Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration

Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1982-04, Vol.142 (7), p.883-889
Hauptverfasser: Orr, James W., Shingleton, Hugh M., Hatch, Kenneth D., Taylor, Peyton T., Austin, J. Max, Partridge, Edward E., Soong, Seng Jaw
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 889
container_issue 7
container_start_page 883
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 142
creator Orr, James W.
Shingleton, Hugh M.
Hatch, Kenneth D.
Taylor, Peyton T.
Austin, J. Max
Partridge, Edward E.
Soong, Seng Jaw
description Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73951658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937816325364</els_id><sourcerecordid>73951658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVZLNJNiCIFL-g4EF7Dml2UiLb7JrsFv33ph949TQM7zMzzIPQlOAbggm_fccYF7mkoroi_JoWjPK8PEJjgqXIecWrYzT-Q07RWYyf27aQxQiNBJGyKvAY3S2C8zr8ZLXbQIiu9ZnzWad7B76P2eBrCKvW-VXWQbNxJoPvFEBIQOvP0YnVTYSLQ52gxdPjx-wln789v84e5rmhHPe5oKUVutKcYQpCMM5MXS4tk4YIwonljBhmrTVLi6UuiNV1KavacE45q6ymE3S539uF9muA2Ku1iwaaRntoh6gElYwkNIFsD5rQxhjAqi64dXpPEay21tTOmtoqUanbWVNlmpseDgzLNdR_UwdNKb_f55C-3DgIKpokyEDtAphe1a3758IvT5x81Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73951658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Orr, James W. ; Shingleton, Hugh M. ; Hatch, Kenneth D. ; Taylor, Peyton T. ; Austin, J. Max ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Soong, Seng Jaw</creator><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W. ; Shingleton, Hugh M. ; Hatch, Kenneth D. ; Taylor, Peyton T. ; Austin, J. Max ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Soong, Seng Jaw</creatorcontrib><description>Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7199820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Colon - surgery ; Colon, Sigmoid - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Ileum - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Pseudomonas Infections - etiology ; Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology ; Pyelonephritis - etiology ; Pyelonephritis - microbiology ; Surgical Staplers ; Urinary Diversion - methods ; Urinary Fistula - etiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery ; Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery ; Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1982-04, Vol.142 (7), p.883-889</ispartof><rights>1982 The C. V. Mosby Co.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7199820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shingleton, Hugh M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Peyton T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, J. Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soong, Seng Jaw</creatorcontrib><title>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration.</description><subject>Colon - surgery</subject><subject>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileum - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Pyelonephritis - etiology</subject><subject>Pyelonephritis - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Staplers</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion - methods</subject><subject>Urinary Fistula - etiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVZLNJNiCIFL-g4EF7Dml2UiLb7JrsFv33ph949TQM7zMzzIPQlOAbggm_fccYF7mkoroi_JoWjPK8PEJjgqXIecWrYzT-Q07RWYyf27aQxQiNBJGyKvAY3S2C8zr8ZLXbQIiu9ZnzWad7B76P2eBrCKvW-VXWQbNxJoPvFEBIQOvP0YnVTYSLQ52gxdPjx-wln789v84e5rmhHPe5oKUVutKcYQpCMM5MXS4tk4YIwonljBhmrTVLi6UuiNV1KavacE45q6ymE3S539uF9muA2Ku1iwaaRntoh6gElYwkNIFsD5rQxhjAqi64dXpPEay21tTOmtoqUanbWVNlmpseDgzLNdR_UwdNKb_f55C-3DgIKpokyEDtAphe1a3758IvT5x81Q</recordid><startdate>19820401</startdate><enddate>19820401</enddate><creator>Orr, James W.</creator><creator>Shingleton, Hugh M.</creator><creator>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creator><creator>Taylor, Peyton T.</creator><creator>Austin, J. Max</creator><creator>Partridge, Edward E.</creator><creator>Soong, Seng Jaw</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820401</creationdate><title>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</title><author>Orr, James W. ; Shingleton, Hugh M. ; Hatch, Kenneth D. ; Taylor, Peyton T. ; Austin, J. Max ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Soong, Seng Jaw</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-734f7a8a6503e77565cd4bf59c17161f651c5fffcbf09a21fad498dc663658fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Colon - surgery</topic><topic>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileum - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Pyelonephritis - etiology</topic><topic>Pyelonephritis - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Staplers</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion - methods</topic><topic>Urinary Fistula - etiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shingleton, Hugh M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Peyton T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, J. Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soong, Seng Jaw</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orr, James W.</au><au>Shingleton, Hugh M.</au><au>Hatch, Kenneth D.</au><au>Taylor, Peyton T.</au><au>Austin, J. Max</au><au>Partridge, Edward E.</au><au>Soong, Seng Jaw</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1982-04-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>883-889</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Between October, 1969, and April, 1981, gynecologic oncologists at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham have performed 119 pelvic exenterations. One hundred fifteen of these patients had a concurrent supravesical urinary diversion. Fifty-six patients (48.7%) had an anterior exenteration and 59 patients (51.3%) had a total exenteration. An ileal segment was used as a conduit in 97 patients while a segment of transverse colon was used in 16 patients. Two patients had sigmoid conduits. Eighty-five patients (73.9%) had the intestinal anastomosis and conduit constructed with gastrointestinal staplers. Stapler use shortened the mean operating time for the exenterative procedure by approximately 30%. No increase in postoperative gastrointestinal complications was noted. Urinary diversion performed as part of a pelvic exenteration has been associated with short- and long-term complications. The use of ureteral stents and the gastrointestinal staplers shortens the procedure without predisposing the patient to major urologic complications. The use of a segment of unirradiated bowel (transverse colon) in conjunction with these techniques constitutes the preferred method of supravesical urinary diversion in patients undergoing a pelvic exenteration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7199820</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1982-04, Vol.142 (7), p.883-889
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73951658
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Colon - surgery
Colon, Sigmoid - surgery
Female
Humans
Ileum - surgery
Middle Aged
Pelvic Exenteration - adverse effects
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Pseudomonas Infections - etiology
Pseudomonas Infections - microbiology
Pyelonephritis - etiology
Pyelonephritis - microbiology
Surgical Staplers
Urinary Diversion - methods
Urinary Fistula - etiology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
Uterine Neoplasms - surgery
Vaginal Neoplasms - surgery
Vulvar Neoplasms - surgery
title Urinary diversion in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A04%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urinary%20diversion%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20pelvic%20exenteration&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Orr,%20James%20W.&rft.date=1982-04-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=883-889&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32536-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73951658%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73951658&rft_id=info:pmid/7199820&rft_els_id=S0002937816325364&rfr_iscdi=true