Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on missio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aircraft Engineering 2009-01, Vol.81 (3), p.226-233
Hauptverfasser: Omran, A., Kassem, A., El-Bayoumi, G., Bayoumi, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 3
container_start_page 226
container_title Aircraft Engineering
container_volume 81
creator Omran, A.
Kassem, A.
El-Bayoumi, G.
Bayoumi, M.
description Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/00022660910954736
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743304921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1857751261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD16sziRpPo6y-AUrHtRzyDYpdGmbmrSI_94u68lV8DRzeJ5h3peQU4QrRFDXAECpEKARdMElE3tkhrJQOafI9jc7V7lSnB6So5TWACgKYDPCn-qU6tDlK5u8y0I_1K1tsjJ0QwxNFqrsZfAfNg5Za7u6Hxs7hHhMDirbJH_yPefk7e72dfGQL5_vHxc3y7zkCEPuXemE11KhK9RqVQjmVWl1IbxjQguB1IIHZBUytEIoXzINwF0xZQFOKzYnF9u7fQzvo0-DaetU-qaxnQ9jMpIzBlxPCefk_Ae5DmPspucM5UxpxbkUE3X2J4VMSi4pnSDcQmUMKUVfmT5OncRPg2A2XZudricHto5vfbSN-5dy-buyg5reVewLnCuJvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213774722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Omran, A. ; Kassem, A. ; El-Bayoumi, G. ; Bayoumi, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Omran, A. ; Kassem, A. ; El-Bayoumi, G. ; Bayoumi, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-8842</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0002-2667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/00022660910954736</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AATEEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Aircraft control ; Aircraft stability ; Augmentation systems ; Aviation ; Computer simulation ; Control stability ; Controllers ; Cost function ; Decentralized control ; Design ; Gain scheduling ; Genetic algorithms ; Kinematics ; Manipulators ; Nonlinear systems ; Optimal control ; Optimization ; Optimization techniques ; Robot arms ; Robust control ; Stability augmentation ; Step response ; Studies ; Task space ; Tuning</subject><ispartof>Aircraft Engineering, 2009-01, Vol.81 (3), p.226-233</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2009</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omran, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassem, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Bayoumi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayoumi, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</title><title>Aircraft Engineering</title><description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Aircraft control</subject><subject>Aircraft stability</subject><subject>Augmentation systems</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Cost function</subject><subject>Decentralized control</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Gain scheduling</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Optimal control</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Robot arms</subject><subject>Robust control</subject><subject>Stability augmentation</subject><subject>Step response</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Task space</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><issn>1748-8842</issn><issn>0002-2667</issn><issn>1758-4213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD16sziRpPo6y-AUrHtRzyDYpdGmbmrSI_94u68lV8DRzeJ5h3peQU4QrRFDXAECpEKARdMElE3tkhrJQOafI9jc7V7lSnB6So5TWACgKYDPCn-qU6tDlK5u8y0I_1K1tsjJ0QwxNFqrsZfAfNg5Za7u6Hxs7hHhMDirbJH_yPefk7e72dfGQL5_vHxc3y7zkCEPuXemE11KhK9RqVQjmVWl1IbxjQguB1IIHZBUytEIoXzINwF0xZQFOKzYnF9u7fQzvo0-DaetU-qaxnQ9jMpIzBlxPCefk_Ae5DmPspucM5UxpxbkUE3X2J4VMSi4pnSDcQmUMKUVfmT5OncRPg2A2XZudricHto5vfbSN-5dy-buyg5reVewLnCuJvw</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Omran, A.</creator><creator>Kassem, A.</creator><creator>El-Bayoumi, G.</creator><creator>Bayoumi, M.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</title><author>Omran, A. ; Kassem, A. ; El-Bayoumi, G. ; Bayoumi, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-edcd6e9781d58bb563e8ca956ed3696612a0e013f131a668ec39004d5002042f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Aircraft control</topic><topic>Aircraft stability</topic><topic>Augmentation systems</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Cost function</topic><topic>Decentralized control</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Gain scheduling</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Optimal control</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Robot arms</topic><topic>Robust control</topic><topic>Stability augmentation</topic><topic>Step response</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Task space</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omran, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassem, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Bayoumi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayoumi, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Aircraft Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omran, A.</au><au>Kassem, A.</au><au>El-Bayoumi, G.</au><au>Bayoumi, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator</atitle><jtitle>Aircraft Engineering</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>226-233</pages><issn>1748-8842</issn><issn>0002-2667</issn><eissn>1758-4213</eissn><coden>AATEEB</coden><abstract>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show the merit of using mission information in tuning the controller gains for Stewart manipulator instead of the generic inputs previously developed in literature.Design methodology approach - The paper introduces two optimization techniques based on mission information. The first technique, a partial-information technique, uses gain scheduling that applies different controllers for different mission tracks. The second technique, a full-information technique uses a single robust controller by considering the full mission data. For demonstrating these techniques' feasibility, a nonlinear numerical simulation for a Stewart manipulator was built and tested using a generic mission. This mission consists of two piecewise trajectories (tracks). The proposed techniques were compared with one of the previous optimization techniques in literature, no-information technique, in which a step response is used to search for optimal controller gains without any information about the mission. Genetic algorithms were used to search for the optimal controller gain in each case with different cost functions.Findings - Based on the numerical simulations, the proposed mission-based optimization techniques have superior performances compared with no-information technique.Research limitations implications - The proposed techniques were applied in a joint space or for a decentralized control. The work can be extended to be applied in a task space or for a centralized control.Originality value - The paper proposes two novel optimization techniques: partial- and full-information techniques for tuning the controller gains of a Stewart manipulator, where mission information was imbedded into the cost function. These two techniques are generally applicable for other nonlinear systems such as aircraft stability and control augmentation systems.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/00022660910954736</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-8842
ispartof Aircraft Engineering, 2009-01, Vol.81 (3), p.226-233
issn 1748-8842
0002-2667
1758-4213
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743304921
source Emerald Journals
subjects Aerodynamics
Aircraft control
Aircraft stability
Augmentation systems
Aviation
Computer simulation
Control stability
Controllers
Cost function
Decentralized control
Design
Gain scheduling
Genetic algorithms
Kinematics
Manipulators
Nonlinear systems
Optimal control
Optimization
Optimization techniques
Robot arms
Robust control
Stability augmentation
Step response
Studies
Task space
Tuning
title Mission-based optimal control of Stewart manipulator
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mission-based%20optimal%20control%20of%20Stewart%20manipulator&rft.jtitle=Aircraft%20Engineering&rft.au=Omran,%20A.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=226-233&rft.issn=1748-8842&rft.eissn=1758-4213&rft.coden=AATEEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/00022660910954736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1857751261%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213774722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true