A Delphi study to validate competencies required of Air Force Medical Surgical (46N3) nurses in mobilized environments
The objectives of this study were to develop competencies for wartime and operations other than war for 46N3 Medical/Surgical Air Force nurses and to validate those competencies among a group of experts in the field. The sample consisted of 109 nurses with mobilization experiences. A Delphi consensu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Military medicine 2003-08, Vol.168 (8), p.618-625 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 625 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 618 |
container_title | Military medicine |
container_volume | 168 |
creator | Thompson, Charles R Repko, Katherine Staggers, Nancy |
description | The objectives of this study were to develop competencies for wartime and operations other than war for 46N3 Medical/Surgical Air Force nurses and to validate those competencies among a group of experts in the field. The sample consisted of 109 nurses with mobilization experiences. A Delphi consensus technique was used to validate both the importance of competencies required in a mobilization environment and to determine the level at which those competencies should be practiced. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect responses during three rounds of data collection. At the end of round 3, 83% of the importance statements achieved consensus whereas 67% of the level of practice statements achieved consensus. Those importance items validated were traditional assessment and interventions skills that represented noncontroversial practices. Those items not validated were either controversial or perceived as not pertinent in an austere mobilization environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/milmed/168.8.618 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73611799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73611799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fd61e044af2a2f37d5d2d77e7e3dc6e763156d2cb2502f1622ede50bc9063cbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4MoOqd3TxI8iB665UebtMcxnQpTDyp4C23yqpG22ZJ2MP96Ozc8eHoP3uf75cEHoTNKRpRkfFzbqgYzpiIdpSNB0z00oBknkaD8fR8NCGEiiolMjtBxCF-E0DhL6SE6oiyLOeFigFYTfAPV4tPi0HZmjVuHV3llTd4C1q5eQAuNthCwh2VnPRjsSjyxHs-c14AfwVidV_il8x-_y1Usnvg1bjof-pBtcO0KW9nvPgjNynrX1NC04QQdlHkV4HQ3h-htdvs6vY_mz3cP08k80lzEbVQaQYHEcV6ynJVcmsQwIyVI4EYLkILTRBimC5YQVlLBGBhISKEzIrguCj5El9vehXfLDkKrahs0VFXegOuCklxQKrOsBy_-gV-u803_m2JUEiG43EBkC2nvQvBQqoW3de7XihK1EaK2QlQvRKWqF9JHzne9XbG5_AV2BvgP04uIlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217066379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Delphi study to validate competencies required of Air Force Medical Surgical (46N3) nurses in mobilized environments</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Thompson, Charles R ; Repko, Katherine ; Staggers, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Charles R ; Repko, Katherine ; Staggers, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to develop competencies for wartime and operations other than war for 46N3 Medical/Surgical Air Force nurses and to validate those competencies among a group of experts in the field. The sample consisted of 109 nurses with mobilization experiences. A Delphi consensus technique was used to validate both the importance of competencies required in a mobilization environment and to determine the level at which those competencies should be practiced. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect responses during three rounds of data collection. At the end of round 3, 83% of the importance statements achieved consensus whereas 67% of the level of practice statements achieved consensus. Those importance items validated were traditional assessment and interventions skills that represented noncontroversial practices. Those items not validated were either controversial or perceived as not pertinent in an austere mobilization environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/milmed/168.8.618</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12943036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Delphi Technique ; Female ; Humanitarianism ; Humans ; Informatics ; Male ; Military Nursing - standards ; Military reserves ; Nurses ; Nursing education ; Questionnaires ; Skills ; Training ; United States</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2003-08, Vol.168 (8), p.618-625</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fd61e044af2a2f37d5d2d77e7e3dc6e763156d2cb2502f1622ede50bc9063cbb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12943036$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repko, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staggers, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>A Delphi study to validate competencies required of Air Force Medical Surgical (46N3) nurses in mobilized environments</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to develop competencies for wartime and operations other than war for 46N3 Medical/Surgical Air Force nurses and to validate those competencies among a group of experts in the field. The sample consisted of 109 nurses with mobilization experiences. A Delphi consensus technique was used to validate both the importance of competencies required in a mobilization environment and to determine the level at which those competencies should be practiced. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect responses during three rounds of data collection. At the end of round 3, 83% of the importance statements achieved consensus whereas 67% of the level of practice statements achieved consensus. Those importance items validated were traditional assessment and interventions skills that represented noncontroversial practices. Those items not validated were either controversial or perceived as not pertinent in an austere mobilization environment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Military Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Military reserves</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4MoOqd3TxI8iB665UebtMcxnQpTDyp4C23yqpG22ZJ2MP96Ozc8eHoP3uf75cEHoTNKRpRkfFzbqgYzpiIdpSNB0z00oBknkaD8fR8NCGEiiolMjtBxCF-E0DhL6SE6oiyLOeFigFYTfAPV4tPi0HZmjVuHV3llTd4C1q5eQAuNthCwh2VnPRjsSjyxHs-c14AfwVidV_il8x-_y1Usnvg1bjof-pBtcO0KW9nvPgjNynrX1NC04QQdlHkV4HQ3h-htdvs6vY_mz3cP08k80lzEbVQaQYHEcV6ynJVcmsQwIyVI4EYLkILTRBimC5YQVlLBGBhISKEzIrguCj5El9vehXfLDkKrahs0VFXegOuCklxQKrOsBy_-gV-u803_m2JUEiG43EBkC2nvQvBQqoW3de7XihK1EaK2QlQvRKWqF9JHzne9XbG5_AV2BvgP04uIlQ</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>Thompson, Charles R</creator><creator>Repko, Katherine</creator><creator>Staggers, Nancy</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>A Delphi study to validate competencies required of Air Force Medical Surgical (46N3) nurses in mobilized environments</title><author>Thompson, Charles R ; Repko, Katherine ; Staggers, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fd61e044af2a2f37d5d2d77e7e3dc6e763156d2cb2502f1622ede50bc9063cbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Military Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Military reserves</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Charles R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repko, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staggers, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, Charles R</au><au>Repko, Katherine</au><au>Staggers, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Delphi study to validate competencies required of Air Force Medical Surgical (46N3) nurses in mobilized environments</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>618-625</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to develop competencies for wartime and operations other than war for 46N3 Medical/Surgical Air Force nurses and to validate those competencies among a group of experts in the field. The sample consisted of 109 nurses with mobilization experiences. A Delphi consensus technique was used to validate both the importance of competencies required in a mobilization environment and to determine the level at which those competencies should be practiced. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect responses during three rounds of data collection. At the end of round 3, 83% of the importance statements achieved consensus whereas 67% of the level of practice statements achieved consensus. Those importance items validated were traditional assessment and interventions skills that represented noncontroversial practices. Those items not validated were either controversial or perceived as not pertinent in an austere mobilization environment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12943036</pmid><doi>10.1093/milmed/168.8.618</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-4075 |
ispartof | Military medicine, 2003-08, Vol.168 (8), p.618-625 |
issn | 0026-4075 1930-613X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73611799 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Clinical Competence - standards Delphi Technique Female Humanitarianism Humans Informatics Male Military Nursing - standards Military reserves Nurses Nursing education Questionnaires Skills Training United States |
title | A Delphi study to validate competencies required of Air Force Medical Surgical (46N3) nurses in mobilized environments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A45%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Delphi%20study%20to%20validate%20competencies%20required%20of%20Air%20Force%20Medical%20Surgical%20(46N3)%20nurses%20in%20mobilized%20environments&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Thompson,%20Charles%20R&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=618-625&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/milmed/168.8.618&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73611799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217066379&rft_id=info:pmid/12943036&rfr_iscdi=true |