Sensory motor inhibition as a prerequisite for theory-of-mind: A comparison of clinical and normal preschoolers differing in sensory motor abilities
After distinguishing between neocortical abilities for executive control and subcortical sensory motor skills for proprioceptive and vestibular integration, we compare a sample of 116 normal preschoolers with a sample of 31 preschoolers receiving occupational therapeutical treatment. This is done in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of behavioral development 2006-03, Vol.30 (2), p.178-190 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 190 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 178 |
| container_title | International journal of behavioral development |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Chasiotis, Athanasios Kiessling, Florian Winter, Vera Hofer, Jan |
| description | After distinguishing between neocortical abilities for executive control and subcortical sensory motor skills for proprioceptive and vestibular integration, we compare a sample of 116 normal preschoolers with a sample of 31 preschoolers receiving occupational therapeutical treatment. This is done in an experimental design controlled for age (mean: 49 months), sex, SES, linguistic abilities, and intelligence. Inhibition and theory-of-mind are measured with test batteries. Results show that children having deficits in sensory motor inhibition are less competent in conflict inhibition and in theoryof-mind. Regression analyses reveal that in the clinical sample conflict inhibition is a significantly stronger predictor of theory-of-mind than in the control group. These results point at a basic sensory motor inhibitory ability as a prerequisite for the development of theory-of-mind. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0165025406063637 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742716529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ813544</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0165025406063637</sage_id><sourcerecordid>21223337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-97c20dd40ac1ade36ce523e95d3b848b24a590374ffec0ce382daa85bbdb89663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhzoGDL8Ap4P9OuFVVW0CVeiicI8eedF0l9taTPfR78IGZ1VYgkMAXW3q_N09-0zSvBf8ghHMfubCGS6O55VZZ5Z40G6Gtbrk14mmzOcjtQX_evEC843SU45vmxw1kLPWBLWUtlaW8TWNaU8nMI_NsV6HC_T5hWoFNBKxbILotU7ukHD-xUxbKsvM1IVnKxMKccgp-Zj5Hlktd6ElDMGxLmaEii2maoKZ8S1kM_wj3Y5opG_Bl82zyM8Krx_uk-X5x_u3sc3t1ffnl7PSqDao3a9u7IHmMmvsgfARlAxipoDdRjZ3uRqm96embmhIDD6A6Gb3vzDjGseutVSfN--PcXS33e8B1WBIGmGefoexxcFo66k32RL77LymFlEopRyA_gqEWxArTsKtp8fVhEHw4LGr4e1Fkefs42yM1N1WfQ8LfPtc7J5Uh7s2Ro_rCL_n8ayeU0Zrk9iijv4Xhruxrpu7-HfsTvkCsIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21223337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory motor inhibition as a prerequisite for theory-of-mind: A comparison of clinical and normal preschoolers differing in sensory motor abilities</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Chasiotis, Athanasios ; Kiessling, Florian ; Winter, Vera ; Hofer, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chasiotis, Athanasios ; Kiessling, Florian ; Winter, Vera ; Hofer, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>After distinguishing between neocortical abilities for executive control and subcortical sensory motor skills for proprioceptive and vestibular integration, we compare a sample of 116 normal preschoolers with a sample of 31 preschoolers receiving occupational therapeutical treatment. This is done in an experimental design controlled for age (mean: 49 months), sex, SES, linguistic abilities, and intelligence. Inhibition and theory-of-mind are measured with test batteries. Results show that children having deficits in sensory motor inhibition are less competent in conflict inhibition and in theoryof-mind. Regression analyses reveal that in the clinical sample conflict inhibition is a significantly stronger predictor of theory-of-mind than in the control group. These results point at a basic sensory motor inhibitory ability as a prerequisite for the development of theory-of-mind.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0165025406063637</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJBDDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Cognitive Development ; Cognitive Processes ; Comparative Analysis ; Developmental psychology ; Foreign Countries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Germany ; Inhibition ; Intelligence ; Linguistics ; Motor skills ; Occupational Therapy ; Perceptual Motor Learning ; Preschool Children ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sensory Integration ; Social Cognition ; Socioeconomic status</subject><ispartof>International journal of behavioral development, 2006-03, Vol.30 (2), p.178-190</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-97c20dd40ac1ade36ce523e95d3b848b24a590374ffec0ce382daa85bbdb89663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-97c20dd40ac1ade36ce523e95d3b848b24a590374ffec0ce382daa85bbdb89663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0165025406063637$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0165025406063637$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ813544$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17977235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chasiotis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiessling, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory motor inhibition as a prerequisite for theory-of-mind: A comparison of clinical and normal preschoolers differing in sensory motor abilities</title><title>International journal of behavioral development</title><description>After distinguishing between neocortical abilities for executive control and subcortical sensory motor skills for proprioceptive and vestibular integration, we compare a sample of 116 normal preschoolers with a sample of 31 preschoolers receiving occupational therapeutical treatment. This is done in an experimental design controlled for age (mean: 49 months), sex, SES, linguistic abilities, and intelligence. Inhibition and theory-of-mind are measured with test batteries. Results show that children having deficits in sensory motor inhibition are less competent in conflict inhibition and in theoryof-mind. Regression analyses reveal that in the clinical sample conflict inhibition is a significantly stronger predictor of theory-of-mind than in the control group. These results point at a basic sensory motor inhibitory ability as a prerequisite for the development of theory-of-mind.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Motor skills</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy</subject><subject>Perceptual Motor Learning</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sensory Integration</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><issn>0165-0254</issn><issn>1464-0651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxSMEEkvhzoGDL8Ap4P9OuFVVW0CVeiicI8eedF0l9taTPfR78IGZ1VYgkMAXW3q_N09-0zSvBf8ghHMfubCGS6O55VZZ5Z40G6Gtbrk14mmzOcjtQX_evEC843SU45vmxw1kLPWBLWUtlaW8TWNaU8nMI_NsV6HC_T5hWoFNBKxbILotU7ukHD-xUxbKsvM1IVnKxMKccgp-Zj5Hlktd6ElDMGxLmaEii2maoKZ8S1kM_wj3Y5opG_Bl82zyM8Krx_uk-X5x_u3sc3t1ffnl7PSqDao3a9u7IHmMmvsgfARlAxipoDdRjZ3uRqm96embmhIDD6A6Gb3vzDjGseutVSfN--PcXS33e8B1WBIGmGefoexxcFo66k32RL77LymFlEopRyA_gqEWxArTsKtp8fVhEHw4LGr4e1Fkefs42yM1N1WfQ8LfPtc7J5Uh7s2Ro_rCL_n8ayeU0Zrk9iijv4Xhruxrpu7-HfsTvkCsIg</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Chasiotis, Athanasios</creator><creator>Kiessling, Florian</creator><creator>Winter, Vera</creator><creator>Hofer, Jan</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Sensory motor inhibition as a prerequisite for theory-of-mind: A comparison of clinical and normal preschoolers differing in sensory motor abilities</title><author>Chasiotis, Athanasios ; Kiessling, Florian ; Winter, Vera ; Hofer, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-97c20dd40ac1ade36ce523e95d3b848b24a590374ffec0ce382daa85bbdb89663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Motor skills</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy</topic><topic>Perceptual Motor Learning</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sensory Integration</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chasiotis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiessling, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chasiotis, Athanasios</au><au>Kiessling, Florian</au><au>Winter, Vera</au><au>Hofer, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ813544</ericid><atitle>Sensory motor inhibition as a prerequisite for theory-of-mind: A comparison of clinical and normal preschoolers differing in sensory motor abilities</atitle><jtitle>International journal of behavioral development</jtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>178-190</pages><issn>0165-0254</issn><eissn>1464-0651</eissn><coden>IJBDDY</coden><abstract>After distinguishing between neocortical abilities for executive control and subcortical sensory motor skills for proprioceptive and vestibular integration, we compare a sample of 116 normal preschoolers with a sample of 31 preschoolers receiving occupational therapeutical treatment. This is done in an experimental design controlled for age (mean: 49 months), sex, SES, linguistic abilities, and intelligence. Inhibition and theory-of-mind are measured with test batteries. Results show that children having deficits in sensory motor inhibition are less competent in conflict inhibition and in theoryof-mind. Regression analyses reveal that in the clinical sample conflict inhibition is a significantly stronger predictor of theory-of-mind than in the control group. These results point at a basic sensory motor inhibitory ability as a prerequisite for the development of theory-of-mind.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0165025406063637</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0165-0254 |
| ispartof | International journal of behavioral development, 2006-03, Vol.30 (2), p.178-190 |
| issn | 0165-0254 1464-0651 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742716529 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Child Child development Cognitive Development Cognitive Processes Comparative Analysis Developmental psychology Foreign Countries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Germany Inhibition Intelligence Linguistics Motor skills Occupational Therapy Perceptual Motor Learning Preschool Children Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sensory Integration Social Cognition Socioeconomic status |
| title | Sensory motor inhibition as a prerequisite for theory-of-mind: A comparison of clinical and normal preschoolers differing in sensory motor abilities |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A57%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20motor%20inhibition%20as%20a%20prerequisite%20for%20theory-of-mind:%20A%20comparison%20of%20clinical%20and%20normal%20preschoolers%20differing%20in%20sensory%20motor%20abilities&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20development&rft.au=Chasiotis,%20Athanasios&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=178-190&rft.issn=0165-0254&rft.eissn=1464-0651&rft.coden=IJBDDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0165025406063637&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21223337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21223337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ813544&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0165025406063637&rfr_iscdi=true |