The Evolutionary Origin of Extracellular Chemical Messengers
To the Editor: We congratulate Roth and his colleagues for their excellent work (March 4 issue). 1 However, we would like to point out that some years ago, we proposed an almost identical theory for the original nature and evolution of hormones, although in contrast to Roth and his group, we have co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1982-09, Vol.307 (10), p.629-631 |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 631 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 629 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 307 |
description | To the Editor:
We congratulate Roth and his colleagues for their excellent work (March 4 issue).
1
However, we would like to point out that some years ago, we proposed an almost identical theory for the original nature and evolution of hormones, although in contrast to Roth and his group, we have concentrated on steroidal messengers.
Hormonal steroids were first isolated from mammalian adrenals and gonads. By the early 1970s, the idea of their exclusively mammalian or vertebrate role had been successfully challenged.
2
The omnipresence of vertebrate-type hormonal steroids is now generally accepted, and we have documented the general occurrence or . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJM198209023071018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74184157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74184157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-18d8da0b2c761697a26c6431fd7d7d24dde4b4d8209ccc1103fa4408d62deaed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRColMIXIKScuKCAx3YcR-KCorCppZdyjlx70qbKUuwEwd-TqhUnxMxhDm_RvEfIJdBboJG8e8teZ5AoRhPKOI2BgjoiY4g4D4Wg8piMKWUqFHHCT8mZ9xs6DIhkREYSWKRUNCb3izUG2Wdb9V3ZNtp9B3NXrsomaIsg--qcNlhVfaVdkK6xLo2ughl6j80KnT8nJ4WuPF4c7oS8P2aL9Dmczp9e0odpaJiSXQjKKqvpkplYgkxizaSRgkNh42GZsBbFUthdEGMMAOWFHgIoK5lFjZZPyPXed-vajx59l9el3z2mG2x7n8cClIAoHoh8TzSu9d5hkW9dWQ-pcqD5rrP8j84G1dXBvl_WaH81h5IG_GaP17XPG9zU_7r9AIKgcwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74184157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Evolutionary Origin of Extracellular Chemical Messengers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><description>To the Editor:
We congratulate Roth and his colleagues for their excellent work (March 4 issue).
1
However, we would like to point out that some years ago, we proposed an almost identical theory for the original nature and evolution of hormones, although in contrast to Roth and his group, we have concentrated on steroidal messengers.
Hormonal steroids were first isolated from mammalian adrenals and gonads. By the early 1970s, the idea of their exclusively mammalian or vertebrate role had been successfully challenged.
2
The omnipresence of vertebrate-type hormonal steroids is now generally accepted, and we have documented the general occurrence or . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198209023071018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6125885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Hormones - physiology ; Neurotransmitter Agents - physiology</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1982-09, Vol.307 (10), p.629-631</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-18d8da0b2c761697a26c6431fd7d7d24dde4b4d8209ccc1103fa4408d62deaed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,64372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6125885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><title>The Evolutionary Origin of Extracellular Chemical Messengers</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor:
We congratulate Roth and his colleagues for their excellent work (March 4 issue).
1
However, we would like to point out that some years ago, we proposed an almost identical theory for the original nature and evolution of hormones, although in contrast to Roth and his group, we have concentrated on steroidal messengers.
Hormonal steroids were first isolated from mammalian adrenals and gonads. By the early 1970s, the idea of their exclusively mammalian or vertebrate role had been successfully challenged.
2
The omnipresence of vertebrate-type hormonal steroids is now generally accepted, and we have documented the general occurrence or . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Hormones - physiology</subject><subject>Neurotransmitter Agents - physiology</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRColMIXIKScuKCAx3YcR-KCorCppZdyjlx70qbKUuwEwd-TqhUnxMxhDm_RvEfIJdBboJG8e8teZ5AoRhPKOI2BgjoiY4g4D4Wg8piMKWUqFHHCT8mZ9xs6DIhkREYSWKRUNCb3izUG2Wdb9V3ZNtp9B3NXrsomaIsg--qcNlhVfaVdkK6xLo2ughl6j80KnT8nJ4WuPF4c7oS8P2aL9Dmczp9e0odpaJiSXQjKKqvpkplYgkxizaSRgkNh42GZsBbFUthdEGMMAOWFHgIoK5lFjZZPyPXed-vajx59l9el3z2mG2x7n8cClIAoHoh8TzSu9d5hkW9dWQ-pcqD5rrP8j84G1dXBvl_WaH81h5IG_GaP17XPG9zU_7r9AIKgcwQ</recordid><startdate>19820902</startdate><enddate>19820902</enddate><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820902</creationdate><title>The Evolutionary Origin of Extracellular Chemical Messengers</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-18d8da0b2c761697a26c6431fd7d7d24dde4b4d8209ccc1103fa4408d62deaed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Hormones - physiology</topic><topic>Neurotransmitter Agents - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Evolutionary Origin of Extracellular Chemical Messengers</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1982-09-02</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>307</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>631</epage><pages>629-631</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor:
We congratulate Roth and his colleagues for their excellent work (March 4 issue).
1
However, we would like to point out that some years ago, we proposed an almost identical theory for the original nature and evolution of hormones, although in contrast to Roth and his group, we have concentrated on steroidal messengers.
Hormonal steroids were first isolated from mammalian adrenals and gonads. By the early 1970s, the idea of their exclusively mammalian or vertebrate role had been successfully challenged.
2
The omnipresence of vertebrate-type hormonal steroids is now generally accepted, and we have documented the general occurrence or . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>6125885</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM198209023071018</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 1982-09, Vol.307 (10), p.629-631 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74184157 |
source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Animals Biological Evolution Hormones - physiology Neurotransmitter Agents - physiology |
title | The Evolutionary Origin of Extracellular Chemical Messengers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Evolutionary%20Origin%20of%20Extracellular%20Chemical%20Messengers&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.date=1982-09-02&rft.volume=307&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=631&rft.pages=629-631&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198209023071018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74184157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74184157&rft_id=info:pmid/6125885&rfr_iscdi=true |