Edaphic Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Retention in the Brazilian Cerrado: Texture and Mineralogy

Soil organic carbon (SOC) retention is a function of climate, vegetation, drainage, and management interactions, but also of intrinsic soil properties such as texture, mineralogy, and structure. To assess these edaphic controls, three soils of the Brazilian savanna (Cerrado) under similar climate, v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2007-07, Vol.71 (4), p.1204-1214
Hauptverfasser: Zinn, Y.L, Lal, R, Bigham, J.M, Resck, D.V.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1214
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1204
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 71
creator Zinn, Y.L
Lal, R
Bigham, J.M
Resck, D.V.S
description Soil organic carbon (SOC) retention is a function of climate, vegetation, drainage, and management interactions, but also of intrinsic soil properties such as texture, mineralogy, and structure. To assess these edaphic controls, three soils of the Brazilian savanna (Cerrado) under similar climate, vegetation, and slope but of contrasting texture were sampled to 1-m depth and characterized for textural, chemical, and mineralogical properties, and SOC concentration (in bulk samples and clay, silt, and sand fractions). The basic assumption was that SOC particle size determines its retention mechanism: colloidal forms are retained by sorption, while particulate organic matter (>20 μm) can occur outside or inside aggregates. It was hypothesized that SOC retention is controlled simultaneously by soil texture, mineralogy, and depth. The three soils are clayey, loamy, and sandy Haplustox, all kaolinitic with minor contents of Fe and Al oxides, vermiculite, and illite. The SOC concentrations in particle size fractions were inversely related to the content of the respective fraction in soil (SOC dilution effect), thus SOC partition is better assessed by determination of SOC pools in each particle size on a total soil mass basis rather than on a size-fraction concentration basis. The positive linear relations between SOC and clay + silt concentrations in bulk soil were explained mostly by greater clay-sized SOC pools, which could be modeled as a function of clay content (related to specific surface area) and depth. Quantitative clay mineralogy showed that bulk SOC and clay-sized SOC pools were well correlated with Fe oxides in topsoil and amorphous Al oxides in subsoil, but this mineralogical control is secondary to the textural control, since it depends on clay content.
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2006.0014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743169295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1392816351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5604-c25b64c921d6ddef258cb55234cb8dfe0e8bac864c9c419843c8e4e8daa3c7e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2LFDEQxRtRcFy9ejUI6qnHfE9a8LAO6xcrC_buOVSnq2cz9CZj0oOOf71pZlDwoJckVH7vVSWvqp4yuuRM6Nc5Z9hySvWSUibvVQsmhaqp1ux-taBCs1o1jXpYPcp5WwjVULqouosedrfekXUMU4pjJjGQNvqRXKUNhPkCUldqX3HCMPly8oFMt0jeJfjpRw-BrDEl6OMbco0_pn1CAqEnX3zABGPcHB5XDwYYMz457WfVzfuL6_XH-vLqw6f1-WUNSlNZO646LV3DWa_7HgeujOuU4kK6zvQDUjQdODMjTrLGSOEMSjQ9gHArlOKsenX03aX4bY95snc-OxxHCBj32a6kYLrhjSrky3-SQjEhGzlbPv8L3MZ9CuUVljNNlVwJXqDlEXIp5pxwsLvk7yAdLKN2Tsb-TsbOyRTBi5MrZAfjkCA4n_-oTBnSqFXh3h65737Ew39cbXv-mbftvJbSqc-zo36AaGGTSo-bllMmKF0ZVT5d_AKRCape</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216054732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Edaphic Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Retention in the Brazilian Cerrado: Texture and Mineralogy</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Zinn, Y.L ; Lal, R ; Bigham, J.M ; Resck, D.V.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Y.L ; Lal, R ; Bigham, J.M ; Resck, D.V.S</creatorcontrib><description>Soil organic carbon (SOC) retention is a function of climate, vegetation, drainage, and management interactions, but also of intrinsic soil properties such as texture, mineralogy, and structure. To assess these edaphic controls, three soils of the Brazilian savanna (Cerrado) under similar climate, vegetation, and slope but of contrasting texture were sampled to 1-m depth and characterized for textural, chemical, and mineralogical properties, and SOC concentration (in bulk samples and clay, silt, and sand fractions). The basic assumption was that SOC particle size determines its retention mechanism: colloidal forms are retained by sorption, while particulate organic matter (&gt;20 μm) can occur outside or inside aggregates. It was hypothesized that SOC retention is controlled simultaneously by soil texture, mineralogy, and depth. The three soils are clayey, loamy, and sandy Haplustox, all kaolinitic with minor contents of Fe and Al oxides, vermiculite, and illite. The SOC concentrations in particle size fractions were inversely related to the content of the respective fraction in soil (SOC dilution effect), thus SOC partition is better assessed by determination of SOC pools in each particle size on a total soil mass basis rather than on a size-fraction concentration basis. The positive linear relations between SOC and clay + silt concentrations in bulk soil were explained mostly by greater clay-sized SOC pools, which could be modeled as a function of clay content (related to specific surface area) and depth. Quantitative clay mineralogy showed that bulk SOC and clay-sized SOC pools were well correlated with Fe oxides in topsoil and amorphous Al oxides in subsoil, but this mineralogical control is secondary to the textural control, since it depends on clay content.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0014</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; aluminum ; Biological and medical sciences ; cerrado ; cerrado soils ; Clay ; clay fraction ; clay minerals ; clay soils ; depth ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; equations ; Exact sciences and technology ; Forest soils ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Illite ; iron oxides ; loam soils ; Mineralogy ; Organic carbon ; Oxides ; Particle size ; Particulate organic matter ; Retention ; retention mechanisms ; sand fraction ; sandy soils ; Silt ; silt fraction ; soil chemical properties ; soil mineralogy ; soil organic carbon ; Soil properties ; Soil science ; soil structure ; Soil texture ; Soils ; sorption ; Subsoils ; Surficial geology ; Topsoil ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2007-07, Vol.71 (4), p.1204-1214</ispartof><rights>Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5604-c25b64c921d6ddef258cb55234cb8dfe0e8bac864c9c419843c8e4e8daa3c7e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5604-c25b64c921d6ddef258cb55234cb8dfe0e8bac864c9c419843c8e4e8daa3c7e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2006.0014$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2006.0014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18929857$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Y.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigham, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resck, D.V.S</creatorcontrib><title>Edaphic Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Retention in the Brazilian Cerrado: Texture and Mineralogy</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Soil organic carbon (SOC) retention is a function of climate, vegetation, drainage, and management interactions, but also of intrinsic soil properties such as texture, mineralogy, and structure. To assess these edaphic controls, three soils of the Brazilian savanna (Cerrado) under similar climate, vegetation, and slope but of contrasting texture were sampled to 1-m depth and characterized for textural, chemical, and mineralogical properties, and SOC concentration (in bulk samples and clay, silt, and sand fractions). The basic assumption was that SOC particle size determines its retention mechanism: colloidal forms are retained by sorption, while particulate organic matter (&gt;20 μm) can occur outside or inside aggregates. It was hypothesized that SOC retention is controlled simultaneously by soil texture, mineralogy, and depth. The three soils are clayey, loamy, and sandy Haplustox, all kaolinitic with minor contents of Fe and Al oxides, vermiculite, and illite. The SOC concentrations in particle size fractions were inversely related to the content of the respective fraction in soil (SOC dilution effect), thus SOC partition is better assessed by determination of SOC pools in each particle size on a total soil mass basis rather than on a size-fraction concentration basis. The positive linear relations between SOC and clay + silt concentrations in bulk soil were explained mostly by greater clay-sized SOC pools, which could be modeled as a function of clay content (related to specific surface area) and depth. Quantitative clay mineralogy showed that bulk SOC and clay-sized SOC pools were well correlated with Fe oxides in topsoil and amorphous Al oxides in subsoil, but this mineralogical control is secondary to the textural control, since it depends on clay content.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>aluminum</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cerrado</subject><subject>cerrado soils</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>clay fraction</subject><subject>clay minerals</subject><subject>clay soils</subject><subject>depth</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>equations</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Illite</subject><subject>iron oxides</subject><subject>loam soils</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Particulate organic matter</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>retention mechanisms</subject><subject>sand fraction</subject><subject>sandy soils</subject><subject>Silt</subject><subject>silt fraction</subject><subject>soil chemical properties</subject><subject>soil mineralogy</subject><subject>soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>soil structure</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>sorption</subject><subject>Subsoils</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Topsoil</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2LFDEQxRtRcFy9ejUI6qnHfE9a8LAO6xcrC_buOVSnq2cz9CZj0oOOf71pZlDwoJckVH7vVSWvqp4yuuRM6Nc5Z9hySvWSUibvVQsmhaqp1ux-taBCs1o1jXpYPcp5WwjVULqouosedrfekXUMU4pjJjGQNvqRXKUNhPkCUldqX3HCMPly8oFMt0jeJfjpRw-BrDEl6OMbco0_pn1CAqEnX3zABGPcHB5XDwYYMz457WfVzfuL6_XH-vLqw6f1-WUNSlNZO646LV3DWa_7HgeujOuU4kK6zvQDUjQdODMjTrLGSOEMSjQ9gHArlOKsenX03aX4bY95snc-OxxHCBj32a6kYLrhjSrky3-SQjEhGzlbPv8L3MZ9CuUVljNNlVwJXqDlEXIp5pxwsLvk7yAdLKN2Tsb-TsbOyRTBi5MrZAfjkCA4n_-oTBnSqFXh3h65737Ew39cbXv-mbftvJbSqc-zo36AaGGTSo-bllMmKF0ZVT5d_AKRCape</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Zinn, Y.L</creator><creator>Lal, R</creator><creator>Bigham, J.M</creator><creator>Resck, D.V.S</creator><general>Soil Science Society</general><general>Soil Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>Edaphic Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Retention in the Brazilian Cerrado: Texture and Mineralogy</title><author>Zinn, Y.L ; Lal, R ; Bigham, J.M ; Resck, D.V.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5604-c25b64c921d6ddef258cb55234cb8dfe0e8bac864c9c419843c8e4e8daa3c7e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>aluminum</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cerrado</topic><topic>cerrado soils</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>clay fraction</topic><topic>clay minerals</topic><topic>clay soils</topic><topic>depth</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>equations</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Illite</topic><topic>iron oxides</topic><topic>loam soils</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Particulate organic matter</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>retention mechanisms</topic><topic>sand fraction</topic><topic>sandy soils</topic><topic>Silt</topic><topic>silt fraction</topic><topic>soil chemical properties</topic><topic>soil mineralogy</topic><topic>soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>soil structure</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>sorption</topic><topic>Subsoils</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Topsoil</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Y.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigham, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resck, D.V.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zinn, Y.L</au><au>Lal, R</au><au>Bigham, J.M</au><au>Resck, D.V.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Edaphic Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Retention in the Brazilian Cerrado: Texture and Mineralogy</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1204</spage><epage>1214</epage><pages>1204-1214</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>Soil organic carbon (SOC) retention is a function of climate, vegetation, drainage, and management interactions, but also of intrinsic soil properties such as texture, mineralogy, and structure. To assess these edaphic controls, three soils of the Brazilian savanna (Cerrado) under similar climate, vegetation, and slope but of contrasting texture were sampled to 1-m depth and characterized for textural, chemical, and mineralogical properties, and SOC concentration (in bulk samples and clay, silt, and sand fractions). The basic assumption was that SOC particle size determines its retention mechanism: colloidal forms are retained by sorption, while particulate organic matter (&gt;20 μm) can occur outside or inside aggregates. It was hypothesized that SOC retention is controlled simultaneously by soil texture, mineralogy, and depth. The three soils are clayey, loamy, and sandy Haplustox, all kaolinitic with minor contents of Fe and Al oxides, vermiculite, and illite. The SOC concentrations in particle size fractions were inversely related to the content of the respective fraction in soil (SOC dilution effect), thus SOC partition is better assessed by determination of SOC pools in each particle size on a total soil mass basis rather than on a size-fraction concentration basis. The positive linear relations between SOC and clay + silt concentrations in bulk soil were explained mostly by greater clay-sized SOC pools, which could be modeled as a function of clay content (related to specific surface area) and depth. Quantitative clay mineralogy showed that bulk SOC and clay-sized SOC pools were well correlated with Fe oxides in topsoil and amorphous Al oxides in subsoil, but this mineralogical control is secondary to the textural control, since it depends on clay content.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Soil Science Society</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2006.0014</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2007-07, Vol.71 (4), p.1204-1214
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743169295
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
aluminum
Biological and medical sciences
cerrado
cerrado soils
Clay
clay fraction
clay minerals
clay soils
depth
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
equations
Exact sciences and technology
Forest soils
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Illite
iron oxides
loam soils
Mineralogy
Organic carbon
Oxides
Particle size
Particulate organic matter
Retention
retention mechanisms
sand fraction
sandy soils
Silt
silt fraction
soil chemical properties
soil mineralogy
soil organic carbon
Soil properties
Soil science
soil structure
Soil texture
Soils
sorption
Subsoils
Surficial geology
Topsoil
Vegetation
title Edaphic Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Retention in the Brazilian Cerrado: Texture and Mineralogy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A51%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Edaphic%20Controls%20on%20Soil%20Organic%20Carbon%20Retention%20in%20the%20Brazilian%20Cerrado:%20Texture%20and%20Mineralogy&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Zinn,%20Y.L&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1204&rft.epage=1214&rft.pages=1204-1214&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2006.0014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1392816351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216054732&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true