Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?

The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2009-10, Vol.35 (5), p.1598-1617
Hauptverfasser: Prince, Jon B, Thompson, William F, Schmuckler, Mark A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1617
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1598
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
container_volume 35
creator Prince, Jon B
Thompson, William F
Schmuckler, Mark A
description The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0016456
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742719209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ860092</ericid><sourcerecordid>614507684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a549t-74b4e09c54ab1951dcf5b0fd339cde62411c68e703c2404f7746a93342ee2c283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiq0X8AFEiiC6cPScXCdLkXqjoou6DmkmQ0emnTGZgn17p7a24EKzCSQffzj5CTlCuEJg6toCoORCbpEuaqYTpEptky6AlgkKyjpkL8Z3aBemYpd0UKfApNBdcvpaNG7cs9OsNywm_rI3rKa2LJr599Gzb3w4IDu5LaM_XO375O2uP7x9SAYv94-3N4PECq6bRPER96Cd4HaEWmDmcjGCPGNMu8xLyhGdTL0C5igHnivFpdWMceo9dTRl--R8mVuH6mPmY2MmRXS-LO3UV7NoFKcKNQX9v2QcFGtfauXpL_lezUI7YTQSuQAlU_4XogvEJC6SLpbIhSrG4HNTh2Jiw9wgmEUJ5qeElp6s8majic82cPXrLThbARudLfNgp66Ia0cpgAKuWne8dD4Ubn3df0pl2yzdxNjamjrOnQ1N4Uofzee4NkwYYVDolH0BB6WeZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614507684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Prince, Jon B ; Thompson, William F ; Schmuckler, Mark A</creator><creatorcontrib>Prince, Jon B ; Thompson, William F ; Schmuckler, Mark A</creatorcontrib><description>The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0016456</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19803659</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; Audition ; Auditory Perception ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification ; Comprehension ; Concept Formation ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goodness of Fit ; Human ; Humans ; Intonation ; Listeners ; Male ; Measurement Equipment ; Music ; Music Education ; Observer Variation ; Perception ; Pitch ; Pitch (Frequency) ; Pitch Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reference Values ; Sensory perception ; Stimulus ; Task Analysis ; Time ; Time Perception ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2009-10, Vol.35 (5), p.1598-1617</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a549t-74b4e09c54ab1951dcf5b0fd339cde62411c68e703c2404f7746a93342ee2c283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ860092$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22007047$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19803659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prince, Jon B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmuckler, Mark A</creatorcontrib><title>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goodness of Fit</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intonation</subject><subject>Listeners</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement Equipment</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music Education</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Pitch</subject><subject>Pitch (Frequency)</subject><subject>Pitch Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKAzEUBuAgiq0X8AFEiiC6cPScXCdLkXqjoou6DmkmQ0emnTGZgn17p7a24EKzCSQffzj5CTlCuEJg6toCoORCbpEuaqYTpEptky6AlgkKyjpkL8Z3aBemYpd0UKfApNBdcvpaNG7cs9OsNywm_rI3rKa2LJr599Gzb3w4IDu5LaM_XO375O2uP7x9SAYv94-3N4PECq6bRPER96Cd4HaEWmDmcjGCPGNMu8xLyhGdTL0C5igHnivFpdWMceo9dTRl--R8mVuH6mPmY2MmRXS-LO3UV7NoFKcKNQX9v2QcFGtfauXpL_lezUI7YTQSuQAlU_4XogvEJC6SLpbIhSrG4HNTh2Jiw9wgmEUJ5qeElp6s8majic82cPXrLThbARudLfNgp66Ia0cpgAKuWne8dD4Ubn3df0pl2yzdxNjamjrOnQ1N4Uofzee4NkwYYVDolH0BB6WeZw</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Prince, Jon B</creator><creator>Thompson, William F</creator><creator>Schmuckler, Mark A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter</title><author>Prince, Jon B ; Thompson, William F ; Schmuckler, Mark A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a549t-74b4e09c54ab1951dcf5b0fd339cde62411c68e703c2404f7746a93342ee2c283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goodness of Fit</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intonation</topic><topic>Listeners</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement Equipment</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music Education</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Pitch</topic><topic>Pitch (Frequency)</topic><topic>Pitch Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prince, Jon B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmuckler, Mark A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prince, Jon B</au><au>Thompson, William F</au><au>Schmuckler, Mark A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ860092</ericid><atitle>Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1598</spage><epage>1617</epage><pages>1598-1617</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>The authors examined how the structural attributes of tonality and meter influence musical pitch-time relations. Listeners heard a musical context followed by probe events that varied in pitch class and temporal position. Tonal and metric hierarchies contributed additively to the goodness-of-fit of probes, with pitch class exerting a stronger influence than temporal position (Experiment 1), even when listeners attempted to ignore pitch (Experiment 2). Speeded classification tasks confirmed this asymmetry. Temporal classification was biased by tonal stability (Experiment 3), but pitch classification was unaffected by temporal position (Experiment 4). Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out explanations based on the presence of pitch classes and temporal positions in the context, unequal stimulus quantity, and discriminability. The authors discuss how typical Western music biases attention toward pitch and distinguish between dimensional discriminability and salience.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19803659</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0016456</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1523
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2009-10, Vol.35 (5), p.1598-1617
issn 0096-1523
1939-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742719209
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Attention
Audition
Auditory Perception
Bias
Biological and medical sciences
Classification
Comprehension
Concept Formation
Cues
Discrimination (Psychology)
Ears & hearing
Experimental psychology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Goodness of Fit
Human
Humans
Intonation
Listeners
Male
Measurement Equipment
Music
Music Education
Observer Variation
Perception
Pitch
Pitch (Frequency)
Pitch Perception
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reference Values
Sensory perception
Stimulus
Task Analysis
Time
Time Perception
Young Adult
title Pitch and Time, Tonality and Meter: How Do Musical Dimensions Combine?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pitch%20and%20Time,%20Tonality%20and%20Meter:%20How%20Do%20Musical%20Dimensions%20Combine?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Prince,%20Jon%20B&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1598&rft.epage=1617&rft.pages=1598-1617&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0016456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614507684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614507684&rft_id=info:pmid/19803659&rft_ericid=EJ860092&rfr_iscdi=true