Scintigraphic Evaluation of Diabetic Osteomyelitis: Concise Communication

We have reviewed the three-phase bone scans, radiographs, and histologic findings of 39 diabetic patients with serious foot problems. The sensitivity and specificity of bone scans were 83% and 75%, respectively, for osteomyelitis of the small bones of the foot. The positive and negative predictive v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1982-07, Vol.23 (7), p.569-573
Hauptverfasser: Park, Hee-Myung, Wheat, L. Joseph, Siddiqui, Aslam R, Burt, Robert W, Robb, John A, Ransburg, Robert C, Kernek, Clyde B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 573
container_issue 7
container_start_page 569
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 23
creator Park, Hee-Myung
Wheat, L. Joseph
Siddiqui, Aslam R
Burt, Robert W
Robb, John A
Ransburg, Robert C
Kernek, Clyde B
description We have reviewed the three-phase bone scans, radiographs, and histologic findings of 39 diabetic patients with serious foot problems. The sensitivity and specificity of bone scans were 83% and 75%, respectively, for osteomyelitis of the small bones of the foot. The positive and negative predictive values were 87% and 69%, respectively. The radiographs were less sensitive (62%) and less specific (69%), with predictive values of 80% (positive) and 47% (negative).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74085492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74085492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h237t-643f6a0a6f6386561af999af72a8e8fb8f1c29211846fe45f9d5057d1e7e7aa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj09LAzEUxIMotVY_grAnbwubZPOS9Sa1aqHQg3oOr9uXbsr-qZus0m_vqgVPA8NvhpkzNuVKqlQB6HM2zTjwVKlMXbKrEPZZloExZsImIDhXAqZs-Vr6Nvpdj4fKl8niE-sBo-_apHPJo8cNxdFeh0hdc6TaRx_uk3nXlj7QqE0ztL78DVyzC4d1oJuTztj70-Jt_pKu1s_L-cMqrYTUMYVcOsAMwYE0oICjK4oCnRZoyLiNcbwUxTjP5OAoV67Yjvv1lpMmjWjkjN399R767mOgEG3jQ0l1jS11Q7A6z4zKCzGCtydw2DS0tYfeN9gf7en7f1Hld9WX78m2Q1kT9j_wvm2EtNoqKOQ358lkLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74085492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scintigraphic Evaluation of Diabetic Osteomyelitis: Concise Communication</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Park, Hee-Myung ; Wheat, L. Joseph ; Siddiqui, Aslam R ; Burt, Robert W ; Robb, John A ; Ransburg, Robert C ; Kernek, Clyde B</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Hee-Myung ; Wheat, L. Joseph ; Siddiqui, Aslam R ; Burt, Robert W ; Robb, John A ; Ransburg, Robert C ; Kernek, Clyde B</creatorcontrib><description>We have reviewed the three-phase bone scans, radiographs, and histologic findings of 39 diabetic patients with serious foot problems. The sensitivity and specificity of bone scans were 83% and 75%, respectively, for osteomyelitis of the small bones of the foot. The positive and negative predictive values were 87% and 69%, respectively. The radiographs were less sensitive (62%) and less specific (69%), with predictive values of 80% (positive) and 47% (negative).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6211526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Arthropathy, Neurogenic - diagnosis ; Diabetes Complications ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Diphosphonates ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; False Negative Reactions ; Foot - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging ; Osteomyelitis - etiology ; Radiography ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Technetium ; Technetium Tc 99m Medronate ; Technology, Radiologic</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1982-07, Vol.23 (7), p.569-573</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6211526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Hee-Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheat, L. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Aslam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ransburg, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kernek, Clyde B</creatorcontrib><title>Scintigraphic Evaluation of Diabetic Osteomyelitis: Concise Communication</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>We have reviewed the three-phase bone scans, radiographs, and histologic findings of 39 diabetic patients with serious foot problems. The sensitivity and specificity of bone scans were 83% and 75%, respectively, for osteomyelitis of the small bones of the foot. The positive and negative predictive values were 87% and 69%, respectively. The radiographs were less sensitive (62%) and less specific (69%), with predictive values of 80% (positive) and 47% (negative).</description><subject>Arthropathy, Neurogenic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Diphosphonates</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Foot - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - etiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Technetium</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</subject><subject>Technology, Radiologic</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFj09LAzEUxIMotVY_grAnbwubZPOS9Sa1aqHQg3oOr9uXbsr-qZus0m_vqgVPA8NvhpkzNuVKqlQB6HM2zTjwVKlMXbKrEPZZloExZsImIDhXAqZs-Vr6Nvpdj4fKl8niE-sBo-_apHPJo8cNxdFeh0hdc6TaRx_uk3nXlj7QqE0ztL78DVyzC4d1oJuTztj70-Jt_pKu1s_L-cMqrYTUMYVcOsAMwYE0oICjK4oCnRZoyLiNcbwUxTjP5OAoV67Yjvv1lpMmjWjkjN399R767mOgEG3jQ0l1jS11Q7A6z4zKCzGCtydw2DS0tYfeN9gf7en7f1Hld9WX78m2Q1kT9j_wvm2EtNoqKOQ358lkLQ</recordid><startdate>198207</startdate><enddate>198207</enddate><creator>Park, Hee-Myung</creator><creator>Wheat, L. Joseph</creator><creator>Siddiqui, Aslam R</creator><creator>Burt, Robert W</creator><creator>Robb, John A</creator><creator>Ransburg, Robert C</creator><creator>Kernek, Clyde B</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198207</creationdate><title>Scintigraphic Evaluation of Diabetic Osteomyelitis: Concise Communication</title><author>Park, Hee-Myung ; Wheat, L. Joseph ; Siddiqui, Aslam R ; Burt, Robert W ; Robb, John A ; Ransburg, Robert C ; Kernek, Clyde B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h237t-643f6a0a6f6386561af999af72a8e8fb8f1c29211846fe45f9d5057d1e7e7aa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Arthropathy, Neurogenic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Diphosphonates</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Foot - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - etiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Technetium</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</topic><topic>Technology, Radiologic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Hee-Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheat, L. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Aslam R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robb, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ransburg, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kernek, Clyde B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Hee-Myung</au><au>Wheat, L. Joseph</au><au>Siddiqui, Aslam R</au><au>Burt, Robert W</au><au>Robb, John A</au><au>Ransburg, Robert C</au><au>Kernek, Clyde B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scintigraphic Evaluation of Diabetic Osteomyelitis: Concise Communication</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1982-07</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>569-573</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>We have reviewed the three-phase bone scans, radiographs, and histologic findings of 39 diabetic patients with serious foot problems. The sensitivity and specificity of bone scans were 83% and 75%, respectively, for osteomyelitis of the small bones of the foot. The positive and negative predictive values were 87% and 69%, respectively. The radiographs were less sensitive (62%) and less specific (69%), with predictive values of 80% (positive) and 47% (negative).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>6211526</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1982-07, Vol.23 (7), p.569-573
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74085492
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Arthropathy, Neurogenic - diagnosis
Diabetes Complications
Diagnosis, Differential
Diphosphonates
Evaluation Studies as Topic
False Negative Reactions
Foot - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging
Osteomyelitis - etiology
Radiography
Radionuclide Imaging
Retrospective Studies
Technetium
Technetium Tc 99m Medronate
Technology, Radiologic
title Scintigraphic Evaluation of Diabetic Osteomyelitis: Concise Communication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T05%3A58%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scintigraphic%20Evaluation%20of%20Diabetic%20Osteomyelitis:%20Concise%20Communication&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Park,%20Hee-Myung&rft.date=1982-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=569-573&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E74085492%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74085492&rft_id=info:pmid/6211526&rfr_iscdi=true