Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults

Objective: To compare the mechanical properties of the human heel pad between young and aged adults. Design: A 7.5-MHz linear-array ultrasound transducer was incorporated into a specially designed device to measure the thickness of the heel pad under different loads. The heel pad was compressed with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1998-09, Vol.79 (9), p.1101-1104
Hauptverfasser: Hsu, Tsz-Ching, Wang, Chung-Li, Tsai, Wen-Chung, Kuo, Jung-Kun, Tang, Fuk-Tan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1104
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1101
container_title Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 79
creator Hsu, Tsz-Ching
Wang, Chung-Li
Tsai, Wen-Chung
Kuo, Jung-Kun
Tang, Fuk-Tan
description Objective: To compare the mechanical properties of the human heel pad between young and aged adults. Design: A 7.5-MHz linear-array ultrasound transducer was incorporated into a specially designed device to measure the thickness of the heel pad under different loads. The heel pad was compressed with serial increments of 0.5kg to a maximum of 3kg and then relaxed sequentially. Then the load-displacement curve of the heel pad during a loading-unloading cycle was plotted. Participants: Convenience sample of 33 volunteers without heel problems, aged 18 to 78 years, were divided into young (less than 40 years) and elderly (older than 60 years) groups. Main Outcome Measures: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, stiffness, and energy dissipation ratio were calculated from the load-displacement curves. Student's t-test was used to compare the mechanical properties of the heel between these two groups. Results: The average unloaded heel-pad thickness was 1.76 ± .20cm in the young group and 2.01 ± .24cm in the elderly group ( p < .001). The average compressibility index was 53.3% ±7.7% in the young group and 61.3% ± 5.5% in the elderly group ( p < .001). Energy dissipation ratio representing shock absorbency of the heel pad, was 23.7% ± 6.9% in the young group and 35.3% ± 10% in the elderly group ( p < .001). Conclusion: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, and energy dissipation ratio of the heel pad were significantly increased in the elderly group, indicating loss of the elasticity of the heel pad. The loss of elasticity may be responsible for the higher incidence of heel injury in elderly individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90178-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73920725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999398901782</els_id><sourcerecordid>73920725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-895308af4890d81d317b50017fc6806665ea3cd9d28f7264b88e78f0de212a943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMotVYfoZCFiC5Gc5lLshIp3qDgQoXuQpqcsZG51GRG6dubXuzWVUj-7-Sc8yE0puSaEprfvBJCeCKl5JdSXElCC5GwAzSkGWeJYHR2iIZ75BidhPAZr3nG6QANZJHKXNIhmk3aeqm9C22D2xJ3C8A1mIVunNEVXvp2Cb5zEP7CBUB81hbPofsBaPCq7ZsPrBuLobLgqxXWtq-6cIqOSl0FONudI_T-cP82eUqmL4_Pk7tpYtKUdomQGSdCl6mQxApqOS3mGYnLlCYXJM_zDDQ3VlomyoLl6VwIKERJLDDKtEz5CF1s_42zfvUQOlW7YKCqdANtH1TBJSMFyyKYbUHj2xA8lGrpXa39SlGi1kbVxqha61JSqI1RxWLdeNegn9dg91U7hTE_3-U6RGel141xYY8xLtb9I3a7xSDK-HbgVTAOGgPWeTCdsq37Z5BfnaiR9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73920725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hsu, Tsz-Ching ; Wang, Chung-Li ; Tsai, Wen-Chung ; Kuo, Jung-Kun ; Tang, Fuk-Tan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Tsz-Ching ; Wang, Chung-Li ; Tsai, Wen-Chung ; Kuo, Jung-Kun ; Tang, Fuk-Tan</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To compare the mechanical properties of the human heel pad between young and aged adults. Design: A 7.5-MHz linear-array ultrasound transducer was incorporated into a specially designed device to measure the thickness of the heel pad under different loads. The heel pad was compressed with serial increments of 0.5kg to a maximum of 3kg and then relaxed sequentially. Then the load-displacement curve of the heel pad during a loading-unloading cycle was plotted. Participants: Convenience sample of 33 volunteers without heel problems, aged 18 to 78 years, were divided into young (less than 40 years) and elderly (older than 60 years) groups. Main Outcome Measures: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, stiffness, and energy dissipation ratio were calculated from the load-displacement curves. Student's t-test was used to compare the mechanical properties of the heel between these two groups. Results: The average unloaded heel-pad thickness was 1.76 ± .20cm in the young group and 2.01 ± .24cm in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). The average compressibility index was 53.3% ±7.7% in the young group and 61.3% ± 5.5% in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). Energy dissipation ratio representing shock absorbency of the heel pad, was 23.7% ± 6.9% in the young group and 35.3% ± 10% in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). Conclusion: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, and energy dissipation ratio of the heel pad were significantly increased in the elderly group, indicating loss of the elasticity of the heel pad. The loss of elasticity may be responsible for the higher incidence of heel injury in elderly individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90178-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9749691</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aging - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Compliance ; Elasticity ; Female ; Heel - diagnostic imaging ; Heel - physiology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Reference Values ; Space life sciences ; Ultrasonography ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1998-09, Vol.79 (9), p.1101-1104</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-895308af4890d81d317b50017fc6806665ea3cd9d28f7264b88e78f0de212a943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-895308af4890d81d317b50017fc6806665ea3cd9d28f7264b88e78f0de212a943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999398901782$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2382072$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9749691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chung-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Wen-Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Jung-Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fuk-Tan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective: To compare the mechanical properties of the human heel pad between young and aged adults. Design: A 7.5-MHz linear-array ultrasound transducer was incorporated into a specially designed device to measure the thickness of the heel pad under different loads. The heel pad was compressed with serial increments of 0.5kg to a maximum of 3kg and then relaxed sequentially. Then the load-displacement curve of the heel pad during a loading-unloading cycle was plotted. Participants: Convenience sample of 33 volunteers without heel problems, aged 18 to 78 years, were divided into young (less than 40 years) and elderly (older than 60 years) groups. Main Outcome Measures: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, stiffness, and energy dissipation ratio were calculated from the load-displacement curves. Student's t-test was used to compare the mechanical properties of the heel between these two groups. Results: The average unloaded heel-pad thickness was 1.76 ± .20cm in the young group and 2.01 ± .24cm in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). The average compressibility index was 53.3% ±7.7% in the young group and 61.3% ± 5.5% in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). Energy dissipation ratio representing shock absorbency of the heel pad, was 23.7% ± 6.9% in the young group and 35.3% ± 10% in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). Conclusion: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, and energy dissipation ratio of the heel pad were significantly increased in the elderly group, indicating loss of the elasticity of the heel pad. The loss of elasticity may be responsible for the higher incidence of heel injury in elderly individuals.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heel - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heel - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMotVYfoZCFiC5Gc5lLshIp3qDgQoXuQpqcsZG51GRG6dubXuzWVUj-7-Sc8yE0puSaEprfvBJCeCKl5JdSXElCC5GwAzSkGWeJYHR2iIZ75BidhPAZr3nG6QANZJHKXNIhmk3aeqm9C22D2xJ3C8A1mIVunNEVXvp2Cb5zEP7CBUB81hbPofsBaPCq7ZsPrBuLobLgqxXWtq-6cIqOSl0FONudI_T-cP82eUqmL4_Pk7tpYtKUdomQGSdCl6mQxApqOS3mGYnLlCYXJM_zDDQ3VlomyoLl6VwIKERJLDDKtEz5CF1s_42zfvUQOlW7YKCqdANtH1TBJSMFyyKYbUHj2xA8lGrpXa39SlGi1kbVxqha61JSqI1RxWLdeNegn9dg91U7hTE_3-U6RGel141xYY8xLtb9I3a7xSDK-HbgVTAOGgPWeTCdsq37Z5BfnaiR9A</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</creator><creator>Wang, Chung-Li</creator><creator>Tsai, Wen-Chung</creator><creator>Kuo, Jung-Kun</creator><creator>Tang, Fuk-Tan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults</title><author>Hsu, Tsz-Ching ; Wang, Chung-Li ; Tsai, Wen-Chung ; Kuo, Jung-Kun ; Tang, Fuk-Tan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-895308af4890d81d317b50017fc6806665ea3cd9d28f7264b88e78f0de212a943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heel - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heel - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chung-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Wen-Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Jung-Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fuk-Tan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hsu, Tsz-Ching</au><au>Wang, Chung-Li</au><au>Tsai, Wen-Chung</au><au>Kuo, Jung-Kun</au><au>Tang, Fuk-Tan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1101</spage><epage>1104</epage><pages>1101-1104</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Objective: To compare the mechanical properties of the human heel pad between young and aged adults. Design: A 7.5-MHz linear-array ultrasound transducer was incorporated into a specially designed device to measure the thickness of the heel pad under different loads. The heel pad was compressed with serial increments of 0.5kg to a maximum of 3kg and then relaxed sequentially. Then the load-displacement curve of the heel pad during a loading-unloading cycle was plotted. Participants: Convenience sample of 33 volunteers without heel problems, aged 18 to 78 years, were divided into young (less than 40 years) and elderly (older than 60 years) groups. Main Outcome Measures: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, stiffness, and energy dissipation ratio were calculated from the load-displacement curves. Student's t-test was used to compare the mechanical properties of the heel between these two groups. Results: The average unloaded heel-pad thickness was 1.76 ± .20cm in the young group and 2.01 ± .24cm in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). The average compressibility index was 53.3% ±7.7% in the young group and 61.3% ± 5.5% in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). Energy dissipation ratio representing shock absorbency of the heel pad, was 23.7% ± 6.9% in the young group and 35.3% ± 10% in the elderly group ( p &lt; .001). Conclusion: Unloaded heel-pad thickness, compressibility index, and energy dissipation ratio of the heel pad were significantly increased in the elderly group, indicating loss of the elasticity of the heel pad. The loss of elasticity may be responsible for the higher incidence of heel injury in elderly individuals.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9749691</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90178-2</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9993
ispartof Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1998-09, Vol.79 (9), p.1101-1104
issn 0003-9993
1532-821X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73920725
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aging - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Compliance
Elasticity
Female
Heel - diagnostic imaging
Heel - physiology
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Osteoarticular system. Muscles
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Reference Values
Space life sciences
Ultrasonography
Weight-Bearing - physiology
title Comparison of the mechanical properties of the heel pad between young and elderly adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20the%20heel%20pad%20between%20young%20and%20elderly%20adults&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Hsu,%20Tsz-Ching&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1101&rft.epage=1104&rft.pages=1101-1104&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90178-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73920725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73920725&rft_id=info:pmid/9749691&rft_els_id=S0003999398901782&rfr_iscdi=true