Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?
The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2009-10, Vol.35 (5), p.1598-1617 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1617 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1598 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Prince, Jon B Thompson, William F Schmuckler, Mark A |
description | The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0016456 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742719209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ860092</ericid><sourcerecordid>614507684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a549t-74b4e09c54ab1951dcf5b0fd339cde62411c68e703c2404f7746a93342ee2c283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiq0X8AFEiiC6cPScXCdLkXqjoou6DmkmQ0emnTGZgn17p7a24EKzCSQffzj5CTlCuEJg6toCoORCbpEuaqYTpEptky6AlgkKyjpkL8Z3aBemYpd0UKfApNBdcvpaNG7cs9OsNywm_rI3rKa2LJr599Gzb3w4IDu5LaM_XO375O2uP7x9SAYv94-3N4PECq6bRPER96Cd4HaEWmDmcjGCPGNMu8xLyhGdTL0C5igHnivFpdWMceo9dTRl--R8mVuH6mPmY2MmRXS-LO3UV7NoFKcKNQX9v2QcFGtfauXpL_lezUI7YTQSuQAlU_4XogvEJC6SLpbIhSrG4HNTh2Jiw9wgmEUJ5qeElp6s8majic82cPXrLThbARudLfNgp66Ia0cpgAKuWne8dD4Ubn3df0pl2yzdxNjamjrOnQ1N4Uofzee4NkwYYVDolH0BB6WeZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614507684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Prince, Jon B ; Thompson, William F ; Schmuckler, Mark A</creator><creatorcontrib>Prince, Jon B ; Thompson, William F ; Schmuckler, Mark A</creatorcontrib><description>The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0016456</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19803659</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; Audition ; Auditory Perception ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification ; Comprehension ; Concept Formation ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Ears & hearing ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goodness of Fit ; Human ; Humans ; Intonation ; Listeners ; Male ; Measurement Equipment ; Music ; Music Education ; Observer Variation ; Perception ; Pitch ; Pitch (Frequency) ; Pitch Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reference Values ; Sensory perception ; Stimulus ; Task Analysis ; Time ; Time Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2009-10, Vol.35 (5), p.1598-1617</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a549t-74b4e09c54ab1951dcf5b0fd339cde62411c68e703c2404f7746a93342ee2c283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ860092$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22007047$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19803659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prince, Jon B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmuckler, Mark A</creatorcontrib><title>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goodness of Fit</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intonation</subject><subject>Listeners</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement Equipment</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music Education</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Pitch</subject><subject>Pitch (Frequency)</subject><subject>Pitch Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiq0X8AFEiiC6cPScXCdLkXqjoou6DmkmQ0emnTGZgn17p7a24EKzCSQffzj5CTlCuEJg6toCoORCbpEuaqYTpEptky6AlgkKyjpkL8Z3aBemYpd0UKfApNBdcvpaNG7cs9OsNywm_rI3rKa2LJr599Gzb3w4IDu5LaM_XO375O2uP7x9SAYv94-3N4PECq6bRPER96Cd4HaEWmDmcjGCPGNMu8xLyhGdTL0C5igHnivFpdWMceo9dTRl--R8mVuH6mPmY2MmRXS-LO3UV7NoFKcKNQX9v2QcFGtfauXpL_lezUI7YTQSuQAlU_4XogvEJC6SLpbIhSrG4HNTh2Jiw9wgmEUJ5qeElp6s8majic82cPXrLThbARudLfNgp66Ia0cpgAKuWne8dD4Ubn3df0pl2yzdxNjamjrOnQ1N4Uofzee4NkwYYVDolH0BB6WeZw</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Prince, Jon B</creator><creator>Thompson, William F</creator><creator>Schmuckler, Mark A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter</title><author>Prince, Jon B ; Thompson, William F ; Schmuckler, Mark A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a549t-74b4e09c54ab1951dcf5b0fd339cde62411c68e703c2404f7746a93342ee2c283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goodness of Fit</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intonation</topic><topic>Listeners</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement Equipment</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music Education</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Pitch</topic><topic>Pitch (Frequency)</topic><topic>Pitch Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prince, Jon B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmuckler, Mark A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prince, Jon B</au><au>Thompson, William F</au><au>Schmuckler, Mark A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ860092</ericid><atitle>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1598</spage><epage>1617</epage><pages>1598-1617</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19803659</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0016456</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2009-10, Vol.35 (5), p.1598-1617 |
issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742719209 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Attention Audition Auditory Perception Bias Biological and medical sciences Classification Comprehension Concept Formation Cues Discrimination (Psychology) Ears & hearing Experimental psychology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Goodness of Fit Human Humans Intonation Listeners Male Measurement Equipment Music Music Education Observer Variation Perception Pitch Pitch (Frequency) Pitch Perception Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reference Values Sensory perception Stimulus Task Analysis Time Time Perception Young Adult |
title | Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pitch%20and%20Time,%20Tonality%20and%20Meter:%20How%20Do%20Musical%20Dimensions%20Combine?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Prince,%20Jon%20B&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1598&rft.epage=1617&rft.pages=1598-1617&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0016456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614507684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614507684&rft_id=info:pmid/19803659&rft_ericid=EJ860092&rfr_iscdi=true |