Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?
De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the atmospheric sciences 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.403-421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 421 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | Journal of the atmospheric sciences |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | DE ROODE, Stephan R DUYNKERKE, Peter G JONKER, Harm J. J |
description | De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0403:lshlil>2.0.co;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743273544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>570807861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-442bc4717a14acf6eb6c24774354a35fb37687df770d650f983613a5ee47ec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQh-XXTLd9opigzdBoVduPuQZenWkTUzWZH9e1M2FLwwNyeQ5zyHnBeAPoI9hATrI4ZhCinP7zGE9AFy9AQpJAMbVrayz7gHe9o94hPQ-SFPQQdCjFOa4-wcXISwhvFggToAFcovTWoWi30Sqk1j1a5y9SAZu6_Etk9JFY4XU7tmuXq5BGelssFcHWsXzN7fZsNxWkxHk-FrkWrKs11KKZ5rKpBQiCpdcjPnGlMhKGFUEVbOieCZWJRCwAVnsMwzwhFRzBgqjEakC-4O2q13n40JO7mpgjbWqtq4JsgowiK6aCRv_yUxIizPMIvg9R9w7Rpfx09ITHg0MZFHaHSAtHcheFPKra82yu8lgrINQLZrle1aZRuAjAHINgBZfIyLSSGxhHI4jcYuuDmOU0ErW3pV6yr86hjNWewj3zSIhvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236443579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>DE ROODE, Stephan R ; DUYNKERKE, Peter G ; JONKER, Harm J. J</creator><creatorcontrib>DE ROODE, Stephan R ; DUYNKERKE, Peter G ; JONKER, Harm J. J</creatorcontrib><description>De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0403:lshlil>2.0.co;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAHSAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Boundary layers ; Buoyancy ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology ; Simulation ; Temperature ; Velocity ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.403-421</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Feb 15, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-442bc4717a14acf6eb6c24774354a35fb37687df770d650f983613a5ee47ec13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15495403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE ROODE, Stephan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONKER, Harm J. J</creatorcontrib><title>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</title><title>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</title><description>De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy.</description><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Buoyancy</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0022-4928</issn><issn>1520-0469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQh-XXTLd9opigzdBoVduPuQZenWkTUzWZH9e1M2FLwwNyeQ5zyHnBeAPoI9hATrI4ZhCinP7zGE9AFy9AQpJAMbVrayz7gHe9o94hPQ-SFPQQdCjFOa4-wcXISwhvFggToAFcovTWoWi30Sqk1j1a5y9SAZu6_Etk9JFY4XU7tmuXq5BGelssFcHWsXzN7fZsNxWkxHk-FrkWrKs11KKZ5rKpBQiCpdcjPnGlMhKGFUEVbOieCZWJRCwAVnsMwzwhFRzBgqjEakC-4O2q13n40JO7mpgjbWqtq4JsgowiK6aCRv_yUxIizPMIvg9R9w7Rpfx09ITHg0MZFHaHSAtHcheFPKra82yu8lgrINQLZrle1aZRuAjAHINgBZfIyLSSGxhHI4jcYuuDmOU0ErW3pV6yr86hjNWewj3zSIhvQ</recordid><startdate>20040215</startdate><enddate>20040215</enddate><creator>DE ROODE, Stephan R</creator><creator>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</creator><creator>JONKER, Harm J. J</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040215</creationdate><title>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</title><author>DE ROODE, Stephan R ; DUYNKERKE, Peter G ; JONKER, Harm J. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-442bc4717a14acf6eb6c24774354a35fb37687df770d650f983613a5ee47ec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Buoyancy</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE ROODE, Stephan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONKER, Harm J. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE ROODE, Stephan R</au><au>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</au><au>JONKER, Harm J. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</jtitle><date>2004-02-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>403-421</pages><issn>0022-4928</issn><eissn>1520-0469</eissn><coden>JAHSAK</coden><abstract>De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0403:lshlil>2.0.co;2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4928 |
ispartof | Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.403-421 |
issn | 0022-4928 1520-0469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743273544 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Boundary layers Buoyancy Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Meteorology Simulation Temperature Velocity Wind |
title | Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A04%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Large-eddy%20simulation:%20How%20large%20is%20large%20enough?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20atmospheric%20sciences&rft.au=DE%20ROODE,%20Stephan%20R&rft.date=2004-02-15&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=403-421&rft.issn=0022-4928&rft.eissn=1520-0469&rft.coden=JAHSAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061%3C0403:lshlil%3E2.0.co;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E570807861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236443579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |