Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?

De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the atmospheric sciences 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.403-421
Hauptverfasser: DE ROODE, Stephan R, DUYNKERKE, Peter G, JONKER, Harm J. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 421
container_issue 4
container_start_page 403
container_title Journal of the atmospheric sciences
container_volume 61
creator DE ROODE, Stephan R
DUYNKERKE, Peter G
JONKER, Harm J. J
description De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0403:lshlil>2.0.co;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743273544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>570807861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-442bc4717a14acf6eb6c24774354a35fb37687df770d650f983613a5ee47ec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQh-XXTLd9opigzdBoVduPuQZenWkTUzWZH9e1M2FLwwNyeQ5zyHnBeAPoI9hATrI4ZhCinP7zGE9AFy9AQpJAMbVrayz7gHe9o94hPQ-SFPQQdCjFOa4-wcXISwhvFggToAFcovTWoWi30Sqk1j1a5y9SAZu6_Etk9JFY4XU7tmuXq5BGelssFcHWsXzN7fZsNxWkxHk-FrkWrKs11KKZ5rKpBQiCpdcjPnGlMhKGFUEVbOieCZWJRCwAVnsMwzwhFRzBgqjEakC-4O2q13n40JO7mpgjbWqtq4JsgowiK6aCRv_yUxIizPMIvg9R9w7Rpfx09ITHg0MZFHaHSAtHcheFPKra82yu8lgrINQLZrle1aZRuAjAHINgBZfIyLSSGxhHI4jcYuuDmOU0ErW3pV6yr86hjNWewj3zSIhvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236443579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>DE ROODE, Stephan R ; DUYNKERKE, Peter G ; JONKER, Harm J. J</creator><creatorcontrib>DE ROODE, Stephan R ; DUYNKERKE, Peter G ; JONKER, Harm J. J</creatorcontrib><description>De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;0403:lshlil&gt;2.0.co;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAHSAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Boundary layers ; Buoyancy ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology ; Simulation ; Temperature ; Velocity ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.403-421</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Feb 15, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-442bc4717a14acf6eb6c24774354a35fb37687df770d650f983613a5ee47ec13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15495403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE ROODE, Stephan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONKER, Harm J. J</creatorcontrib><title>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</title><title>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</title><description>De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy.</description><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Buoyancy</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0022-4928</issn><issn>1520-0469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQh-XXTLd9opigzdBoVduPuQZenWkTUzWZH9e1M2FLwwNyeQ5zyHnBeAPoI9hATrI4ZhCinP7zGE9AFy9AQpJAMbVrayz7gHe9o94hPQ-SFPQQdCjFOa4-wcXISwhvFggToAFcovTWoWi30Sqk1j1a5y9SAZu6_Etk9JFY4XU7tmuXq5BGelssFcHWsXzN7fZsNxWkxHk-FrkWrKs11KKZ5rKpBQiCpdcjPnGlMhKGFUEVbOieCZWJRCwAVnsMwzwhFRzBgqjEakC-4O2q13n40JO7mpgjbWqtq4JsgowiK6aCRv_yUxIizPMIvg9R9w7Rpfx09ITHg0MZFHaHSAtHcheFPKra82yu8lgrINQLZrle1aZRuAjAHINgBZfIyLSSGxhHI4jcYuuDmOU0ErW3pV6yr86hjNWewj3zSIhvQ</recordid><startdate>20040215</startdate><enddate>20040215</enddate><creator>DE ROODE, Stephan R</creator><creator>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</creator><creator>JONKER, Harm J. J</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040215</creationdate><title>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</title><author>DE ROODE, Stephan R ; DUYNKERKE, Peter G ; JONKER, Harm J. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-442bc4717a14acf6eb6c24774354a35fb37687df770d650f983613a5ee47ec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Buoyancy</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE ROODE, Stephan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONKER, Harm J. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE ROODE, Stephan R</au><au>DUYNKERKE, Peter G</au><au>JONKER, Harm J. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</jtitle><date>2004-02-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>403-421</pages><issn>0022-4928</issn><eissn>1520-0469</eissn><coden>JAHSAK</coden><abstract>De Roode et al study by means of large-eddy simulations on a large horizontal domain the length scale evolution of various quantities in a clear convective boundary layer, a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, and three radiatively cooled convective boundary layers. Result shows that mesoscale fluctuations are negligibly small only for conserved variables that have an entrainment to surface flux ration close to -0.25, which is about the flux ratio for the buoyancy.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061&lt;0403:lshlil&gt;2.0.co;2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4928
ispartof Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 2004-02, Vol.61 (4), p.403-421
issn 0022-4928
1520-0469
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743273544
source American Meteorological Society; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Boundary layers
Buoyancy
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Meteorology
Simulation
Temperature
Velocity
Wind
title Large-eddy simulation: How large is large enough?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A04%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Large-eddy%20simulation:%20How%20large%20is%20large%20enough?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20atmospheric%20sciences&rft.au=DE%20ROODE,%20Stephan%20R&rft.date=2004-02-15&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=403-421&rft.issn=0022-4928&rft.eissn=1520-0469&rft.coden=JAHSAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061%3C0403:lshlil%3E2.0.co;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E570807861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236443579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true