Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on missio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aircraft Engineering 2009-01, Vol.81 (3), p.226-233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 233 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 226 |
container_title | Aircraft Engineering |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Omran, A. Kassem, A. El-Bayoumi, G. Bayoumi, M. |
description | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/00022660910954736 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743304921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1857751261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD16sziRpPo6y-AUrHtRzyDYpdGmbmrSI_94u68lV8DRzeJ5h3peQU4QrRFDXAECpEKARdMElE3tkhrJQOafI9jc7V7lSnB6So5TWACgKYDPCn-qU6tDlK5u8y0I_1K1tsjJ0QwxNFqrsZfAfNg5Za7u6Hxs7hHhMDirbJH_yPefk7e72dfGQL5_vHxc3y7zkCEPuXemE11KhK9RqVQjmVWl1IbxjQguB1IIHZBUytEIoXzINwF0xZQFOKzYnF9u7fQzvo0-DaetU-qaxnQ9jMpIzBlxPCefk_Ae5DmPspucM5UxpxbkUE3X2J4VMSi4pnSDcQmUMKUVfmT5OncRPg2A2XZudricHto5vfbSN-5dy-buyg5reVewLnCuJvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213774722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Omran, A. ; Kassem, A. ; El-Bayoumi, G. ; Bayoumi, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Omran, A. ; Kassem, A. ; El-Bayoumi, G. ; Bayoumi, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-8842</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0002-2667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/00022660910954736</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AATEEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Aircraft control ; Aircraft stability ; Augmentation systems ; Aviation ; Computer simulation ; Control stability ; Controllers ; Cost function ; Decentralized control ; Design ; Gain scheduling ; Genetic algorithms ; Kinematics ; Manipulators ; Nonlinear systems ; Optimal control ; Optimization ; Optimization techniques ; Robot arms ; Robust control ; Stability augmentation ; Step response ; Studies ; Task space ; Tuning</subject><ispartof>Aircraft Engineering, 2009-01, Vol.81 (3), p.226-233</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2009</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omran, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassem, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Bayoumi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayoumi, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</title><title>Aircraft Engineering</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Aircraft control</subject><subject>Aircraft stability</subject><subject>Augmentation systems</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Cost function</subject><subject>Decentralized control</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Gain scheduling</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Optimal control</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Robot arms</subject><subject>Robust control</subject><subject>Stability augmentation</subject><subject>Step response</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task space</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><issn>1748-8842</issn><issn>0002-2667</issn><issn>1758-4213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD16sziRpPo6y-AUrHtRzyDYpdGmbmrSI_94u68lV8DRzeJ5h3peQU4QrRFDXAECpEKARdMElE3tkhrJQOafI9jc7V7lSnB6So5TWACgKYDPCn-qU6tDlK5u8y0I_1K1tsjJ0QwxNFqrsZfAfNg5Za7u6Hxs7hHhMDirbJH_yPefk7e72dfGQL5_vHxc3y7zkCEPuXemE11KhK9RqVQjmVWl1IbxjQguB1IIHZBUytEIoXzINwF0xZQFOKzYnF9u7fQzvo0-DaetU-qaxnQ9jMpIzBlxPCefk_Ae5DmPspucM5UxpxbkUE3X2J4VMSi4pnSDcQmUMKUVfmT5OncRPg2A2XZudricHto5vfbSN-5dy-buyg5reVewLnCuJvw</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Omran, A.</creator><creator>Kassem, A.</creator><creator>El-Bayoumi, G.</creator><creator>Bayoumi, M.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</title><author>Omran, A. ; Kassem, A. ; El-Bayoumi, G. ; Bayoumi, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Aircraft control</topic><topic>Aircraft stability</topic><topic>Augmentation systems</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Cost function</topic><topic>Decentralized control</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Gain scheduling</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Optimal control</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Robot arms</topic><topic>Robust control</topic><topic>Stability augmentation</topic><topic>Step response</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task space</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omran, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassem, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Bayoumi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayoumi, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Aircraft Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omran, A.</au><au>Kassem, A.</au><au>El-Bayoumi, G.</au><au>Bayoumi, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</atitle><jtitle>Aircraft Engineering</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>226-233</pages><issn>1748-8842</issn><issn>0002-2667</issn><eissn>1758-4213</eissn><coden>AATEEB</coden><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/00022660910954736</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-8842 |
ispartof | Aircraft Engineering, 2009-01, Vol.81 (3), p.226-233 |
issn | 1748-8842 0002-2667 1758-4213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743304921 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Aerodynamics Aircraft control Aircraft stability Augmentation systems Aviation Computer simulation Control stability Controllers Cost function Decentralized control Design Gain scheduling Genetic algorithms Kinematics Manipulators Nonlinear systems Optimal control Optimization Optimization techniques Robot arms Robust control Stability augmentation Step response Studies Task space Tuning |
title | Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mission-based%20optimal%20control%20of%20Stewart%20manipulator&rft.jtitle=Aircraft%20Engineering&rft.au=Omran,%20A.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=226-233&rft.issn=1748-8842&rft.eissn=1758-4213&rft.coden=AATEEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/00022660910954736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1857751261%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213774722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |