Endometrial ablation by rollerball electrocoagulation compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation: Technical and safety aspects
Objective: To compare two methods of endometrial ablation, hysteroscopic rollerball electrocoagulation (RBE) and non-hysteroscopic uterine balloon thermal (UBT) ablation (Thermachoice™), regarding intra- and post-operative technical complications and safety aspects. Study design: A randomised contro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2003-10, Vol.110 (2), p.220-223 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 223 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 220 |
| container_title | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology |
| container_volume | 110 |
| creator | van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A. Vleugels, Michel P.H. Merkus, Hans M.W.M. de Graaf, Ruurd |
| description | Objective: To compare two methods of endometrial ablation, hysteroscopic rollerball electrocoagulation (RBE) and non-hysteroscopic uterine balloon thermal (UBT) ablation (Thermachoice™), regarding intra- and post-operative technical complications and safety aspects.
Study design: A randomised controlled study in a teaching hospital, 139 pre-menopausal women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding proved by a validated menstrual score list were enclosed. Endometrial ablation by a hysteroscopic or non-hysteroscopic method was performed.
Results: Rollerball electrocoagulation carries a significantly higher risk of intra-operative complications compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation and is a significantly more time consuming procedure. Post-operative complication rates in both groups were low, but post-operative analgesics were prescribed significantly more in the uterine balloon group.
Conclusion: Endometrial ablation by uterine balloon thermal ablation (Thermachoice™) is a safe and simple non-hysteroscopic procedure. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00160-X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73639574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030121150300160X</els_id><sourcerecordid>73639574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e293t-801dfd5b9a5b7af249a7623550ec58af8b400f1d5ae0568b2fd430f8cbbc72563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUuLFTEQhYMozp2rP0HJRhkXrUmn04_ZiAzjAwZcOMLsQiWpOJF055qkhbvzp5s7c33UpqDq41CnDiHPOHvNGe_ffGGC8ablXJ4x8YrVEWtuHpANH4e2GXrZPSSbv8gJOc35O6slxPSYnPB26ic5jhvy63KxccaSPAQKOkDxcaF6T1MMAZOGECgGNCVFE-HbegRMnHeQ0NIS6Vow-QXpgY11V24xzf-pndNrNLeLN4fZYmkGh2VPIe-qbH5CHjkIGZ8e-5Z8fX95ffGxufr84dPFu6sG20mUZmTcOiv1BFIP4NpugqFvhZQMjRzBjbpjzHErAZnsR9062wnmRqO1GVrZiy15ea-7S_HHirmo2WeDIcCCcc1qEL2Y5NBV8PkRXPWMVu2SnyHt1Z-fVeDFEYBcPbkEi_H5HyfZNLF69Ja8veew2vrpMalsPC4GrU_VubLRK87UIU11l6Y6RKWYUHdpqhvxG8ogk3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73639574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endometrial ablation by rollerball electrocoagulation compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation: Technical and safety aspects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A. ; Vleugels, Michel P.H. ; Merkus, Hans M.W.M. ; de Graaf, Ruurd</creator><creatorcontrib>van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A. ; Vleugels, Michel P.H. ; Merkus, Hans M.W.M. ; de Graaf, Ruurd</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To compare two methods of endometrial ablation, hysteroscopic rollerball electrocoagulation (RBE) and non-hysteroscopic uterine balloon thermal (UBT) ablation (Thermachoice™), regarding intra- and post-operative technical complications and safety aspects.
Study design: A randomised controlled study in a teaching hospital, 139 pre-menopausal women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding proved by a validated menstrual score list were enclosed. Endometrial ablation by a hysteroscopic or non-hysteroscopic method was performed.
Results: Rollerball electrocoagulation carries a significantly higher risk of intra-operative complications compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation and is a significantly more time consuming procedure. Post-operative complication rates in both groups were low, but post-operative analgesics were prescribed significantly more in the uterine balloon group.
Conclusion: Endometrial ablation by uterine balloon thermal ablation (Thermachoice™) is a safe and simple non-hysteroscopic procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00160-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12969588</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EOGRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization ; Electrocoagulation - methods ; Endometrial ablation ; Endometrium - surgery ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Hot Temperature - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hysteroscopy ; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Menorrhagia - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Non tumoral diseases ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Premenopause ; Rollerball electrocoagulation ; Safety ; Thermachoice ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2003-10, Vol.110 (2), p.220-223</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00160-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15099029$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12969588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Michel P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merkus, Hans M.W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaf, Ruurd</creatorcontrib><title>Endometrial ablation by rollerball electrocoagulation compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation: Technical and safety aspects</title><title>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Objective: To compare two methods of endometrial ablation, hysteroscopic rollerball electrocoagulation (RBE) and non-hysteroscopic uterine balloon thermal (UBT) ablation (Thermachoice™), regarding intra- and post-operative technical complications and safety aspects.
Study design: A randomised controlled study in a teaching hospital, 139 pre-menopausal women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding proved by a validated menstrual score list were enclosed. Endometrial ablation by a hysteroscopic or non-hysteroscopic method was performed.
Results: Rollerball electrocoagulation carries a significantly higher risk of intra-operative complications compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation and is a significantly more time consuming procedure. Post-operative complication rates in both groups were low, but post-operative analgesics were prescribed significantly more in the uterine balloon group.
Conclusion: Endometrial ablation by uterine balloon thermal ablation (Thermachoice™) is a safe and simple non-hysteroscopic procedure.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation - methods</subject><subject>Endometrial ablation</subject><subject>Endometrium - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Hot Temperature - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysteroscopy</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menorrhagia - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Premenopause</subject><subject>Rollerball electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Thermachoice</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUuLFTEQhYMozp2rP0HJRhkXrUmn04_ZiAzjAwZcOMLsQiWpOJF055qkhbvzp5s7c33UpqDq41CnDiHPOHvNGe_ffGGC8ablXJ4x8YrVEWtuHpANH4e2GXrZPSSbv8gJOc35O6slxPSYnPB26ic5jhvy63KxccaSPAQKOkDxcaF6T1MMAZOGECgGNCVFE-HbegRMnHeQ0NIS6Vow-QXpgY11V24xzf-pndNrNLeLN4fZYmkGh2VPIe-qbH5CHjkIGZ8e-5Z8fX95ffGxufr84dPFu6sG20mUZmTcOiv1BFIP4NpugqFvhZQMjRzBjbpjzHErAZnsR9062wnmRqO1GVrZiy15ea-7S_HHirmo2WeDIcCCcc1qEL2Y5NBV8PkRXPWMVu2SnyHt1Z-fVeDFEYBcPbkEi_H5HyfZNLF69Ja8veew2vrpMalsPC4GrU_VubLRK87UIU11l6Y6RKWYUHdpqhvxG8ogk3E</recordid><startdate>20031010</startdate><enddate>20031010</enddate><creator>van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A.</creator><creator>Vleugels, Michel P.H.</creator><creator>Merkus, Hans M.W.M.</creator><creator>de Graaf, Ruurd</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031010</creationdate><title>Endometrial ablation by rollerball electrocoagulation compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation: Technical and safety aspects</title><author>van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A. ; Vleugels, Michel P.H. ; Merkus, Hans M.W.M. ; de Graaf, Ruurd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e293t-801dfd5b9a5b7af249a7623550ec58af8b400f1d5ae0568b2fd430f8cbbc72563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation - methods</topic><topic>Endometrial ablation</topic><topic>Endometrium - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Hot Temperature - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysteroscopy</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menorrhagia - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Premenopause</topic><topic>Rollerball electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Thermachoice</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Michel P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merkus, Hans M.W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaf, Ruurd</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Zon-Rabelink, Ingrid A.A.</au><au>Vleugels, Michel P.H.</au><au>Merkus, Hans M.W.M.</au><au>de Graaf, Ruurd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endometrial ablation by rollerball electrocoagulation compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation: Technical and safety aspects</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2003-10-10</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>220-223</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><coden>EOGRAL</coden><abstract>Objective: To compare two methods of endometrial ablation, hysteroscopic rollerball electrocoagulation (RBE) and non-hysteroscopic uterine balloon thermal (UBT) ablation (Thermachoice™), regarding intra- and post-operative technical complications and safety aspects.
Study design: A randomised controlled study in a teaching hospital, 139 pre-menopausal women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding proved by a validated menstrual score list were enclosed. Endometrial ablation by a hysteroscopic or non-hysteroscopic method was performed.
Results: Rollerball electrocoagulation carries a significantly higher risk of intra-operative complications compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation and is a significantly more time consuming procedure. Post-operative complication rates in both groups were low, but post-operative analgesics were prescribed significantly more in the uterine balloon group.
Conclusion: Endometrial ablation by uterine balloon thermal ablation (Thermachoice™) is a safe and simple non-hysteroscopic procedure.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>12969588</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00160-X</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-2115 |
| ispartof | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2003-10, Vol.110 (2), p.220-223 |
| issn | 0301-2115 1872-7654 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73639574 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Catheterization Electrocoagulation - methods Endometrial ablation Endometrium - surgery Female Female genital diseases Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Hot Temperature - therapeutic use Humans Hysteroscopy Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology Medical sciences Menorrhagia - surgery Middle Aged Non tumoral diseases Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Premenopause Rollerball electrocoagulation Safety Thermachoice Time Factors |
| title | Endometrial ablation by rollerball electrocoagulation compared to uterine balloon thermal ablation: Technical and safety aspects |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endometrial%20ablation%20by%20rollerball%20electrocoagulation%20compared%20to%20uterine%20balloon%20thermal%20ablation:%20Technical%20and%20safety%20aspects&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=van%20Zon-Rabelink,%20Ingrid%20A.A.&rft.date=2003-10-10&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=220-223&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft.coden=EOGRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00160-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73639574%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73639574&rft_id=info:pmid/12969588&rft_els_id=S030121150300160X&rfr_iscdi=true |