Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315

This paper discusses Swift observations of the g-ray burst GRB 050315 (z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t super(-5)) for 6200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/g-ray emission (observed by the BA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2006-02, Vol.638 (2), p.920-929
Hauptverfasser: Vaughan, S, Goad, M. R, Beardmore, A. P, O’Brien, P. T, Osborne, J. P, Page, K. L, Barthelmy, S. D, Burrows, D. N, Campana, S, Cannizzo, J. K, Capalbi, M, Chincarini, G, Cummings, J. R, Cusumano, G, Giommi, P, Godet, O, Hill, J. E, Kobayashi, S, Kumar, P, La Parola, V, Levan, A, Mangano, V, Mészáros, P, Moretti, A, Morris, D. C, Nousek, J. A, Pagani, C, Palmer, D. M, Racusin, J. L, Romano, P, Tagliaferri, G, Zhang, B, Gehrels, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 929
container_issue 2
container_start_page 920
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 638
creator Vaughan, S
Goad, M. R
Beardmore, A. P
O’Brien, P. T
Osborne, J. P
Page, K. L
Barthelmy, S. D
Burrows, D. N
Campana, S
Cannizzo, J. K
Capalbi, M
Chincarini, G
Cummings, J. R
Cusumano, G
Giommi, P
Godet, O
Hill, J. E
Kobayashi, S
Kumar, P
La Parola, V
Levan, A
Mangano, V
Mészáros, P
Moretti, A
Morris, D. C
Nousek, J. A
Pagani, C
Palmer, D. M
Racusin, J. L
Romano, P
Tagliaferri, G
Zhang, B
Gehrels, N
description This paper discusses Swift observations of the g-ray burst GRB 050315 (z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t super(-5)) for 6200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/g-ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first 6300 s of X-ray emission (observed by the XRT) can be explained by exponential decays, with similar decay constants. Extrapolating the BAT light curve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading prompt emission; this strong similarity between the prompt g-ray and early X-ray emission may be related to the simple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray-rich GRB. The prompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to 615 keV and appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for 61.2x 10 super(4) s, after which time it decayed with a temporal index of a- 0.7, followed by a second break at 62.5 x 10 super(5) s to a slope of a 6 2. The apparent "plateau" in the X-ray light curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening angle was f sub(0) 65, implying E sub(g) 10 super(50) ergs.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/499069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743074229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19431621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-78f7f8de36784537763d20393b6c076745075d6f8f306fc85b24e97f5277fa613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V1LwzAUBuAgCs6pv6FeqCBU832SSzd0CoPBVNhdyNrEVbq1Jp2yf2_LBrsQvcnhHB7eizcInRN8S7CSd1xrLPUB6hHBVMqZgEPUwxjzVDKYHaOTGD-6lWrdQ-Tlu_BNMplHF75sU1SrmFQ-aRYumaVTu0kHoXhfNMloOkiwwIyIU3TkbRnd2W720dvjw-vwKR1PRs_D-3GaMYAmBeXBq9wxCYqL9iRZTjHTbC4zDBK4wCBy6ZVnWPpMiTnlToMXFMBbSVgfXW9z61B9rl1szLKImStLu3LVOhrgDAOnVLfy6l9JNGdEUrKHWahiDM6bOhRLGzaGYNN1Z7bdtfByl2hjZksf7Cor4l6DIFozaN3F1hVV_XfWzW_T9W-672gfZajRFJs69-wHxwN_3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19431621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Vaughan, S ; Goad, M. R ; Beardmore, A. P ; O’Brien, P. T ; Osborne, J. P ; Page, K. L ; Barthelmy, S. D ; Burrows, D. N ; Campana, S ; Cannizzo, J. K ; Capalbi, M ; Chincarini, G ; Cummings, J. R ; Cusumano, G ; Giommi, P ; Godet, O ; Hill, J. E ; Kobayashi, S ; Kumar, P ; La Parola, V ; Levan, A ; Mangano, V ; Mészáros, P ; Moretti, A ; Morris, D. C ; Nousek, J. A ; Pagani, C ; Palmer, D. M ; Racusin, J. L ; Romano, P ; Tagliaferri, G ; Zhang, B ; Gehrels, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, S ; Goad, M. R ; Beardmore, A. P ; O’Brien, P. T ; Osborne, J. P ; Page, K. L ; Barthelmy, S. D ; Burrows, D. N ; Campana, S ; Cannizzo, J. K ; Capalbi, M ; Chincarini, G ; Cummings, J. R ; Cusumano, G ; Giommi, P ; Godet, O ; Hill, J. E ; Kobayashi, S ; Kumar, P ; La Parola, V ; Levan, A ; Mangano, V ; Mészáros, P ; Moretti, A ; Morris, D. C ; Nousek, J. A ; Pagani, C ; Palmer, D. M ; Racusin, J. L ; Romano, P ; Tagliaferri, G ; Zhang, B ; Gehrels, N</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses Swift observations of the g-ray burst GRB 050315 (z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t super(-5)) for 6200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/g-ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first 6300 s of X-ray emission (observed by the XRT) can be explained by exponential decays, with similar decay constants. Extrapolating the BAT light curve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading prompt emission; this strong similarity between the prompt g-ray and early X-ray emission may be related to the simple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray-rich GRB. The prompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to 615 keV and appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for 61.2x 10 super(4) s, after which time it decayed with a temporal index of a- 0.7, followed by a second break at 62.5 x 10 super(5) s to a slope of a 6 2. The apparent "plateau" in the X-ray light curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening angle was f sub(0) 65, implying E sub(g) 10 super(50) ergs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/499069</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2006-02, Vol.638 (2), p.920-929</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-78f7f8de36784537763d20393b6c076745075d6f8f306fc85b24e97f5277fa613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-78f7f8de36784537763d20393b6c076745075d6f8f306fc85b24e97f5277fa613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/499069/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27605,27901,27902,53906</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/638/2/920$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17519937$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goad, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardmore, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, P. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, K. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barthelmy, S. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burrows, D. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campana, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannizzo, J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capalbi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chincarini, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cusumano, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giommi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godet, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Parola, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangano, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mészáros, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretti, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, D. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nousek, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagani, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, D. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racusin, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrels, N</creatorcontrib><title>Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><description>This paper discusses Swift observations of the g-ray burst GRB 050315 (z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t super(-5)) for 6200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/g-ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first 6300 s of X-ray emission (observed by the XRT) can be explained by exponential decays, with similar decay constants. Extrapolating the BAT light curve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading prompt emission; this strong similarity between the prompt g-ray and early X-ray emission may be related to the simple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray-rich GRB. The prompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to 615 keV and appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for 61.2x 10 super(4) s, after which time it decayed with a temporal index of a- 0.7, followed by a second break at 62.5 x 10 super(5) s to a slope of a 6 2. The apparent "plateau" in the X-ray light curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening angle was f sub(0) 65, implying E sub(g) 10 super(50) ergs.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90V1LwzAUBuAgCs6pv6FeqCBU832SSzd0CoPBVNhdyNrEVbq1Jp2yf2_LBrsQvcnhHB7eizcInRN8S7CSd1xrLPUB6hHBVMqZgEPUwxjzVDKYHaOTGD-6lWrdQ-Tlu_BNMplHF75sU1SrmFQ-aRYumaVTu0kHoXhfNMloOkiwwIyIU3TkbRnd2W720dvjw-vwKR1PRs_D-3GaMYAmBeXBq9wxCYqL9iRZTjHTbC4zDBK4wCBy6ZVnWPpMiTnlToMXFMBbSVgfXW9z61B9rl1szLKImStLu3LVOhrgDAOnVLfy6l9JNGdEUrKHWahiDM6bOhRLGzaGYNN1Z7bdtfByl2hjZksf7Cor4l6DIFozaN3F1hVV_XfWzW_T9W-672gfZajRFJs69-wHxwN_3g</recordid><startdate>20060220</startdate><enddate>20060220</enddate><creator>Vaughan, S</creator><creator>Goad, M. R</creator><creator>Beardmore, A. P</creator><creator>O’Brien, P. T</creator><creator>Osborne, J. P</creator><creator>Page, K. L</creator><creator>Barthelmy, S. D</creator><creator>Burrows, D. N</creator><creator>Campana, S</creator><creator>Cannizzo, J. K</creator><creator>Capalbi, M</creator><creator>Chincarini, G</creator><creator>Cummings, J. R</creator><creator>Cusumano, G</creator><creator>Giommi, P</creator><creator>Godet, O</creator><creator>Hill, J. E</creator><creator>Kobayashi, S</creator><creator>Kumar, P</creator><creator>La Parola, V</creator><creator>Levan, A</creator><creator>Mangano, V</creator><creator>Mészáros, P</creator><creator>Moretti, A</creator><creator>Morris, D. C</creator><creator>Nousek, J. A</creator><creator>Pagani, C</creator><creator>Palmer, D. M</creator><creator>Racusin, J. L</creator><creator>Romano, P</creator><creator>Tagliaferri, G</creator><creator>Zhang, B</creator><creator>Gehrels, N</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060220</creationdate><title>Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315</title><author>Vaughan, S ; Goad, M. R ; Beardmore, A. P ; O’Brien, P. T ; Osborne, J. P ; Page, K. L ; Barthelmy, S. D ; Burrows, D. N ; Campana, S ; Cannizzo, J. K ; Capalbi, M ; Chincarini, G ; Cummings, J. R ; Cusumano, G ; Giommi, P ; Godet, O ; Hill, J. E ; Kobayashi, S ; Kumar, P ; La Parola, V ; Levan, A ; Mangano, V ; Mészáros, P ; Moretti, A ; Morris, D. C ; Nousek, J. A ; Pagani, C ; Palmer, D. M ; Racusin, J. L ; Romano, P ; Tagliaferri, G ; Zhang, B ; Gehrels, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-78f7f8de36784537763d20393b6c076745075d6f8f306fc85b24e97f5277fa613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goad, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardmore, A. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Brien, P. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, K. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barthelmy, S. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burrows, D. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campana, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannizzo, J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capalbi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chincarini, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cusumano, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giommi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godet, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Parola, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangano, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mészáros, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretti, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, D. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nousek, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagani, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, D. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racusin, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrels, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaughan, S</au><au>Goad, M. R</au><au>Beardmore, A. P</au><au>O’Brien, P. T</au><au>Osborne, J. P</au><au>Page, K. L</au><au>Barthelmy, S. D</au><au>Burrows, D. N</au><au>Campana, S</au><au>Cannizzo, J. K</au><au>Capalbi, M</au><au>Chincarini, G</au><au>Cummings, J. R</au><au>Cusumano, G</au><au>Giommi, P</au><au>Godet, O</au><au>Hill, J. E</au><au>Kobayashi, S</au><au>Kumar, P</au><au>La Parola, V</au><au>Levan, A</au><au>Mangano, V</au><au>Mészáros, P</au><au>Moretti, A</au><au>Morris, D. C</au><au>Nousek, J. A</au><au>Pagani, C</au><au>Palmer, D. M</au><au>Racusin, J. L</au><au>Romano, P</au><au>Tagliaferri, G</au><au>Zhang, B</au><au>Gehrels, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><date>2006-02-20</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>638</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>920</spage><epage>929</epage><pages>920-929</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><coden>ASJOAB</coden><abstract>This paper discusses Swift observations of the g-ray burst GRB 050315 (z = 1.949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t super(-5)) for 6200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/g-ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first 6300 s of X-ray emission (observed by the XRT) can be explained by exponential decays, with similar decay constants. Extrapolating the BAT light curve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading prompt emission; this strong similarity between the prompt g-ray and early X-ray emission may be related to the simple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray-rich GRB. The prompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to 615 keV and appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for 61.2x 10 super(4) s, after which time it decayed with a temporal index of a- 0.7, followed by a second break at 62.5 x 10 super(5) s to a slope of a 6 2. The apparent "plateau" in the X-ray light curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening angle was f sub(0) 65, implying E sub(g) 10 super(50) ergs.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1086/499069</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2006-02, Vol.638 (2), p.920-929
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_743074229
source IOP Publishing Free Content
subjects Astronomy
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
title Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A23%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Swift%20Observations%20of%20the%20X-Ray-Bright%20GRB%20050315&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Vaughan,%20S&rft.date=2006-02-20&rft.volume=638&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=920&rft.epage=929&rft.pages=920-929&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft.coden=ASJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/499069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E19431621%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19431621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true