Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: The Role of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy
Treatment of esophageal cancer has traditionally included surgery as the initial modality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been introduced with the goal of downstaging tumors before surgical resection; however, its role in esophageal cancer remains controversial. We report 116 patients who un...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2003-08, Vol.69 (8), p.693-702 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 702 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 693 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Makary, Martin A. Kiernan, Paul D. Sheridan, Michael J. Tonnesen, Glen Hetrick, Vivian Vaughan, Betty Graling, Paula Elster, Eric |
description | Treatment of esophageal cancer has traditionally included surgery as the initial modality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been introduced with the goal of downstaging tumors before surgical resection; however, its role in esophageal cancer remains controversial. We report 116 patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy with reconstruction for carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction over a 10-year period (January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2001). Forty patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Hospital mortality in this group was 7.5 per cent, complete pathologic response (CPR) was 37.5 per cent, and overall 3– and 5-year survival rates were 47 and 38 per cent. Five-year survival in the 15 patients with CPR was 85 per cent. Five patients underwent neoadjuvant single-agent therapy (four chemotherapy and one radiation) followed by surgery, and none survived to 3 years. Seventy-one patients underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital mortality in this group was 1.4 per cent, with 3- and 5-year survival of 21 and 17 per cent—a decreased long-term survival compared with the neoadjuvant therapy group despite the observation that patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a larger tumor size on presentation (5.5 ± 0.4 cm vs 3.8 ± 0.2 cm; P = 0.002). Squamous cell carcinomas seemed to be more responsive to neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery than were adenocarcinomas, with a CPR of 44.4 versus 35.5 per cent; however, 5-year survival rates in these complete responders were not significantly different (100% and 78%, respectively; P = 0.97). We report that esophagogastrectomy in conjunction with neoadjuvant therapy results in increased survival compared with surgery without neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.01), although there may be an increased perioperative mortality associated with neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of preoperative chemoradiation and to better identify the pretreatment characteristics of patients with a complete pathological response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313480306900811 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73608671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000313480306900811</sage_id><sourcerecordid>424936621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-b15afbf30f5b2a2a995b44cc98358a45890522ca1bf04ea0af7633030b5d13e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcSvPCuLh9Nm3onY37AVNB54005bZOto21q0gr992ZsICh4FQ4873tyHoTOKbmmNI6nhBBOeSgJJ1FCiKT0AI2pECJIJOOHaLwFgi0xQifObfwYRoIeoxFlieCSyTH6eOqrrqxNAVXZDXhpFXS1ajqsjcVzZ9o1rBRUeAZNruwNXq4VfjWVwkbjt96ulB0wNAV-VgaKTf8FPuoZC-1wio40VE6d7d8Jer-bL2cPweLl_nF2uwhyHkVdkFEBOtOcaJExYJAkIgvDPE8kFxJCIRMiGMuBZpqECgjoOOLc35yJgnJF-ARd7Xpbaz575bq0Ll2uqgoaZXqXxjwiMoqpBy9_gRvT28b_LWWUyTD0WjzEdlBujXNW6bS1ZQ12SClJt9rTv9p96GLf3Ge1Kn4ie88emO4A53X-rP2n8huG-Ik9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212844129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: The Role of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Makary, Martin A. ; Kiernan, Paul D. ; Sheridan, Michael J. ; Tonnesen, Glen ; Hetrick, Vivian ; Vaughan, Betty ; Graling, Paula ; Elster, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Makary, Martin A. ; Kiernan, Paul D. ; Sheridan, Michael J. ; Tonnesen, Glen ; Hetrick, Vivian ; Vaughan, Betty ; Graling, Paula ; Elster, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment of esophageal cancer has traditionally included surgery as the initial modality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been introduced with the goal of downstaging tumors before surgical resection; however, its role in esophageal cancer remains controversial. We report 116 patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy with reconstruction for carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction over a 10-year period (January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2001). Forty patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Hospital mortality in this group was 7.5 per cent, complete pathologic response (CPR) was 37.5 per cent, and overall 3– and 5-year survival rates were 47 and 38 per cent. Five-year survival in the 15 patients with CPR was 85 per cent. Five patients underwent neoadjuvant single-agent therapy (four chemotherapy and one radiation) followed by surgery, and none survived to 3 years. Seventy-one patients underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital mortality in this group was 1.4 per cent, with 3- and 5-year survival of 21 and 17 per cent—a decreased long-term survival compared with the neoadjuvant therapy group despite the observation that patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a larger tumor size on presentation (5.5 ± 0.4 cm vs 3.8 ± 0.2 cm; P = 0.002). Squamous cell carcinomas seemed to be more responsive to neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery than were adenocarcinomas, with a CPR of 44.4 versus 35.5 per cent; however, 5-year survival rates in these complete responders were not significantly different (100% and 78%, respectively; P = 0.97). We report that esophagogastrectomy in conjunction with neoadjuvant therapy results in increased survival compared with surgery without neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.01), although there may be an increased perioperative mortality associated with neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of preoperative chemoradiation and to better identify the pretreatment characteristics of patients with a complete pathological response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313480306900811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12953828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy ; Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Cancer ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy ; Esophagogastric Junction - surgery ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Surgery ; Survival Rate ; Therapy ; Throat</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2003-08, Vol.69 (8), p.693-702</ispartof><rights>2003 Southeastern Surgical Congress</rights><rights>Copyright The Southeastern Surgical Congress Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-b15afbf30f5b2a2a995b44cc98358a45890522ca1bf04ea0af7633030b5d13e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-b15afbf30f5b2a2a995b44cc98358a45890522ca1bf04ea0af7633030b5d13e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000313480306900811$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000313480306900811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12953828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Makary, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiernan, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheridan, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonnesen, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetrick, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graling, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elster, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: The Role of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Treatment of esophageal cancer has traditionally included surgery as the initial modality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been introduced with the goal of downstaging tumors before surgical resection; however, its role in esophageal cancer remains controversial. We report 116 patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy with reconstruction for carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction over a 10-year period (January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2001). Forty patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Hospital mortality in this group was 7.5 per cent, complete pathologic response (CPR) was 37.5 per cent, and overall 3– and 5-year survival rates were 47 and 38 per cent. Five-year survival in the 15 patients with CPR was 85 per cent. Five patients underwent neoadjuvant single-agent therapy (four chemotherapy and one radiation) followed by surgery, and none survived to 3 years. Seventy-one patients underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital mortality in this group was 1.4 per cent, with 3- and 5-year survival of 21 and 17 per cent—a decreased long-term survival compared with the neoadjuvant therapy group despite the observation that patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a larger tumor size on presentation (5.5 ± 0.4 cm vs 3.8 ± 0.2 cm; P = 0.002). Squamous cell carcinomas seemed to be more responsive to neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery than were adenocarcinomas, with a CPR of 44.4 versus 35.5 per cent; however, 5-year survival rates in these complete responders were not significantly different (100% and 78%, respectively; P = 0.97). We report that esophagogastrectomy in conjunction with neoadjuvant therapy results in increased survival compared with surgery without neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.01), although there may be an increased perioperative mortality associated with neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of preoperative chemoradiation and to better identify the pretreatment characteristics of patients with a complete pathological response.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy</subject><subject>Esophagogastric Junction - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrectomy</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Throat</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcSvPCuLh9Nm3onY37AVNB54005bZOto21q0gr992ZsICh4FQ4873tyHoTOKbmmNI6nhBBOeSgJJ1FCiKT0AI2pECJIJOOHaLwFgi0xQifObfwYRoIeoxFlieCSyTH6eOqrrqxNAVXZDXhpFXS1ajqsjcVzZ9o1rBRUeAZNruwNXq4VfjWVwkbjt96ulB0wNAV-VgaKTf8FPuoZC-1wio40VE6d7d8Jer-bL2cPweLl_nF2uwhyHkVdkFEBOtOcaJExYJAkIgvDPE8kFxJCIRMiGMuBZpqECgjoOOLc35yJgnJF-ARd7Xpbaz575bq0Ll2uqgoaZXqXxjwiMoqpBy9_gRvT28b_LWWUyTD0WjzEdlBujXNW6bS1ZQ12SClJt9rTv9p96GLf3Ge1Kn4ie88emO4A53X-rP2n8huG-Ik9</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Makary, Martin A.</creator><creator>Kiernan, Paul D.</creator><creator>Sheridan, Michael J.</creator><creator>Tonnesen, Glen</creator><creator>Hetrick, Vivian</creator><creator>Vaughan, Betty</creator><creator>Graling, Paula</creator><creator>Elster, Eric</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: The Role of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy</title><author>Makary, Martin A. ; Kiernan, Paul D. ; Sheridan, Michael J. ; Tonnesen, Glen ; Hetrick, Vivian ; Vaughan, Betty ; Graling, Paula ; Elster, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-b15afbf30f5b2a2a995b44cc98358a45890522ca1bf04ea0af7633030b5d13e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy</topic><topic>Esophagogastric Junction - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrectomy</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Throat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Makary, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiernan, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheridan, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonnesen, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetrick, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graling, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elster, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Makary, Martin A.</au><au>Kiernan, Paul D.</au><au>Sheridan, Michael J.</au><au>Tonnesen, Glen</au><au>Hetrick, Vivian</au><au>Vaughan, Betty</au><au>Graling, Paula</au><au>Elster, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: The Role of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>693</spage><epage>702</epage><pages>693-702</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Treatment of esophageal cancer has traditionally included surgery as the initial modality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been introduced with the goal of downstaging tumors before surgical resection; however, its role in esophageal cancer remains controversial. We report 116 patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy with reconstruction for carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction over a 10-year period (January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2001). Forty patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Hospital mortality in this group was 7.5 per cent, complete pathologic response (CPR) was 37.5 per cent, and overall 3– and 5-year survival rates were 47 and 38 per cent. Five-year survival in the 15 patients with CPR was 85 per cent. Five patients underwent neoadjuvant single-agent therapy (four chemotherapy and one radiation) followed by surgery, and none survived to 3 years. Seventy-one patients underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital mortality in this group was 1.4 per cent, with 3- and 5-year survival of 21 and 17 per cent—a decreased long-term survival compared with the neoadjuvant therapy group despite the observation that patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a larger tumor size on presentation (5.5 ± 0.4 cm vs 3.8 ± 0.2 cm; P = 0.002). Squamous cell carcinomas seemed to be more responsive to neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery than were adenocarcinomas, with a CPR of 44.4 versus 35.5 per cent; however, 5-year survival rates in these complete responders were not significantly different (100% and 78%, respectively; P = 0.97). We report that esophagogastrectomy in conjunction with neoadjuvant therapy results in increased survival compared with surgery without neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.01), although there may be an increased perioperative mortality associated with neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of preoperative chemoradiation and to better identify the pretreatment characteristics of patients with a complete pathological response.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>12953828</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313480306900811</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2003-08, Vol.69 (8), p.693-702 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73608671 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy Adenocarcinoma - surgery Adult Aged Cancer Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Esophageal Neoplasms - drug therapy Esophageal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Esophagectomy Esophagogastric Junction - surgery Female Gastrectomy Hospital Mortality Humans Length of Stay Male Medical treatment Middle Aged Neoadjuvant Therapy Neoplasm Staging Surgery Survival Rate Therapy Throat |
title | Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: The Role of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A22%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multimodality%20Treatment%20for%20Esophageal%20Cancer:%20The%20Role%20of%20Surgery%20and%20Neoadjuvant%20Therapy&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Makary,%20Martin%20A.&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=693&rft.epage=702&rft.pages=693-702&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313480306900811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E424936621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212844129&rft_id=info:pmid/12953828&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000313480306900811&rfr_iscdi=true |