Genetic and Environmental Contributions to the Association Between Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Mineral Density Measurements: A Twin Study

This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty‐nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins betwe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and mineral research 1998-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1318-1327
Hauptverfasser: Howard, Gabrielle M., Nguyen, Tuan V., Harris, Mark, Kelly, Paul J., Eisman, John A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1327
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1318
container_title Journal of bone and mineral research
container_volume 13
creator Howard, Gabrielle M.
Nguyen, Tuan V.
Harris, Mark
Kelly, Paul J.
Eisman, John A.
description This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty‐nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins between 20 and 83 years of age (53 ± 13 years, mean ± SD) were studied. Digital (phalangeal) QUS (speed of sound [SOS]) and calcaneal QUS (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA] and velocity of sound [VOS]) were measured using a DBM Sonic 1200 ultrasound densitometer and a CUBA ultrasound densitometer, respectively. Femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total body (TB) BMD were measured using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Familial resemblance and hence heritability (proportion of variance of a trait attributable to genetic factors) were assessed by analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate model‐fitting genetic analyses. In both QUS and BMD parameters, MZ twins were more alike than DZ pairs. Estimates of heritability for age‐ and weight‐adjusted BUA, VOS, and SOS were 0.74, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Corresponding indices of heritability for LS, FN, and TB BMD were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. In cross‐sectional analysis, both BUA and SOS, but not VOS, were independently associated with BMD measurements. However, analysis based on intrapair differences suggested that only BUA was related to BMD. Bivariate genetic analysis indicated that the genetic correlations between BUA and BMD ranged between 0.43 and 0.51 (p < 0.001), whereas the environmental correlations ranged between 0.20 and 0.28 (p < 0.01). While the genetic correlations within QUS and BMD measurements were significant, factor analysis indicates that common genes affect BMD at different sites. Also, individual QUS measurements appear to be influenced by some common sets of genes rather than by environmental factors. Significant environmental correlations were only found for BMD measurements and ranged between 0.50 and 0.65 (p < 0.001). These data suggest that QUS and BMD measurements are highly heritable traits. While it appears that there is a common set of genes influencing both QUS and BMD measurements, specific genes yet to be identified appear to have greater effects than that of shared genes in each trait.
doi_str_mv 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1318
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73849628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17155900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-5a9eab0a2fb1c24e1e857fad1a3baad37b93da0c3c7b8cebf980c630dfe6f56b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EKkvhCRCSD4hbFjuOHZsL2l1KAXWFgPYcjZ2JcJV1iu10tS_BM5Owq17hMqOZ-ef7Dz8hLzlbciHN21u7i0tujJ7G5Vy4fkQWXJaiqJTmj8mCaV0VrBL8KXmW0i1jTEmlzsiZqbkuGV-Q35cYMHtHIbT0Itz7OIQdhgw93QwhR2_H7IeQaB5o_ol0ldLgPMw7usa8Rwz02wgh-zwt75He9DlCGsYJNyPXQ0C69QHjRPyAIfl8oFuENEacfdI7uqLXex_ojzy2h-fkSQd9whenfk5uPl5cbz4VV18vP29WV4WruKoKCQbBMig7y11ZIUct6w5aDsICtKK2RrTAnHC11Q5tZzRzSrC2Q9VJZcU5eXPk3sXh14gpNzufHPY9BBzG1NRCV0aV-p9CXnMpDWOTUByFLg4pReyau-h3EA8NZ80cVzPH1cxxTWMzFz7jX53wo91h-_Bzyme6vz7dITnouwjB-fQgK4U25i_m_VG29z0e_se5-bLefpdKTh5M80r8Ac6TtWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17155900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic and Environmental Contributions to the Association Between Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Mineral Density Measurements: A Twin Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Howard, Gabrielle M. ; Nguyen, Tuan V. ; Harris, Mark ; Kelly, Paul J. ; Eisman, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Howard, Gabrielle M. ; Nguyen, Tuan V. ; Harris, Mark ; Kelly, Paul J. ; Eisman, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty‐nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins between 20 and 83 years of age (53 ± 13 years, mean ± SD) were studied. Digital (phalangeal) QUS (speed of sound [SOS]) and calcaneal QUS (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA] and velocity of sound [VOS]) were measured using a DBM Sonic 1200 ultrasound densitometer and a CUBA ultrasound densitometer, respectively. Femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total body (TB) BMD were measured using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Familial resemblance and hence heritability (proportion of variance of a trait attributable to genetic factors) were assessed by analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate model‐fitting genetic analyses. In both QUS and BMD parameters, MZ twins were more alike than DZ pairs. Estimates of heritability for age‐ and weight‐adjusted BUA, VOS, and SOS were 0.74, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Corresponding indices of heritability for LS, FN, and TB BMD were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. In cross‐sectional analysis, both BUA and SOS, but not VOS, were independently associated with BMD measurements. However, analysis based on intrapair differences suggested that only BUA was related to BMD. Bivariate genetic analysis indicated that the genetic correlations between BUA and BMD ranged between 0.43 and 0.51 (p &lt; 0.001), whereas the environmental correlations ranged between 0.20 and 0.28 (p &lt; 0.01). While the genetic correlations within QUS and BMD measurements were significant, factor analysis indicates that common genes affect BMD at different sites. Also, individual QUS measurements appear to be influenced by some common sets of genes rather than by environmental factors. Significant environmental correlations were only found for BMD measurements and ranged between 0.50 and 0.65 (p &lt; 0.001). These data suggest that QUS and BMD measurements are highly heritable traits. While it appears that there is a common set of genes influencing both QUS and BMD measurements, specific genes yet to be identified appear to have greater effects than that of shared genes in each trait.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-0431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1318</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9718201</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMREJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density - genetics ; Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Finger Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Middle Aged ; Phenotype ; Regression Analysis ; Skeleton and joints ; Space life sciences ; Twins, Dizygotic - genetics ; Twins, Monozygotic - genetics ; Ultrasonography ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and mineral research, 1998-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1318-1327</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 ASBMR</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-5a9eab0a2fb1c24e1e857fad1a3baad37b93da0c3c7b8cebf980c630dfe6f56b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-5a9eab0a2fb1c24e1e857fad1a3baad37b93da0c3c7b8cebf980c630dfe6f56b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1359%2Fjbmr.1998.13.8.1318$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1359%2Fjbmr.1998.13.8.1318$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2389918$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9718201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howard, Gabrielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuan V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisman, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic and Environmental Contributions to the Association Between Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Mineral Density Measurements: A Twin Study</title><title>Journal of bone and mineral research</title><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><description>This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty‐nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins between 20 and 83 years of age (53 ± 13 years, mean ± SD) were studied. Digital (phalangeal) QUS (speed of sound [SOS]) and calcaneal QUS (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA] and velocity of sound [VOS]) were measured using a DBM Sonic 1200 ultrasound densitometer and a CUBA ultrasound densitometer, respectively. Femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total body (TB) BMD were measured using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Familial resemblance and hence heritability (proportion of variance of a trait attributable to genetic factors) were assessed by analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate model‐fitting genetic analyses. In both QUS and BMD parameters, MZ twins were more alike than DZ pairs. Estimates of heritability for age‐ and weight‐adjusted BUA, VOS, and SOS were 0.74, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Corresponding indices of heritability for LS, FN, and TB BMD were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. In cross‐sectional analysis, both BUA and SOS, but not VOS, were independently associated with BMD measurements. However, analysis based on intrapair differences suggested that only BUA was related to BMD. Bivariate genetic analysis indicated that the genetic correlations between BUA and BMD ranged between 0.43 and 0.51 (p &lt; 0.001), whereas the environmental correlations ranged between 0.20 and 0.28 (p &lt; 0.01). While the genetic correlations within QUS and BMD measurements were significant, factor analysis indicates that common genes affect BMD at different sites. Also, individual QUS measurements appear to be influenced by some common sets of genes rather than by environmental factors. Significant environmental correlations were only found for BMD measurements and ranged between 0.50 and 0.65 (p &lt; 0.001). These data suggest that QUS and BMD measurements are highly heritable traits. While it appears that there is a common set of genes influencing both QUS and BMD measurements, specific genes yet to be identified appear to have greater effects than that of shared genes in each trait.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density - genetics</subject><subject>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Finger Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Twins, Dizygotic - genetics</subject><subject>Twins, Monozygotic - genetics</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EKkvhCRCSD4hbFjuOHZsL2l1KAXWFgPYcjZ2JcJV1iu10tS_BM5Owq17hMqOZ-ef7Dz8hLzlbciHN21u7i0tujJ7G5Vy4fkQWXJaiqJTmj8mCaV0VrBL8KXmW0i1jTEmlzsiZqbkuGV-Q35cYMHtHIbT0Itz7OIQdhgw93QwhR2_H7IeQaB5o_ol0ldLgPMw7usa8Rwz02wgh-zwt75He9DlCGsYJNyPXQ0C69QHjRPyAIfl8oFuENEacfdI7uqLXex_ojzy2h-fkSQd9whenfk5uPl5cbz4VV18vP29WV4WruKoKCQbBMig7y11ZIUct6w5aDsICtKK2RrTAnHC11Q5tZzRzSrC2Q9VJZcU5eXPk3sXh14gpNzufHPY9BBzG1NRCV0aV-p9CXnMpDWOTUByFLg4pReyau-h3EA8NZ80cVzPH1cxxTWMzFz7jX53wo91h-_Bzyme6vz7dITnouwjB-fQgK4U25i_m_VG29z0e_se5-bLefpdKTh5M80r8Ac6TtWs</recordid><startdate>199808</startdate><enddate>199808</enddate><creator>Howard, Gabrielle M.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Tuan V.</creator><creator>Harris, Mark</creator><creator>Kelly, Paul J.</creator><creator>Eisman, John A.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)</general><general>American Society for Bone and Mineral Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199808</creationdate><title>Genetic and Environmental Contributions to the Association Between Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Mineral Density Measurements: A Twin Study</title><author>Howard, Gabrielle M. ; Nguyen, Tuan V. ; Harris, Mark ; Kelly, Paul J. ; Eisman, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4164-5a9eab0a2fb1c24e1e857fad1a3baad37b93da0c3c7b8cebf980c630dfe6f56b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density - genetics</topic><topic>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Finger Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Twins, Dizygotic - genetics</topic><topic>Twins, Monozygotic - genetics</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howard, Gabrielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuan V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisman, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howard, Gabrielle M.</au><au>Nguyen, Tuan V.</au><au>Harris, Mark</au><au>Kelly, Paul J.</au><au>Eisman, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic and Environmental Contributions to the Association Between Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Mineral Density Measurements: A Twin Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><date>1998-08</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1318</spage><epage>1327</epage><pages>1318-1327</pages><issn>0884-0431</issn><eissn>1523-4681</eissn><coden>JBMREJ</coden><abstract>This study was designed to assess the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the variation and covariation of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements and their relationships to bone mineral density (BMD). Forty‐nine monozygotic (MZ) and 44 dizygotic (DZ) female twins between 20 and 83 years of age (53 ± 13 years, mean ± SD) were studied. Digital (phalangeal) QUS (speed of sound [SOS]) and calcaneal QUS (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA] and velocity of sound [VOS]) were measured using a DBM Sonic 1200 ultrasound densitometer and a CUBA ultrasound densitometer, respectively. Femoral neck (FN), lumbar spine (LS), and total body (TB) BMD were measured using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Familial resemblance and hence heritability (proportion of variance of a trait attributable to genetic factors) were assessed by analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate model‐fitting genetic analyses. In both QUS and BMD parameters, MZ twins were more alike than DZ pairs. Estimates of heritability for age‐ and weight‐adjusted BUA, VOS, and SOS were 0.74, 0.55, and 0.82, respectively. Corresponding indices of heritability for LS, FN, and TB BMD were 0.79, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively. In cross‐sectional analysis, both BUA and SOS, but not VOS, were independently associated with BMD measurements. However, analysis based on intrapair differences suggested that only BUA was related to BMD. Bivariate genetic analysis indicated that the genetic correlations between BUA and BMD ranged between 0.43 and 0.51 (p &lt; 0.001), whereas the environmental correlations ranged between 0.20 and 0.28 (p &lt; 0.01). While the genetic correlations within QUS and BMD measurements were significant, factor analysis indicates that common genes affect BMD at different sites. Also, individual QUS measurements appear to be influenced by some common sets of genes rather than by environmental factors. Significant environmental correlations were only found for BMD measurements and ranged between 0.50 and 0.65 (p &lt; 0.001). These data suggest that QUS and BMD measurements are highly heritable traits. While it appears that there is a common set of genes influencing both QUS and BMD measurements, specific genes yet to be identified appear to have greater effects than that of shared genes in each trait.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)</pub><pmid>9718201</pmid><doi>10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1318</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-0431
ispartof Journal of bone and mineral research, 1998-08, Vol.13 (8), p.1318-1327
issn 0884-0431
1523-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73849628
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density - genetics
Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging
Finger Joint - diagnostic imaging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Middle Aged
Phenotype
Regression Analysis
Skeleton and joints
Space life sciences
Twins, Dizygotic - genetics
Twins, Monozygotic - genetics
Ultrasonography
Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system
title Genetic and Environmental Contributions to the Association Between Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Mineral Density Measurements: A Twin Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A09%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20and%20Environmental%20Contributions%20to%20the%20Association%20Between%20Quantitative%20Ultrasound%20and%20Bone%20Mineral%20Density%20Measurements:%20A%20Twin%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20mineral%20research&rft.au=Howard,%20Gabrielle%20M.&rft.date=1998-08&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1318&rft.epage=1327&rft.pages=1318-1327&rft.issn=0884-0431&rft.eissn=1523-4681&rft.coden=JBMREJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1318&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17155900%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17155900&rft_id=info:pmid/9718201&rfr_iscdi=true