Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content. II. Impact on Escherichia coli O157

The moisture and manure contents of soils at cattle feedlot surfaces vary spatiotemporally and likely are important factors in the persistence of Escherichia coli O157 in these soils. The impacts of water content (0.11-1.50 g H2O g(-1) dry feedlot surface material [FSM]) and manure level (5, 25, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental quality 2005-03, Vol.34 (2), p.656-663
Hauptverfasser: Berry, E.D, Miller, D.N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 663
container_issue 2
container_start_page 656
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 34
creator Berry, E.D
Miller, D.N
description The moisture and manure contents of soils at cattle feedlot surfaces vary spatiotemporally and likely are important factors in the persistence of Escherichia coli O157 in these soils. The impacts of water content (0.11-1.50 g H2O g(-1) dry feedlot surface material [FSM]) and manure level (5, 25, and 75% dry manure in dry FSM) on E. coli O157:H7 in feedlot soils were evaluated. Generally, E. coli O157:H7 numbers either persisted or increased at all but the lowest moisture levels examined. Manure content modulated the effect of water on E. coli growth; for example, at water content of 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 25% manure, E. coli O157:H7 increased by 2 log10 colony forming units (CFU) g(-1) dry FSM in 3 d, while at 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 75% manure, populations remained stable over 14 d. Escherichia coli and coliform populations responded similarly. In a second study, the impacts of cycling moisture levels and different drying rates on naturally occurring E. coli O157 in feedlot soils were examined. Low initial levels of E. coli O157 were reduced to below enumerable levels by 21 d, but indigenous E. coli populations persisted at >2.50 log10 CFU g(-1) dry FSM up to 133 d. We conclude that E. coli O157 can persist and may even grow in feedlot soils, over a wide range of water and manure contents. Further investigations are needed to determine if these variables can be manipulated to reduce this pathogen in cattle and the feedlot environment.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2005.0656
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743155970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14726665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6136-a6be9996b474d7e42e03f09c01c6b6309f3604c8384bb59db9f4cb60d0634abc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCjTNYHODCLjPxV3ysVltYVKlCtGfLcRyaVRJv7USo_x5HGwmJQ3sYe2Q9fmzNS8g7hE2BjH89-IcCQGxACvmCrFAwtS7y8pKsAHjueSHOyHlKBwAsQMnX5AyFEiViuSK3WzuOnaeN93UXRppC29E-tGmcoqd2qGlvh7l1YRj9MG7ofp-rP1o30jDQXXL3PrbuvrUZ6Vp6k91vyKvGdsm_XfYLcne1u91-X1_ffNtvL6_XTiKTaysrr7WWFVe8Vp4XHlgD2gE6WUkGumESuCtZyatK6LrSDXeVhBok47Zy7IJ8PnmPMTxMPo2mb5PzXWcHH6ZkFGcohFaQyU9PknmSiiHisyBqpVBq-TzIVSGlFBn8-B94CFMc8lxmGVPIxPzslxPkYkgp-sYcY9vb-GgQ5s9xs8Rs5pgz_n5xTlXv63_wkmsG9An403b-8UmZ-bH7WcyVDxb5h9PdxgZjf8c2mbtfBSAD0CUqrthfVTK5eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197371351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content. II. Impact on Escherichia coli O157</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Berry, E.D ; Miller, D.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Berry, E.D ; Miller, D.N</creatorcontrib><description>The moisture and manure contents of soils at cattle feedlot surfaces vary spatiotemporally and likely are important factors in the persistence of Escherichia coli O157 in these soils. The impacts of water content (0.11-1.50 g H2O g(-1) dry feedlot surface material [FSM]) and manure level (5, 25, and 75% dry manure in dry FSM) on E. coli O157:H7 in feedlot soils were evaluated. Generally, E. coli O157:H7 numbers either persisted or increased at all but the lowest moisture levels examined. Manure content modulated the effect of water on E. coli growth; for example, at water content of 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 25% manure, E. coli O157:H7 increased by 2 log10 colony forming units (CFU) g(-1) dry FSM in 3 d, while at 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 75% manure, populations remained stable over 14 d. Escherichia coli and coliform populations responded similarly. In a second study, the impacts of cycling moisture levels and different drying rates on naturally occurring E. coli O157 in feedlot soils were examined. Low initial levels of E. coli O157 were reduced to below enumerable levels by 21 d, but indigenous E. coli populations persisted at &gt;2.50 log10 CFU g(-1) dry FSM up to 133 d. We conclude that E. coli O157 can persist and may even grow in feedlot soils, over a wide range of water and manure contents. Further investigations are needed to determine if these variables can be manipulated to reduce this pathogen in cattle and the feedlot environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0656</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15758118</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; Bacteria ; beef cattle ; Cattle ; cattle manure ; coliform bacteria ; drying ; E coli ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental quality ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli O157 - isolation &amp; purification ; Escherichia coli O157 - physiology ; Feedlots ; Manure ; Manures ; Moisture content ; Pathogens ; Soil ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil moisture ; soil pollution ; soil water content ; Soils ; Survival ; Water ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2005-03, Vol.34 (2), p.656-663</ispartof><rights>ASA, CSSA, SSSA</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6136-a6be9996b474d7e42e03f09c01c6b6309f3604c8384bb59db9f4cb60d0634abc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6136-a6be9996b474d7e42e03f09c01c6b6309f3604c8384bb59db9f4cb60d0634abc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2005.0656$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2005.0656$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15758118$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berry, E.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.N</creatorcontrib><title>Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content. II. Impact on Escherichia coli O157</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>The moisture and manure contents of soils at cattle feedlot surfaces vary spatiotemporally and likely are important factors in the persistence of Escherichia coli O157 in these soils. The impacts of water content (0.11-1.50 g H2O g(-1) dry feedlot surface material [FSM]) and manure level (5, 25, and 75% dry manure in dry FSM) on E. coli O157:H7 in feedlot soils were evaluated. Generally, E. coli O157:H7 numbers either persisted or increased at all but the lowest moisture levels examined. Manure content modulated the effect of water on E. coli growth; for example, at water content of 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 25% manure, E. coli O157:H7 increased by 2 log10 colony forming units (CFU) g(-1) dry FSM in 3 d, while at 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 75% manure, populations remained stable over 14 d. Escherichia coli and coliform populations responded similarly. In a second study, the impacts of cycling moisture levels and different drying rates on naturally occurring E. coli O157 in feedlot soils were examined. Low initial levels of E. coli O157 were reduced to below enumerable levels by 21 d, but indigenous E. coli populations persisted at &gt;2.50 log10 CFU g(-1) dry FSM up to 133 d. We conclude that E. coli O157 can persist and may even grow in feedlot soils, over a wide range of water and manure contents. Further investigations are needed to determine if these variables can be manipulated to reduce this pathogen in cattle and the feedlot environment.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cattle manure</subject><subject>coliform bacteria</subject><subject>drying</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - physiology</subject><subject>Feedlots</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>soil pollution</subject><subject>soil water content</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCjTNYHODCLjPxV3ysVltYVKlCtGfLcRyaVRJv7USo_x5HGwmJQ3sYe2Q9fmzNS8g7hE2BjH89-IcCQGxACvmCrFAwtS7y8pKsAHjueSHOyHlKBwAsQMnX5AyFEiViuSK3WzuOnaeN93UXRppC29E-tGmcoqd2qGlvh7l1YRj9MG7ofp-rP1o30jDQXXL3PrbuvrUZ6Vp6k91vyKvGdsm_XfYLcne1u91-X1_ffNtvL6_XTiKTaysrr7WWFVe8Vp4XHlgD2gE6WUkGumESuCtZyatK6LrSDXeVhBok47Zy7IJ8PnmPMTxMPo2mb5PzXWcHH6ZkFGcohFaQyU9PknmSiiHisyBqpVBq-TzIVSGlFBn8-B94CFMc8lxmGVPIxPzslxPkYkgp-sYcY9vb-GgQ5s9xs8Rs5pgz_n5xTlXv63_wkmsG9An403b-8UmZ-bH7WcyVDxb5h9PdxgZjf8c2mbtfBSAD0CUqrthfVTK5eg</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Berry, E.D</creator><creator>Miller, D.N</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content. II. Impact on Escherichia coli O157</title><author>Berry, E.D ; Miller, D.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6136-a6be9996b474d7e42e03f09c01c6b6309f3604c8384bb59db9f4cb60d0634abc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cattle manure</topic><topic>coliform bacteria</topic><topic>drying</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - physiology</topic><topic>Feedlots</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>soil pollution</topic><topic>soil water content</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berry, E.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, D.N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berry, E.D</au><au>Miller, D.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content. II. Impact on Escherichia coli O157</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>656</spage><epage>663</epage><pages>656-663</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>The moisture and manure contents of soils at cattle feedlot surfaces vary spatiotemporally and likely are important factors in the persistence of Escherichia coli O157 in these soils. The impacts of water content (0.11-1.50 g H2O g(-1) dry feedlot surface material [FSM]) and manure level (5, 25, and 75% dry manure in dry FSM) on E. coli O157:H7 in feedlot soils were evaluated. Generally, E. coli O157:H7 numbers either persisted or increased at all but the lowest moisture levels examined. Manure content modulated the effect of water on E. coli growth; for example, at water content of 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 25% manure, E. coli O157:H7 increased by 2 log10 colony forming units (CFU) g(-1) dry FSM in 3 d, while at 0.43 g H2O g(-1) dry FSM and 75% manure, populations remained stable over 14 d. Escherichia coli and coliform populations responded similarly. In a second study, the impacts of cycling moisture levels and different drying rates on naturally occurring E. coli O157 in feedlot soils were examined. Low initial levels of E. coli O157 were reduced to below enumerable levels by 21 d, but indigenous E. coli populations persisted at &gt;2.50 log10 CFU g(-1) dry FSM up to 133 d. We conclude that E. coli O157 can persist and may even grow in feedlot soils, over a wide range of water and manure contents. Further investigations are needed to determine if these variables can be manipulated to reduce this pathogen in cattle and the feedlot environment.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</pub><pmid>15758118</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2005.0656</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2005-03, Vol.34 (2), p.656-663
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743155970
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal Husbandry
Animals
Bacteria
beef cattle
Cattle
cattle manure
coliform bacteria
drying
E coli
Environmental impact
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental quality
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli O157 - isolation & purification
Escherichia coli O157 - physiology
Feedlots
Manure
Manures
Moisture content
Pathogens
Soil
Soil Microbiology
Soil moisture
soil pollution
soil water content
Soils
Survival
Water
Water content
title Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content. II. Impact on Escherichia coli O157
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cattle%20feedlot%20soil%20moisture%20and%20manure%20content.%20II.%20Impact%20on%20Escherichia%20coli%20O157&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Berry,%20E.D&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=656&rft.epage=663&rft.pages=656-663&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2005.0656&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14726665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197371351&rft_id=info:pmid/15758118&rfr_iscdi=true