Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income

Illegal hunting of resident and migratory herbivores is widespread in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. To devise effective strategies to reduce levels of hunting, information is required on why people are involved in illegal hunting and the role of bushmeat in the local economy. Participation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental conservation 2002-09, Vol.29 (3), p.391-398
Hauptverfasser: Loibooki, Martin, Hofer, Heribert, Campbell, Kenneth L.I., East, Marion L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 398
container_issue 3
container_start_page 391
container_title Environmental conservation
container_volume 29
creator Loibooki, Martin
Hofer, Heribert
Campbell, Kenneth L.I.
East, Marion L.
description Illegal hunting of resident and migratory herbivores is widespread in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. To devise effective strategies to reduce levels of hunting, information is required on why people are involved in illegal hunting and the role of bushmeat in the local economy. Participation in hunting may be influenced by measures of relative wealth, including livestock ownership, means of generating cash income and access to alternative sources of meat. Data came from 300 individuals responding to a questionnaire in 10 villages, from responses by 359 people in 24 group discussions in another 12 villages, and from 552 people arrested and interviewed in the National Park. A smaller proportion of individual respondents (32%) than group respondents (57%) volunteered that they participated in illegal hunting. Most individual and group respondents were subsistence farmers who considered bushmeat to be a source of protein and a means of generating cash income. Three-quarters of those arrested participated in hunting primarily to generate cash income and a quarter claimed that they only hunted to obtain food. Participation in illegal hunting decreased as wealth in terms of the number of sheep and goats owned increased. People with access to alternative means of generating income or acquiring protein were also less likely to be involved in illegal hunting. Arrested respondents were typically young adult males with low incomes and few or no livestock. Illegal hunting was not reduced by participation in community-based conservation pro-grammes. Results suggested that between 52 000 and 60 000 people participated in illegal hunting within protected areas, and that many young men (approximately 5200) derived their primary source of income from hunting.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0376892902000279
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743111436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0376892902000279</cupid><jstor_id>44520618</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44520618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-2aa1866b568633670a5535b157b4611740e8a825818fd2b0c2ce9b49f6bbb05e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstuEzEUhkcIJELhAVggWSxgw4A9vg47WkFBRFyUsmFj2ZMzidMZO9ieQnkgnhMnqYoEAlZe_N_5_enYVXWf4KcEE_lsgakUqm1a3GCMG9neqGaEibZmVMmb1WwX17v8dnUnpU1hBJdqVv04ntJ6BJPRevLZ-RWyl6gL4zh5lx0kZJYb04HPKAeU14AWEMGvIDv0zmQXvBnQBxPPn6Az478b78zzPebGbYjZ-A5Q6NHgLiDl0J2j8NVDTGu3RcYvkRkyRF96LgClMMWuXFjwbQwZnN8jzhcbuFvd6s2Q4N7VeVR9evXy7OR1PX9_-ubkxbzumFC5bowhSgjLhRKUCokN55RbwqVlghDJMCijGq6I6peNxV3TQWtZ2wtrLeZAj6rHh96i8GUqznp0qYNhMB7ClLRklBDCqCjko3-SDWFECsH-CxZhSQWWBXz4G7gpKykLLmWY7sr2beQAdTGkFKHX2-hGEy81wXr3E_QfP6HMPDjMbMobxOsBxniDBVElrw-5Sxm-XeflVXVRk1yL04968VmKxVs-18eFp1cOZrTRLVfwy_TvFj8BatrPtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203176664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Loibooki, Martin ; Hofer, Heribert ; Campbell, Kenneth L.I. ; East, Marion L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Loibooki, Martin ; Hofer, Heribert ; Campbell, Kenneth L.I. ; East, Marion L.</creatorcontrib><description>Illegal hunting of resident and migratory herbivores is widespread in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. To devise effective strategies to reduce levels of hunting, information is required on why people are involved in illegal hunting and the role of bushmeat in the local economy. Participation in hunting may be influenced by measures of relative wealth, including livestock ownership, means of generating cash income and access to alternative sources of meat. Data came from 300 individuals responding to a questionnaire in 10 villages, from responses by 359 people in 24 group discussions in another 12 villages, and from 552 people arrested and interviewed in the National Park. A smaller proportion of individual respondents (32%) than group respondents (57%) volunteered that they participated in illegal hunting. Most individual and group respondents were subsistence farmers who considered bushmeat to be a source of protein and a means of generating cash income. Three-quarters of those arrested participated in hunting primarily to generate cash income and a quarter claimed that they only hunted to obtain food. Participation in illegal hunting decreased as wealth in terms of the number of sheep and goats owned increased. People with access to alternative means of generating income or acquiring protein were also less likely to be involved in illegal hunting. Arrested respondents were typically young adult males with low incomes and few or no livestock. Illegal hunting was not reduced by participation in community-based conservation pro-grammes. Results suggested that between 52 000 and 60 000 people participated in illegal hunting within protected areas, and that many young men (approximately 5200) derived their primary source of income from hunting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0376892902000279</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVCNA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; bushmeat ; Cattle ; Connochaetes taurinus ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Equus ; Goats ; Herbivores ; illegal hunting ; Income ; Law enforcement ; Legislation ; Livestock ; Meats ; National Park ; National parks ; Overexploitation ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; Poaching ; Protected areas ; Proteins ; rural economy ; Serengeti ecosystem ; Sheep ; Subsistence farming ; Villages ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Environmental conservation, 2002-09, Vol.29 (3), p.391-398</ispartof><rights>2002 Foundation for Environmental Conservation</rights><rights>Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Sep 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-2aa1866b568633670a5535b157b4611740e8a825818fd2b0c2ce9b49f6bbb05e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44520618$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0376892902000279/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loibooki, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Heribert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kenneth L.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Marion L.</creatorcontrib><title>Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income</title><title>Environmental conservation</title><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><description>Illegal hunting of resident and migratory herbivores is widespread in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. To devise effective strategies to reduce levels of hunting, information is required on why people are involved in illegal hunting and the role of bushmeat in the local economy. Participation in hunting may be influenced by measures of relative wealth, including livestock ownership, means of generating cash income and access to alternative sources of meat. Data came from 300 individuals responding to a questionnaire in 10 villages, from responses by 359 people in 24 group discussions in another 12 villages, and from 552 people arrested and interviewed in the National Park. A smaller proportion of individual respondents (32%) than group respondents (57%) volunteered that they participated in illegal hunting. Most individual and group respondents were subsistence farmers who considered bushmeat to be a source of protein and a means of generating cash income. Three-quarters of those arrested participated in hunting primarily to generate cash income and a quarter claimed that they only hunted to obtain food. Participation in illegal hunting decreased as wealth in terms of the number of sheep and goats owned increased. People with access to alternative means of generating income or acquiring protein were also less likely to be involved in illegal hunting. Arrested respondents were typically young adult males with low incomes and few or no livestock. Illegal hunting was not reduced by participation in community-based conservation pro-grammes. Results suggested that between 52 000 and 60 000 people participated in illegal hunting within protected areas, and that many young men (approximately 5200) derived their primary source of income from hunting.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>bushmeat</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Connochaetes taurinus</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Equus</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>illegal hunting</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Meats</subject><subject>National Park</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Overexploitation</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>Poaching</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>rural economy</subject><subject>Serengeti ecosystem</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Subsistence farming</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstuEzEUhkcIJELhAVggWSxgw4A9vg47WkFBRFyUsmFj2ZMzidMZO9ieQnkgnhMnqYoEAlZe_N_5_enYVXWf4KcEE_lsgakUqm1a3GCMG9neqGaEibZmVMmb1WwX17v8dnUnpU1hBJdqVv04ntJ6BJPRevLZ-RWyl6gL4zh5lx0kZJYb04HPKAeU14AWEMGvIDv0zmQXvBnQBxPPn6Az478b78zzPebGbYjZ-A5Q6NHgLiDl0J2j8NVDTGu3RcYvkRkyRF96LgClMMWuXFjwbQwZnN8jzhcbuFvd6s2Q4N7VeVR9evXy7OR1PX9_-ubkxbzumFC5bowhSgjLhRKUCokN55RbwqVlghDJMCijGq6I6peNxV3TQWtZ2wtrLeZAj6rHh96i8GUqznp0qYNhMB7ClLRklBDCqCjko3-SDWFECsH-CxZhSQWWBXz4G7gpKykLLmWY7sr2beQAdTGkFKHX2-hGEy81wXr3E_QfP6HMPDjMbMobxOsBxniDBVElrw-5Sxm-XeflVXVRk1yL04968VmKxVs-18eFp1cOZrTRLVfwy_TvFj8BatrPtg</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Loibooki, Martin</creator><creator>Hofer, Heribert</creator><creator>Campbell, Kenneth L.I.</creator><creator>East, Marion L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income</title><author>Loibooki, Martin ; Hofer, Heribert ; Campbell, Kenneth L.I. ; East, Marion L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-2aa1866b568633670a5535b157b4611740e8a825818fd2b0c2ce9b49f6bbb05e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>bushmeat</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Connochaetes taurinus</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Equus</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>illegal hunting</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Meats</topic><topic>National Park</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Overexploitation</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>Poaching</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>rural economy</topic><topic>Serengeti ecosystem</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Subsistence farming</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loibooki, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Heribert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Kenneth L.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Marion L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loibooki, Martin</au><au>Hofer, Heribert</au><au>Campbell, Kenneth L.I.</au><au>East, Marion L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income</atitle><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>391-398</pages><issn>0376-8929</issn><eissn>1469-4387</eissn><coden>EVCNA4</coden><abstract>Illegal hunting of resident and migratory herbivores is widespread in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. To devise effective strategies to reduce levels of hunting, information is required on why people are involved in illegal hunting and the role of bushmeat in the local economy. Participation in hunting may be influenced by measures of relative wealth, including livestock ownership, means of generating cash income and access to alternative sources of meat. Data came from 300 individuals responding to a questionnaire in 10 villages, from responses by 359 people in 24 group discussions in another 12 villages, and from 552 people arrested and interviewed in the National Park. A smaller proportion of individual respondents (32%) than group respondents (57%) volunteered that they participated in illegal hunting. Most individual and group respondents were subsistence farmers who considered bushmeat to be a source of protein and a means of generating cash income. Three-quarters of those arrested participated in hunting primarily to generate cash income and a quarter claimed that they only hunted to obtain food. Participation in illegal hunting decreased as wealth in terms of the number of sheep and goats owned increased. People with access to alternative means of generating income or acquiring protein were also less likely to be involved in illegal hunting. Arrested respondents were typically young adult males with low incomes and few or no livestock. Illegal hunting was not reduced by participation in community-based conservation pro-grammes. Results suggested that between 52 000 and 60 000 people participated in illegal hunting within protected areas, and that many young men (approximately 5200) derived their primary source of income from hunting.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0376892902000279</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-8929
ispartof Environmental conservation, 2002-09, Vol.29 (3), p.391-398
issn 0376-8929
1469-4387
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743111436
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural production
bushmeat
Cattle
Connochaetes taurinus
Endangered & extinct species
Equus
Goats
Herbivores
illegal hunting
Income
Law enforcement
Legislation
Livestock
Meats
National Park
National parks
Overexploitation
Parks & recreation areas
Poaching
Protected areas
Proteins
rural economy
Serengeti ecosystem
Sheep
Subsistence farming
Villages
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
title Bushmeat hunting by communities adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania: the importance of livestock ownership and alternative sources of protein and income
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bushmeat%20hunting%20by%20communities%20adjacent%20to%20the%20Serengeti%20National%20Park,%20Tanzania:%20the%20importance%20of%20livestock%20ownership%20and%20alternative%20sources%20of%20protein%20and%20income&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20conservation&rft.au=Loibooki,%20Martin&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=391-398&rft.issn=0376-8929&rft.eissn=1469-4387&rft.coden=EVCNA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0376892902000279&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44520618%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203176664&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0376892902000279&rft_jstor_id=44520618&rfr_iscdi=true