Alternative Birth Rooms and Birth Options
The hospital-based alternative birth room has become a popular alternative to the conventional labor and delivery room setting. Responses to a mailed questionnaire from 78 of 82 (95%) Washington State hospitals with obstetric services were used to relate available birth options to alternative birth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1981-11, Vol.58 (5), p.626-630 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 630 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 626 |
container_title | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | DOBBS, KATHE B SHY, KIRKWOOD K |
description | The hospital-based alternative birth room has become a popular alternative to the conventional labor and delivery room setting. Responses to a mailed questionnaire from 78 of 82 (95%) Washington State hospitals with obstetric services were used to relate available birth options to alternative birth room status and obstetric volume. Alternative birth rooms were in existence, or planned, in 63% of responding hospitals. The presence of an alternative birth room was directly related to obstetric volume (P |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73700537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73700537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2517-430f794db8955b892037876e5032d191feab4d0119508e58cf18ff2a635dcafe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUE1LAzEUDKLUtfoThJ4ED4GXvGSTHGvxCwoFUfC2pN0XurpfbnYt_nu3dC8zDDMMzJyxRFiDXCJ-nrMEQDpurFKX7CrGLwAQqcMZmxkEIRUk7H5Z9tTVvi9-afFQdP1-8dY0VVz4Op_0pu2Lpo7X7CL4MtLNxHP28fT4vnrh683z62q55q3UwnCFEIxT-dY6rUeQgMaalDSgzIUTgfxW5SCE02BJ210QNgTpU9T5zgfCObs79bZd8zNQ7LOqiDsqS19TM8TMoAHQaMbg7RQcthXlWdsVle_-smnb6KuTf2iOG-N3ORyoy_bky36fjV9AKjVw4awQYlT8eI_Bf8TDWRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73700537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative Birth Rooms and Birth Options</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>DOBBS, KATHE B ; SHY, KIRKWOOD K</creator><creatorcontrib>DOBBS, KATHE B ; SHY, KIRKWOOD K</creatorcontrib><description>The hospital-based alternative birth room has become a popular alternative to the conventional labor and delivery room setting. Responses to a mailed questionnaire from 78 of 82 (95%) Washington State hospitals with obstetric services were used to relate available birth options to alternative birth room status and obstetric volume. Alternative birth rooms were in existence, or planned, in 63% of responding hospitals. The presence of an alternative birth room was directly related to obstetric volume (P<.05) and perceived local incidence of home deliveries (P<.025). Hospitals with an alternative birth room had more postpartum options regardless of obstetric volume. Hospitals with an alternative birth room and less than 1000 annual deliveries had more delivery and bonding options. The results of this analysis, plus the fact that 47 of 78 (60%) responding hospitals offered more than half of the options surveyed, suggest that Washington State hospitals have responded to new consumer desires more than previously appreciated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7301240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</publisher><subject>Delivery Rooms ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Family ; Female ; Hospital Departments - organization & administration ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Labor, Obstetric ; Male ; Object Attachment ; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital - organization & administration ; Operating Rooms ; Pregnancy ; Rooming-in Care ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Washington</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1981-11, Vol.58 (5), p.626-630</ispartof><rights>1981 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7301240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DOBBS, KATHE B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHY, KIRKWOOD K</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative Birth Rooms and Birth Options</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>The hospital-based alternative birth room has become a popular alternative to the conventional labor and delivery room setting. Responses to a mailed questionnaire from 78 of 82 (95%) Washington State hospitals with obstetric services were used to relate available birth options to alternative birth room status and obstetric volume. Alternative birth rooms were in existence, or planned, in 63% of responding hospitals. The presence of an alternative birth room was directly related to obstetric volume (P<.05) and perceived local incidence of home deliveries (P<.025). Hospitals with an alternative birth room had more postpartum options regardless of obstetric volume. Hospitals with an alternative birth room and less than 1000 annual deliveries had more delivery and bonding options. The results of this analysis, plus the fact that 47 of 78 (60%) responding hospitals offered more than half of the options surveyed, suggest that Washington State hospitals have responded to new consumer desires more than previously appreciated.</description><subject>Delivery Rooms</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Departments - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Operating Rooms</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Rooming-in Care</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotUE1LAzEUDKLUtfoThJ4ED4GXvGSTHGvxCwoFUfC2pN0XurpfbnYt_nu3dC8zDDMMzJyxRFiDXCJ-nrMEQDpurFKX7CrGLwAQqcMZmxkEIRUk7H5Z9tTVvi9-afFQdP1-8dY0VVz4Op_0pu2Lpo7X7CL4MtLNxHP28fT4vnrh683z62q55q3UwnCFEIxT-dY6rUeQgMaalDSgzIUTgfxW5SCE02BJ210QNgTpU9T5zgfCObs79bZd8zNQ7LOqiDsqS19TM8TMoAHQaMbg7RQcthXlWdsVle_-smnb6KuTf2iOG-N3ORyoy_bky36fjV9AKjVw4awQYlT8eI_Bf8TDWRg</recordid><startdate>198111</startdate><enddate>198111</enddate><creator>DOBBS, KATHE B</creator><creator>SHY, KIRKWOOD K</creator><general>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198111</creationdate><title>Alternative Birth Rooms and Birth Options</title><author>DOBBS, KATHE B ; SHY, KIRKWOOD K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2517-430f794db8955b892037876e5032d191feab4d0119508e58cf18ff2a635dcafe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Delivery Rooms</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Departments - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Operating Rooms</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Rooming-in Care</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DOBBS, KATHE B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHY, KIRKWOOD K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DOBBS, KATHE B</au><au>SHY, KIRKWOOD K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative Birth Rooms and Birth Options</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1981-11</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>626-630</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>The hospital-based alternative birth room has become a popular alternative to the conventional labor and delivery room setting. Responses to a mailed questionnaire from 78 of 82 (95%) Washington State hospitals with obstetric services were used to relate available birth options to alternative birth room status and obstetric volume. Alternative birth rooms were in existence, or planned, in 63% of responding hospitals. The presence of an alternative birth room was directly related to obstetric volume (P<.05) and perceived local incidence of home deliveries (P<.025). Hospitals with an alternative birth room had more postpartum options regardless of obstetric volume. Hospitals with an alternative birth room and less than 1000 annual deliveries had more delivery and bonding options. The results of this analysis, plus the fact that 47 of 78 (60%) responding hospitals offered more than half of the options surveyed, suggest that Washington State hospitals have responded to new consumer desires more than previously appreciated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</pub><pmid>7301240</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-7844 |
ispartof | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1981-11, Vol.58 (5), p.626-630 |
issn | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73700537 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Delivery Rooms Delivery, Obstetric - methods Family Female Hospital Departments - organization & administration Humans Infant, Newborn Labor, Obstetric Male Object Attachment Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital - organization & administration Operating Rooms Pregnancy Rooming-in Care Surveys and Questionnaires Washington |
title | Alternative Birth Rooms and Birth Options |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T19%3A50%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20Birth%20Rooms%20and%20Birth%20Options&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=DOBBS,%20KATHE%20B&rft.date=1981-11&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=626-630&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73700537%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73700537&rft_id=info:pmid/7301240&rfr_iscdi=true |