Comparison of estrogen receptors in human premenopausal and postmenopausal uteri: Indication of biologically inactive receptor in postmenopausal uteri

Analysis of the estrogen receptor (ER) from uteri of premenopausal and postmenopausal patients has largely been limited to quantitation. The present study examined the biologic activity of the receptors with regard to their nuclear binding capacities. A Scatchard analysis of myometrial cytosol indic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1982-02, Vol.142 (4), p.372-382
Hauptverfasser: Strathy, Janette H., Coulam, Carolyn B., Spelsberg, Thomas C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 382
container_issue 4
container_start_page 372
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 142
creator Strathy, Janette H.
Coulam, Carolyn B.
Spelsberg, Thomas C.
description Analysis of the estrogen receptor (ER) from uteri of premenopausal and postmenopausal patients has largely been limited to quantitation. The present study examined the biologic activity of the receptors with regard to their nuclear binding capacities. A Scatchard analysis of myometrial cytosol indicated high-affinity and low-capacity estradiol binding (Kd=10−10M). A 35% ammonium sulfate fraction of cytosol was characterized for steroid speciflcity, receptor concentration, isoelectric focusing patterns, and capacity of the ER to bind to nuclear acceptor sites in a cell-free assay. The ER from premenopausal uteri displayed an extensive but saturable binding to the nuclear acceptor sites. In contrast, the postmenopausal ER displayed minimal binding. These cell-free binding differences were supported by tissue culture studies. This difference may be accentuated by the fact that much of the receptor is bound by endogenous estrogen in the premenopausal uterine preparation, which would decrease the subsequent binding of the [3H]ER to nuclear sites. This receptor in the postmenopausal uterus is largely unbound and thus would not compete for nuclear sites. These studies suggest that a significant fraction of the ER in postmenopausal uteri is biologically inactive; for example, it cannot translocate and bind to nuclear acceptor sites. This loss in nuclear binding may represent a change in the ER occurring at menopause as a result of changing endocrine states.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32376-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73981382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937816323766</els_id><sourcerecordid>73981382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fe43e80bb9f84e0df8b675ad32826e989408ad390cc87bde70c802f01fb9249f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVoSTYfPyGgU2gOTmXJq49eSljyBYEe2pyFLI8SBVtyJDuQP5LfW212WXIo9DTMzDvPMPMidFqTi5rU_PtvQgitFBPyW83PGWWCV3wPLWqiRMUll1_QYic5QIc5P69Tqug-2hdkKWXDFuh9FYfRJJ9jwNFhyFOKjxBwAgvjFFPGPuCneTABjwkGCHE0czY9NqHDY8zTp9I8QfI_8F3ovDWT3xBbH_v4WAp9_1ZYxk7-FXb4Nf1flGP01Zk-w8k2HqGH66s_q9vq_tfN3eryvrJULKfKQcNAkrZVTjZAOidbLpamY1RSDkqqhsiSKWKtFG0HglhJqCO1axVtlGNH6GzDHVN8mcv1evDZQt-bAHHOWjAlayZpES43QptizgmcHpMfTHrTNdFrP_SHH3r9bF2yDz80L3On2wVzO0C3m9oaUPo_N30oV756SDpbD8FC58uPJt1F_58NfwFH5Z-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73981382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of estrogen receptors in human premenopausal and postmenopausal uteri: Indication of biologically inactive receptor in postmenopausal uteri</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Strathy, Janette H. ; Coulam, Carolyn B. ; Spelsberg, Thomas C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strathy, Janette H. ; Coulam, Carolyn B. ; Spelsberg, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis of the estrogen receptor (ER) from uteri of premenopausal and postmenopausal patients has largely been limited to quantitation. The present study examined the biologic activity of the receptors with regard to their nuclear binding capacities. A Scatchard analysis of myometrial cytosol indicated high-affinity and low-capacity estradiol binding (Kd=10−10M). A 35% ammonium sulfate fraction of cytosol was characterized for steroid speciflcity, receptor concentration, isoelectric focusing patterns, and capacity of the ER to bind to nuclear acceptor sites in a cell-free assay. The ER from premenopausal uteri displayed an extensive but saturable binding to the nuclear acceptor sites. In contrast, the postmenopausal ER displayed minimal binding. These cell-free binding differences were supported by tissue culture studies. This difference may be accentuated by the fact that much of the receptor is bound by endogenous estrogen in the premenopausal uterine preparation, which would decrease the subsequent binding of the [3H]ER to nuclear sites. This receptor in the postmenopausal uterus is largely unbound and thus would not compete for nuclear sites. These studies suggest that a significant fraction of the ER in postmenopausal uteri is biologically inactive; for example, it cannot translocate and bind to nuclear acceptor sites. This loss in nuclear binding may represent a change in the ER occurring at menopause as a result of changing endocrine states.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32376-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7058843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Chromatin - metabolism ; Estradiol - metabolism ; Female ; Humans ; Isoelectric Focusing ; Isoelectric Point ; Menopause ; Middle Aged ; Protein Binding ; Receptors, Estrogen - analysis ; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism ; Uterus - analysis ; Uterus - metabolism</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1982-02, Vol.142 (4), p.372-382</ispartof><rights>1982 The C. V. Mosby Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fe43e80bb9f84e0df8b675ad32826e989408ad390cc87bde70c802f01fb9249f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fe43e80bb9f84e0df8b675ad32826e989408ad390cc87bde70c802f01fb9249f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937816323766$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7058843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strathy, Janette H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulam, Carolyn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spelsberg, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of estrogen receptors in human premenopausal and postmenopausal uteri: Indication of biologically inactive receptor in postmenopausal uteri</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Analysis of the estrogen receptor (ER) from uteri of premenopausal and postmenopausal patients has largely been limited to quantitation. The present study examined the biologic activity of the receptors with regard to their nuclear binding capacities. A Scatchard analysis of myometrial cytosol indicated high-affinity and low-capacity estradiol binding (Kd=10−10M). A 35% ammonium sulfate fraction of cytosol was characterized for steroid speciflcity, receptor concentration, isoelectric focusing patterns, and capacity of the ER to bind to nuclear acceptor sites in a cell-free assay. The ER from premenopausal uteri displayed an extensive but saturable binding to the nuclear acceptor sites. In contrast, the postmenopausal ER displayed minimal binding. These cell-free binding differences were supported by tissue culture studies. This difference may be accentuated by the fact that much of the receptor is bound by endogenous estrogen in the premenopausal uterine preparation, which would decrease the subsequent binding of the [3H]ER to nuclear sites. This receptor in the postmenopausal uterus is largely unbound and thus would not compete for nuclear sites. These studies suggest that a significant fraction of the ER in postmenopausal uteri is biologically inactive; for example, it cannot translocate and bind to nuclear acceptor sites. This loss in nuclear binding may represent a change in the ER occurring at menopause as a result of changing endocrine states.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chromatin - metabolism</subject><subject>Estradiol - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isoelectric Focusing</subject><subject>Isoelectric Point</subject><subject>Menopause</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Uterus - analysis</subject><subject>Uterus - metabolism</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVoSTYfPyGgU2gOTmXJq49eSljyBYEe2pyFLI8SBVtyJDuQP5LfW212WXIo9DTMzDvPMPMidFqTi5rU_PtvQgitFBPyW83PGWWCV3wPLWqiRMUll1_QYic5QIc5P69Tqug-2hdkKWXDFuh9FYfRJJ9jwNFhyFOKjxBwAgvjFFPGPuCneTABjwkGCHE0czY9NqHDY8zTp9I8QfI_8F3ovDWT3xBbH_v4WAp9_1ZYxk7-FXb4Nf1flGP01Zk-w8k2HqGH66s_q9vq_tfN3eryvrJULKfKQcNAkrZVTjZAOidbLpamY1RSDkqqhsiSKWKtFG0HglhJqCO1axVtlGNH6GzDHVN8mcv1evDZQt-bAHHOWjAlayZpES43QptizgmcHpMfTHrTNdFrP_SHH3r9bF2yDz80L3On2wVzO0C3m9oaUPo_N30oV756SDpbD8FC58uPJt1F_58NfwFH5Z-E</recordid><startdate>19820215</startdate><enddate>19820215</enddate><creator>Strathy, Janette H.</creator><creator>Coulam, Carolyn B.</creator><creator>Spelsberg, Thomas C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820215</creationdate><title>Comparison of estrogen receptors in human premenopausal and postmenopausal uteri: Indication of biologically inactive receptor in postmenopausal uteri</title><author>Strathy, Janette H. ; Coulam, Carolyn B. ; Spelsberg, Thomas C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fe43e80bb9f84e0df8b675ad32826e989408ad390cc87bde70c802f01fb9249f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chromatin - metabolism</topic><topic>Estradiol - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isoelectric Focusing</topic><topic>Isoelectric Point</topic><topic>Menopause</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Uterus - analysis</topic><topic>Uterus - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strathy, Janette H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulam, Carolyn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spelsberg, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strathy, Janette H.</au><au>Coulam, Carolyn B.</au><au>Spelsberg, Thomas C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of estrogen receptors in human premenopausal and postmenopausal uteri: Indication of biologically inactive receptor in postmenopausal uteri</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1982-02-15</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>372-382</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Analysis of the estrogen receptor (ER) from uteri of premenopausal and postmenopausal patients has largely been limited to quantitation. The present study examined the biologic activity of the receptors with regard to their nuclear binding capacities. A Scatchard analysis of myometrial cytosol indicated high-affinity and low-capacity estradiol binding (Kd=10−10M). A 35% ammonium sulfate fraction of cytosol was characterized for steroid speciflcity, receptor concentration, isoelectric focusing patterns, and capacity of the ER to bind to nuclear acceptor sites in a cell-free assay. The ER from premenopausal uteri displayed an extensive but saturable binding to the nuclear acceptor sites. In contrast, the postmenopausal ER displayed minimal binding. These cell-free binding differences were supported by tissue culture studies. This difference may be accentuated by the fact that much of the receptor is bound by endogenous estrogen in the premenopausal uterine preparation, which would decrease the subsequent binding of the [3H]ER to nuclear sites. This receptor in the postmenopausal uterus is largely unbound and thus would not compete for nuclear sites. These studies suggest that a significant fraction of the ER in postmenopausal uteri is biologically inactive; for example, it cannot translocate and bind to nuclear acceptor sites. This loss in nuclear binding may represent a change in the ER occurring at menopause as a result of changing endocrine states.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7058843</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32376-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1982-02, Vol.142 (4), p.372-382
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73981382
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Chromatin - metabolism
Estradiol - metabolism
Female
Humans
Isoelectric Focusing
Isoelectric Point
Menopause
Middle Aged
Protein Binding
Receptors, Estrogen - analysis
Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism
Uterus - analysis
Uterus - metabolism
title Comparison of estrogen receptors in human premenopausal and postmenopausal uteri: Indication of biologically inactive receptor in postmenopausal uteri
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T11%3A29%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20estrogen%20receptors%20in%20human%20premenopausal%20and%20postmenopausal%20uteri:%20Indication%20of%20biologically%20inactive%20receptor%20in%20postmenopausal%20uteri&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Strathy,%20Janette%20H.&rft.date=1982-02-15&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=372-382&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32376-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73981382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73981382&rft_id=info:pmid/7058843&rft_els_id=S0002937816323766&rfr_iscdi=true