The Rewards of Reading Instructions from Journal Editors
To the Editor: Editors, when they send manuscripts to external consultants for peer review, usually include a letter that provides some instructions regarding what the reviewers should do, when they should do it, and related matters. My colleagues and I have wondered how often these instructions are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1998-10, Vol.339 (14), p.1006-1006 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Editors, when they send manuscripts to external consultants for peer review, usually include a letter that provides some instructions regarding what the reviewers should do, when they should do it, and related matters. My colleagues and I have wondered how often these instructions are read, and we recently conducted a small study to find out.
Our letter to reviewers consists of four paragraphs that in aggregate occupy about two thirds of a page. The longest paragraph asks the reviewer to evaluate such factors as the originality and design of the study described in the manuscript, the interpretation . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199810013391416 |