Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience
Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recover...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ground water 1993-05, Vol.31 (3), p.410-416 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 416 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 410 |
container_title | Ground water |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA) Wilson, L.G Amy, G.L Brothers, K |
description | Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743210910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7207610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkkFv0zAYhiMEEmXwBzhZO8ApwV_s2PEuaKrWDqkCITa2E5abfMlS0rizE2j__Rwy7cCBDR9sy36-1_brN4qOgSYQ2odNApJnschynoBSLOnXFHLOkv2zaPaw9TyaUQoy5kJev4xeeb-hlDJF1Sz6sTA9ElsR62rT2eKmta7pkBR2u7NDV3pSDmGhJuZ2aCp0xPfWmRqJ6UrisLC_0B1OSH-DZGU8-Y516HG_Q9dgV-Dr6EVlWo9v7sej6HJxdjE_j1dflp_mp6vYCAAaZ2VZCZBGooKsYjlymqYlq4xSwKocsORrqEwaiLIopZSUpeEJ2ZpLLJSh7Ch6P-nunL0d0Pd62_gC29Z0aAevJWcpUAUj-e6fZAos56mAR0EQQqg8eP4EkHNQT1AMl6SQ8sdBJsK5lAXw-C9wYwfXBad1ykQuM8ZkgE4mqHDWe4eV3rlma9xBA9VjivRGj1HRY1T0mCJ9nyK9D8Ufp-LfTYuH_6jUy6vTC_7H8HhSaHyP-wcF435qIZnM9NXnZZjx668LNtejnW8nvjJWm9o1Xl9-Uzx8CzB2B0ek5T8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236875337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA) ; Wilson, L.G ; Amy, G.L ; Brothers, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA) ; Wilson, L.G ; Amy, G.L ; Brothers, K</creatorcontrib><description>Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-467X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GRWAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>AGUA ; AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS ; ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA ; Aquifers ; CALIFORNIA ; CALIFORNIE ; CAPA FREATICA ; Chlorination ; Chlorine ; Chlorine compounds ; COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE ; COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO ; EAU ; EAU SOUTERRAINE ; Groundwater ; Methane ; NAPPE SOUTERRAINE ; Organic compounds ; POLLUTION DE L'EAU ; POLUCION DEL AGUA ; Q1 ; Rivers ; STOCKAGE D'EAU ; Water treatment ; Water wells</subject><ispartof>Ground water, 1993-05, Vol.31 (3), p.410-416</ispartof><rights>Copyright Ground Water Publishing Company May 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, L.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amy, G.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brothers, K</creatorcontrib><title>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</title><title>Ground water</title><description>Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored</description><subject>AGUA</subject><subject>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</subject><subject>ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>CALIFORNIA</subject><subject>CALIFORNIE</subject><subject>CAPA FREATICA</subject><subject>Chlorination</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Chlorine compounds</subject><subject>COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE</subject><subject>COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO</subject><subject>EAU</subject><subject>EAU SOUTERRAINE</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>NAPPE SOUTERRAINE</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</subject><subject>POLUCION DEL AGUA</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>STOCKAGE D'EAU</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water wells</subject><issn>0017-467X</issn><issn>1745-6584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkkFv0zAYhiMEEmXwBzhZO8ApwV_s2PEuaKrWDqkCITa2E5abfMlS0rizE2j__Rwy7cCBDR9sy36-1_brN4qOgSYQ2odNApJnschynoBSLOnXFHLOkv2zaPaw9TyaUQoy5kJev4xeeb-hlDJF1Sz6sTA9ElsR62rT2eKmta7pkBR2u7NDV3pSDmGhJuZ2aCp0xPfWmRqJ6UrisLC_0B1OSH-DZGU8-Y516HG_Q9dgV-Dr6EVlWo9v7sej6HJxdjE_j1dflp_mp6vYCAAaZ2VZCZBGooKsYjlymqYlq4xSwKocsORrqEwaiLIopZSUpeEJ2ZpLLJSh7Ch6P-nunL0d0Pd62_gC29Z0aAevJWcpUAUj-e6fZAos56mAR0EQQqg8eP4EkHNQT1AMl6SQ8sdBJsK5lAXw-C9wYwfXBad1ykQuM8ZkgE4mqHDWe4eV3rlma9xBA9VjivRGj1HRY1T0mCJ9nyK9D8Ufp-LfTYuH_6jUy6vTC_7H8HhSaHyP-wcF435qIZnM9NXnZZjx668LNtejnW8nvjJWm9o1Xl9-Uzx8CzB2B0ek5T8</recordid><startdate>199305</startdate><enddate>199305</enddate><creator>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</creator><creator>Wilson, L.G</creator><creator>Amy, G.L</creator><creator>Brothers, K</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Ground Water Publishing Company</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199305</creationdate><title>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</title><author>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA) ; Wilson, L.G ; Amy, G.L ; Brothers, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>AGUA</topic><topic>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</topic><topic>ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>CALIFORNIA</topic><topic>CALIFORNIE</topic><topic>CAPA FREATICA</topic><topic>Chlorination</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Chlorine compounds</topic><topic>COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE</topic><topic>COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO</topic><topic>EAU</topic><topic>EAU SOUTERRAINE</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>NAPPE SOUTERRAINE</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</topic><topic>POLUCION DEL AGUA</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>STOCKAGE D'EAU</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, L.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amy, G.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brothers, K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</au><au>Wilson, L.G</au><au>Amy, G.L</au><au>Brothers, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</atitle><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle><date>1993-05</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>410-416</pages><issn>0017-467X</issn><eissn>1745-6584</eissn><coden>GRWAAP</coden><abstract>Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-467X |
ispartof | Ground water, 1993-05, Vol.31 (3), p.410-416 |
issn | 0017-467X 1745-6584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743210910 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | AGUA AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA Aquifers CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIE CAPA FREATICA Chlorination Chlorine Chlorine compounds COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO EAU EAU SOUTERRAINE Groundwater Methane NAPPE SOUTERRAINE Organic compounds POLLUTION DE L'EAU POLUCION DEL AGUA Q1 Rivers STOCKAGE D'EAU Water treatment Water wells |
title | Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A34%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fate%20of%20organochlorine%20compounds%20during%20aquifer%20storage%20and%20recovery:%20the%20Las%20Vegas%20experience&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water&rft.au=Miller,%20C.J.%20(County%20Sanitations%20Districts%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20County,%20Whittier,%20CA)&rft.date=1993-05&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=410-416&rft.issn=0017-467X&rft.eissn=1745-6584&rft.coden=GRWAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E7207610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236875337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |