Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration
Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenter...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1982-04, Vol.142 (7), p.883-889 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 889 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 883 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Orr, James W. Shingleton, Hugh M. Hatch, Kenneth D. Taylor, Peyton T. Austin, J. Max Partridge, Edward E. Soong, Seng Jaw |
description | Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73951658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937816325364</els_id><sourcerecordid>73951658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVZLNJNiCIFL-g4EF7Dml2UiLb7JrsFv33ph949TQM7zMzzIPQlOAbggm_fccYF7mkoroi_JoWjPK8PEJjgqXIecWrYzT-Q07RWYyf27aQxQiNBJGyKvAY3S2C8zr8ZLXbQIiu9ZnzWad7B76P2eBrCKvW-VXWQbNxJoPvFEBIQOvP0YnVTYSLQ52gxdPjx-wln789v84e5rmhHPe5oKUVutKcYQpCMM5MXS4tk4YIwonljBhmrTVLi6UuiNV1KavacE45q6ymE3S539uF9muA2Ku1iwaaRntoh6gElYwkNIFsD5rQxhjAqi64dXpPEay21tTOmtoqUanbWVNlmpseDgzLNdR_UwdNKb_f55C-3DgIKpokyEDtAphe1a3758IvT5x81Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73951658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Orr, James W. ; Shingleton, Hugh M. ; Hatch, Kenneth D. ; Taylor, Peyton T. ; Austin, J. Max ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Soong, Seng Jaw</creator><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W. ; Shingleton, Hugh M. ; Hatch, Kenneth D. ; Taylor, Peyton T. ; Austin, J. Max ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Soong, Seng Jaw</creatorcontrib><description>Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7199820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Colon - surgery ; Colon, Sigmoid - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Ileum - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Pseudomonas Infections - etiology ; Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology ; Pyelonephritis - etiology ; Pyelonephritis - microbiology ; Surgical Staplers ; Urinary Diversion - methods ; Urinary Fistula - etiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery ; Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery ; Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1982-04, Vol.142 (7), p.883-889</ispartof><rights>1982 The C. V. Mosby Co.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7199820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shingleton, Hugh M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Peyton T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, J. Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soong, Seng Jaw</creatorcontrib><title>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration.</description><subject>Colon - surgery</subject><subject>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileum - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Pyelonephritis - etiology</subject><subject>Pyelonephritis - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Staplers</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion - methods</subject><subject>Urinary Fistula - etiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVZLNJNiCIFL-g4EF7Dml2UiLb7JrsFv33ph949TQM7zMzzIPQlOAbggm_fccYF7mkoroi_JoWjPK8PEJjgqXIecWrYzT-Q07RWYyf27aQxQiNBJGyKvAY3S2C8zr8ZLXbQIiu9ZnzWad7B76P2eBrCKvW-VXWQbNxJoPvFEBIQOvP0YnVTYSLQ52gxdPjx-wln789v84e5rmhHPe5oKUVutKcYQpCMM5MXS4tk4YIwonljBhmrTVLi6UuiNV1KavacE45q6ymE3S539uF9muA2Ku1iwaaRntoh6gElYwkNIFsD5rQxhjAqi64dXpPEay21tTOmtoqUanbWVNlmpseDgzLNdR_UwdNKb_f55C-3DgIKpokyEDtAphe1a3758IvT5x81Q</recordid><startdate>19820401</startdate><enddate>19820401</enddate><creator>Orr, James W.</creator><creator>Shingleton, Hugh M.</creator><creator>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creator><creator>Taylor, Peyton T.</creator><creator>Austin, J. Max</creator><creator>Partridge, Edward E.</creator><creator>Soong, Seng Jaw</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820401</creationdate><title>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</title><author>Orr, James W. ; Shingleton, Hugh M. ; Hatch, Kenneth D. ; Taylor, Peyton T. ; Austin, J. Max ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Soong, Seng Jaw</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Colon - surgery</topic><topic>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileum - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Pyelonephritis - etiology</topic><topic>Pyelonephritis - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Staplers</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion - methods</topic><topic>Urinary Fistula - etiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shingleton, Hugh M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Peyton T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, J. Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soong, Seng Jaw</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orr, James W.</au><au>Shingleton, Hugh M.</au><au>Hatch, Kenneth D.</au><au>Taylor, Peyton T.</au><au>Austin, J. Max</au><au>Partridge, Edward E.</au><au>Soong, Seng Jaw</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1982-04-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>883-889</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7199820</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1982-04, Vol.142 (7), p.883-889 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73951658 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Colon - surgery Colon, Sigmoid - surgery Female Humans Ileum - surgery Middle Aged Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects Postoperative Complications - etiology Pseudomonas Infections - etiology Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology Pyelonephritis - etiology Pyelonephritis - microbiology Surgical Staplers Urinary Diversion - methods Urinary Fistula - etiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery Uterine Neoplasms - surgery Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery |
title | Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A04%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urinary%20diversion%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20pelvic%20exenteration&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Orr,%20James%20W.&rft.date=1982-04-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=883-889&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73951658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73951658&rft_id=info:pmid/7199820&rft_els_id=S0002937816325364&rfr_iscdi=true |