Item Banking to Improve, Shorten and Computerize Self-Reported Fatigue: An Illustration of Steps to Create a Core Item Bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale

Fatigue is a common symptom among cancer patients and the general population. Due to its subjective nature, fatigue has been difficult to effectively and efficiently assess. Modern computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can enable precise assessment of fatigue using a small number of items from a fatig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality of life research 2003-08, Vol.12 (5), p.485-501
Hauptverfasser: Jin-shei Lai, Cella, David, Chang, Chih-Hung, Rita K. Bode, Allen W. Heinemann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 501
container_issue 5
container_start_page 485
container_title Quality of life research
container_volume 12
creator Jin-shei Lai
Cella, David
Chang, Chih-Hung
Rita K. Bode
Allen W. Heinemann
description Fatigue is a common symptom among cancer patients and the general population. Due to its subjective nature, fatigue has been difficult to effectively and efficiently assess. Modern computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can enable precise assessment of fatigue using a small number of items from a fatigue item bank. CAT enables brief assessment by selecting questions from an item bank that provide the maximum amount of information given a person's previous responses. This article illustrates steps to prepare such an item bank, using 13 items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-F) as the basis. Samples included 1022 cancer patients and 1010 people from the general population. An Item Response Theory (IRT)-based rating scale model, a polytomous extension of the Rasch dichotomous model was utilized. Nine items demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties were selected and positioned on the fatigue continuum. The fatigue levels measured by these nine items along with their response categories covered 66.8% of the general population and 82.6% of the cancer patients. Although the operational CAT algorithms to handle polytomously scored items are still in progress, we illustrated how CAT may work by using nine core items to measure level of fatigue. Using this illustration, a fatigue measure comparable to its full-length 13-item scale administration was obtained using four items. The resulting item bank can serve as a core to which will be added a psychometrically sound and operational item bank covering the entire fatigue continuum.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1025014509626
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73661418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4038075</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4038075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-ccd7138f4856b2d7e30ff73fd80fb606693b2aa0bbd00f1328741dcaae20bab53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1q3DAUhUVIaSZp19mEcOmiq7qRLFmSs5uaTGsIFDLp2sj2VeKJbTmSXGifpI9bD5lm0dWBcz7O_SHknNHPjKb8an29SEaZyGguU3lEVixTPEmlyI_Jau8lORf8hJyGsKOU6pymb8kJ41IpkYsV-VNGHOCLGZ-68QGig3KYvPuJn2D76HzEEczYQuGGaY7ou98IW-xtcofTPm1hY2L3MOM1rEco-34O0S-OG8FZ2Eacwr6z8Ggigll6PMLrRLDeDRAfETbrorxPDl2wbUyP78gba_qA7w96Rn5sbu6Lb8nt969lsb5NGi5UTJqmVYxrK3Qm67RVyKm1ittWU1tLKmXO69QYWtctpZbxVCvB2sYYTGlt6oyfkY8vvcvZzzOGWA1daLDvzYhuDpXiUjLB9AJ--A_cudmPy26V1lyzXGu2QJcHaK4HbKvJd4Pxv6p_D1-AixdgF6Lzr7mgXFOV8b-1JIuJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883819881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Item Banking to Improve, Shorten and Computerize Self-Reported Fatigue: An Illustration of Steps to Create a Core Item Bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Jin-shei Lai ; Cella, David ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Rita K. Bode ; Allen W. Heinemann</creator><creatorcontrib>Jin-shei Lai ; Cella, David ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Rita K. Bode ; Allen W. Heinemann</creatorcontrib><description>Fatigue is a common symptom among cancer patients and the general population. Due to its subjective nature, fatigue has been difficult to effectively and efficiently assess. Modern computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can enable precise assessment of fatigue using a small number of items from a fatigue item bank. CAT enables brief assessment by selecting questions from an item bank that provide the maximum amount of information given a person's previous responses. This article illustrates steps to prepare such an item bank, using 13 items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-F) as the basis. Samples included 1022 cancer patients and 1010 people from the general population. An Item Response Theory (IRT)-based rating scale model, a polytomous extension of the Rasch dichotomous model was utilized. Nine items demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties were selected and positioned on the fatigue continuum. The fatigue levels measured by these nine items along with their response categories covered 66.8% of the general population and 82.6% of the cancer patients. Although the operational CAT algorithms to handle polytomously scored items are still in progress, we illustrated how CAT may work by using nine core items to measure level of fatigue. Using this illustration, a fatigue measure comparable to its full-length 13-item scale administration was obtained using four items. The resulting item bank can serve as a core to which will be added a psychometrically sound and operational item bank covering the entire fatigue continuum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1025014509626</identifier><identifier>PMID: 13677494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Adult ; Banks ; Calibration ; Cancer ; Fatigue ; Fatigue - diagnosis ; Fatigue - etiology ; Female ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Item response theory ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - complications ; Population studies ; Psychometrics ; Quality of life ; Rating scales ; Screening questions ; Sickness Impact Profile ; Statistical variance ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2003-08, Vol.12 (5), p.485-501</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-ccd7138f4856b2d7e30ff73fd80fb606693b2aa0bbd00f1328741dcaae20bab53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4038075$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4038075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13677494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jin-shei Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rita K. Bode</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen W. Heinemann</creatorcontrib><title>Item Banking to Improve, Shorten and Computerize Self-Reported Fatigue: An Illustration of Steps to Create a Core Item Bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Fatigue is a common symptom among cancer patients and the general population. Due to its subjective nature, fatigue has been difficult to effectively and efficiently assess. Modern computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can enable precise assessment of fatigue using a small number of items from a fatigue item bank. CAT enables brief assessment by selecting questions from an item bank that provide the maximum amount of information given a person's previous responses. This article illustrates steps to prepare such an item bank, using 13 items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-F) as the basis. Samples included 1022 cancer patients and 1010 people from the general population. An Item Response Theory (IRT)-based rating scale model, a polytomous extension of the Rasch dichotomous model was utilized. Nine items demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties were selected and positioned on the fatigue continuum. The fatigue levels measured by these nine items along with their response categories covered 66.8% of the general population and 82.6% of the cancer patients. Although the operational CAT algorithms to handle polytomously scored items are still in progress, we illustrated how CAT may work by using nine core items to measure level of fatigue. Using this illustration, a fatigue measure comparable to its full-length 13-item scale administration was obtained using four items. The resulting item bank can serve as a core to which will be added a psychometrically sound and operational item bank covering the entire fatigue continuum.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fatigue - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Rating scales</subject><subject>Screening questions</subject><subject>Sickness Impact Profile</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1q3DAUhUVIaSZp19mEcOmiq7qRLFmSs5uaTGsIFDLp2sj2VeKJbTmSXGifpI9bD5lm0dWBcz7O_SHknNHPjKb8an29SEaZyGguU3lEVixTPEmlyI_Jau8lORf8hJyGsKOU6pymb8kJ41IpkYsV-VNGHOCLGZ-68QGig3KYvPuJn2D76HzEEczYQuGGaY7ou98IW-xtcofTPm1hY2L3MOM1rEco-34O0S-OG8FZ2Eacwr6z8Ggigll6PMLrRLDeDRAfETbrorxPDl2wbUyP78gba_qA7w96Rn5sbu6Lb8nt969lsb5NGi5UTJqmVYxrK3Qm67RVyKm1ittWU1tLKmXO69QYWtctpZbxVCvB2sYYTGlt6oyfkY8vvcvZzzOGWA1daLDvzYhuDpXiUjLB9AJ--A_cudmPy26V1lyzXGu2QJcHaK4HbKvJd4Pxv6p_D1-AixdgF6Lzr7mgXFOV8b-1JIuJ</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Jin-shei Lai</creator><creator>Cella, David</creator><creator>Chang, Chih-Hung</creator><creator>Rita K. Bode</creator><creator>Allen W. Heinemann</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Item Banking to Improve, Shorten and Computerize Self-Reported Fatigue: An Illustration of Steps to Create a Core Item Bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale</title><author>Jin-shei Lai ; Cella, David ; Chang, Chih-Hung ; Rita K. Bode ; Allen W. Heinemann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-ccd7138f4856b2d7e30ff73fd80fb606693b2aa0bbd00f1328741dcaae20bab53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fatigue - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Rating scales</topic><topic>Screening questions</topic><topic>Sickness Impact Profile</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jin-shei Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chih-Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rita K. Bode</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen W. Heinemann</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jin-shei Lai</au><au>Cella, David</au><au>Chang, Chih-Hung</au><au>Rita K. Bode</au><au>Allen W. Heinemann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Item Banking to Improve, Shorten and Computerize Self-Reported Fatigue: An Illustration of Steps to Create a Core Item Bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>485-501</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Fatigue is a common symptom among cancer patients and the general population. Due to its subjective nature, fatigue has been difficult to effectively and efficiently assess. Modern computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can enable precise assessment of fatigue using a small number of items from a fatigue item bank. CAT enables brief assessment by selecting questions from an item bank that provide the maximum amount of information given a person's previous responses. This article illustrates steps to prepare such an item bank, using 13 items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-F) as the basis. Samples included 1022 cancer patients and 1010 people from the general population. An Item Response Theory (IRT)-based rating scale model, a polytomous extension of the Rasch dichotomous model was utilized. Nine items demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties were selected and positioned on the fatigue continuum. The fatigue levels measured by these nine items along with their response categories covered 66.8% of the general population and 82.6% of the cancer patients. Although the operational CAT algorithms to handle polytomously scored items are still in progress, we illustrated how CAT may work by using nine core items to measure level of fatigue. Using this illustration, a fatigue measure comparable to its full-length 13-item scale administration was obtained using four items. The resulting item bank can serve as a core to which will be added a psychometrically sound and operational item bank covering the entire fatigue continuum.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><pmid>13677494</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1025014509626</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-9343
ispartof Quality of life research, 2003-08, Vol.12 (5), p.485-501
issn 0962-9343
1573-2649
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73661418
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Adult
Banks
Calibration
Cancer
Fatigue
Fatigue - diagnosis
Fatigue - etiology
Female
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Item response theory
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - complications
Population studies
Psychometrics
Quality of life
Rating scales
Screening questions
Sickness Impact Profile
Statistical variance
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Item Banking to Improve, Shorten and Computerize Self-Reported Fatigue: An Illustration of Steps to Create a Core Item Bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Item%20Banking%20to%20Improve,%20Shorten%20and%20Computerize%20Self-Reported%20Fatigue:%20An%20Illustration%20of%20Steps%20to%20Create%20a%20Core%20Item%20Bank%20from%20the%20FACIT-Fatigue%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Jin-shei%20Lai&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=485-501&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1025014509626&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4038075%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883819881&rft_id=info:pmid/13677494&rft_jstor_id=4038075&rfr_iscdi=true