A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance
We argue that corporate social performance (CSP) has become a legitimizing identity (brand) for researchers in the business and society field, but it has not developed into a viable theoretical or operational construct. Because measuring CSP is contingent on the operational setting (industry, issues...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business & society 2000-12, Vol.39 (4), p.397-418 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 418 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | Business & society |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Rowley, Tim Berman, Shawn |
description | We argue that corporate social performance (CSP) has become a legitimizing identity (brand) for researchers in the business and society field, but it has not developed into a viable theoretical or operational construct. Because measuring CSP is contingent on the operational setting (industry, issues, etc.), it is difficult to produce worthwhile comparisons across studies or generalizing beyond the boundaries of a specific study. The authors suggest that researchers remove the CSP label from their operational variables, and instead narrowly define their studies in operational terms. They provide aworking example of the proposed research direction by examining the theory underlying the popular CSP–financial performance (FP) debate. In the authors’ conceptualization, stakeholder action provides the underlying logic connecting CSP-FP, and we recast the research question to investigate the conditions under which stakeholders will take action to influence the focal organization and when those actions will influence the CSP-FP link. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000765030003900404 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743108360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000765030003900404</sage_id><sourcerecordid>60380277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c98c5446cdb3368a446144db2054d340164fa2c0daccc0906623da21147579743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqH_C0COpp7eR791iLX1BUUM9hms3Klu2mJi3ivzdLC4qip5nDM28mQ8gxhQtKtR4BgFYSeKq8BBAgdsiASslywUDukkEP8l7sk4MY5wCUMaUHhI6zy4Bdld27923n62ziw9IHXLnsydsG2-zRhdqHBXbWHZK9GtvojrZ1SF6ur54nt_n04eZuMp7mljO2ym1ZWCmEstWMc1VgaqkQ1SytIyougCpRI7NQobUWSlCK8QoZpUJLXWrBh-R8k7sM_m3t4sosmmhd22Ln_DqaRCgUXEGSZ__KRApgWid48gPO_Tp06ReGliUvhJI0IbZBNvgYg6vNMjQLDB-GgumPbX4fOw2dbpMxWmzrdEjbxK9J0efLftXRxkV8dd9e_zv5E3-Whtk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199384651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rowley, Tim ; Berman, Shawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Rowley, Tim ; Berman, Shawn</creatorcontrib><description>We argue that corporate social performance (CSP) has become a legitimizing identity (brand) for researchers in the business and society field, but it has not developed into a viable theoretical or operational construct. Because measuring CSP is contingent on the operational setting (industry, issues, etc.), it is difficult to produce worthwhile comparisons across studies or generalizing beyond the boundaries of a specific study. The authors suggest that researchers remove the CSP label from their operational variables, and instead narrowly define their studies in operational terms. They provide aworking example of the proposed research direction by examining the theory underlying the popular CSP–financial performance (FP) debate. In the authors’ conceptualization, stakeholder action provides the underlying logic connecting CSP-FP, and we recast the research question to investigate the conditions under which stakeholders will take action to influence the focal organization and when those actions will influence the CSP-FP link.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000765030003900404</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUSOBE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Corporate identity ; Corporate responsibility ; Corporations ; Financial performance ; Methodological Problems ; Organizational Research ; Researchers ; Social Responsibility ; Society ; Sociology ; Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Stakeholders ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Business & society, 2000-12, Vol.39 (4), p.397-418</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Dec 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c98c5446cdb3368a446144db2054d340164fa2c0daccc0906623da21147579743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c98c5446cdb3368a446144db2054d340164fa2c0daccc0906623da21147579743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000765030003900404$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000765030003900404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,21819,23930,23931,25140,27344,27924,27925,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14199350$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rowley, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Shawn</creatorcontrib><title>A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance</title><title>Business & society</title><description>We argue that corporate social performance (CSP) has become a legitimizing identity (brand) for researchers in the business and society field, but it has not developed into a viable theoretical or operational construct. Because measuring CSP is contingent on the operational setting (industry, issues, etc.), it is difficult to produce worthwhile comparisons across studies or generalizing beyond the boundaries of a specific study. The authors suggest that researchers remove the CSP label from their operational variables, and instead narrowly define their studies in operational terms. They provide aworking example of the proposed research direction by examining the theory underlying the popular CSP–financial performance (FP) debate. In the authors’ conceptualization, stakeholder action provides the underlying logic connecting CSP-FP, and we recast the research question to investigate the conditions under which stakeholders will take action to influence the focal organization and when those actions will influence the CSP-FP link.</description><subject>Corporate identity</subject><subject>Corporate responsibility</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Financial performance</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Organizational Research</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0007-6503</issn><issn>1552-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqH_C0COpp7eR791iLX1BUUM9hms3Klu2mJi3ivzdLC4qip5nDM28mQ8gxhQtKtR4BgFYSeKq8BBAgdsiASslywUDukkEP8l7sk4MY5wCUMaUHhI6zy4Bdld27923n62ziw9IHXLnsydsG2-zRhdqHBXbWHZK9GtvojrZ1SF6ur54nt_n04eZuMp7mljO2ym1ZWCmEstWMc1VgaqkQ1SytIyougCpRI7NQobUWSlCK8QoZpUJLXWrBh-R8k7sM_m3t4sosmmhd22Ln_DqaRCgUXEGSZ__KRApgWid48gPO_Tp06ReGliUvhJI0IbZBNvgYg6vNMjQLDB-GgumPbX4fOw2dbpMxWmzrdEjbxK9J0efLftXRxkV8dd9e_zv5E3-Whtk</recordid><startdate>200012</startdate><enddate>200012</enddate><creator>Rowley, Tim</creator><creator>Berman, Shawn</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200012</creationdate><title>A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance</title><author>Rowley, Tim ; Berman, Shawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-c98c5446cdb3368a446144db2054d340164fa2c0daccc0906623da21147579743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Corporate identity</topic><topic>Corporate responsibility</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Financial performance</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Organizational Research</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rowley, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Shawn</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Business & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rowley, Tim</au><au>Berman, Shawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance</atitle><jtitle>Business & society</jtitle><date>2000-12</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>397-418</pages><issn>0007-6503</issn><eissn>1552-4205</eissn><coden>BUSOBE</coden><abstract>We argue that corporate social performance (CSP) has become a legitimizing identity (brand) for researchers in the business and society field, but it has not developed into a viable theoretical or operational construct. Because measuring CSP is contingent on the operational setting (industry, issues, etc.), it is difficult to produce worthwhile comparisons across studies or generalizing beyond the boundaries of a specific study. The authors suggest that researchers remove the CSP label from their operational variables, and instead narrowly define their studies in operational terms. They provide aworking example of the proposed research direction by examining the theory underlying the popular CSP–financial performance (FP) debate. In the authors’ conceptualization, stakeholder action provides the underlying logic connecting CSP-FP, and we recast the research question to investigate the conditions under which stakeholders will take action to influence the focal organization and when those actions will influence the CSP-FP link.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/000765030003900404</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-6503 |
ispartof | Business & society, 2000-12, Vol.39 (4), p.397-418 |
issn | 0007-6503 1552-4205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743108360 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Corporate identity Corporate responsibility Corporations Financial performance Methodological Problems Organizational Research Researchers Social Responsibility Society Sociology Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration Sociology of work and sociology of organizations Stakeholders Studies |
title | A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T02%3A42%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Brand%20New%20Brand%20of%20Corporate%20Social%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Business%20&%20society&rft.au=Rowley,%20Tim&rft.date=2000-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=397-418&rft.issn=0007-6503&rft.eissn=1552-4205&rft.coden=BUSOBE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000765030003900404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60380277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199384651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000765030003900404&rfr_iscdi=true |