a topsoil concentration Kex range of 40–550 mg/kg were used, each situated within an individual field, one on a silty clay loam at Rothamsted and the other on a contrasting sandy loam at Woburn. The interactions between topsoil Kex and applied N, K and Na fertilizers were studied at Rothamsted. Under these well-defined conditions, maximum yields of 55–71 t/ha of adjusted clean beet were achieved with a topsoil Kex concentration of 120–150 mg/kg, i.e. at Soil K Index 2–, with a small difference between the two soils being accounted for by differences in exchangeable soil Na and subsoil Kex. There were no yield responses to freshly applied fertilizer K, even on low K plots where responses might be expected. It is concluded that the existing recommendations for K fertilizer use on UK sugar beet do not need to be adjusted to allow for the higher yields of modern crops. There were no yield responses to NaCl fertilizer at any level of topsoil Kex at Rothamsted (where the soil contained 15–20 mg Na/kg), but yields were increased on low Kex plots at Woburn whose sandy loam contained only 5–10 mg Na/kg. The uptake of Na from the applied NaCl fertilizer was strongly influenced by the exchangeable K and Na status of the soil. On the low Na soil at Woburn, almost all of the applied Na was taken up by sugar beet grown on plots with low concentrations of topsoil Kex and half of it on plots with adequate concentrations of topsoil Kex compared with two-thirds and one-fifth, respectively, on the higher Na-content soil at Rothamsted. Plants partitioned 0·75 of their K and 0·95 of their Na to the shoot and the balance to the storage root. This pattern of distribution was consistent across sites, seasons and soil K supply. The physiological interactions between K and Na were studied by examining their millimolar concentrations in the tissue-water (mmol/kg) of the shoots and storage roots. The tissue-water concentrations of K in the shoot increased asymptotically with the concentration of Kex in the topsoil, and the increase in K concentration was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the tissue-water concentration of Na. Maximum concentrations of K in shoot tissue-water (and minimum concentrations of Na) were achieved when the topsoil contained a minimum of 200 mg Kex/kg. The optimal physiological tissue-water concentration of Na in shoots was estimated to be c. 90–100 mmol/kg; maintenance of this level required a minimum of 25 mg/kg of exchangeable Na in the topsoil. When not limited by soil Kex, plants maintained a total tissue-water concentration of c. 300–350 mmol/kg of K+Na within the shoot. This was achieved with 80 mmol of Na and 230 mmol of K/kg of tissue water on the high Na-content soil at Rothamsted, and with 40 mmol of Na and 275 mmol of K/kg tissue water on the low-Na soil at Woburn. Significant correlations were established between measurements of beet K made in the factory tarehouse and those made using standard laboratory chemical analyses and between factory estimates of the concentrations of K in the tissue-water of delivered beet and the topsoil Kex. The uses of these relationships to estimate the off-takes of K in the harvested beet and provide feedback to growers on the K status of their soils, and the implications of the study for the use of K and Na fertilizers on UK sugar beet are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859607007630</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASIAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; application rate ; Beta vulgaris ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clay loam ; crop management ; crop yield ; exchangeable potassium ; exchangeable sodium ; Experiments ; fertilizer rates ; fertilizer requirements ; Fertilizers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Loam soils ; nutrient requirements ; Physiology ; plant nutrition ; Potassium ; Sandy loam ; Shoots ; sodium ; Sodium chloride ; soil fertility ; Soils ; Subsoils ; Sugar ; sugar beet ; Tissues ; Topsoil ; water content ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2008-08, Vol.146 (4), p.429-443</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e31360cf7cd1f2db33a13a70a446c1ab75b33cc552862d594dffdca2f0c41bd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e31360cf7cd1f2db33a13a70a446c1ab75b33cc552862d594dffdca2f0c41bd43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859607007630/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20488156$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MILFORD, G. F. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JARVIS, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRACLOUGH, P. B.</creatorcontrib><title>An agronomic and physiological re-evaluation of the potassium and sodium requirements and fertilizer recommendations for sugar beet</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>The potassium (K) and sodium (Na) requirements of sugar beet were re-examined in a 6-year series of experiments between 2000 and 2005 using reference plots with a wide range of long-established differences in exchangeable topsoil K (Kex). Two groups of plots with a topsoil concentration Kex range of 40–550 mg/kg were used, each situated within an individual field, one on a silty clay loam at Rothamsted and the other on a contrasting sandy loam at Woburn. The interactions between topsoil Kex and applied N, K and Na fertilizers were studied at Rothamsted. Under these well-defined conditions, maximum yields of 55–71 t/ha of adjusted clean beet were achieved with a topsoil Kex concentration of 120–150 mg/kg, i.e. at Soil K Index 2–, with a small difference between the two soils being accounted for by differences in exchangeable soil Na and subsoil Kex. There were no yield responses to freshly applied fertilizer K, even on low K plots where responses might be expected. It is concluded that the existing recommendations for K fertilizer use on UK sugar beet do not need to be adjusted to allow for the higher yields of modern crops. There were no yield responses to NaCl fertilizer at any level of topsoil Kex at Rothamsted (where the soil contained 15–20 mg Na/kg), but yields were increased on low Kex plots at Woburn whose sandy loam contained only 5–10 mg Na/kg. The uptake of Na from the applied NaCl fertilizer was strongly influenced by the exchangeable K and Na status of the soil. On the low Na soil at Woburn, almost all of the applied Na was taken up by sugar beet grown on plots with low concentrations of topsoil Kex and half of it on plots with adequate concentrations of topsoil Kex compared with two-thirds and one-fifth, respectively, on the higher Na-content soil at Rothamsted. Plants partitioned 0·75 of their K and 0·95 of their Na to the shoot and the balance to the storage root. This pattern of distribution was consistent across sites, seasons and soil K supply. The physiological interactions between K and Na were studied by examining their millimolar concentrations in the tissue-water (mmol/kg) of the shoots and storage roots. The tissue-water concentrations of K in the shoot increased asymptotically with the concentration of Kex in the topsoil, and the increase in K concentration was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the tissue-water concentration of Na. Maximum concentrations of K in shoot tissue-water (and minimum concentrations of Na) were achieved when the topsoil contained a minimum of 200 mg Kex/kg. The optimal physiological tissue-water concentration of Na in shoots was estimated to be c. 90–100 mmol/kg; maintenance of this level required a minimum of 25 mg/kg of exchangeable Na in the topsoil. When not limited by soil Kex, plants maintained a total tissue-water concentration of c. 300–350 mmol/kg of K+Na within the shoot. This was achieved with 80 mmol of Na and 230 mmol of K/kg of tissue water on the high Na-content soil at Rothamsted, and with 40 mmol of Na and 275 mmol of K/kg tissue water on the low-Na soil at Woburn. Significant correlations were established between measurements of beet K made in the factory tarehouse and those made using standard laboratory chemical analyses and between factory estimates of the concentrations of K in the tissue-water of delivered beet and the topsoil Kex. The uses of these relationships to estimate the off-takes of K in the harvested beet and provide feedback to growers on the K status of their soils, and the implications of the study for the use of K and Na fertilizers on UK sugar beet are discussed.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>application rate</subject><subject>Beta vulgaris</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clay loam</subject><subject>crop management</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>exchangeable potassium</subject><subject>exchangeable sodium</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>fertilizer requirements</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>nutrient requirements</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>plant nutrition</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Sandy loam</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>sodium</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>soil fertility</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Subsoils</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>sugar beet</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Topsoil</subject><subject>water content</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EEsvCD-CEhYQ4Bcbf2WNV9YNShFCphLhYjmNvXZJ4ayeo7ZU_jrO7KhKIy9ia95l3xh6EXhJ4R4Co9xcAlNRiJUEBKMngEVoQLleVKPExWsxyNetP0bOcr6FAsKoX6NfBgM06xSH2wWIztHhzdZdD7OI6WNPh5Cr303STGUMccPR4vHJ4E0eTc5j6bUGO7XxN7mYKyfVuGPM2710aQxfuXSqajX1R2q1Nxj4mnKe1SbhxbnyOnnjTZfdify7R5fHR18PT6vzzyYfDg_PKcg5j5RhhEqxXtiWetg1jhjCjwHAuLTGNEiVlrRC0lrQVK95631pDPVhOmpazJXq7892keDO5POo-ZOu6zgwuTlkrzhhlrMQlev0XeR2nNJThNAWmCFA5Q2QH2RRzTs7rTQq9SXeagJ6Xov9ZSql5szc2uXyvT2awIT8UUuB1TYQsXLXjQh7d7YNu0g8tFVNCy5Mv-uPp2dnxt--gPxX-1Y73Juqyz-J5eUGBMCCCl_6iEGw_rembFNq1-_Om_8_7G4y_tis</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>MILFORD, G. F. J.</creator><creator>JARVIS, P. J.</creator><creator>JONES, J.</creator><creator>BARRACLOUGH, P. B.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>An agronomic and physiological re-evaluation of the potassium and sodium requirements and fertilizer recommendations for sugar beet</title><author>MILFORD, G. F. J. ; JARVIS, P. J. ; JONES, J. ; BARRACLOUGH, P. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-e31360cf7cd1f2db33a13a70a446c1ab75b33cc552862d594dffdca2f0c41bd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>application rate</topic><topic>Beta vulgaris</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clay loam</topic><topic>crop management</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>exchangeable potassium</topic><topic>exchangeable sodium</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>fertilizer requirements</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>nutrient requirements</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>plant nutrition</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Sandy loam</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>sodium</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>soil fertility</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Subsoils</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>sugar beet</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Topsoil</topic><topic>water content</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MILFORD, G. F. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JARVIS, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRACLOUGH, P. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MILFORD, G. F. J.</au><au>JARVIS, P. J.</au><au>JONES, J.</au><au>BARRACLOUGH, P. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An agronomic and physiological re-evaluation of the potassium and sodium requirements and fertilizer recommendations for sugar beet</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>429-443</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><coden>JASIAB</coden><abstract>The potassium (K) and sodium (Na) requirements of sugar beet were re-examined in a 6-year series of experiments between 2000 and 2005 using reference plots with a wide range of long-established differences in exchangeable topsoil K (Kex). Two groups of plots with a topsoil concentration Kex range of 40–550 mg/kg were used, each situated within an individual field, one on a silty clay loam at Rothamsted and the other on a contrasting sandy loam at Woburn. The interactions between topsoil Kex and applied N, K and Na fertilizers were studied at Rothamsted. Under these well-defined conditions, maximum yields of 55–71 t/ha of adjusted clean beet were achieved with a topsoil Kex concentration of 120–150 mg/kg, i.e. at Soil K Index 2–, with a small difference between the two soils being accounted for by differences in exchangeable soil Na and subsoil Kex. There were no yield responses to freshly applied fertilizer K, even on low K plots where responses might be expected. It is concluded that the existing recommendations for K fertilizer use on UK sugar beet do not need to be adjusted to allow for the higher yields of modern crops. There were no yield responses to NaCl fertilizer at any level of topsoil Kex at Rothamsted (where the soil contained 15–20 mg Na/kg), but yields were increased on low Kex plots at Woburn whose sandy loam contained only 5–10 mg Na/kg. The uptake of Na from the applied NaCl fertilizer was strongly influenced by the exchangeable K and Na status of the soil. On the low Na soil at Woburn, almost all of the applied Na was taken up by sugar beet grown on plots with low concentrations of topsoil Kex and half of it on plots with adequate concentrations of topsoil Kex compared with two-thirds and one-fifth, respectively, on the higher Na-content soil at Rothamsted. Plants partitioned 0·75 of their K and 0·95 of their Na to the shoot and the balance to the storage root. This pattern of distribution was consistent across sites, seasons and soil K supply. The physiological interactions between K and Na were studied by examining their millimolar concentrations in the tissue-water (mmol/kg) of the shoots and storage roots. The tissue-water concentrations of K in the shoot increased asymptotically with the concentration of Kex in the topsoil, and the increase in K concentration was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in the tissue-water concentration of Na. Maximum concentrations of K in shoot tissue-water (and minimum concentrations of Na) were achieved when the topsoil contained a minimum of 200 mg Kex/kg. The optimal physiological tissue-water concentration of Na in shoots was estimated to be c. 90–100 mmol/kg; maintenance of this level required a minimum of 25 mg/kg of exchangeable Na in the topsoil. When not limited by soil Kex, plants maintained a total tissue-water concentration of c. 300–350 mmol/kg of K+Na within the shoot. This was achieved with 80 mmol of Na and 230 mmol of K/kg of tissue water on the high Na-content soil at Rothamsted, and with 40 mmol of Na and 275 mmol of K/kg tissue water on the low-Na soil at Woburn. Significant correlations were established between measurements of beet K made in the factory tarehouse and those made using standard laboratory chemical analyses and between factory estimates of the concentrations of K in the tissue-water of delivered beet and the topsoil Kex. The uses of these relationships to estimate the off-takes of K in the harvested beet and provide feedback to growers on the K status of their soils, and the implications of the study for the use of K and Na fertilizers on UK sugar beet are discussed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859607007630</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 2008-08, Vol.146 (4), p.429-443
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743323343
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural production
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
application rate
Beta vulgaris
Biological and medical sciences
Clay loam
crop management
crop yield
exchangeable potassium
exchangeable sodium
Experiments
fertilizer rates
fertilizer requirements
Fertilizers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Loam soils
nutrient requirements
Physiology
plant nutrition
Potassium
Sandy loam
Shoots
sodium
Sodium chloride
soil fertility
Soils
Subsoils
Sugar
sugar beet
Tissues
Topsoil
water content
Wheat
title An agronomic and physiological re-evaluation of the potassium and sodium requirements and fertilizer recommendations for sugar beet
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20agronomic%20and%20physiological%20re-evaluation%20of%20the%20potassium%20and%20sodium%20requirements%20and%20fertilizer%20recommendations%20for%20sugar%20beet&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=MILFORD,%20G.%C2%A0F.%C2%A0J.&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=429-443&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft.coden=JASIAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859607007630&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743323343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203710263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859607007630&rfr_iscdi=true