Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience

Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recover...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ground water 1993-05, Vol.31 (3), p.410-416
Hauptverfasser: Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA), Wilson, L.G, Amy, G.L, Brothers, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 416
container_issue 3
container_start_page 410
container_title Ground water
container_volume 31
creator Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)
Wilson, L.G
Amy, G.L
Brothers, K
description Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743210910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7207610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkkFv0zAYhiMEEmXwBzhZO8ApwV_s2PEuaKrWDqkCITa2E5abfMlS0rizE2j__Rwy7cCBDR9sy36-1_brN4qOgSYQ2odNApJnschynoBSLOnXFHLOkv2zaPaw9TyaUQoy5kJev4xeeb-hlDJF1Sz6sTA9ElsR62rT2eKmta7pkBR2u7NDV3pSDmGhJuZ2aCp0xPfWmRqJ6UrisLC_0B1OSH-DZGU8-Y516HG_Q9dgV-Dr6EVlWo9v7sej6HJxdjE_j1dflp_mp6vYCAAaZ2VZCZBGooKsYjlymqYlq4xSwKocsORrqEwaiLIopZSUpeEJ2ZpLLJSh7Ch6P-nunL0d0Pd62_gC29Z0aAevJWcpUAUj-e6fZAos56mAR0EQQqg8eP4EkHNQT1AMl6SQ8sdBJsK5lAXw-C9wYwfXBad1ykQuM8ZkgE4mqHDWe4eV3rlma9xBA9VjivRGj1HRY1T0mCJ9nyK9D8Ufp-LfTYuH_6jUy6vTC_7H8HhSaHyP-wcF435qIZnM9NXnZZjx668LNtejnW8nvjJWm9o1Xl9-Uzx8CzB2B0ek5T8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236875337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA) ; Wilson, L.G ; Amy, G.L ; Brothers, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA) ; Wilson, L.G ; Amy, G.L ; Brothers, K</creatorcontrib><description>Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-467X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GRWAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>AGUA ; AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS ; ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA ; Aquifers ; CALIFORNIA ; CALIFORNIE ; CAPA FREATICA ; Chlorination ; Chlorine ; Chlorine compounds ; COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE ; COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO ; EAU ; EAU SOUTERRAINE ; Groundwater ; Methane ; NAPPE SOUTERRAINE ; Organic compounds ; POLLUTION DE L'EAU ; POLUCION DEL AGUA ; Q1 ; Rivers ; STOCKAGE D'EAU ; Water treatment ; Water wells</subject><ispartof>Ground water, 1993-05, Vol.31 (3), p.410-416</ispartof><rights>Copyright Ground Water Publishing Company May 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, L.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amy, G.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brothers, K</creatorcontrib><title>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</title><title>Ground water</title><description>Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored</description><subject>AGUA</subject><subject>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</subject><subject>ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>CALIFORNIA</subject><subject>CALIFORNIE</subject><subject>CAPA FREATICA</subject><subject>Chlorination</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Chlorine compounds</subject><subject>COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE</subject><subject>COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO</subject><subject>EAU</subject><subject>EAU SOUTERRAINE</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>NAPPE SOUTERRAINE</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</subject><subject>POLUCION DEL AGUA</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>STOCKAGE D'EAU</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water wells</subject><issn>0017-467X</issn><issn>1745-6584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkkFv0zAYhiMEEmXwBzhZO8ApwV_s2PEuaKrWDqkCITa2E5abfMlS0rizE2j__Rwy7cCBDR9sy36-1_brN4qOgSYQ2odNApJnschynoBSLOnXFHLOkv2zaPaw9TyaUQoy5kJev4xeeb-hlDJF1Sz6sTA9ElsR62rT2eKmta7pkBR2u7NDV3pSDmGhJuZ2aCp0xPfWmRqJ6UrisLC_0B1OSH-DZGU8-Y516HG_Q9dgV-Dr6EVlWo9v7sej6HJxdjE_j1dflp_mp6vYCAAaZ2VZCZBGooKsYjlymqYlq4xSwKocsORrqEwaiLIopZSUpeEJ2ZpLLJSh7Ch6P-nunL0d0Pd62_gC29Z0aAevJWcpUAUj-e6fZAos56mAR0EQQqg8eP4EkHNQT1AMl6SQ8sdBJsK5lAXw-C9wYwfXBad1ykQuM8ZkgE4mqHDWe4eV3rlma9xBA9VjivRGj1HRY1T0mCJ9nyK9D8Ufp-LfTYuH_6jUy6vTC_7H8HhSaHyP-wcF435qIZnM9NXnZZjx668LNtejnW8nvjJWm9o1Xl9-Uzx8CzB2B0ek5T8</recordid><startdate>199305</startdate><enddate>199305</enddate><creator>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</creator><creator>Wilson, L.G</creator><creator>Amy, G.L</creator><creator>Brothers, K</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Ground Water Publishing Company</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199305</creationdate><title>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</title><author>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA) ; Wilson, L.G ; Amy, G.L ; Brothers, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a6110-5ddf617a7e915f38e4022d3fa9913f81ed4b1fa27a7dcd7770320005b47ec9a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>AGUA</topic><topic>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</topic><topic>ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>CALIFORNIA</topic><topic>CALIFORNIE</topic><topic>CAPA FREATICA</topic><topic>Chlorination</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Chlorine compounds</topic><topic>COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE</topic><topic>COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO</topic><topic>EAU</topic><topic>EAU SOUTERRAINE</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>NAPPE SOUTERRAINE</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</topic><topic>POLUCION DEL AGUA</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>STOCKAGE D'EAU</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, L.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amy, G.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brothers, K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, C.J. (County Sanitations Districts of Los Angeles County, Whittier, CA)</au><au>Wilson, L.G</au><au>Amy, G.L</au><au>Brothers, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience</atitle><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle><date>1993-05</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>410-416</pages><issn>0017-467X</issn><eissn>1745-6584</eissn><coden>GRWAAP</coden><abstract>Two water quality concerns with aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) operations are (1) the fate of organochlorine compounds, such as trihalomethanes (THMS), in the treated recharge source, and (2) the formation of organochlorine compounds from precursor materials following the chlorination of recovered water. The fate of chloroorganic compounds in chlorinated Colorado River water was studied during a 1989 recharge/recovery operation conducted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD). Water samples were obtained from two dual-purpose wells during the pumping cycle for THMs and other indicators of organochlorine precursors. The percentage recovery of THMs was approximately the same as the percentage recovery of Colorado River water. This suggests that the removal of organochlorine compounds (e.g., by sorption) did not appreciably occur in the aquifer materials at the two well sites. Recovery of source water was incomplete. Accordingly, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), representing precursor material, remained in the aquifer at the end of the pumping cycle. The Las Vegas experience suggests that prolonged recharge and storage of Colorado River water in similar hydrogeologic basins (e.g., the Tucson basin) could result in problems with THM compliance at the well head. This will be a problem if THM standards are reduced during the interval that water is stored</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-467X
ispartof Ground water, 1993-05, Vol.31 (3), p.410-416
issn 0017-467X
1745-6584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743210910
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects AGUA
AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS
ALMACENAMIENTO DE AGUA
Aquifers
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIE
CAPA FREATICA
Chlorination
Chlorine
Chlorine compounds
COMPOSE ORGANOCHLORE
COMPUESTO ORGANICO DEL CLORO
EAU
EAU SOUTERRAINE
Groundwater
Methane
NAPPE SOUTERRAINE
Organic compounds
POLLUTION DE L'EAU
POLUCION DEL AGUA
Q1
Rivers
STOCKAGE D'EAU
Water treatment
Water wells
title Fate of organochlorine compounds during aquifer storage and recovery: the Las Vegas experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A34%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fate%20of%20organochlorine%20compounds%20during%20aquifer%20storage%20and%20recovery:%20the%20Las%20Vegas%20experience&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water&rft.au=Miller,%20C.J.%20(County%20Sanitations%20Districts%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20County,%20Whittier,%20CA)&rft.date=1993-05&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=410-416&rft.issn=0017-467X&rft.eissn=1745-6584&rft.coden=GRWAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01843.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E7207610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236875337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true