The effect of a PEG versus a chitosan coating on the interaction of drug colloidal carriers with the ocular mucosa

The influence of the surface characteristics of colloidal drug carriers in their interaction with different biological surfaces is becoming increasingly evident. In order to investigate the importance of these characteristics in their interaction with the ocular mucosa, we developed three types of n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2003-09, Vol.20 (1), p.73-81
Hauptverfasser: De Campos, Angela M., Sánchez, Alejandro, Gref, Ruxandra, Calvo, Pilar, Alonso, Marı&#x0301, a J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title European journal of pharmaceutical sciences
container_volume 20
creator De Campos, Angela M.
Sánchez, Alejandro
Gref, Ruxandra
Calvo, Pilar
Alonso, Marı&#x0301
a J.
description The influence of the surface characteristics of colloidal drug carriers in their interaction with different biological surfaces is becoming increasingly evident. In order to investigate the importance of these characteristics in their interaction with the ocular mucosa, we developed three types of nanocapsules that differ in their surface properties: poly-ε-caprolactone (PECL) nanocapsules, chitosan (CS)-coated PECL nanocapsules and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-coated PECL nanocapsules. Two different approaches were used to form these polymer coated nanocapsules: (i) the electrostatic anchorage of the coating onto the PECL nanocapsules—in the case of CS—and (ii) the use of the previously synthesized copolymer PECL-PEG for the formation of the nanocapsules. In both cases, the systems, prepared by the interfacial deposition technique, were loaded with a fluorescent dye (rhodamine) in order to quantify and visualize their interaction with the ocular surface ex vivo and in vivo. An important conclusion from the ex vivo studies is that the developed systems, and specially the CS-coated ones, enhanced the penetration of the encapsulated dye through the cornea. This effect was not simple due to the physical presence of the nanocapsules but to their ability to carry the encapsulated compound. The second conclusion from the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) studies is that the systems were able to enter the corneal epithelium by a transcellular pathway and that the penetration rate was dependent on the coating composition. The images suggest that the PEG coating accelerates the transport of the nanocapsules across the whole epithelium, whereas the CS coating favours the retention of the nanocapsules in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The specific behaviour of CS-coated systems was also corroborated in vivo. These results indicate that the surface composition of colloidal drug carriers affects their biodistribution in the eye. Therefore, this surface modification approach can be used as a targeting strategy in ocular drug delivery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0928-0987(03)00178-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73660828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928098703001787</els_id><sourcerecordid>73660828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-9bbdb5477d214d9c731d18b1c73db74b724da617c45d2f77f51e811eacab634d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LBCEUhiWK2rZ-QuFNURdTx_nSuYqIviAoqK7FOTqtMTuWOkX_Pttd6rIrPfC8r4dHQvYYnDBg9ekjNLnIoBH8CIpjAMZFxtfIhAneZMBzWCeTX2SLbIfwCgC14LBJtlhR88RVE-KfZoaarjMYqeuoog-X1_TD-DCGNODMRhfUQNGpaIcX6gYaU8AO0XiF0aY5pbQfXxLS985q1VNU3ttUQT9tnC14h2OvPJ2PmNp2yEan-mB2V-eUPF9dPl3cZHf317cX53cZlmURs6ZtdVuVnOuclbpBXjDNRMvSRbe8bHlealUzjmWl847zrmJGMGYUqrYuSl1MyeGy982799GEKOc2oOl7NRg3BsmLugaRiwRWSxC9C8GbTr55O1f-SzKQP7LlQrb8MSmhkAvZKT4l-6sHxnZu9F9qZTcBBytABVR959WANvxxFYOmqiFxZ0vOJB0fSZ0MaM2ARlufPkZqZ_9Z5Rv7xZyF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73660828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of a PEG versus a chitosan coating on the interaction of drug colloidal carriers with the ocular mucosa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>De Campos, Angela M. ; Sánchez, Alejandro ; Gref, Ruxandra ; Calvo, Pilar ; Alonso, Marı&amp;#x0301;a J.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Campos, Angela M. ; Sánchez, Alejandro ; Gref, Ruxandra ; Calvo, Pilar ; Alonso, Marı&amp;#x0301;a J.</creatorcontrib><description>The influence of the surface characteristics of colloidal drug carriers in their interaction with different biological surfaces is becoming increasingly evident. In order to investigate the importance of these characteristics in their interaction with the ocular mucosa, we developed three types of nanocapsules that differ in their surface properties: poly-ε-caprolactone (PECL) nanocapsules, chitosan (CS)-coated PECL nanocapsules and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-coated PECL nanocapsules. Two different approaches were used to form these polymer coated nanocapsules: (i) the electrostatic anchorage of the coating onto the PECL nanocapsules—in the case of CS—and (ii) the use of the previously synthesized copolymer PECL-PEG for the formation of the nanocapsules. In both cases, the systems, prepared by the interfacial deposition technique, were loaded with a fluorescent dye (rhodamine) in order to quantify and visualize their interaction with the ocular surface ex vivo and in vivo. An important conclusion from the ex vivo studies is that the developed systems, and specially the CS-coated ones, enhanced the penetration of the encapsulated dye through the cornea. This effect was not simple due to the physical presence of the nanocapsules but to their ability to carry the encapsulated compound. The second conclusion from the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) studies is that the systems were able to enter the corneal epithelium by a transcellular pathway and that the penetration rate was dependent on the coating composition. The images suggest that the PEG coating accelerates the transport of the nanocapsules across the whole epithelium, whereas the CS coating favours the retention of the nanocapsules in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The specific behaviour of CS-coated systems was also corroborated in vivo. These results indicate that the surface composition of colloidal drug carriers affects their biodistribution in the eye. Therefore, this surface modification approach can be used as a targeting strategy in ocular drug delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-0987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(03)00178-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 13678795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological Transport ; Capsules ; Chitin - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Chitin - chemistry ; Chitin - pharmacokinetics ; Chitosan ; Colloids ; Corneal transport ; Drug Carriers - chemistry ; Drug Carriers - pharmacokinetics ; Endothelium, Corneal - metabolism ; General pharmacology ; In Vitro Techniques ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Nanocapsules ; Nanotechnology ; Ocular drug delivery ; Particle Size ; Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Polyesters - chemistry ; Polyesters - pharmacokinetics ; Polyethylene glycol ; Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry ; Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics ; Rabbits ; Surface Properties ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2003-09, Vol.20 (1), p.73-81</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-9bbdb5477d214d9c731d18b1c73db74b724da617c45d2f77f51e811eacab634d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-9bbdb5477d214d9c731d18b1c73db74b724da617c45d2f77f51e811eacab634d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098703001787$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15109560$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13678795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Campos, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gref, Ruxandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Marı&amp;#x0301;a J.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of a PEG versus a chitosan coating on the interaction of drug colloidal carriers with the ocular mucosa</title><title>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Pharm Sci</addtitle><description>The influence of the surface characteristics of colloidal drug carriers in their interaction with different biological surfaces is becoming increasingly evident. In order to investigate the importance of these characteristics in their interaction with the ocular mucosa, we developed three types of nanocapsules that differ in their surface properties: poly-ε-caprolactone (PECL) nanocapsules, chitosan (CS)-coated PECL nanocapsules and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-coated PECL nanocapsules. Two different approaches were used to form these polymer coated nanocapsules: (i) the electrostatic anchorage of the coating onto the PECL nanocapsules—in the case of CS—and (ii) the use of the previously synthesized copolymer PECL-PEG for the formation of the nanocapsules. In both cases, the systems, prepared by the interfacial deposition technique, were loaded with a fluorescent dye (rhodamine) in order to quantify and visualize their interaction with the ocular surface ex vivo and in vivo. An important conclusion from the ex vivo studies is that the developed systems, and specially the CS-coated ones, enhanced the penetration of the encapsulated dye through the cornea. This effect was not simple due to the physical presence of the nanocapsules but to their ability to carry the encapsulated compound. The second conclusion from the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) studies is that the systems were able to enter the corneal epithelium by a transcellular pathway and that the penetration rate was dependent on the coating composition. The images suggest that the PEG coating accelerates the transport of the nanocapsules across the whole epithelium, whereas the CS coating favours the retention of the nanocapsules in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The specific behaviour of CS-coated systems was also corroborated in vivo. These results indicate that the surface composition of colloidal drug carriers affects their biodistribution in the eye. Therefore, this surface modification approach can be used as a targeting strategy in ocular drug delivery.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological Transport</subject><subject>Capsules</subject><subject>Chitin - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Chitin - chemistry</subject><subject>Chitin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Colloids</subject><subject>Corneal transport</subject><subject>Drug Carriers - chemistry</subject><subject>Drug Carriers - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Endothelium, Corneal - metabolism</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Nanocapsules</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Ocular drug delivery</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Polyesters - chemistry</subject><subject>Polyesters - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0928-0987</issn><issn>1879-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LBCEUhiWK2rZ-QuFNURdTx_nSuYqIviAoqK7FOTqtMTuWOkX_Pttd6rIrPfC8r4dHQvYYnDBg9ekjNLnIoBH8CIpjAMZFxtfIhAneZMBzWCeTX2SLbIfwCgC14LBJtlhR88RVE-KfZoaarjMYqeuoog-X1_TD-DCGNODMRhfUQNGpaIcX6gYaU8AO0XiF0aY5pbQfXxLS985q1VNU3ttUQT9tnC14h2OvPJ2PmNp2yEan-mB2V-eUPF9dPl3cZHf317cX53cZlmURs6ZtdVuVnOuclbpBXjDNRMvSRbe8bHlealUzjmWl847zrmJGMGYUqrYuSl1MyeGy982799GEKOc2oOl7NRg3BsmLugaRiwRWSxC9C8GbTr55O1f-SzKQP7LlQrb8MSmhkAvZKT4l-6sHxnZu9F9qZTcBBytABVR959WANvxxFYOmqiFxZ0vOJB0fSZ0MaM2ARlufPkZqZ_9Z5Rv7xZyF</recordid><startdate>20030901</startdate><enddate>20030901</enddate><creator>De Campos, Angela M.</creator><creator>Sánchez, Alejandro</creator><creator>Gref, Ruxandra</creator><creator>Calvo, Pilar</creator><creator>Alonso, Marı&amp;#x0301;a J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030901</creationdate><title>The effect of a PEG versus a chitosan coating on the interaction of drug colloidal carriers with the ocular mucosa</title><author>De Campos, Angela M. ; Sánchez, Alejandro ; Gref, Ruxandra ; Calvo, Pilar ; Alonso, Marı&amp;#x0301;a J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-9bbdb5477d214d9c731d18b1c73db74b724da617c45d2f77f51e811eacab634d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological Transport</topic><topic>Capsules</topic><topic>Chitin - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Chitin - chemistry</topic><topic>Chitin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Colloids</topic><topic>Corneal transport</topic><topic>Drug Carriers - chemistry</topic><topic>Drug Carriers - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Endothelium, Corneal - metabolism</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Nanocapsules</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Ocular drug delivery</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Polyesters - chemistry</topic><topic>Polyesters - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Campos, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gref, Ruxandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Marı&amp;#x0301;a J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Campos, Angela M.</au><au>Sánchez, Alejandro</au><au>Gref, Ruxandra</au><au>Calvo, Pilar</au><au>Alonso, Marı&amp;#x0301;a J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of a PEG versus a chitosan coating on the interaction of drug colloidal carriers with the ocular mucosa</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pharmaceutical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pharm Sci</addtitle><date>2003-09-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>73-81</pages><issn>0928-0987</issn><eissn>1879-0720</eissn><abstract>The influence of the surface characteristics of colloidal drug carriers in their interaction with different biological surfaces is becoming increasingly evident. In order to investigate the importance of these characteristics in their interaction with the ocular mucosa, we developed three types of nanocapsules that differ in their surface properties: poly-ε-caprolactone (PECL) nanocapsules, chitosan (CS)-coated PECL nanocapsules and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-coated PECL nanocapsules. Two different approaches were used to form these polymer coated nanocapsules: (i) the electrostatic anchorage of the coating onto the PECL nanocapsules—in the case of CS—and (ii) the use of the previously synthesized copolymer PECL-PEG for the formation of the nanocapsules. In both cases, the systems, prepared by the interfacial deposition technique, were loaded with a fluorescent dye (rhodamine) in order to quantify and visualize their interaction with the ocular surface ex vivo and in vivo. An important conclusion from the ex vivo studies is that the developed systems, and specially the CS-coated ones, enhanced the penetration of the encapsulated dye through the cornea. This effect was not simple due to the physical presence of the nanocapsules but to their ability to carry the encapsulated compound. The second conclusion from the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) studies is that the systems were able to enter the corneal epithelium by a transcellular pathway and that the penetration rate was dependent on the coating composition. The images suggest that the PEG coating accelerates the transport of the nanocapsules across the whole epithelium, whereas the CS coating favours the retention of the nanocapsules in the superficial layers of the epithelium. The specific behaviour of CS-coated systems was also corroborated in vivo. These results indicate that the surface composition of colloidal drug carriers affects their biodistribution in the eye. Therefore, this surface modification approach can be used as a targeting strategy in ocular drug delivery.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>13678795</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0928-0987(03)00178-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0928-0987
ispartof European journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2003-09, Vol.20 (1), p.73-81
issn 0928-0987
1879-0720
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73660828
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Biological Transport
Capsules
Chitin - analogs & derivatives
Chitin - chemistry
Chitin - pharmacokinetics
Chitosan
Colloids
Corneal transport
Drug Carriers - chemistry
Drug Carriers - pharmacokinetics
Endothelium, Corneal - metabolism
General pharmacology
In Vitro Techniques
Male
Medical sciences
Microscopy, Confocal
Nanocapsules
Nanotechnology
Ocular drug delivery
Particle Size
Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Polyesters - chemistry
Polyesters - pharmacokinetics
Polyethylene glycol
Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry
Polyethylene Glycols - pharmacokinetics
Rabbits
Surface Properties
Time Factors
title The effect of a PEG versus a chitosan coating on the interaction of drug colloidal carriers with the ocular mucosa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20a%20PEG%20versus%20a%20chitosan%20coating%20on%20the%20interaction%20of%20drug%20colloidal%20carriers%20with%20the%20ocular%20mucosa&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutical%20sciences&rft.au=De%20Campos,%20Angela%20M.&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=73-81&rft.issn=0928-0987&rft.eissn=1879-0720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0928-0987(03)00178-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73660828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73660828&rft_id=info:pmid/13678795&rft_els_id=S0928098703001787&rfr_iscdi=true