Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the λPRM promoter

The mechanism of activation of the bacteriophage λP RM promoter by the product of the λcI gene, the λ repressor, was studied in vitro. We found that repressor increased the rate of RNA polymerase open complex formation at P RM; the final extent of promoter occupancy and the catalytic properties of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of molecular biology 1982-05, Vol.157 (3), p.493-525
Hauptverfasser: Hawley, Diane K., Mcclure, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 525
container_issue 3
container_start_page 493
container_title Journal of molecular biology
container_volume 157
creator Hawley, Diane K.
Mcclure, William R.
description The mechanism of activation of the bacteriophage λP RM promoter by the product of the λcI gene, the λ repressor, was studied in vitro. We found that repressor increased the rate of RNA polymerase open complex formation at P RM; the final extent of promoter occupancy and the catalytic properties of the open complexes were unaffected by the presence of repressor. Separate quantitation of the two steps of open complex formation showed that repressor specifically enhanced the rate of the second step, the isomerization of the closed complex to the transcriptionally active open complex. The first step, the initial binding of the RNA polymerase to the promoter to form the closed complex, was not significantly affected by repressor. We also studied the activation of a −35 region mutant of P RM, prmup-1, and found that the mechanism of activation was analogous to that of the wild-type promoter, even though the prmup-1 promoter initiates more frequently than P RM in the absence of repressor. Finally, we present evidence for a stabilizing interaction between RNA polymerase at P RM and repressor at O R2 and demonstrate that repressor is required only for the formation, but not for the maintenance, of the open complex. The comparison of the in vitro initiation properties of the wild-type and prmup-1 promoters revealed an effect of the mutation on both steps of open complex formation. This result is analogous to the observation that a −35 mutation in P R, x3, decreased the favorability of both steps (Hawley & McClure, 1980). We propose a model in which the mutation directly affects only one step, the initial binding, while the observed effect on the isomerization rate is indirect. We present a detailed discussion of this model in the Appendix.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90473-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74224179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0022283682904739</els_id><sourcerecordid>74224179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-851815e1d961245c4c8dff70e5254fc7a68da6d016ca8b141f5e602b6fbd393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EKqVwA5CyQrAI2I7jOBskVPEnWoGAveXYY9WoSYrtVuJs3IEzkbRVl6xGM-_NPM2H0CnBVwQTfo0xpSkVGb8Q9LLErMjScg8NCRZlKngm9tFwZzlERyF8YozzjIkBGnBKWGcZoucp6JlqXKiT1iZKR7dS0bVN30WvmqC9W6wHrnHRbTTr2zqJM0h-f17fpsmia9sI_hgdWDUPcLKtI_R-f_cxfkwnLw9P49tJqrO8iKnIiSA5EFNyQlmumRbG2gJDTnNmdaG4MIqb7kWtREUYsTlwTCtuK5OV2Qidb652sV9LCFHWLmiYz1UD7TLIglHKSNEb2caofRuCBysX3tXKf0uCZU9Q9nhkj0cKKtcEZb92tr2_rGowu6Utsk6_2ejQvbhy4GXQDhoNxnnQUZrW_R_wB4FQgMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74224179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the λPRM promoter</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hawley, Diane K. ; Mcclure, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hawley, Diane K. ; Mcclure, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>The mechanism of activation of the bacteriophage λP RM promoter by the product of the λcI gene, the λ repressor, was studied in vitro. We found that repressor increased the rate of RNA polymerase open complex formation at P RM; the final extent of promoter occupancy and the catalytic properties of the open complexes were unaffected by the presence of repressor. Separate quantitation of the two steps of open complex formation showed that repressor specifically enhanced the rate of the second step, the isomerization of the closed complex to the transcriptionally active open complex. The first step, the initial binding of the RNA polymerase to the promoter to form the closed complex, was not significantly affected by repressor. We also studied the activation of a −35 region mutant of P RM, prmup-1, and found that the mechanism of activation was analogous to that of the wild-type promoter, even though the prmup-1 promoter initiates more frequently than P RM in the absence of repressor. Finally, we present evidence for a stabilizing interaction between RNA polymerase at P RM and repressor at O R2 and demonstrate that repressor is required only for the formation, but not for the maintenance, of the open complex. The comparison of the in vitro initiation properties of the wild-type and prmup-1 promoters revealed an effect of the mutation on both steps of open complex formation. This result is analogous to the observation that a −35 mutation in P R, x3, decreased the favorability of both steps (Hawley &amp; McClure, 1980). We propose a model in which the mutation directly affects only one step, the initial binding, while the observed effect on the isomerization rate is indirect. We present a detailed discussion of this model in the Appendix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-8638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90473-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6214638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteriophage lambda - genetics ; DNA, Superhelical - metabolism ; DNA, Viral - metabolism ; DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases - metabolism ; Gene Expression Regulation ; Genes, Regulator ; Kinetics ; Mutation ; Operon ; Plasmids ; Transcription, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular biology, 1982-05, Vol.157 (3), p.493-525</ispartof><rights>1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-851815e1d961245c4c8dff70e5254fc7a68da6d016ca8b141f5e602b6fbd393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-851815e1d961245c4c8dff70e5254fc7a68da6d016ca8b141f5e602b6fbd393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(82)90473-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6214638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hawley, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mcclure, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the λPRM promoter</title><title>Journal of molecular biology</title><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><description>The mechanism of activation of the bacteriophage λP RM promoter by the product of the λcI gene, the λ repressor, was studied in vitro. We found that repressor increased the rate of RNA polymerase open complex formation at P RM; the final extent of promoter occupancy and the catalytic properties of the open complexes were unaffected by the presence of repressor. Separate quantitation of the two steps of open complex formation showed that repressor specifically enhanced the rate of the second step, the isomerization of the closed complex to the transcriptionally active open complex. The first step, the initial binding of the RNA polymerase to the promoter to form the closed complex, was not significantly affected by repressor. We also studied the activation of a −35 region mutant of P RM, prmup-1, and found that the mechanism of activation was analogous to that of the wild-type promoter, even though the prmup-1 promoter initiates more frequently than P RM in the absence of repressor. Finally, we present evidence for a stabilizing interaction between RNA polymerase at P RM and repressor at O R2 and demonstrate that repressor is required only for the formation, but not for the maintenance, of the open complex. The comparison of the in vitro initiation properties of the wild-type and prmup-1 promoters revealed an effect of the mutation on both steps of open complex formation. This result is analogous to the observation that a −35 mutation in P R, x3, decreased the favorability of both steps (Hawley &amp; McClure, 1980). We propose a model in which the mutation directly affects only one step, the initial binding, while the observed effect on the isomerization rate is indirect. We present a detailed discussion of this model in the Appendix.</description><subject>Bacteriophage lambda - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Superhelical - metabolism</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - metabolism</subject><subject>DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases - metabolism</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation</subject><subject>Genes, Regulator</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Operon</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><issn>0022-2836</issn><issn>1089-8638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EKqVwA5CyQrAI2I7jOBskVPEnWoGAveXYY9WoSYrtVuJs3IEzkbRVl6xGM-_NPM2H0CnBVwQTfo0xpSkVGb8Q9LLErMjScg8NCRZlKngm9tFwZzlERyF8YozzjIkBGnBKWGcZoucp6JlqXKiT1iZKR7dS0bVN30WvmqC9W6wHrnHRbTTr2zqJM0h-f17fpsmia9sI_hgdWDUPcLKtI_R-f_cxfkwnLw9P49tJqrO8iKnIiSA5EFNyQlmumRbG2gJDTnNmdaG4MIqb7kWtREUYsTlwTCtuK5OV2Qidb652sV9LCFHWLmiYz1UD7TLIglHKSNEb2caofRuCBysX3tXKf0uCZU9Q9nhkj0cKKtcEZb92tr2_rGowu6Utsk6_2ejQvbhy4GXQDhoNxnnQUZrW_R_wB4FQgMA</recordid><startdate>19820525</startdate><enddate>19820525</enddate><creator>Hawley, Diane K.</creator><creator>Mcclure, William R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820525</creationdate><title>Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the λPRM promoter</title><author>Hawley, Diane K. ; Mcclure, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-851815e1d961245c4c8dff70e5254fc7a68da6d016ca8b141f5e602b6fbd393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Bacteriophage lambda - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Superhelical - metabolism</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - metabolism</topic><topic>DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases - metabolism</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation</topic><topic>Genes, Regulator</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Operon</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hawley, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mcclure, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hawley, Diane K.</au><au>Mcclure, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the λPRM promoter</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Biol</addtitle><date>1982-05-25</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>493-525</pages><issn>0022-2836</issn><eissn>1089-8638</eissn><abstract>The mechanism of activation of the bacteriophage λP RM promoter by the product of the λcI gene, the λ repressor, was studied in vitro. We found that repressor increased the rate of RNA polymerase open complex formation at P RM; the final extent of promoter occupancy and the catalytic properties of the open complexes were unaffected by the presence of repressor. Separate quantitation of the two steps of open complex formation showed that repressor specifically enhanced the rate of the second step, the isomerization of the closed complex to the transcriptionally active open complex. The first step, the initial binding of the RNA polymerase to the promoter to form the closed complex, was not significantly affected by repressor. We also studied the activation of a −35 region mutant of P RM, prmup-1, and found that the mechanism of activation was analogous to that of the wild-type promoter, even though the prmup-1 promoter initiates more frequently than P RM in the absence of repressor. Finally, we present evidence for a stabilizing interaction between RNA polymerase at P RM and repressor at O R2 and demonstrate that repressor is required only for the formation, but not for the maintenance, of the open complex. The comparison of the in vitro initiation properties of the wild-type and prmup-1 promoters revealed an effect of the mutation on both steps of open complex formation. This result is analogous to the observation that a −35 mutation in P R, x3, decreased the favorability of both steps (Hawley &amp; McClure, 1980). We propose a model in which the mutation directly affects only one step, the initial binding, while the observed effect on the isomerization rate is indirect. We present a detailed discussion of this model in the Appendix.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>6214638</pmid><doi>10.1016/0022-2836(82)90473-9</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2836
ispartof Journal of molecular biology, 1982-05, Vol.157 (3), p.493-525
issn 0022-2836
1089-8638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74224179
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Bacteriophage lambda - genetics
DNA, Superhelical - metabolism
DNA, Viral - metabolism
DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases - metabolism
Gene Expression Regulation
Genes, Regulator
Kinetics
Mutation
Operon
Plasmids
Transcription, Genetic
title Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the λPRM promoter
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A49%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanism%20of%20activation%20of%20transcription%20initiation%20from%20the%20%CE%BBPRM%20promoter&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20biology&rft.au=Hawley,%20Diane%20K.&rft.date=1982-05-25&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=493-525&rft.issn=0022-2836&rft.eissn=1089-8638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0022-2836(82)90473-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74224179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74224179&rft_id=info:pmid/6214638&rft_els_id=0022283682904739&rfr_iscdi=true