Best available techniques (BAT) in the Finnish pulp and paper industry - a critical review
In this multiple‐case study the BAT‐associated techniques and relative emission levels presented in the EU's best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the pulp and paper industry (PP‐BREF) are compared with the techniques applied and the relative emission levels achieved in the Fin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European environment 2005-05, Vol.15 (3), p.175-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | European environment |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Silvo, Kimmo Jouttijärvi, Timo Melanen, Matti Ruonala, Seppo |
description | In this multiple‐case study the BAT‐associated techniques and relative emission levels presented in the EU's best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the pulp and paper industry (PP‐BREF) are compared with the techniques applied and the relative emission levels achieved in the Finnish pulp and paper industry. Information on the emissions of 24 Finnish pulp and paper plants was compiled from the national databases maintained by the Finnish Environment Institute. Moreover, a supportive study was conducted on the use of the PP‐BREF in the environmental permitting process. The techniques applied in the studied plants represented the BAT as defined in the PP‐BREF to a high degree, but the emission levels showed a larger variation. Possible reasons for this variation were discussed. A BAT emission index (BEI) was designed to trace the degree to which the BAT‐associated emission levels were achieved as a whole. The BEI appeared to be a useful indicator for assessing the BAT‐related environmental performance of the plants. An important area for improvement, identified from the point of view of the applicability of the PP‐BREF in the permit process, was the information on waste management issues. Moreover, a consistent cross‐media assessment in the PP‐BREF was called for. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eet.373 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743106356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38120395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4243-f178951eaa5cb51f527ac8b5483da5b9db7c200620e5623112db6c4718c1d1503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d9rE0EQB_BDFIxV_BcWH_xBuTqzP28f25BGJShCRPBl2dubkK3Xy7l715r_vhciCoL2aR7mw-7MfIviOcIZAvC3RMOZMOJBMUOwtgRr9MNiBlZjCRLU4-JJzlcAIBTKWfHtgvLA_I2Pra9bYgOFbRd_jJTZ64vz9RsWOzZsiV3Grot5y_qx7ZnvGtb7ntLUbcY8pD0rmWchxSEG37JEN5FunxaPNr7N9OxXPSm-XC7W83fl6tPy_fx8VQbJpSg3aCqrkLxXoVa4Udz4UNVKVqLxqrZNbQIH0BxIaS4QeVPrIA1WARtUIE6KV8d3-7Q7DD6465gDta3vaDdmZ6RA0ELpSb78rxQVchBW3QvRCG55Je-HcvpdycOQL_6CV7sxddNdHJ9W0qBQ_NkkpF3OiTauT_Hap71DcIdw3RSum8Kd5OlR3saW9v9ibrFYH3V51DEP9PO39um700YY5b5-XLrV5_mH1VJXzoo7326wmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211260513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best available techniques (BAT) in the Finnish pulp and paper industry - a critical review</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Silvo, Kimmo ; Jouttijärvi, Timo ; Melanen, Matti ; Ruonala, Seppo</creator><creatorcontrib>Silvo, Kimmo ; Jouttijärvi, Timo ; Melanen, Matti ; Ruonala, Seppo</creatorcontrib><description>In this multiple‐case study the BAT‐associated techniques and relative emission levels presented in the EU's best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the pulp and paper industry (PP‐BREF) are compared with the techniques applied and the relative emission levels achieved in the Finnish pulp and paper industry. Information on the emissions of 24 Finnish pulp and paper plants was compiled from the national databases maintained by the Finnish Environment Institute. Moreover, a supportive study was conducted on the use of the PP‐BREF in the environmental permitting process. The techniques applied in the studied plants represented the BAT as defined in the PP‐BREF to a high degree, but the emission levels showed a larger variation. Possible reasons for this variation were discussed. A BAT emission index (BEI) was designed to trace the degree to which the BAT‐associated emission levels were achieved as a whole. The BEI appeared to be a useful indicator for assessing the BAT‐related environmental performance of the plants. An important area for improvement, identified from the point of view of the applicability of the PP‐BREF in the permit process, was the information on waste management issues. Moreover, a consistent cross‐media assessment in the PP‐BREF was called for. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-0405</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-932X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eet.373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>best available techniques ; Emissions ; Environmental performance ; environmental permits ; Environmental protection ; Finland ; Industrial plant emissions ; integrated pollution prevention and control ; International conventions ; Pollution control ; Programme evaluation ; Pulp & paper industry ; Pulp and paper industry ; Studies ; Technical efficiency ; Waste management</subject><ispartof>European environment, 2005-05, Vol.15 (3), p.175-191</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. May/Jun 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4243-f178951eaa5cb51f527ac8b5483da5b9db7c200620e5623112db6c4718c1d1503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4243-f178951eaa5cb51f527ac8b5483da5b9db7c200620e5623112db6c4718c1d1503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feet.373$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feet.373$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27870,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silvo, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouttijärvi, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melanen, Matti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruonala, Seppo</creatorcontrib><title>Best available techniques (BAT) in the Finnish pulp and paper industry - a critical review</title><title>European environment</title><addtitle>Eur. Env</addtitle><description>In this multiple‐case study the BAT‐associated techniques and relative emission levels presented in the EU's best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the pulp and paper industry (PP‐BREF) are compared with the techniques applied and the relative emission levels achieved in the Finnish pulp and paper industry. Information on the emissions of 24 Finnish pulp and paper plants was compiled from the national databases maintained by the Finnish Environment Institute. Moreover, a supportive study was conducted on the use of the PP‐BREF in the environmental permitting process. The techniques applied in the studied plants represented the BAT as defined in the PP‐BREF to a high degree, but the emission levels showed a larger variation. Possible reasons for this variation were discussed. A BAT emission index (BEI) was designed to trace the degree to which the BAT‐associated emission levels were achieved as a whole. The BEI appeared to be a useful indicator for assessing the BAT‐related environmental performance of the plants. An important area for improvement, identified from the point of view of the applicability of the PP‐BREF in the permit process, was the information on waste management issues. Moreover, a consistent cross‐media assessment in the PP‐BREF was called for. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</description><subject>best available techniques</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental performance</subject><subject>environmental permits</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>integrated pollution prevention and control</subject><subject>International conventions</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Programme evaluation</subject><subject>Pulp & paper industry</subject><subject>Pulp and paper industry</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technical efficiency</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><issn>0961-0405</issn><issn>1756-932X</issn><issn>1099-0976</issn><issn>1756-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d9rE0EQB_BDFIxV_BcWH_xBuTqzP28f25BGJShCRPBl2dubkK3Xy7l715r_vhciCoL2aR7mw-7MfIviOcIZAvC3RMOZMOJBMUOwtgRr9MNiBlZjCRLU4-JJzlcAIBTKWfHtgvLA_I2Pra9bYgOFbRd_jJTZ64vz9RsWOzZsiV3Grot5y_qx7ZnvGtb7ntLUbcY8pD0rmWchxSEG37JEN5FunxaPNr7N9OxXPSm-XC7W83fl6tPy_fx8VQbJpSg3aCqrkLxXoVa4Udz4UNVKVqLxqrZNbQIH0BxIaS4QeVPrIA1WARtUIE6KV8d3-7Q7DD6465gDta3vaDdmZ6RA0ELpSb78rxQVchBW3QvRCG55Je-HcvpdycOQL_6CV7sxddNdHJ9W0qBQ_NkkpF3OiTauT_Hap71DcIdw3RSum8Kd5OlR3saW9v9ibrFYH3V51DEP9PO39um700YY5b5-XLrV5_mH1VJXzoo7326wmw</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Silvo, Kimmo</creator><creator>Jouttijärvi, Timo</creator><creator>Melanen, Matti</creator><creator>Ruonala, Seppo</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Best available techniques (BAT) in the Finnish pulp and paper industry - a critical review</title><author>Silvo, Kimmo ; Jouttijärvi, Timo ; Melanen, Matti ; Ruonala, Seppo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4243-f178951eaa5cb51f527ac8b5483da5b9db7c200620e5623112db6c4718c1d1503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>best available techniques</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental performance</topic><topic>environmental permits</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>integrated pollution prevention and control</topic><topic>International conventions</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Programme evaluation</topic><topic>Pulp & paper industry</topic><topic>Pulp and paper industry</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technical efficiency</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silvo, Kimmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouttijärvi, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melanen, Matti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruonala, Seppo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silvo, Kimmo</au><au>Jouttijärvi, Timo</au><au>Melanen, Matti</au><au>Ruonala, Seppo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best available techniques (BAT) in the Finnish pulp and paper industry - a critical review</atitle><jtitle>European environment</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. Env</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>175-191</pages><issn>0961-0405</issn><issn>1756-932X</issn><eissn>1099-0976</eissn><eissn>1756-9338</eissn><abstract>In this multiple‐case study the BAT‐associated techniques and relative emission levels presented in the EU's best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the pulp and paper industry (PP‐BREF) are compared with the techniques applied and the relative emission levels achieved in the Finnish pulp and paper industry. Information on the emissions of 24 Finnish pulp and paper plants was compiled from the national databases maintained by the Finnish Environment Institute. Moreover, a supportive study was conducted on the use of the PP‐BREF in the environmental permitting process. The techniques applied in the studied plants represented the BAT as defined in the PP‐BREF to a high degree, but the emission levels showed a larger variation. Possible reasons for this variation were discussed. A BAT emission index (BEI) was designed to trace the degree to which the BAT‐associated emission levels were achieved as a whole. The BEI appeared to be a useful indicator for assessing the BAT‐related environmental performance of the plants. An important area for improvement, identified from the point of view of the applicability of the PP‐BREF in the permit process, was the information on waste management issues. Moreover, a consistent cross‐media assessment in the PP‐BREF was called for. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/eet.373</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0961-0405 |
ispartof | European environment, 2005-05, Vol.15 (3), p.175-191 |
issn | 0961-0405 1756-932X 1099-0976 1756-9338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743106356 |
source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | best available techniques Emissions Environmental performance environmental permits Environmental protection Finland Industrial plant emissions integrated pollution prevention and control International conventions Pollution control Programme evaluation Pulp & paper industry Pulp and paper industry Studies Technical efficiency Waste management |
title | Best available techniques (BAT) in the Finnish pulp and paper industry - a critical review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T02%3A13%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20available%20techniques%20(BAT)%20in%20the%20Finnish%20pulp%20and%20paper%20industry%20-%20a%20critical%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20environment&rft.au=Silvo,%20Kimmo&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=175-191&rft.issn=0961-0405&rft.eissn=1099-0976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eet.373&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38120395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211260513&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |