Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy

Objectives. To determine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis could prevent infections after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate using automated biopsy devices. Methods. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which a total of 537 patients received either oral c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1998-10, Vol.52 (4), p.552-558
Hauptverfasser: Kapoor, Deepak A, Klimberg, Ira W, Malek, Gholam H, Wegenke, John D, Cox, Clair E, Patterson, A.Lynn, Graham, Evelyn, Echols, Roger M, Whalen, Edward, Kowalsky, Steven F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 558
container_issue 4
container_start_page 552
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 52
creator Kapoor, Deepak A
Klimberg, Ira W
Malek, Gholam H
Wegenke, John D
Cox, Clair E
Patterson, A.Lynn
Graham, Evelyn
Echols, Roger M
Whalen, Edward
Kowalsky, Steven F
description Objectives. To determine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis could prevent infections after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate using automated biopsy devices. Methods. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which a total of 537 patients received either oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Repeated urine cultures and urinalysis were obtained at 2 to 6 days after biopsy and 9 to 15 days after biopsy. The primary determinant of efficacy was bacteriologic response (bacteriuria [more than 10 4 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] versus no bacteriuria) at the 9- to 15-day follow-up evaluation. Results. Two hundred twenty-seven (84%) of 269 ciprofloxacin patients and 230 (86%) of 268 placebo patients were valid for efficacy analysis in which a mean of four biopsies was performed. Six ciprofloxacin-treated (3%) and 19 placebo-treated (8%) patients had bacteriuria (more than 10 4 CFU/mL) after the procedure ( P = 0.009). Six ciprofloxacin recipients (3%) and 12 placebo recipients (5%) had clinical signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) ( P = 0.15). In addition, no ciprofloxacin-treated patients compared with 4 placebo-treated patients (2%) were admitted to the hospital for febrile UTI after the procedure. Ciprofloxacin reduced the expected net costs of treating infectious complications after biopsy by $23 per patient for an overall annual savings of $68,195 in the five study groups when compared with placebo. Conclusions. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin reduced bacteriuria after biopsy compared with placebo in patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy and provided an economic advantage. In addition, this study establishes the actual rate of bacteriuria after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate without antibiotic prophylaxis to be 8% with a clinical rate of UTI of 5% and a hospitalization rate of 2%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00296-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73975762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429598002969</els_id><sourcerecordid>73975762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e484d2c0f1c5b96264bb823c952a4546095be13eaa0d05b04deca2009beb15cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EKkvhESr5gBAcQseO7cQnhKoWkCr1UDgb25mAkTcOdlJ13x5vd7VXTj783--Z-Qi5YPCRAVOX9wAaGsG1fK_7DwBcq0Y_IxsmeddoreVzsjkhL8mrUv4AgFKqOyNnulMtdLAhP-_D9CtiM6SCNGUbqQ9zTmNMj9aHiT5gLmuhc7QeXaJjyrTG8-9dtI-h0GHNtU-XbKeS0S-1X-Oy2AWpC2kuu9fkxWhjwTfH95z8uLn-fvW1ub378u3q823jhZRLg6IXA_cwMi-dVlwJ53reei25FVIo0NIha9FaGEA6EAN6y-t9Dh2TfmzPybvDv3X-3xXLYraheIzRTpjWYrpWd7JTvILyAPq6aF16NHMOW5t3hoHZmzVPZs1em9G9eTJrdO1dHAesbovDqXVUWfO3x9wWb-NYlfhQThgX0HesrdinA4ZVxkPAbIoPOHkcwl6gGVL4zyL_AEaml2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73975762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kapoor, Deepak A ; Klimberg, Ira W ; Malek, Gholam H ; Wegenke, John D ; Cox, Clair E ; Patterson, A.Lynn ; Graham, Evelyn ; Echols, Roger M ; Whalen, Edward ; Kowalsky, Steven F</creator><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Deepak A ; Klimberg, Ira W ; Malek, Gholam H ; Wegenke, John D ; Cox, Clair E ; Patterson, A.Lynn ; Graham, Evelyn ; Echols, Roger M ; Whalen, Edward ; Kowalsky, Steven F</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. To determine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis could prevent infections after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate using automated biopsy devices. Methods. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which a total of 537 patients received either oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Repeated urine cultures and urinalysis were obtained at 2 to 6 days after biopsy and 9 to 15 days after biopsy. The primary determinant of efficacy was bacteriologic response (bacteriuria [more than 10 4 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] versus no bacteriuria) at the 9- to 15-day follow-up evaluation. Results. Two hundred twenty-seven (84%) of 269 ciprofloxacin patients and 230 (86%) of 268 placebo patients were valid for efficacy analysis in which a mean of four biopsies was performed. Six ciprofloxacin-treated (3%) and 19 placebo-treated (8%) patients had bacteriuria (more than 10 4 CFU/mL) after the procedure ( P = 0.009). Six ciprofloxacin recipients (3%) and 12 placebo recipients (5%) had clinical signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) ( P = 0.15). In addition, no ciprofloxacin-treated patients compared with 4 placebo-treated patients (2%) were admitted to the hospital for febrile UTI after the procedure. Ciprofloxacin reduced the expected net costs of treating infectious complications after biopsy by $23 per patient for an overall annual savings of $68,195 in the five study groups when compared with placebo. Conclusions. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin reduced bacteriuria after biopsy compared with placebo in patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy and provided an economic advantage. In addition, this study establishes the actual rate of bacteriuria after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate without antibiotic prophylaxis to be 8% with a clinical rate of UTI of 5% and a hospitalization rate of 2%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00296-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9763070</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Ciprofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate - pathology ; Rectum</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1998-10, Vol.52 (4), p.552-558</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e484d2c0f1c5b96264bb823c952a4546095be13eaa0d05b04deca2009beb15cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e484d2c0f1c5b96264bb823c952a4546095be13eaa0d05b04deca2009beb15cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00296-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2408713$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9763070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Deepak A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimberg, Ira W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Gholam H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegenke, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Clair E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, A.Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echols, Roger M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalen, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalsky, Steven F</creatorcontrib><title>Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objectives. To determine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis could prevent infections after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate using automated biopsy devices. Methods. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which a total of 537 patients received either oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Repeated urine cultures and urinalysis were obtained at 2 to 6 days after biopsy and 9 to 15 days after biopsy. The primary determinant of efficacy was bacteriologic response (bacteriuria [more than 10 4 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] versus no bacteriuria) at the 9- to 15-day follow-up evaluation. Results. Two hundred twenty-seven (84%) of 269 ciprofloxacin patients and 230 (86%) of 268 placebo patients were valid for efficacy analysis in which a mean of four biopsies was performed. Six ciprofloxacin-treated (3%) and 19 placebo-treated (8%) patients had bacteriuria (more than 10 4 CFU/mL) after the procedure ( P = 0.009). Six ciprofloxacin recipients (3%) and 12 placebo recipients (5%) had clinical signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) ( P = 0.15). In addition, no ciprofloxacin-treated patients compared with 4 placebo-treated patients (2%) were admitted to the hospital for febrile UTI after the procedure. Ciprofloxacin reduced the expected net costs of treating infectious complications after biopsy by $23 per patient for an overall annual savings of $68,195 in the five study groups when compared with placebo. Conclusions. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin reduced bacteriuria after biopsy compared with placebo in patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy and provided an economic advantage. In addition, this study establishes the actual rate of bacteriuria after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate without antibiotic prophylaxis to be 8% with a clinical rate of UTI of 5% and a hospitalization rate of 2%.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFu1DAQhi0EKkvhESr5gBAcQseO7cQnhKoWkCr1UDgb25mAkTcOdlJ13x5vd7VXTj783--Z-Qi5YPCRAVOX9wAaGsG1fK_7DwBcq0Y_IxsmeddoreVzsjkhL8mrUv4AgFKqOyNnulMtdLAhP-_D9CtiM6SCNGUbqQ9zTmNMj9aHiT5gLmuhc7QeXaJjyrTG8-9dtI-h0GHNtU-XbKeS0S-1X-Oy2AWpC2kuu9fkxWhjwTfH95z8uLn-fvW1ub378u3q823jhZRLg6IXA_cwMi-dVlwJ53reei25FVIo0NIha9FaGEA6EAN6y-t9Dh2TfmzPybvDv3X-3xXLYraheIzRTpjWYrpWd7JTvILyAPq6aF16NHMOW5t3hoHZmzVPZs1em9G9eTJrdO1dHAesbovDqXVUWfO3x9wWb-NYlfhQThgX0HesrdinA4ZVxkPAbIoPOHkcwl6gGVL4zyL_AEaml2o</recordid><startdate>19981001</startdate><enddate>19981001</enddate><creator>Kapoor, Deepak A</creator><creator>Klimberg, Ira W</creator><creator>Malek, Gholam H</creator><creator>Wegenke, John D</creator><creator>Cox, Clair E</creator><creator>Patterson, A.Lynn</creator><creator>Graham, Evelyn</creator><creator>Echols, Roger M</creator><creator>Whalen, Edward</creator><creator>Kowalsky, Steven F</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981001</creationdate><title>Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy</title><author>Kapoor, Deepak A ; Klimberg, Ira W ; Malek, Gholam H ; Wegenke, John D ; Cox, Clair E ; Patterson, A.Lynn ; Graham, Evelyn ; Echols, Roger M ; Whalen, Edward ; Kowalsky, Steven F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-e484d2c0f1c5b96264bb823c952a4546095be13eaa0d05b04deca2009beb15cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Deepak A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimberg, Ira W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malek, Gholam H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegenke, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Clair E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, A.Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echols, Roger M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whalen, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalsky, Steven F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kapoor, Deepak A</au><au>Klimberg, Ira W</au><au>Malek, Gholam H</au><au>Wegenke, John D</au><au>Cox, Clair E</au><au>Patterson, A.Lynn</au><au>Graham, Evelyn</au><au>Echols, Roger M</au><au>Whalen, Edward</au><au>Kowalsky, Steven F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>1998-10-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>552-558</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Objectives. To determine whether antimicrobial prophylaxis could prevent infections after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate using automated biopsy devices. Methods. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in which a total of 537 patients received either oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo before transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Repeated urine cultures and urinalysis were obtained at 2 to 6 days after biopsy and 9 to 15 days after biopsy. The primary determinant of efficacy was bacteriologic response (bacteriuria [more than 10 4 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL] versus no bacteriuria) at the 9- to 15-day follow-up evaluation. Results. Two hundred twenty-seven (84%) of 269 ciprofloxacin patients and 230 (86%) of 268 placebo patients were valid for efficacy analysis in which a mean of four biopsies was performed. Six ciprofloxacin-treated (3%) and 19 placebo-treated (8%) patients had bacteriuria (more than 10 4 CFU/mL) after the procedure ( P = 0.009). Six ciprofloxacin recipients (3%) and 12 placebo recipients (5%) had clinical signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) ( P = 0.15). In addition, no ciprofloxacin-treated patients compared with 4 placebo-treated patients (2%) were admitted to the hospital for febrile UTI after the procedure. Ciprofloxacin reduced the expected net costs of treating infectious complications after biopsy by $23 per patient for an overall annual savings of $68,195 in the five study groups when compared with placebo. Conclusions. Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin reduced bacteriuria after biopsy compared with placebo in patients undergoing transrectal prostatic biopsy and provided an economic advantage. In addition, this study establishes the actual rate of bacteriuria after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate without antibiotic prophylaxis to be 8% with a clinical rate of UTI of 5% and a hospitalization rate of 2%.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9763070</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00296-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1998-10, Vol.52 (4), p.552-558
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73975762
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Administration, Oral
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage
Antibacterial agents
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy, Needle - methods
Ciprofloxacin - administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Prospective Studies
Prostate - pathology
Rectum
title Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-dose%20oral%20ciprofloxacin%20versus%20placebo%20for%20prophylaxis%20during%20transrectal%20prostate%20biopsy&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Kapoor,%20Deepak%20A&rft.date=1998-10-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=552-558&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00296-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73975762%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73975762&rft_id=info:pmid/9763070&rft_els_id=S0090429598002969&rfr_iscdi=true