A Comparison of Student Perceptions of Their Computer Skills to Their Actual Abilities
In this technology intensive society, most students are required to be proficient in computer skills to compete in today's global job market. These computer skills usually consist of basic to advanced knowledge in word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet applications. In many U.S. states,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of information technology education 2009, Vol.8, p.141-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 160 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Journal of information technology education |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Grant, Donna M Malloy, Alisha D Murphy, Marianne C |
description | In this technology intensive society, most students are required to be proficient in computer skills to compete in today's global job market. These computer skills usually consist of basic to advanced knowledge in word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet applications. In many U.S. states, students are required to demonstrate computer proficiency early in their educational experience by means of passing an assessment test. This research was conducted in North Carolina where all students must pass a computer/technology skills assessment test prior to completing twelfth grade. This study explored U.S. college students' perceived mastery of their computer skills, evaluated their actual scores on a computer skills assessment, and compared the results to realign and enhance an introductory business computer applications course. Two instruments were developed to accomplish the objectives for this research: a survey to capture students' perceptions of their computer proficiency and a computer skills assessment to measure their actual performance. The assessment tool evaluated their knowledge of three computer application skills--word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet--with three levels of proficiency--basic, moderate, and advanced. The survey and assessment instruments were administered to over 200 business students in a medium sized, public university with a required introductory computer applications course. The findings of this study indicate some differences in the students' perception of their word processing skills and actual performance, no difference in perception and performance for their presentation skills, and a significant difference in perception and performance for their spreadsheet skills. As a result of this research, the curriculum for the introductory course was redesigned to concentrate primarily on the substantial skill deficiency in spreadsheet skills while still allowing the students to demonstrate their level of proficiency in word processing and presentation skills through a mandatory online assessment test beginning in fall semester 2008. Any student who does not perform well on the word processing and presentation assessment will be required to obtain additional training to enhance these skills. These findings have important implications for two reasons: 1) schools with a similar profile can possibly replicate the realignment and enhancement of the business computer application course and 2) any school interested in compari |
doi_str_mv | 10.28945/164 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743133438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A208275946</galeid><ericid>EJ835532</ericid><sourcerecordid>A208275946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-882005dedbe24172eff6df2592bab78532fa761e446f0446dd7e4e1d7b40aa993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLxEAMx4so-PwGHgoKnqrzfhzL4pMFBR_XMm0zOmu3s85MD357x93FgwSSkPz-ISFFcYzRJVGa8Sss2E5xgDnVFeWK7_7mTFZaYrZfHMa4QIhQoshB8VaXM79cmeCiH0tvy-c09TCm8glCB6vk_Bh_yy8f4MIanRKE8vnTDUMsk9826i5NZijr1g0uOYjHxZ41Q4STbTwqXm-uX2Z31fzx9n5Wz6uOaJ0qpQhCvIe-BcKwJGCt6C3hmrSmlYpTYo0UGBgTFmXX9xIY4F62DBmjNT0qLjZzV8F_TRBTs3Sxg2EwI_gpNpJRTCmjKpNn_8iFn8KYl2uIwEIIhhDN1OWGejcDNG60PgXTZeth6To_gnW5XhOkiOSaiSw43wi64GMMYJtVcEsTvhuMmvUzmvyMjJ1uMAiu-0OuHxTl-Uj6A6csgtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616664003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Student Perceptions of Their Computer Skills to Their Actual Abilities</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Grant, Donna M ; Malloy, Alisha D ; Murphy, Marianne C</creator><creatorcontrib>Grant, Donna M ; Malloy, Alisha D ; Murphy, Marianne C</creatorcontrib><description>In this technology intensive society, most students are required to be proficient in computer skills to compete in today's global job market. These computer skills usually consist of basic to advanced knowledge in word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet applications. In many U.S. states, students are required to demonstrate computer proficiency early in their educational experience by means of passing an assessment test. This research was conducted in North Carolina where all students must pass a computer/technology skills assessment test prior to completing twelfth grade. This study explored U.S. college students' perceived mastery of their computer skills, evaluated their actual scores on a computer skills assessment, and compared the results to realign and enhance an introductory business computer applications course. Two instruments were developed to accomplish the objectives for this research: a survey to capture students' perceptions of their computer proficiency and a computer skills assessment to measure their actual performance. The assessment tool evaluated their knowledge of three computer application skills--word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet--with three levels of proficiency--basic, moderate, and advanced. The survey and assessment instruments were administered to over 200 business students in a medium sized, public university with a required introductory computer applications course. The findings of this study indicate some differences in the students' perception of their word processing skills and actual performance, no difference in perception and performance for their presentation skills, and a significant difference in perception and performance for their spreadsheet skills. As a result of this research, the curriculum for the introductory course was redesigned to concentrate primarily on the substantial skill deficiency in spreadsheet skills while still allowing the students to demonstrate their level of proficiency in word processing and presentation skills through a mandatory online assessment test beginning in fall semester 2008. Any student who does not perform well on the word processing and presentation assessment will be required to obtain additional training to enhance these skills. These findings have important implications for two reasons: 1) schools with a similar profile can possibly replicate the realignment and enhancement of the business computer application course and 2) any school interested in comparing their students' perception of their computer skill proficiency and actual performance on three different levels can apply a modified version of this study. (Contains 9 tables, 1 figure, and 1 footnote.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-9714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-3585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.28945/164</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Rosa: Informing Science Institute</publisher><subject>Academic Ability ; Business Administration Education ; College Curriculum ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Graphics ; Computer Literacy ; Computer Oriented Programs ; Computer Software ; Computers ; Curriculum Design ; Educational Experience ; Evaluation ; Finance ; Information technology ; Introductory Courses ; Labor Market ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001 ; North Carolina ; Program Effectiveness ; Scores ; Spreadsheets ; Student Attitudes ; Student Evaluation ; Student Surveys ; Students ; Undergraduate Students ; Word Processing</subject><ispartof>Journal of information technology education, 2009, Vol.8, p.141-160</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Informing Science Institute</rights><rights>2009. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-882005dedbe24172eff6df2592bab78532fa761e446f0446dd7e4e1d7b40aa993</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ835532$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grant, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malloy, Alisha D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Marianne C</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Student Perceptions of Their Computer Skills to Their Actual Abilities</title><title>Journal of information technology education</title><description>In this technology intensive society, most students are required to be proficient in computer skills to compete in today's global job market. These computer skills usually consist of basic to advanced knowledge in word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet applications. In many U.S. states, students are required to demonstrate computer proficiency early in their educational experience by means of passing an assessment test. This research was conducted in North Carolina where all students must pass a computer/technology skills assessment test prior to completing twelfth grade. This study explored U.S. college students' perceived mastery of their computer skills, evaluated their actual scores on a computer skills assessment, and compared the results to realign and enhance an introductory business computer applications course. Two instruments were developed to accomplish the objectives for this research: a survey to capture students' perceptions of their computer proficiency and a computer skills assessment to measure their actual performance. The assessment tool evaluated their knowledge of three computer application skills--word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet--with three levels of proficiency--basic, moderate, and advanced. The survey and assessment instruments were administered to over 200 business students in a medium sized, public university with a required introductory computer applications course. The findings of this study indicate some differences in the students' perception of their word processing skills and actual performance, no difference in perception and performance for their presentation skills, and a significant difference in perception and performance for their spreadsheet skills. As a result of this research, the curriculum for the introductory course was redesigned to concentrate primarily on the substantial skill deficiency in spreadsheet skills while still allowing the students to demonstrate their level of proficiency in word processing and presentation skills through a mandatory online assessment test beginning in fall semester 2008. Any student who does not perform well on the word processing and presentation assessment will be required to obtain additional training to enhance these skills. These findings have important implications for two reasons: 1) schools with a similar profile can possibly replicate the realignment and enhancement of the business computer application course and 2) any school interested in comparing their students' perception of their computer skill proficiency and actual performance on three different levels can apply a modified version of this study. (Contains 9 tables, 1 figure, and 1 footnote.)</description><subject>Academic Ability</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>College Curriculum</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Graphics</subject><subject>Computer Literacy</subject><subject>Computer Oriented Programs</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Curriculum Design</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Labor Market</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Spreadsheets</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Word Processing</subject><issn>1547-9714</issn><issn>1539-3585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLxEAMx4so-PwGHgoKnqrzfhzL4pMFBR_XMm0zOmu3s85MD357x93FgwSSkPz-ISFFcYzRJVGa8Sss2E5xgDnVFeWK7_7mTFZaYrZfHMa4QIhQoshB8VaXM79cmeCiH0tvy-c09TCm8glCB6vk_Bh_yy8f4MIanRKE8vnTDUMsk9826i5NZijr1g0uOYjHxZ41Q4STbTwqXm-uX2Z31fzx9n5Wz6uOaJ0qpQhCvIe-BcKwJGCt6C3hmrSmlYpTYo0UGBgTFmXX9xIY4F62DBmjNT0qLjZzV8F_TRBTs3Sxg2EwI_gpNpJRTCmjKpNn_8iFn8KYl2uIwEIIhhDN1OWGejcDNG60PgXTZeth6To_gnW5XhOkiOSaiSw43wi64GMMYJtVcEsTvhuMmvUzmvyMjJ1uMAiu-0OuHxTl-Uj6A6csgtA</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Grant, Donna M</creator><creator>Malloy, Alisha D</creator><creator>Murphy, Marianne C</creator><general>Informing Science Institute</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Student Perceptions of Their Computer Skills to Their Actual Abilities</title><author>Grant, Donna M ; Malloy, Alisha D ; Murphy, Marianne C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-882005dedbe24172eff6df2592bab78532fa761e446f0446dd7e4e1d7b40aa993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Academic Ability</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>College Curriculum</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Graphics</topic><topic>Computer Literacy</topic><topic>Computer Oriented Programs</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Curriculum Design</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Labor Market</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Spreadsheets</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Word Processing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grant, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malloy, Alisha D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Marianne C</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of information technology education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grant, Donna M</au><au>Malloy, Alisha D</au><au>Murphy, Marianne C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ835532</ericid><atitle>A Comparison of Student Perceptions of Their Computer Skills to Their Actual Abilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of information technology education</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>141</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>141-160</pages><issn>1547-9714</issn><eissn>1539-3585</eissn><abstract>In this technology intensive society, most students are required to be proficient in computer skills to compete in today's global job market. These computer skills usually consist of basic to advanced knowledge in word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet applications. In many U.S. states, students are required to demonstrate computer proficiency early in their educational experience by means of passing an assessment test. This research was conducted in North Carolina where all students must pass a computer/technology skills assessment test prior to completing twelfth grade. This study explored U.S. college students' perceived mastery of their computer skills, evaluated their actual scores on a computer skills assessment, and compared the results to realign and enhance an introductory business computer applications course. Two instruments were developed to accomplish the objectives for this research: a survey to capture students' perceptions of their computer proficiency and a computer skills assessment to measure their actual performance. The assessment tool evaluated their knowledge of three computer application skills--word processing, presentation, and spreadsheet--with three levels of proficiency--basic, moderate, and advanced. The survey and assessment instruments were administered to over 200 business students in a medium sized, public university with a required introductory computer applications course. The findings of this study indicate some differences in the students' perception of their word processing skills and actual performance, no difference in perception and performance for their presentation skills, and a significant difference in perception and performance for their spreadsheet skills. As a result of this research, the curriculum for the introductory course was redesigned to concentrate primarily on the substantial skill deficiency in spreadsheet skills while still allowing the students to demonstrate their level of proficiency in word processing and presentation skills through a mandatory online assessment test beginning in fall semester 2008. Any student who does not perform well on the word processing and presentation assessment will be required to obtain additional training to enhance these skills. These findings have important implications for two reasons: 1) schools with a similar profile can possibly replicate the realignment and enhancement of the business computer application course and 2) any school interested in comparing their students' perception of their computer skill proficiency and actual performance on three different levels can apply a modified version of this study. (Contains 9 tables, 1 figure, and 1 footnote.)</abstract><cop>Santa Rosa</cop><pub>Informing Science Institute</pub><doi>10.28945/164</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1547-9714 |
ispartof | Journal of information technology education, 2009, Vol.8, p.141-160 |
issn | 1547-9714 1539-3585 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743133438 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Academic Ability Business Administration Education College Curriculum Comparative Analysis Computer Graphics Computer Literacy Computer Oriented Programs Computer Software Computers Curriculum Design Educational Experience Evaluation Finance Information technology Introductory Courses Labor Market No Child Left Behind Act 2001 North Carolina Program Effectiveness Scores Spreadsheets Student Attitudes Student Evaluation Student Surveys Students Undergraduate Students Word Processing |
title | A Comparison of Student Perceptions of Their Computer Skills to Their Actual Abilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Student%20Perceptions%20of%20Their%20Computer%20Skills%20to%20Their%20Actual%20Abilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20information%20technology%20education&rft.au=Grant,%20Donna%20M&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=141-160&rft.issn=1547-9714&rft.eissn=1539-3585&rft_id=info:doi/10.28945/164&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA208275946%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616664003&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A208275946&rft_ericid=EJ835532&rfr_iscdi=true |