A clinical perspective on cell markers in acute lymphocytic leukemia

Two hundred consecutive new patients, with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) have been studied with a battery of five cell marker assays to determine if a classification system with prognostic significance can be developed; 182 have been classified among four groups as follows: 33 T-cell, 3 B-cell, 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1981-11, Vol.41 (11 Pt 2), p.4794-4801
Hauptverfasser: Bowman, W P, Melvin, S L, Aur, R J, Mauer, A M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4801
container_issue 11 Pt 2
container_start_page 4794
container_title Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.)
container_volume 41
creator Bowman, W P
Melvin, S L
Aur, R J
Mauer, A M
description Two hundred consecutive new patients, with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) have been studied with a battery of five cell marker assays to determine if a classification system with prognostic significance can be developed; 182 have been classified among four groups as follows: 33 T-cell, 3 B-cell, 126 common, and 20 undifferentiated ALLs. Patients with T-cell disease are likely to have unfavorable clinical prognostic features and a poor response to therapy. Rare patients with B-cell disease are closely related clinically to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Those with common ALL infrequently have unfavorable clinical features and have a superior outcome to that of T-cell patients. Children with undifferentiated markers seem to respond less well to treatment than do those with common ALL, yet may not be identifiable as poor risk by clinical features. What remains to be resolved with further observation is whether these marker patterns are more reliable indicators of prognosis than the usual clinical determinants predisposing to treatment failure (high white blood cell count, mediastinal mass, and central nervous system disease). At the present time, it appears that in the absence of poor-risk clinical prognostic features, patients with common ALL are more likely to have lasting remissions than those with erythrocyte-rosette-positive T-cell disease or those with ALL that is undifferentiated by markers.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73717656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73717656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h247t-5ee46b425ba22704a545d432f47deefc0725901b9e9b88d5196dc47cdc2bf3323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LxDAYhHNQ1nX1Jwg5eSukSd6kPS7r18KCFz2XfLxl46YfNq3Qf2_FnoYZHoaZK7JljBUZSM1vyG1KX4uFnMGGbFSpIVd8S5721MXQBmci7XFIPbox_CDtWuowRtqY4bLENLTUuGlEGuemP3duHoOjEacLNsHckevaxIT3q-7I58vzx-EtO72_Hg_7U3bmUo8ZIEplJQdrONdMGpDgpeC11B6xdkxzKFluSyxtUXjIS-Wd1M47bmshuNiRx__efui-J0xj1YT0N9O02E2p0kLnWoFawIcVnGyDvuqHsByZq_W2-AWKVFK-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73717656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clinical perspective on cell markers in acute lymphocytic leukemia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bowman, W P ; Melvin, S L ; Aur, R J ; Mauer, A M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowman, W P ; Melvin, S L ; Aur, R J ; Mauer, A M</creatorcontrib><description>Two hundred consecutive new patients, with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) have been studied with a battery of five cell marker assays to determine if a classification system with prognostic significance can be developed; 182 have been classified among four groups as follows: 33 T-cell, 3 B-cell, 126 common, and 20 undifferentiated ALLs. Patients with T-cell disease are likely to have unfavorable clinical prognostic features and a poor response to therapy. Rare patients with B-cell disease are closely related clinically to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Those with common ALL infrequently have unfavorable clinical features and have a superior outcome to that of T-cell patients. Children with undifferentiated markers seem to respond less well to treatment than do those with common ALL, yet may not be identifiable as poor risk by clinical features. What remains to be resolved with further observation is whether these marker patterns are more reliable indicators of prognosis than the usual clinical determinants predisposing to treatment failure (high white blood cell count, mediastinal mass, and central nervous system disease). At the present time, it appears that in the absence of poor-risk clinical prognostic features, patients with common ALL are more likely to have lasting remissions than those with erythrocyte-rosette-positive T-cell disease or those with ALL that is undifferentiated by markers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-5472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6975162</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis ; Antigens, Surface - analysis ; B-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Female ; Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - analysis ; Humans ; Leukemia, Lymphoid - classification ; Leukemia, Lymphoid - diagnosis ; Leukemia, Lymphoid - immunology ; Leukemia, Lymphoid - therapy ; Male ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Antigen, B-Cell - analysis ; Rosette Formation ; Sex Factors ; T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><ispartof>Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.), 1981-11, Vol.41 (11 Pt 2), p.4794-4801</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6975162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowman, W P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melvin, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aur, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauer, A M</creatorcontrib><title>A clinical perspective on cell markers in acute lymphocytic leukemia</title><title>Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.)</title><addtitle>Cancer Res</addtitle><description>Two hundred consecutive new patients, with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) have been studied with a battery of five cell marker assays to determine if a classification system with prognostic significance can be developed; 182 have been classified among four groups as follows: 33 T-cell, 3 B-cell, 126 common, and 20 undifferentiated ALLs. Patients with T-cell disease are likely to have unfavorable clinical prognostic features and a poor response to therapy. Rare patients with B-cell disease are closely related clinically to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Those with common ALL infrequently have unfavorable clinical features and have a superior outcome to that of T-cell patients. Children with undifferentiated markers seem to respond less well to treatment than do those with common ALL, yet may not be identifiable as poor risk by clinical features. What remains to be resolved with further observation is whether these marker patterns are more reliable indicators of prognosis than the usual clinical determinants predisposing to treatment failure (high white blood cell count, mediastinal mass, and central nervous system disease). At the present time, it appears that in the absence of poor-risk clinical prognostic features, patients with common ALL are more likely to have lasting remissions than those with erythrocyte-rosette-positive T-cell disease or those with ALL that is undifferentiated by markers.</description><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, Surface - analysis</subject><subject>B-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukemia, Lymphoid - classification</subject><subject>Leukemia, Lymphoid - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leukemia, Lymphoid - immunology</subject><subject>Leukemia, Lymphoid - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptors, Antigen, B-Cell - analysis</subject><subject>Rosette Formation</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><issn>0008-5472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LxDAYhHNQ1nX1Jwg5eSukSd6kPS7r18KCFz2XfLxl46YfNq3Qf2_FnoYZHoaZK7JljBUZSM1vyG1KX4uFnMGGbFSpIVd8S5721MXQBmci7XFIPbox_CDtWuowRtqY4bLENLTUuGlEGuemP3duHoOjEacLNsHckevaxIT3q-7I58vzx-EtO72_Hg_7U3bmUo8ZIEplJQdrONdMGpDgpeC11B6xdkxzKFluSyxtUXjIS-Wd1M47bmshuNiRx__efui-J0xj1YT0N9O02E2p0kLnWoFawIcVnGyDvuqHsByZq_W2-AWKVFK-</recordid><startdate>19811101</startdate><enddate>19811101</enddate><creator>Bowman, W P</creator><creator>Melvin, S L</creator><creator>Aur, R J</creator><creator>Mauer, A M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19811101</creationdate><title>A clinical perspective on cell markers in acute lymphocytic leukemia</title><author>Bowman, W P ; Melvin, S L ; Aur, R J ; Mauer, A M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h247t-5ee46b425ba22704a545d432f47deefc0725901b9e9b88d5196dc47cdc2bf3323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, Surface - analysis</topic><topic>B-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukemia, Lymphoid - classification</topic><topic>Leukemia, Lymphoid - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leukemia, Lymphoid - immunology</topic><topic>Leukemia, Lymphoid - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptors, Antigen, B-Cell - analysis</topic><topic>Rosette Formation</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowman, W P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melvin, S L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aur, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauer, A M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowman, W P</au><au>Melvin, S L</au><au>Aur, R J</au><au>Mauer, A M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clinical perspective on cell markers in acute lymphocytic leukemia</atitle><jtitle>Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Res</addtitle><date>1981-11-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>11 Pt 2</issue><spage>4794</spage><epage>4801</epage><pages>4794-4801</pages><issn>0008-5472</issn><abstract>Two hundred consecutive new patients, with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) have been studied with a battery of five cell marker assays to determine if a classification system with prognostic significance can be developed; 182 have been classified among four groups as follows: 33 T-cell, 3 B-cell, 126 common, and 20 undifferentiated ALLs. Patients with T-cell disease are likely to have unfavorable clinical prognostic features and a poor response to therapy. Rare patients with B-cell disease are closely related clinically to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Those with common ALL infrequently have unfavorable clinical features and have a superior outcome to that of T-cell patients. Children with undifferentiated markers seem to respond less well to treatment than do those with common ALL, yet may not be identifiable as poor risk by clinical features. What remains to be resolved with further observation is whether these marker patterns are more reliable indicators of prognosis than the usual clinical determinants predisposing to treatment failure (high white blood cell count, mediastinal mass, and central nervous system disease). At the present time, it appears that in the absence of poor-risk clinical prognostic features, patients with common ALL are more likely to have lasting remissions than those with erythrocyte-rosette-positive T-cell disease or those with ALL that is undifferentiated by markers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>6975162</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-5472
ispartof Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.), 1981-11, Vol.41 (11 Pt 2), p.4794-4801
issn 0008-5472
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73717656
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Antigens, Neoplasm - analysis
Antigens, Surface - analysis
B-Lymphocytes - immunology
Female
Histocompatibility Antigens Class II - analysis
Humans
Leukemia, Lymphoid - classification
Leukemia, Lymphoid - diagnosis
Leukemia, Lymphoid - immunology
Leukemia, Lymphoid - therapy
Male
Prognosis
Receptors, Antigen, B-Cell - analysis
Rosette Formation
Sex Factors
T-Lymphocytes - immunology
title A clinical perspective on cell markers in acute lymphocytic leukemia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A21%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clinical%20perspective%20on%20cell%20markers%20in%20acute%20lymphocytic%20leukemia&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20research%20(Chicago,%20Ill.)&rft.au=Bowman,%20W%20P&rft.date=1981-11-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=11%20Pt%202&rft.spage=4794&rft.epage=4801&rft.pages=4794-4801&rft.issn=0008-5472&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73717656%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73717656&rft_id=info:pmid/6975162&rfr_iscdi=true